The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 97 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
Faundit shines in ease of use and customer support , with exclusive features like Mobile Access.
Quore shines when it comes to task management — especially for brand properties (4.7/5) , with exclusive features like Mobile App and Mobile access on any device.
Side-by-side ratings based on 97 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | From $100/mo | Contact sales |
| Verified Reviews | 50 | 47 |
After analyzing 97 verified reviews, Faundit users most value its ease of use, guest experience, time-saving automation, while Quore users highlight task management, inter-departmental communication, guest interaction. Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Ease of Use
▾
|
+
Task Management
▾
|
|
+
Guest Experience
▾
|
+
Inter-departmental Communication
▾
|
|
+
Time-Saving Automation
▾
|
+
Guest Interaction
▾
|
|
+
Courier and Shipping Preferences
▾
|
+
Training Resources
▾
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Inventory and Case Management
▾
|
−
User Interface and Experience
▾
|
|
−
Mobile App Improvements
▾
|
−
Feature Requests and Improvements
▾
|
|
−
Cost for Customers
▾
|
−
App Performance
▾
|
How each product ranks among Housekeeping Software vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) | #14 1 reviews | #13 1 reviews |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | #9 26 reviews | #7 28 reviews |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | #7 11 reviews | #6 12 reviews |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) | #9 3 reviews | #7 4 reviews |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #8 17 reviews | #7 14 reviews |
| Luxury ▾ | #7 22 reviews | #8 12 reviews |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | #9 17 reviews | #5 41 reviews |
| Extended Stay ▾ | #10 6 reviews | #5 9 reviews |
By Region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | #19 1 reviews | #2 42 reviews |
| Europe ▾ | #5 42 reviews | #16 0 reviews |
| Asia Pacific | — | #10 0 reviews |
Your hotel faces a choice between Faundit by Faundit and Quore (Cleanings Plus) for housekeeping management. Both systems aim to streamline operations, but they serve different core functions: Faundit specializes in Lost & Found, while Quore focuses on cleaning workflows. Understanding their strengths and weaknesses will help you determine which aligns best with your hotel’s needs. Are you prioritizing guest property return processes or cleaning efficiency?
Faundit is the more reviewed and highly rated platform, with recent positive feedback from over 14 hotels in the last six months, reinforcing its current relevance. Quore, despite a solid user base, has not received reviews in recent months, leaving its current user sentiment less certain. Given this, Faundit’s recent performance data makes it the more reliable choice today.
Faundit and Quore both aim to improve operational workflows but target different pain points. Faundit automates the complex process of managing lost and found items, including guest coordination, payments, and shipping logistics. Quore, on the other hand, coordinates housekeeping tasks, tracks cleaning performance, and communicates with staff in real time.
While Faundit's focus on guest satisfaction and lost property management reduces administrative workload, Quore enhances front-line productivity through task automation and communication. The divergence is clear: Faundit excels in guest-facing services, and Quore improves internal housekeeping efficiency.
Are you looking for a system that reduces lost property headaches or one that accelerates housekeeping workflows? Your choice depends on which problem is more pressing for your hotel.
If your hotel needs to streamline guest property management, reduce lost & found handling time, and enhance guest satisfaction, go with Faundit. Its automation of guest communications, payment processing, and international shipping reduces staff workload and improves the guest experience. Plus, its recent reviews emphasize its ease of use and positive impact on operational costs.
If your hotel requires detailed housekeeping task management, real-time cleaning updates, and inter-department communication, Quore is a better fit. Its extensive feature set, including mobile notifications and task tracking, is favored by properties aiming to maximize operational efficiency. However, its recent lack of reviews suggests less current user feedback.
For a hotel prioritizing lost & found management, Faundit’s stronger recent reviews and high user ratings make it the clear choice. Conversely, if your focus is on housekeeping workflow optimization, Quore’s broader feature set might be appealing, but consider the limited recent feedback.
Faundit boasts a 4.96/5 ease of use score based on reviews from 47 hotels, with many noting its simple, transparent interface and quick onboarding. Users appreciate how straightforward it is to file lost items and manage guest communication, with comments highlighting its user-friendly platform and easy integration.
Quore scores slightly lower at 4.6/5, with some users mentioning occasional app crashes and interface redundancies. Despite its comprehensive features, some hotel staff find it less intuitive, especially during initial training phases.
Edge: Faundit.
Faundit offers 6 unique features, including request management, lost & found, package tracking, mobile access, and multi-language UI support. These features are tailored specifically to managing guest property recovery and communication, streamlining lost & found processes effectively.
Quore provides 33 features, covering extensive housekeeping and maintenance capabilities such as work orders, recurring tasks, asset logs, preventative maintenance, and real-time task tracking. Its broad toolset addresses multiple operational areas but may be more complex to implement.
While Quore offers a wider range of features, Faundit’s specialized tools for lost & found management and automation are more targeted and easier to adopt.
Edge: Quore.
Faundit’s support scores a 4.94/5, with reviews often praising its friendly, solution-focused team and quick response times. Users note its willingness to adapt and improve, especially in challenging markets like Europe.
Quore’s support scores 4.58/5, with some reviews indicating occasional delays and a desire for more comprehensive training resources. Users appreciate its responsiveness but mention that app performance issues can hinder support interactions.
Edge: Faundit.
Faundit integrates with six verified partners, including hotelkit, Mews, Oracle Hospitality, and Stayntouch, primarily focusing on property management and operational systems. Its integrations support streamlined guest communication and property management workflows.
Quore offers eight verified integrations, including Zingle, Revinate, and Canary Technologies, covering guest messaging, reputation management, and other operational tools. Its broader integration network caters to diverse hotel tech stacks.
While Quore has a slight edge in total integrations, Faundit’s targeted partnerships focus on essential operational links relevant to its niche.
Edge: Quore.
Faundit is rated at 5/5 by 47 reviews, with recent feedback emphasizing its ease of use, high guest satisfaction, and operational efficiencies. Hoteliers in Europe and North America commend its customization and automation features, with an NPS of 9.85/10.
Quore has an overall rating of 4.59/5 from 46 reviews, primarily from U.S. properties. Users value its communication tools and task management but note some issues with app stability. Recent reviews are limited, making Faundit’s high and recent ratings more compelling.
Edge: Faundit.
Faundit is priced at a straightforward $100/month, with no freemium or trial options. Its flat monthly fee simplifies budgeting, especially for hotels seeking predictable costs.
Quore’s pricing is not publicly disclosed, indicating it likely offers tailored quotes based on property size and feature needs. This approach can be advantageous for larger hotels but may complicate initial decision-making.
Faundit’s transparent pricing makes it easier to evaluate economically.
Not ideal if:
Faundit is best suited for hotels focusing on guest satisfaction, lost & found efficiency, and branding.
Not ideal if:
Quore is ideal for hotels aiming to streamline multiple operational facets with a focus on housekeeping.
Faundit and Quore serve distinct purposes within hotel operations. Faundit’s core strength lies in managing guest property recovery efficiently, with recent reviews validating its ease of use and high satisfaction. Quore excels in housekeeping and maintenance management, offering a more extensive feature set but with less recent user feedback.
If your hotel’s primary concern is guest satisfaction around lost & found issues, Faundit’s recent high ratings, ease of use, and tailored features make it the superior choice. For hotels needing a broad operational platform, Quore’s extensive suite is compelling, but consider its current lack of recent reviews.
Ultimately, your decision should align with your hotel’s immediate operational priorities—guest property management or housekeeping efficiency. Based on recent data and review activity, Faundit currently stands out as the more dependable solution.
According to HTR's product database, Faundit and Quore (Cleanings Plus) share 3 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Asset Maintenance Logs | ||
| CapEX Budgeting & Forecasting | ||
| Hotel branded confirmations & recommendations | ||
| Inventory Trend Analysis | ||
| Lost & Found | ||
| Mobile Access | ||
| Mobile App | ||
| Multi Language UI Support | ||
| Package Management & Tracking | ||
| Recurring Tasks | ||
| Request Management | ||
| Work Orders & Ticketing |
Showing top differences. 27 more features differ between these products.
What hoteliers love
Faundit is consistently highlighted for its user-friendly interface, making it intuitive for staff to navigate and handle lost and found items seamles... Faundit is consistently highlighted for its user-friendly interface, making it intuitive for staff to navigate and handle lost and found items seamlessly. The platform's ease of deployment and daily use is highly appreciated by hotel staff, streamlining their workflow significantly.
Faundit contributes to improved guest experience by allowing guests to manage their lost items online, creating a smoother and more professional inter... Faundit contributes to improved guest experience by allowing guests to manage their lost items online, creating a smoother and more professional interaction with the hotel staff. This capability helps in enhancing customer satisfaction.
The system's ability to save time by centralizing and automating lost and found procedures is a standout point. By eliminating the need for manual pos... The system's ability to save time by centralizing and automating lost and found procedures is a standout point. By eliminating the need for manual post office trips and easing tracking, Faundit frees up staff time for other tasks, contributing to cost efficiency.
Where hoteliers push back
The ability to manage and track lost items, ensuring efficient organization and storage, is remarked upon. Enhancements requested in this area include... The ability to manage and track lost items, ensuring efficient organization and storage, is remarked upon. Enhancements requested in this area include more flexible management tools like archiving completed cases.
There is a desire for a dedicated mobile app that could streamline item registration and management on the move, enhancing efficiency and reducing err... There is a desire for a dedicated mobile app that could streamline item registration and management on the move, enhancing efficiency and reducing errors on the spot.
Ranks higher for
Unique capabilities
What hoteliers love
Users highlight Quore's effective task management features, such as logging deep cleans and PM rooms, setting up automated work orders, and organizing... Users highlight Quore's effective task management features, such as logging deep cleans and PM rooms, setting up automated work orders, and organizing to-do lists. These features help keep the staff on track with inspection goals and ensure that tasks are not forgotten.
Many hoteliers appreciate Quore's ability to streamline communication between departments, making guest service more effective and reducing the need f... Many hoteliers appreciate Quore's ability to streamline communication between departments, making guest service more effective and reducing the need for physical tools like walkie-talkies. This efficiency leads to quicker response times and better guest satisfaction, ensuring that departments like housekeeping, maintenance, and front desk can coordinate seamlessly.
Several reviews note the advantage of Quore's guest messaging platform, which allows hoteliers to interact with guests via text messaging. This capabi... Several reviews note the advantage of Quore's guest messaging platform, which allows hoteliers to interact with guests via text messaging. This capability not only meets modern communication standards but also leads to improved guest satisfaction through quicker response times.
Where hoteliers push back
While many find Quore user-friendly, a few reviews indicate that certain functions are confusing or redundant. Improving the interface could enhance t... While many find Quore user-friendly, a few reviews indicate that certain functions are confusing or redundant. Improving the interface could enhance the overall user experience, particularly for desktop users.
Hoteliers often mention desired additions and improvements, such as more frequent updates, integrated inventory management, and enhanced push notifica... Hoteliers often mention desired additions and improvements, such as more frequent updates, integrated inventory management, and enhanced push notifications. These suggestions indicate an engaged user base looking to derive even more value from the software.
Ranks higher for
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. Faundit and Quore (Cleanings Plus) share many core Housekeeping Software features, but each has unique capabilities. Faundit offers 6 verified integration partners, while Quore (Cleanings Plus) offers 8. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. Faundit leads in ease of use at 5.0/5 vs 4.6/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
Faundit: No. Quore (Cleanings Plus): No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Housekeeping Software vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. Faundit has an HT Score of 83 and Quore has 22. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor