The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 563 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
Actabl shines when it comes to interface usability & customization — especially for independent properties (5.0/5) , with exclusive features like Mobile Access.
Quore shines when it comes to task management — especially for brand properties (4.7/5) , with exclusive features like Mobile App.
Side-by-side ratings based on 563 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | From $900/mo | Contact sales |
| Verified Reviews | 516 | 47 |
After analyzing 563 verified reviews, Actabl users most value its interface usability & customization, housekeeping task optimization, guest communication & experience, while Quore users highlight task management, inter-departmental communication, guest interaction. Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Interface Usability & Customization
▾
|
+
Task Management
▾
|
|
+
Housekeeping Task Optimization
▾
|
+
Inter-departmental Communication
▾
|
|
+
Guest Communication & Experience
▾
|
+
Guest Interaction
▾
|
|
+
Real-time Task Management
▾
|
+
Training Resources
▾
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Guest Communication & Experience
▾
|
−
User Interface and Experience
▾
|
|
−
Integration with Existing Systems
▾
|
−
Feature Requests and Improvements
▾
|
|
−
Mobile Access Delays
▾
|
−
App Performance
▾
|
How each product ranks among Housekeeping Software vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | #3 24 reviews | #13 1 reviews |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | #1 241 reviews | #7 28 reviews |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | #1 119 reviews | #6 12 reviews |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) ▾ | #1 92 reviews | #7 4 reviews |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #1 232 reviews | #7 14 reviews |
| Luxury ▾ | #1 255 reviews | #8 12 reviews |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | #1 188 reviews | #5 41 reviews |
| Extended Stay ▾ | #1 33 reviews | #5 9 reviews |
By Region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | #1 417 reviews | #2 42 reviews |
| Europe ▾ | #6 43 reviews | #16 0 reviews |
| Asia Pacific ▾ | #2 9 reviews | #10 0 reviews |
| Middle East ▾ | #5 8 reviews | — |
Choosing between ALICE Housekeeping by Actabl and Quore’s Cleanings Plus hinges on your hotel’s specific operational needs and strategic priorities. Both solutions aim to streamline housekeeping workflows, improve communication, and enhance guest satisfaction, but they approach these goals differently.
ALICE, with its broader integration capabilities and extensive feature set, offers a comprehensive management system that extends beyond housekeeping. In contrast, Quore focuses intensely on real-time communication, task tracking, and operational transparency within housekeeping, emphasizing ease of use and immediate responsiveness.
Are you looking for a more holistic hotel management platform or a specialized housekeeping communication tool? Your choice depends on the scale of your operations, existing system integration needs, and your team’s technological readiness.
When evaluating ALICE and Quore, consider what core problems you need to solve. ALICE’s platform excels in integrating multiple departments—front desk, engineering, and guest communication—making it ideal if your hotel seeks a unified system.
Quore, on the other hand, specializes in detailed housekeeping task management, real-time notifications, and guest interaction, making it suitable for hotels that prioritize swift, focused housekeeping operations.
While ALICE boasts a higher overall rating (4.7/5 vs. 4.59/5) and significantly more recent reviews (116 in last six months vs. no recent Quore feedback), Quore’s slightly higher likelihood to recommend score (96% vs. 92%) suggests strong user satisfaction within its niche.
Do you want a broad, integrated management tool or a dedicated housekeeping app? Your hotel’s operational complexity will guide this decision.
If your hotel needs a comprehensive platform capable of managing multiple departments, ALICE is the better fit. Its 413 reviews, with a high rating of 4.7/5, demonstrate broad adoption and recent positive feedback, especially in large or complex properties.
If your focus is on streamlining housekeeping operations with real-time communication and task tracking, Quore’s Cleanings Plus is a solid option. Its 46 reviews and a 4.59/5 rating indicate a more specialized tool that’s particularly valued in smaller or highly service-driven properties.
For hotels seeking a single platform that integrates with existing systems and offers extensive features, ALICE’s 10 unique features and 100 verified partners give it a notable edge. Conversely, if your priority is dedicated housekeeping efficiency with fewer integration needs, Quore’s niche focus might suffice.
Based on current reviews, ALICE’s ease of use rating (4.71/5) surpasses Quore’s (4.6/5). ALICE’s interface, praised for its overall intuitiveness, is user-friendly for staff familiar with hotel management systems, although some users mention it can be cluttered and slow during peak times.
Quore’s simple mobile app and straightforward task management make it accessible, especially for housekeeping staff who rely on instant notifications and quick updates. However, some users report occasional crashes and bugs that hinder smooth operation.
Edge: ALICE, with its higher overall usability score and recent positive feedback.
ALICE offers 10 features exclusive to its platform including in-app translation, service recovery, case management, late checkouts, open API, PMS integration, inspection module, mobile access, and multi-language support. These extend its capabilities beyond housekeeping to broader hotel management needs.
Quore provides 13 unique features such as CapEX budgeting, work orders, recurring tasks, asset maintenance logs, inventory trend analysis, custom inspections, preventative maintenance, notifications, deep cleaning, and in-app translation.
With a shared feature count of 23, ALICE’s broad feature set and open API give it more customization potential. Quore’s strengths lie in detailed task management and maintenance features.
Edge: ALICE, for its wider array of features and deeper integration capabilities.
ALICE’s support rating (4.48/5) is slightly lower than Quore’s (4.58/5), but recent reviews show both companies deliver strong customer service. ALICE’s support team is praised for responsiveness, though some users note that app performance issues and slow support response times can be frustrating.
Quore’s users highlight effective support, with review quotes emphasizing helpful onboarding and issue resolution. However, some mention that additional training resources could improve user experience.
Edge: Quore, for consistent praise about support quality and onboarding.
ALICE’s extensive partner network boasts over 100 verified integrations, including industry leaders like Revinate, Canary Technologies, and STR. Its open API facilitates custom integrations, making it suitable for hotels with complex tech stacks.
Quore’s 8 verified partners include notable PMS and service providers like Zingle and Beekeeper, but its smaller integration ecosystem may limit flexibility for larger, multi-system hotels.
Edge: ALICE, with a significantly larger, more versatile integration network.
Recent reviews indicate that ALICE’s more extensive user base and recent feedback result in a higher overall rating (4.7/5) from 413 reviews, with a strong trend of satisfaction across various hotel segments.
Quore, with fewer reviews (46) and a slightly lower rating (4.59/5), is favored in boutique, branded, and extended stay hotels, but less so among larger properties.
For overall hotel satisfaction and recent positive feedback, ALICE holds the edge.
ALICE’s pricing starts at $900/month for its core platform, with no free tier or trial offered, reflecting its enterprise focus and feature richness. Quore’s pricing information is not publicly available, but its SaaS model typically involves a subscription with potential customization costs.
While ALICE’s upfront cost is clear, the total value depends on the scale of your hotel and needed integrations. Quore’s flexible pricing, if available, may appeal to smaller properties or those seeking targeted housekeeping tools.
Not ideal if your hotel is small, with minimal tech infrastructure, or requires only housekeeping-specific features.
Not ideal if your hotel requires extensive multi-department management or advanced financial planning features.
ALICE offers a comprehensive, highly integrated platform favored by large, complex hotels looking for broad management capabilities. Its extensive feature set and vast partner network make it suitable for properties aiming for operational cohesion and scalability.
Quore excels in dedicated housekeeping and maintenance workflows, providing real-time notifications and task tracking with a simple interface. It’s best suited for hotels that want a focused solution without the need for extensive integrations.
If your hotel values a multi-department solution with extensive customization, ALICE is the clear choice. For properties seeking a streamlined, housekeeping-centric app, Quore remains a strong contender.
In summary, ALICE’s higher review count, recent positive feedback, and richer feature set make it the more reliable, versatile option for most hotels. However, if your primary concern is housekeeper communication and quick turnaround, Quore’s targeted approach may serve you well.
According to HTR's product database, ALICE Housekeeping by Actabl and Quore (Cleanings Plus) share 23 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Asset Maintenance Logs | ||
| CapEX Budgeting & Forecasting | ||
| Case Management | ||
| In app translation | ||
| Inventory Trend Analysis | ||
| Late checkouts | ||
| Mobile App | ||
| Open API | ||
| Recurring Tasks | ||
| Service Recovery/Escalation | ||
| Two-Way PMS Integration | ||
| Work Orders & Ticketing |
Showing top differences. 11 more features differ between these products.
We analyzed 1 verified case studies to compare what hotels actually achieve with each platform across four key business objectives.
"We do recommend ALICE to other hotels since it is a way to facilitate work with perfection. ALICE makes our work easier and more efficient in regard to following up and keeping tr..."
No published case study for this goal yet.
What hoteliers love
The app is generally user-friendly, but reports of cluttered interfaces and limited customization options suggest room for improvement in streamlining... The app is generally user-friendly, but reports of cluttered interfaces and limited customization options suggest room for improvement in streamlining the user experience, particularly for new or less tech-savvy employees.
ALICE's tool for housekeeping gains commendation for its task allocation and status tracking, yet some users note the need for improved module feature... ALICE's tool for housekeeping gains commendation for its task allocation and status tracking, yet some users note the need for improved module features and better cross-department communication.
ALICE effectively enhances guest service through quick communication of special requests and status updates, bolstering guest satisfaction and operati... ALICE effectively enhances guest service through quick communication of special requests and status updates, bolstering guest satisfaction and operational transparency. However, SMS feature handling is critiqued for its lack of customization.
Where hoteliers push back
ALICE effectively enhances guest service through quick communication of special requests and status updates, bolstering guest satisfaction and operati... ALICE effectively enhances guest service through quick communication of special requests and status updates, bolstering guest satisfaction and operational transparency. However, SMS feature handling is critiqued for its lack of customization.
The integration capability of ALICE with other systems, such as Opera, is frequently mentioned. Users appreciate smooth data consistency which aids in... The integration capability of ALICE with other systems, such as Opera, is frequently mentioned. Users appreciate smooth data consistency which aids in operational flow, though some face challenges with older system compatibility.
Ranks higher for
Unique capabilities
What hoteliers love
Users highlight Quore's effective task management features, such as logging deep cleans and PM rooms, setting up automated work orders, and organizing... Users highlight Quore's effective task management features, such as logging deep cleans and PM rooms, setting up automated work orders, and organizing to-do lists. These features help keep the staff on track with inspection goals and ensure that tasks are not forgotten.
Many hoteliers appreciate Quore's ability to streamline communication between departments, making guest service more effective and reducing the need f... Many hoteliers appreciate Quore's ability to streamline communication between departments, making guest service more effective and reducing the need for physical tools like walkie-talkies. This efficiency leads to quicker response times and better guest satisfaction, ensuring that departments like housekeeping, maintenance, and front desk can coordinate seamlessly.
Several reviews note the advantage of Quore's guest messaging platform, which allows hoteliers to interact with guests via text messaging. This capabi... Several reviews note the advantage of Quore's guest messaging platform, which allows hoteliers to interact with guests via text messaging. This capability not only meets modern communication standards but also leads to improved guest satisfaction through quicker response times.
Where hoteliers push back
While many find Quore user-friendly, a few reviews indicate that certain functions are confusing or redundant. Improving the interface could enhance t... While many find Quore user-friendly, a few reviews indicate that certain functions are confusing or redundant. Improving the interface could enhance the overall user experience, particularly for desktop users.
Hoteliers often mention desired additions and improvements, such as more frequent updates, integrated inventory management, and enhanced push notifica... Hoteliers often mention desired additions and improvements, such as more frequent updates, integrated inventory management, and enhanced push notifications. These suggestions indicate an engaged user base looking to derive even more value from the software.
Ranks higher for
Unique capabilities
It depends on your requirements. ALICE Housekeeping by Actabl and Quore (Cleanings Plus) share many core Housekeeping Software features, but each has unique capabilities. ALICE Housekeeping by Actabl offers 100 verified integration partners, while Quore (Cleanings Plus) offers 8. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. ALICE Housekeeping by Actabl leads in ease of use at 4.7/5 vs 4.6/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
ALICE Housekeeping by Actabl: No. Quore (Cleanings Plus): No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Housekeeping Software vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. Actabl has an HT Score of 99 and Quore has 22. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor