The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 34 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
Quiq shines .
RUNNR.ai shines in ease of use and customer support , with exclusive features like Broadcast Messaging and Mobile Friendly.
Side-by-side ratings based on 34 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | Contact sales | From $400/mo |
| Verified Reviews | 0 | 34 |
After analyzing 34 verified reviews, Quiq users most value its , while RUNNR.ai users highlight automation of guest inquiries, improvement in guest satisfaction, multichannel communication. Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Automation of Guest Inquiries
▾
|
|
|
+
Improvement in Guest Satisfaction
▾
|
|
|
+
Multichannel Communication
▾
|
|
|
+
Cost Efficiency
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Integration with PMS/CRM
▾
|
|
|
−
Potential Technology Improvements
▾
|
|
|
−
Flexibility and Customization
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Guest Messaging Software vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | — | #15 4 reviews |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | — | #14 17 reviews |
| Large (75-199 rooms) | — | #21 2 reviews |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) | — | #13 3 reviews |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | — | #14 15 reviews |
| Luxury ▾ | — | #13 12 reviews |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | — | #19 7 reviews |
| Extended Stay | — | #15 2 reviews |
By Region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| North America | — | #27 0 reviews |
| Europe ▾ | — | #7 29 reviews |
Choosing the right guest messaging platform is crucial for streamlining communication, reducing costs, and boosting guest satisfaction. Both Quiq and RUNNR.ai aim to enhance how your team interacts with guests, but their approaches and strengths diverge significantly. Quiq, despite its limited recent reviews and zero ratings, emphasizes multi-channel messaging across SMS, Facebook Messenger, and more. RUNNR.ai, on the other hand, attracts more recent praise for automation, integrations, and ease of use. So, which one truly fits your hotel’s needs?
Quiq is a legacy messaging platform built to replace traditional communication channels with SMS, Facebook Messenger, Live Chat, and Kik, focusing on reducing operational costs. Its main appeal is integrating with CRMs like Oracle, Zendesk, and Salesforce, making it suitable for hotels with existing CRM-heavy workflows. Meanwhile, RUNNR.ai’s latest reviews highlight it as an AI-driven virtual concierge that automates 95% of guest inquiries using WhatsApp and SMS, with extensive integrations and automation features.
Quiq’s strengths lie in multi-channel communication, which suits hotels prioritizing direct, customer-preferred channels. Conversely, RUNNR.ai excels in automation and integration, making it ideal for hotels seeking operational efficiency and guest engagement through AI. Given the recent reviews and higher user engagement, RUNNR.ai’s value seems more proven today. Are you looking for broad channel coverage or AI-powered automation?
If your hotel needs a highly automated guest communication system that integrates with multiple booking platforms and property management systems, RUNNR.ai is the better choice. It automates nearly all inquiries, supports multichannel messaging, and provides detailed analytics and workflows suitable for mid to large-sized hotels seeking efficiency.
If your team relies heavily on existing CRM integrations and prefers multi-channel messaging without heavy automation, Quiq might serve you better. However, with no recent reviews or current user feedback, its proven effectiveness is less clear. For hotels prioritizing automation and recent user satisfaction, RUNNR.ai is the clearer winner.
RUNNR.ai’s average ease of use rating of 4.84/5 reflects its intuitive interface, quick onboarding, and positive staff adoption. Recent reviews praise its user-friendly dashboard, automation setup, and straightforward integrations, with a 4.73/5 onboarding rating. Many users mention that staff adapted quickly, and the platform felt accessible even for small teams.
Quiq, with a 0/5 rating, seems to lack recent usability data and reviews, making it difficult to judge current user experience. Its age and absence of recent feedback suggest it may not be as user-friendly or modern as RUNNR.ai. Edge: RUNNR.ai.
RUNNR.ai’s offering includes over 50 features such as automated replies, broadcast messaging, upsell campaigns, chatbots, message routing, sentiment analysis, and API access—many tailored specifically for hospitality. It also supports photo sharing, guest surveys, digital check-in, and multi-property management.
Quiq’s feature set appears limited to basic messaging channels, with no additional features or integrations documented. Its lack of recent updates and features puts it at a disadvantage. For your team requiring a wide range of automation, marketing, and operational tools, RUNNR.ai clearly leads.
Edge: RUNNR.ai.
While Quiq’s support and onboarding ratings are unavailable, RUNNR.ai boasts a 4.81/5 support rating based on recent reviews. Users highlight responsive support, detailed onboarding, and ongoing assistance, with comments like "support was quick to respond and helped us integrate smoothly." The recent positive feedback signals strong customer service.
Quiq’s lack of recent reviews makes it impossible to assess current support quality. Given the clear recent praise for RUNNR.ai’s support team, it is the stronger choice here.
Edge: RUNNR.ai.
RUNNR.ai integrates with 18 verified partners, including popular PMS and channel managers like Mews, Cloudbeds, and Stayntouch, plus booking platforms such as Booking.com and Airbnb. These integrations enable smooth workflows and unified guest data.
Quiq, on the other hand, has no verified integrations listed, limiting its functionality to native messaging channels and CRM integrations. For a hotel seeking a connected tech stack, RUNNR.ai’s extensive integrations are a decisive advantage.
Edge: RUNNR.ai.
With 31 recent reviews, RUNNR.ai’s average rating is 4.84/5 for ease of use and support, and a 9.68/5 NPS score, indicating high satisfaction and likelihood to recommend. Hoteliers across various segments—boutique hotels, city centers, resorts—rate RUNNR.ai highly for automation, support, and features.
Quiq, with no recent reviews or ratings, leaves its current user satisfaction unknown. The existing data favors RUNNR.ai’s reputation among active users, making it the more credible choice today.
Edge: RUNNR.ai.
Quiq’s pricing information is unavailable, and it offers no freemium or trial options, suggesting a potentially high or custom quote model. RUNNR.ai charges a flat $400 monthly base fee, with no free tier or trial, but the transparent pricing allows better planning and evaluation.
Given the detailed pricing, RUNNR.ai delivers clear value for its features, while Quiq’s cost structure remains opaque. For budget-conscious hotels, knowing the flat fee is advantageous.
Edge: RUNNR.ai.
Not ideal if your hotel requires extensive automation, integrations, or a modern interface, as Quiq’s features and recent reviews are limited.
Not ideal if your hotel prefers a simple, low-cost messaging app or has minimal automation needs, as RUNNR.ai’s extensive features come at a $400/month base.
The core difference is that RUNNR.ai is a modern, AI-powered guest communication platform with extensive integrations, automation, and recent positive reviews. Quiq, despite its multi-channel approach, lacks recent validation and a broad feature set, making it less compelling today.
If your hotel values automation, integrations, and high user satisfaction, RUNNR.ai is your best choice. It offers a comprehensive solution to streamline operations and improve guest interactions at a predictable cost.
Choose RUNNR.ai if you want a proven, feature-rich system with high recent reviews. Opt for Quiq only if your hotel already relies heavily on CRM channels and prefers a simpler, less automated messaging tool—though its current user feedback is minimal.
In conclusion, for most hotels today, RUNNR.ai is the smarter, more supported, and more feature-complete platform to meet your guest messaging needs.
According to HTR's product database, Quiq and RUNNR.ai share 0 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Automated Replies | ||
| Automated Workflows | ||
| Broadcast Messaging | ||
| Mobile Friendly | ||
| Upsell Fulfillment Tracking | ||
| Whatsapp Integration |
Showing top differences. 38 more features differ between these products.
What hoteliers love
RUNNR.ai automates the majority of guest inquiries, significantly reducing the workload on reception staff. The system provides instant, human-like re... RUNNR.ai automates the majority of guest inquiries, significantly reducing the workload on reception staff. The system provides instant, human-like responses, often without guests realizing they are interacting with AI, thereby enhancing both efficiency and guest experiences.
RUNNR.ai significantly improves guest satisfaction by enabling more efficient communication, allowing guests to receive quick responses and personal a... RUNNR.ai significantly improves guest satisfaction by enabling more efficient communication, allowing guests to receive quick responses and personal attention, which boosts their overall experience.
While RUNNR.ai supports WhatsApp and online platforms, suggestions include diversifying communication channels to include options like SMS, broadening... While RUNNR.ai supports WhatsApp and online platforms, suggestions include diversifying communication channels to include options like SMS, broadening reach especially in regions where WhatsApp is less common.
Where hoteliers push back
Users desire more seamless integration with Property Management Systems. While some progress has been made, expanding integration options would free u... Users desire more seamless integration with Property Management Systems. While some progress has been made, expanding integration options would free up additional staff time and improve system usability.
Users suggest enhancements such as Gmail integration, as well as more robust connectivity and communication options to further leverage the system's p... Users suggest enhancements such as Gmail integration, as well as more robust connectivity and communication options to further leverage the system's potential.
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. Quiq and RUNNR.ai share many core Guest Messaging Software features, but each has unique capabilities. Quiq offers 0 verified integration partners, while RUNNR.ai offers 18. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. RUNNR.ai leads in ease of use at 4.8/5 vs 0.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
Quiq: No. RUNNR.ai: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Guest Messaging Software vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. Quiq has an HT Score of 0 and RUNNR.ai has 76. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor