The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 108 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
Planet shines in ease of use and customer support — especially for brand properties (5.0/5) , with exclusive features like On premise and Revenue management module.
Roomsy shines .
Side-by-side ratings based on 108 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | From $500/mo | Contact sales |
| Verified Reviews | 108 | 0 |
After analyzing 108 verified reviews, Planet users most value its functionality and features, ease of use, multi-property management, while Roomsy users highlight . Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Functionality and Features
▾
|
|
|
+
Ease of Use
▾
|
|
|
+
Multi-property Management
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Support Issues
▾
|
|
|
−
Customization and Flexibility
▾
|
|
|
−
System Performance and Reliability
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Property Management Systems vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | #27 32 reviews | #78 0 reviews |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | #15 50 reviews | — |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | #15 10 reviews | — |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) | #17 3 reviews | — |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #21 42 reviews | #77 0 reviews |
| Luxury ▾ | #21 34 reviews | — |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | #17 33 reviews | — |
| Extended Stay ▾ | #20 9 reviews | #52 0 reviews |
By Region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | #29 6 reviews | #62 0 reviews |
| Europe ▾ | #10 79 reviews | — |
| Middle East | #15 2 reviews | — |
Choosing the right property management system can define your hotel's efficiency, guest experience, and revenue growth. With Protel PMS by Planet and Roomsy both positioned as hotel management tools, your decision hinges on which features, support, and reputation align best with your property’s needs.
Protel offers a long-standing, feature-rich platform with extensive integrations and a solid reputation backed by over 100 reviews and recent positive feedback. Roomsy, meanwhile, is newer, more streamlined, but lacks the same breadth of data and user feedback.
What will serve your hotel better — a proven, comprehensive system with a broad ecosystem or a simpler, more agile platform that’s still building its reputation?
Protel PMS’s high review count (105 reviews) and recent updates give it a clear edge as the more trusted, established choice. It consistently scores above 4/5 across key categories, and its deep integration ecosystem and flexible deployment options make it suitable for a wide array of hotel types.
Roomsy, with its limited review data and no recent reviews, lacks the proven track record necessary for a confident decision. Its focus on simplicity and mobility may appeal to small hotels or startups but should be approached cautiously without more user feedback.
In short, Protel is the stronger, more reliable option for hoteliers seeking a full-featured PMS. Roomsy remains untested at scale and lacks the recent review data to justify a decisive recommendation.
Protel PMS is a versatile platform designed to cater to hotels of all sizes, especially those with complex operations or multi-property portfolios. It offers over 46 unique features, including revenue management, multi-currency support, integrated booking engine, and extensive reporting. Its cloud and on-premise options allow flexibility, and the system's integration ecosystem includes over 1,200 verified partners, ensuring your hotel can connect with most third-party tools.
Roomsy claims to simplify hotel management with a user-friendly interface aimed at small to mid-sized properties. However, it offers no detailed feature list or review data, making it difficult to assess its capability for complex workflows. Without recent user feedback or a broad integration network, its ability to scale and manage sophisticated operations remains uncertain.
In terms of solving core hotel management problems, Protel’s proven track record and extensive features make it the clear choice. Roomsy’s simplicity may be appealing but lacks the depth necessary for more demanding hotel environments. Would your hotel benefit more from a well-established system or a lightweight solution?
If your hotel needs a comprehensive, scalable PMS that integrates with a broad ecosystem of systems and offers robust tools for revenue management, marketing, and multi-property oversight, go with Protel. Its review count and recent feedback highlight its reliability and depth, especially for independent hotels, boutique properties, and larger resorts.
If your hotel prioritizes ease of use, mobility, and simplicity for small operations, Roomsy might seem attractive. Yet, without a significant review base or detailed feature set, it’s difficult to confirm whether it can handle your specific operational challenges or scale as your property grows.
For hotels with complex needs, multiple locations, or a desire for a system backed by years of proven performance, Protel is the safe and proven choice. Smaller or new hotels seeking a straightforward management tool might consider Roomsy but should proceed cautiously due to its limited feedback.
Protel scores 4.12/5 for ease of use, based on user reviews praising its intuitive interface and efficient workflows. Onboarding is rated 3.79/5, with many users appreciating its logical design, though some mention initial training could be improved. Support response times are a concern, with users citing delays but generally noting that the system itself is straightforward once learned.
Roomsy, lacking detailed review data and ratings, cannot be confidently compared. Its emphasis on simplicity suggests an easy onboarding process, but without user testimonials or ratings, this assumption remains unverified.
Edge: Protel PMS. Its broad user feedback and high ease-of-use ratings make it the more dependable choice here.
Protel offers over 46 features exclusive to its platform, including revenue management, multi-currency support, digital registration, integrated payment solutions, and extensive reporting tools. Its feature set is designed for full operational control, automation, and multiple integrations—making it suitable for complex and larger hotels.
Roomsy provides core hotel management functions but offers no detailed feature list or unique capabilities. Its focus on simplicity suggests a limited feature scope, likely lacking advanced tools like revenue management or extensive reporting.
Given the comprehensive feature count and flexibility, Protel’s feature set outpaces Roomsy’s unverified claims. Edge: Protel PMS.
Protel’s support is rated 3.95/5, with reviews indicating a mix of helpfulness and delays. Customers appreciate the 24/7 multilingual support but often cite long response times and occasional difficulty in resolving complex issues swiftly.
Roomsy, with no available reviews or ratings, provides no verifiable support data. Given its small team of 2 employees and lack of customer feedback, confidence in its support quality is limited.
Edge: Protel PMS. Its established support infrastructure and recent positive reviews make it the more dependable option.
Protel boasts a verified network of 195 partners, including major channel managers like SiteMinder, booking engines, revenue tools, and more. Its ecosystem is one of the largest in hospitality, facilitating seamless operation across various systems.
Roomsy only has 2 verified integrations—only one shared partner with Protel (SiteMinder). This limited ecosystem restricts flexibility and may hinder integration with critical third-party tools.
Edge: Protel PMS.
Protel’s 105 reviews with an overall score of 4.11/5 and recent positive feedback from users across different hotel segments establish its strong reputation. Independent, boutique, and resort hotels appreciate its reliability, extensive features, and support, with some reviews citing it as their "favorite" system.
Roomsy has no reviews or ratings, making it impossible to determine user satisfaction or preferences. Without recent feedback, its reputation remains unverified.
Edge: Protel PMS.
Protel’s pricing is straightforward at $500/month with no implementation or trial fees. It offers a clear subscription model suitable for hotels seeking transparency and value.
Roomsy does not publicly list pricing or provide details on its fee structure, leaving potential buyers uncertain about costs.
Conclusion: if budget transparency and predictable costs are priorities, Protel’s straightforward pricing offers peace of mind.
Not ideal if:
Protel is best for hotels with growth ambitions and operational complexity.
Not ideal if:
Roomsy fits hotels that want a simple, accessible platform without complex features.
Protel PMS stands out as a reliable, feature-rich platform with a proven track record, extensive integrations, and high user ratings. Its broad ecosystem and ongoing development make it suitable for a wide variety of hotel types, particularly those with complex needs or growth plans.
Roomsy, while promising simplicity and mobility, lacks the user feedback, feature depth, and integration options necessary for larger or more demanding properties. Its limited review data and unverified reputation make it a less confident choice for hotels seeking a proven management system.
For most hotels, especially those looking for a mature, scalable, and well-supported PMS, Protel is the clear winner. Hotels seeking a minimal solution should proceed cautiously with Roomsy, pending further user feedback and feature validation.
According to HTR's product database, protel PMS (by Planet) and Roomsy share 0 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Booking Engine | ||
| Cloud based | ||
| Multi-currency | ||
| Multi-lingual | ||
| On premise | ||
| Revenue management module |
Showing top differences. 34 more features differ between these products.
We analyzed 4 verified case studies to compare what hotels actually achieve with each platform across four key business objectives.
"It feels like a partnership, not a product. Our feedback is always heard and acted on. We’re working together for the shared goal of great guest service."
No published case study for this goal yet.
What hoteliers love
Users appreciate Protel's extensive features for managing single properties, with comprehensive tools for reporting, room plans, and rate management.... Users appreciate Protel's extensive features for managing single properties, with comprehensive tools for reporting, room plans, and rate management. However, many reviews expressed disappointment that a lot of these functionalities are incomplete, buggy, or missing entirely when dealing with more complex setups or multi-property environments. Custom reports and seamless integration with other tools are also highlighted as beneficial.
The user interface is generally praised for being intuitive and easy to navigate. Many users found Protel Air particularly user-friendly and noted the... The user interface is generally praised for being intuitive and easy to navigate. Many users found Protel Air particularly user-friendly and noted the efficiency in managing daily operations. However, certain updates have made certain functions more complex and less intuitive than before.
Protel's performance in catering to multi-property environments received mixed feedback. While some users praised its organizational tools and interfa... Protel's performance in catering to multi-property environments received mixed feedback. While some users praised its organizational tools and interfaces, many found the system frustratingly limited for multi-location setups, highlighting significant bugs and reduced functionalities.
Where hoteliers push back
Customer support is a consistent area of concern. Reviews mentioned long waiting times for support requests, lack of phone availability, and poor resp... Customer support is a consistent area of concern. Reviews mentioned long waiting times for support requests, lack of phone availability, and poor response times after the acquisition by Planet. Users recommend improving the speed and reliability of customer service.
Users are generally happy with the level of customization available in Protel, allowing them to adapt the system to better fit their specific needs. H... Users are generally happy with the level of customization available in Protel, allowing them to adapt the system to better fit their specific needs. However, this flexibility often comes at a high cost, and some required features are only available through paid custom development.
Ranks higher for
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. protel PMS (by Planet) and Roomsy share many core Property Management Systems features, but each has unique capabilities. protel PMS (by Planet) offers 194 verified integration partners, while Roomsy offers 2. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. protel PMS (by Planet) leads in ease of use at 4.1/5 vs 0.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
protel PMS (by Planet): No. Roomsy: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Property Management Systems vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. Planet has an HT Score of 33 and Roomsy has 0. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor