The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 224 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
hub OS shines when it comes to efficiency in task management — especially for brand properties (5.0/5) , with exclusive features like Mobile Access.
Quore shines when it comes to task management — especially for brand properties (4.7/5) , with exclusive features like Mobile App and Mobile access on any device.
Side-by-side ratings based on 224 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | From $300/mo | Contact sales |
| Verified Reviews | 177 | 47 |
After analyzing 224 verified reviews, hub OS users most value its efficiency in task management, customization options, housekeeping module, while Quore users highlight task management, inter-departmental communication, guest interaction. Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Efficiency in task management
▾
|
+
Task Management
▾
|
|
+
Customization options
▾
|
+
Inter-departmental Communication
▾
|
|
+
Housekeeping module
▾
|
+
Guest Interaction
▾
|
|
+
Maintenance module
▾
|
+
Training Resources
▾
|
| Cons | |
|
−
User Interface and Experience
▾
|
|
|
−
Feature Requests and Improvements
▾
|
|
|
−
App Performance
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Housekeeping Software vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | #5 13 reviews | #13 1 reviews |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | #4 85 reviews | #7 28 reviews |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | #2 62 reviews | #6 12 reviews |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) ▾ | #5 9 reviews | #7 4 reviews |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #4 74 reviews | #7 14 reviews |
| Luxury ▾ | #3 73 reviews | #8 12 reviews |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | #2 70 reviews | #5 41 reviews |
| Extended Stay ▾ | #8 11 reviews | #5 9 reviews |
By Region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | #8 10 reviews | #2 42 reviews |
| Europe ▾ | #3 132 reviews | #16 0 reviews |
| Asia Pacific | #8 1 reviews | #10 0 reviews |
| Middle East ▾ | #2 7 reviews | — |
Choosing between hub OS Housekeeping by hub OS and Quore (Cleanings Plus) hinges on your hotel’s specific needs and operational priorities. Both products aim to streamline housekeeping, but they approach this goal differently. hub OS offers a broad, integrated platform that connects multiple departments, while Quore specializes in real-time cleaning management and guest communication. Your decision depends on whether you value an all-in-one system or a dedicated housekeeping solution.
In this comparison, hub OS has more recent reviews and a significantly higher review count, making it the more robust choice in terms of user feedback. Its overall rating of 4.88/5 from 161 reviews far exceeds Quore’s 4.59/5 from 46 reviews, indicating stronger user satisfaction and ongoing support.
Both hub OS and Quore address the core challenge of managing housekeeping and operations efficiently, but they diverge in scope and depth. hub OS’s platform integrates housekeeping with maintenance, front desk, and quality control, promoting cross-department collaboration. Quore, on the other hand, focuses squarely on cleaning workflows, guest notifications, and task tracking within the housekeeping realm.
The key difference lies in their targeted functionalities: hub OS provides extensive modules like inspections, multi-language support, and open API access, whereas Quore emphasizes real-time notifications, guest messaging, and detailed cleaning performance tracking. Your hotel’s operational complexity and integration needs will determine which aligns better with your goals. Are you seeking a comprehensive system or a specialized housekeeping platform?
hub OS scores a 4.86/5 for ease of use, with many reviews praising its intuitive interface and straightforward navigation. Users highlight that staff adoption is quick, and onboarding is smooth, supported by a 4.76/5 onboarding rating.
Quore’s ease of use, rated at 4.6/5, is still strong but slightly behind hub OS. Some users report app crashes and performance hiccups, especially on mobile devices, which can hinder daily operations.
Edge: hub OS
hub OS offers 12 shared features with Quore, but it also includes 6 features unique to its platform, such as two-way PMS integration, open API, inspection modules, multi-language UI support, mobile access, and chat. These add flexibility and deeper integration, enabling more comprehensive operational management.
Quore boasts 24 features exclusive to its platform, including CapEX budgeting, work orders, recurring tasks, asset logs, inventory analysis, and a robust analytics dashboard. Its extensive feature set supports detailed task management and preventive maintenance.
Edge: Quore
hub OS’s customer support is highly regarded, with a 4.8/5 support rating. Reviewers praise the responsiveness, proactive communication, and personalized assistance, making onboarding and troubleshooting hassle-free.
Quore’s support, rated at 4.58/5, is still strong but slightly less praised. Some users mention occasional delays in support response and limited training resources, which can impact new users or those facing complex issues.
Edge: hub OS
hub OS excels in connectivity, with 23 verified partners, including popular industry integrations like Canary Technologies, Infor, and Oracle Hospitality. Its open API and extensive partner network facilitate seamless data exchange across multiple systems.
Quore has 8 verified partners, with integrations primarily focused on messaging, guest engagement, and some property management tools. Its fewer integrations can limit compatibility with other hotel systems.
Edge: hub OS
hub OS’s ratings are notably higher, with a 4.88/5 overall from 161 reviews, compared to Quore’s 4.59/5 from 46 reviews. The recent reviews for hub OS reinforce its strong reputation, with consistent praise for usability, customer support, and value.
Hoteliers in luxury and branded hotels tend to rate hub OS higher, reflecting its suitability for larger, complex operations. Quore’s reviews are more mixed, especially among independent and limited-service hotels, where some note usability issues and limited features.
Edge: hub OS
hub OS costs $300 per month with no implementation or hidden fees, offering a straightforward subscription model. Quore’s pricing is not publicly disclosed, which may suggest custom quotes based on hotel size or needs, making direct comparison difficult.
Your hotel should consider whether the value and features of hub OS justify its fixed monthly rate or whether Quore’s flexible pricing better suits your budget.
Not ideal if your hotel is small with minimal operational complexity or if you prefer a lightweight, simple system.
Not ideal if your hotel requires extensive cross-department integration or advanced reporting outside cleaning workflows.
hub OS is a comprehensive, multi-department platform with a strong focus on integration, reporting, and user satisfaction. Its extensive features and high ratings make it suitable for larger, complex hotels that want to streamline multiple operations in one system.
Quore excels in housekeeping-specific functionality, especially for hotels emphasizing cleaning efficiency, guest notifications, and task management. Its rich feature set is ideal for properties looking to optimize cleaning workflows and improve guest communication.
If your hotel needs a broad, integrated solution with proven support, choose hub OS. For a dedicated, feature-rich housekeeping app with real-time notifications, Quore is the better fit.
In conclusion, hub OS’s larger user base, more recent reviews, and higher ratings make it the more reliable and scalable choice today. However, if your focus is solely on cleaning management and guest interaction, Quore remains a solid option.
According to HTR's product database, hub OS Housekeeping and Quore (Cleanings Plus) share 12 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Asset Maintenance Logs | ||
| CapEX Budgeting & Forecasting | ||
| Chat | ||
| Inspection Module | ||
| Inventory Trend Analysis | ||
| Mobile Access | ||
| Mobile App | ||
| Multi Language UI Support | ||
| Open API | ||
| Recurring Tasks | ||
| Two-Way PMS Integration | ||
| Work Orders & Ticketing |
Showing top differences. 18 more features differ between these products.
What hoteliers love
Hub OS significantly increases task management efficiency across departments like housekeeping, maintenance, and front desk. The system improves commu... Hub OS significantly increases task management efficiency across departments like housekeeping, maintenance, and front desk. The system improves communication, task delegation, and tracking, leading to more streamlined operations and higher productivity. A few reviews, however, point to areas where additional features could enhance task management further.
While Hub OS is appreciated for its flexibility and customization capabilities, several users note that certain customizations and personalized settin... While Hub OS is appreciated for its flexibility and customization capabilities, several users note that certain customizations and personalized settings are challenging to achieve without technical support. There is a desire for more self-servicing options within the software, especially related to the mobile app and user interface.
The housekeeping module of Hub OS receives high praise as a game-changer, drastically improving efficiency and productivity. It enables staff to see r... The housekeeping module of Hub OS receives high praise as a game-changer, drastically improving efficiency and productivity. It enables staff to see room statuses, report issues promptly, and manage tasks effectively. Several reviews specifically mention that the system helps maintain high housekeeping cleanliness scores.
Where hoteliers push back
Hub OS is highly praised for its seamless integration with Property Management Systems (PMS), making it easier to manage various hotel operations like... Hub OS is highly praised for its seamless integration with Property Management Systems (PMS), making it easier to manage various hotel operations like housekeeping and maintenance efficiently in one place. Nonetheless, some reviews mention occasional delays and issues with syncing integrations, specifically with systems such as SAP and Opera.
Ranks higher for
Unique capabilities
What hoteliers love
Users highlight Quore's effective task management features, such as logging deep cleans and PM rooms, setting up automated work orders, and organizing... Users highlight Quore's effective task management features, such as logging deep cleans and PM rooms, setting up automated work orders, and organizing to-do lists. These features help keep the staff on track with inspection goals and ensure that tasks are not forgotten.
Many hoteliers appreciate Quore's ability to streamline communication between departments, making guest service more effective and reducing the need f... Many hoteliers appreciate Quore's ability to streamline communication between departments, making guest service more effective and reducing the need for physical tools like walkie-talkies. This efficiency leads to quicker response times and better guest satisfaction, ensuring that departments like housekeeping, maintenance, and front desk can coordinate seamlessly.
Several reviews note the advantage of Quore's guest messaging platform, which allows hoteliers to interact with guests via text messaging. This capabi... Several reviews note the advantage of Quore's guest messaging platform, which allows hoteliers to interact with guests via text messaging. This capability not only meets modern communication standards but also leads to improved guest satisfaction through quicker response times.
Where hoteliers push back
While many find Quore user-friendly, a few reviews indicate that certain functions are confusing or redundant. Improving the interface could enhance t... While many find Quore user-friendly, a few reviews indicate that certain functions are confusing or redundant. Improving the interface could enhance the overall user experience, particularly for desktop users.
Hoteliers often mention desired additions and improvements, such as more frequent updates, integrated inventory management, and enhanced push notifica... Hoteliers often mention desired additions and improvements, such as more frequent updates, integrated inventory management, and enhanced push notifications. These suggestions indicate an engaged user base looking to derive even more value from the software.
Ranks higher for
Unique capabilities
It depends on your requirements. hub OS Housekeeping and Quore (Cleanings Plus) share many core Housekeeping Software features, but each has unique capabilities. hub OS Housekeeping offers 23 verified integration partners, while Quore (Cleanings Plus) offers 8. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. hub OS Housekeeping leads in ease of use at 4.9/5 vs 4.6/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
hub OS Housekeeping: No. Quore (Cleanings Plus): No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Housekeeping Software vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. hub OS has an HT Score of 34 and Quore has 22. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor