The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 160 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
Preno shines in ease of use and customer support , with exclusive features like Guest CRM.
Zavia ERP shines , with exclusive features like Guest Communication (SMS Messaging) and Centralized Messaging.
Side-by-side ratings based on 160 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | From $800/mo | From $300/mo |
| Verified Reviews | 160 | 0 |
After analyzing 160 verified reviews, Preno users most value its user-friendly interface, customer support, channel management, while Zavia ERP users highlight . Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
User-Friendly Interface
▾
|
|
|
+
Customer Support
▾
|
|
|
+
Channel Management
▾
|
|
|
+
Reporting and Analytics
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Reporting and Analytics
▾
|
|
|
−
Mobile Application
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Property Management Systems vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | #13 80 reviews | — |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | #32 15 reviews | — |
| Large (75-199 rooms) | #46 1 reviews | — |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) | #39 0 reviews | — |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #14 65 reviews | — |
| Luxury ▾ | #12 53 reviews | — |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | #21 17 reviews | — |
| Extended Stay ▾ | #8 26 reviews | — |
By Region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | #27 7 reviews | — |
| Europe ▾ | #25 13 reviews | — |
| Asia Pacific | #20 3 reviews | — |
| Middle East | #13 2 reviews | — |
Choosing between Preno by Preno and Zavia ERP by Zavia ERP hinges on your hotel's size, geographical focus, and operational needs. While Preno is an established global player with a large, recent review base, Zavia ERP is a newer, Mexico-origin solution targeting smaller hotels in Latin America. Both systems aim to streamline hotel operations but diverge significantly in features, regional presence, and user feedback.
Preno offers a well-rounded, user-friendly PMS with broad integrations and a strong international footprint, making it suitable for hotels seeking simplicity and proven reliability. Conversely, Zavia ERP emphasizes comprehensive control, multi-channel management, and localized support, ideal for small to medium hotels in Latin America aspiring to scale efficiently. Are you ready to decide based on these core differences?
Preno and Zavia ERP are designed to solve core hotel management challenges: reservations, billing, guest communication, and operational oversight. Preno’s primary strength lies in its ease of use, integrations with channel managers and accounting tools, and its reputation backed by 144 recent reviews, most within the last six months. Zavia ERP, with no recent reviews, has a broader feature set but lacks the recent user feedback to demonstrate real-world performance.
Preno’s cloud-based platform simplifies daily tasks through an intuitive interface, supporting multi-property management and automation. Zavia ERP claims to offer extensive features like real-time rate sync, website creation, and integrated payments, but the absence of recent reviews diminishes confidence in its current usability and support. Do you prioritize proven user satisfaction or comprehensive feature sets?
If your hotel needs a straightforward, reliable PMS with top-rated ease of use, support, and recent customer feedback, go with Preno. Its 4.78/5 ease of use rating and 144 reviews in the past six months show widespread satisfaction, especially among boutique, motel, and inn segments. For hotels seeking a system proven to reduce admin time, streamline bookings, and integrate with tools like Xero, Preno is the clear choice.
If, however, your hotel is in Mexico or Latin America and requires a platform with robust multi-channel management, direct website booking, and local support, Zavia ERP might appeal—though the lack of recent reviews makes its current performance uncertain. Zavia’s feature set supports growth and control, but without recent user experiences, it’s harder to gauge its real-world reliability. Which factors are most critical for your current operational stage?
Preno’s user experience is highly rated, with a 4.78/5 score based on 144 reviews, and users praise its simple, intuitive interface. Many highlight its quick onboarding, straightforward navigation, and minimal training needs, which is reinforced by support ratings of 4.8/5. The platform’s design caters to a range of staff skill levels, making staff adoption relatively painless.
Zavia ERP, with no recent reviews or user ratings available, provides a broad feature set, but its ease of use remains unverified. Given the absence of recent feedback, it’s uncertain how quickly your team could adapt to the system or how supportive onboarding would be. Edge: Preno.
Preno offers core features like guest CRM and integrated channel management, but only has two features that Zavia ERP does not. Zavia, however, boasts 23 features exclusive to it, including multi-currency support, guest communication via SMS, online check-in/out, shift planning, and integrated payment gateways.
While Preno excels in simplicity and essential integrations, Zavia’s extensive feature list supports advanced control and automation—especially for hotels in Latin America. However, the sheer number of features in Zavia could overwhelm users unfamiliar with complex systems, whereas Preno’s focused approach reduces learning curve. Edge: Zavia ERP.
Preno consistently receives praise for its customer support, with a 4.8/5 rating and reviews emphasizing its responsive, helpful team. Hoteliers frequently mention how Preno’s support smooths onboarding and resolves issues quickly, with comments like “service is brilliant” and “support team took me through whatever I couldn’t work out.”
Zavia ERP, with no recent reviews or detailed feedback, remains an unknown in this area. The absence of current customer support ratings makes it unclear how responsive or helpful its team is, especially considering the importance of support during implementation and daily use. Edge: Preno.
Preno integrates with 17 verified partners, including major channel managers like SiteMinder, and accounting tools like Xero. It also offers integrations with booking engines and revenue management tools, enhancing operational efficiency and revenue control.
Zavia ERP supports only five verified partners, with notable integrations including Stripe, Profitroom, and AskSuite. Its fewer integrations may limit automation and connectivity options, especially if your hotel relies on specific tools or multi-channel strategies. For hotels seeking a broader ecosystem, Preno’s more extensive partner network is advantageous. Edge: Preno.
Preno’s reviews reflect a high level of satisfaction, with an overall rating of 4.73/5 based on 144 reviews, and recent feedback confirms continued satisfaction. Hoteliers across the boutique, motel, and inn segments rate it highly, citing ease of use, support, and integration as key positives.
Zavia ERP, lacking recent reviews, cannot be reliably rated by hoteliers. Its absence of feedback prevents a fair comparison, but the lack of recent data suggests it has not gained widespread trust or adoption outside its core Latin American market. Given the recent review volume and ratings, Preno is clearly the stronger choice. Edge: Preno.
Preno charges a flat fee of $800 per month without a freemium option or tiered pricing, which covers basic usage and support. Zavia ERP’s base price is $300 per month, also without a freemium, but its feature set suggests potential for additional costs depending on modules or integrations.
While Preno’s price may seem higher, its comprehensive support, ease of use, and proven ROI justify the expense. Zavia’s lower initial price could be attractive but may lack the same level of support and integration, especially if your hotel needs more advanced features. Do you prefer a more predictable, supported solution or a potentially cheaper but less proven system?
Not ideal if your hotel requires multi-currency support, complex automation, or is heavily rooted in Latin America (where support and features are less tailored).
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if you need a system with extensive recent user feedback, proven integrations outside Latin America, or comprehensive support in languages other than Spanish.
Not ideal if:
Preno and Zavia ERP serve different hotel segments and markets. Preno, with its recent and numerous reviews, is a well-established, trusted platform suited for hotels that value ease of use, support, and broad integrations. Zavia ERP offers a feature-rich alternative tailored to Latin American hotels seeking localized control and growth tools, but its current lack of recent reviews makes its performance less certain.
Choose Preno if you want a proven, straightforward solution with high user satisfaction. Opt for Zavia ERP if your hotel is in Latin America, needs advanced automation, and can accept the risk of less recent feedback. Your decision should hinge on regional needs, desired features, and confidence in support.
According to HTR's product database, Preno and Zavia ERP share 28 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Centralized Messaging | ||
| Gift Vouchers | ||
| Guest CRM | ||
| Guest Communication (SMS Messaging) | ||
| Integrated CRS | ||
| Multi-currency | ||
| Multi-lingual | ||
| Task Management |
Showing top differences. 13 more features differ between these products.
What hoteliers love
Preno is frequently commended for its intuitive and clean interface, which makes it simple to navigate. Users across various tech skill levels find it... Preno is frequently commended for its intuitive and clean interface, which makes it simple to navigate. Users across various tech skill levels find it easy to learn and use, which reduces the time and cost associated with staff training.
The support team is typically praised for being responsive and helpful, although some reviews indicate that there can be delays, especially during wee... The support team is typically praised for being responsive and helpful, although some reviews indicate that there can be delays, especially during weekends or busy periods. Responsiveness and direct contact with support staff are valued highly.
Preno’s seamless integration with channel managers like SiteMinder allows for real-time updates and has been attributed to eliminating double bookings... Preno’s seamless integration with channel managers like SiteMinder allows for real-time updates and has been attributed to eliminating double bookings. Users commend this functionality for improving operational efficiency and enhancing bookings management.
Where hoteliers push back
Preno's reporting functions receive mixed reviews, with some users satisfied with its ease of use, while others desire deeper analytics for better str... Preno's reporting functions receive mixed reviews, with some users satisfied with its ease of use, while others desire deeper analytics for better strategic decision-making. Some users expressed a need for customized reporting features.
Although some users laud Preno's features, there is a call for more robust mobile app capabilities. Reviews suggest that enhancing the mobile app with... Although some users laud Preno's features, there is a call for more robust mobile app capabilities. Reviews suggest that enhancing the mobile app with offline functionality and more feature depth would improve usability, especially for managers on the go.
Unique capabilities
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. Preno and Zavia ERP share many core Property Management Systems features, but each has unique capabilities. Preno offers 17 verified integration partners, while Zavia ERP offers 5. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. Preno leads in ease of use at 4.8/5 vs 0.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
Preno: No. Zavia ERP: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Property Management Systems vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. Preno has an HT Score of 80 and Zavia ERP has 0. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor