The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 58 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
PesoPay shines .
Zil Money shines in ease of use and customer support , with exclusive features like Recurring Payments and Mail Order Telephone Order (MOTO) Payments.
Side-by-side ratings based on 58 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | Contact sales | From $400/mo |
| Verified Reviews | 0 | 58 |
After analyzing 58 verified reviews, PesoPay users most value its , while Zil Money users highlight user-friendly interface, customer experience enhancements, payment processing speed. Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
| PesoPay |
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
User-Friendly Interface
▾
|
|
|
+
Customer Experience Enhancements
▾
|
|
|
+
Payment Processing Speed
▾
|
|
|
+
Customer Support
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Integration Capabilities
▾
|
|
|
−
Third-Party Integrations
▾
|
|
|
−
Approval Process
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Payments Processing Software vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment | PesoPay |
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | — | #1 9 reviews |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | — | #2 27 reviews |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | — | #3 12 reviews |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) | — | #3 2 reviews |
By Property Type
| Segment | PesoPay |
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | — | #3 17 reviews |
| Luxury ▾ | — | #3 15 reviews |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | — | #3 25 reviews |
| Extended Stay ▾ | — | #1 9 reviews |
By Region
| Segment | PesoPay |
|
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | — | #3 51 reviews |
| Asia Pacific | — | #3 0 reviews |
| Middle East | — | #2 1 reviews |
Choosing between PesoPay by PesoPay and Zil Money hinges on your hotel’s specific payment processing needs and operational priorities. Both aim to facilitate financial transactions but diverge significantly in their feature sets, user experience, and market presence. PesoPay, with no recent reviews or user feedback, appears inactive or underperforming, whereas Zil Money offers a robust, highly-rated platform with a broad feature set and active user base.
Given the current review data and product activity, Zil Money provides a clearer, more reliable solution. Does your hotel prioritize comprehensive payment features and ease of use, or are you still evaluating options? Let’s compare these two products more deeply.
PesoPay is virtually unreviewed, with zero ratings and no recent feedback, making it impossible to assess its effectiveness or user satisfaction. In contrast, Zil Money has accumulated 54 reviews over the past six months, with a stellar 87% likelihood to recommend and a high NPS score of 8.57/10, signaling strong recent performance.
PesoPay’s lack of recent reviews suggests limited activity or support, whereas Zil Money’s active user feedback highlights ongoing development and customer engagement. Which platform seems more reliable for your hotel’s payment processing needs?
If your hotel needs a mature, feature-rich payments platform that integrates with multiple accounting systems and offers extensive payment options, Zil Money is the clear winner. Its 15 unique features—like Pay by Link, Recurring Payments, Multi-Currency Settlements, and Contactless Payments—are absent in PesoPay, which offers no additional features beyond basic payment handling.
Hotels seeking a user-friendly, well-supported system with active reviews should lean toward Zil Money. On the other hand, if your hotel is exploring options with minimal upfront costs and no commitment, PesoPay’s lack of pricing and features makes it less practical. But given the data, Zil Money’s maturity and feature set make it the more dependable choice.
Zil Money scores an impressive 4.5/5 for ease of use, supported by reviews praising its intuitive interface and straightforward payment management. Users report that onboarding is smooth, and staff adopt the platform quickly, reducing training time and operational disruption.
PesoPay, with a 0/5 rating, provides no information on usability or onboarding, suggesting it might be inactive or not user-ready. Edge: Zil Money.
Zil Money offers 15 distinct features, including Pay by Link, Recurring Payments, Multi-Currency Settlements, Apple Pay, Google Pay, Contactless Payments, and Payment Splitting—all absent in PesoPay. This breadth of capabilities enables a hotel to handle diverse payment scenarios efficiently.
PesoPay, with zero features listed, appears to lack any notable functionalities or active development. For hotels needing advanced, flexible payment options, Zil Money’s feature set is the clear advantage. Edge: Zil Money.
Zil Money’s support ratings are high at 4.5/5, with reviews indicating prompt and helpful service, although some feedback suggests room for improvement in responsiveness. Customers appreciate the support’s professionalism and the platform’s overall reliability.
PesoPay has no available support ratings or recent reviews, indicating it may not be actively maintained or supported. For hotels where support quality is critical, Zil Money’s proven support team is preferable. Edge: Zil Money.
Zil Money has verified integration with Yanolja Cloud and offers an API, supporting a more flexible connection to other systems. It’s the only product among the two with verified partners, facilitating smoother integration into your hotel’s existing infrastructure.
PesoPay, with only one verified partner, provides limited integration options, which could hinder operational flexibility. For hotels seeking comprehensive payment system integration, Zil Money’s ecosystem is advantageous. Edge: Zil Money.
With 54 reviews, Zil Money’s recent ratings reveal a high user satisfaction, with an 87% likelihood to recommend. Hotels across various segments, including luxury, boutique, and branded hotels, rate Zil Money highly, often citing its ease of use and feature set.
PesoPay’s zero reviews make it impossible to gauge user satisfaction, but its lack of recent feedback indicates it’s not actively serving hotel clients currently. For hotelier confidence, Zil Money’s active review base is more reassuring. Edge: Zil Money.
PesoPay’s pricing details are unavailable, and it appears to lack a clear fee structure or trial offers. Conversely, Zil Money charges a $400 base price with no free tier or trial currently listed, and no monthly per-room fees.
Given Zil Money’s transparent pricing model, your hotel can better evaluate its ROI. The absence of pricing info for PesoPay makes it hard to compare value, but the active feature set and reviews suggest Zil Money offers more tangible value.
Currently, PesoPay’s suitability is uncertain due to the lack of recent activity or reviews. If your hotel is exploring basic payment handling with minimal complexity, and perhaps willing to test an unproven platform, it might consider PesoPay.
However, this is not ideal if your hotel requires secure, reliable, and feature-rich payment processing, or if support and integrations are priorities. Given the data, PesoPay isn’t a recommended choice for active hotel operations.
Hotels that need a flexible, feature-rich payments system capable of handling multiple payment methods and currencies should consider Zil Money. Its support for contactless payments, Apple Pay, Google Pay, and split payments suits modern hotels aiming for frictionless transactions.
Teams managing diverse property types—luxury, boutique, or branded hotels—will appreciate the platform’s multiple entity support and extensive features. Not ideal if your hotel relies solely on basic payment solutions or has a very limited budget, as the $400 fee might be a consideration.
The core difference is clear: Zil Money is an active, feature-packed platform with a broad user base and recent positive reviews, while PesoPay appears inactive, with no recent feedback or features listed. For hotels needing reliable, versatile payment processing, Zil Money is the evident choice.
Choose Zil Money if you value extensive features, ease of use, active support, and integration options, especially if your property requires multiple payment methods and currencies. If your hotel is simply exploring basic payment options without immediate needs for support or advanced features, PesoPay might be considered—though current data advises caution.
In summary, for most hotels actively seeking a dependable payments solution today, Zil Money’s current presence and review activity make it the better fit. PesoPay’s silence and lack of recent data suggest it’s not a viable option right now.
According to HTR's product database, PesoPay and Zil Money share 0 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature | PesoPay |
|
|---|---|---|
| Authorization Adjustments | ||
| Gratuity Function | ||
| Multi-Currency Settlements | ||
| Partial Capture | ||
| Pay by Link | ||
| Recurring Payments |
Showing top differences. 3 more features differ between these products.
What hoteliers love
Users frequently praise Zil Money for its intuitive and straightforward interface that simplifies invoicing, expense tracking, and other financial tas... Users frequently praise Zil Money for its intuitive and straightforward interface that simplifies invoicing, expense tracking, and other financial tasks. The platform’s ease of use reduces the onboarding time and enhances operational efficiency.
Several reviews indicate that minor improvements in customer experience, such as easing the verification process and reducing the time taken for setup... Several reviews indicate that minor improvements in customer experience, such as easing the verification process and reducing the time taken for setup, could make the platform even more efficient and user-friendly.
Several users highlight the speed and reliability of Zil Money's payment processing feature, which ensures timely transactions and supports the hotels... Several users highlight the speed and reliability of Zil Money's payment processing feature, which ensures timely transactions and supports the hotels' cash flow management.
Where hoteliers push back
Users value Zil Money's ability to integrate seamlessly with various accounting and financial software, which helps consolidate financial operations a... Users value Zil Money's ability to integrate seamlessly with various accounting and financial software, which helps consolidate financial operations and enhances efficiency.
Expanding integrations with more third-party applications is suggested by users, which would offer more flexibility and customization, catering to var... Expanding integrations with more third-party applications is suggested by users, which would offer more flexibility and customization, catering to varying business needs.
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. PesoPay and Zil Money share many core Payments Processing Software features, but each has unique capabilities. PesoPay offers 1 verified integration partners, while Zil Money offers 0. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. Zil Money leads in ease of use at 4.5/5 vs 0.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
PesoPay: No. Zil Money: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Payments Processing Software vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. PesoPay has an HT Score of 0 and Zil Money has 63. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor