The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 34 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
Shiji Group shines in ease of use and customer support , with exclusive features like Guest profiles and Tablet/Kiosk Check-in.
Sciener Smart Technology Co.,Ltd shines .
Side-by-side ratings based on 34 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | From $1,200/mo | Contact sales |
| Verified Reviews | 34 | 0 |
After analyzing 34 verified reviews, Shiji Group users most value its ease of use, support team, implementation, while Sciener Smart Technology Co.,Ltd users highlight . Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
Sciener Smart Technology Co.,Ltd |
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Ease of Use
▾
|
|
|
+
Support Team
▾
|
|
|
+
Implementation
▾
|
|
|
+
Training Materials
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Reporting and Analytics
▾
|
|
|
−
System Speed
▾
|
|
|
−
Integration Capabilities
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Property Management Systems vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
Sciener Smart Technology Co.,Ltd |
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) | #53 2 reviews | — |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | #31 17 reviews | — |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | #11 13 reviews | — |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) | #22 2 reviews | — |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
Sciener Smart Technology Co.,Ltd |
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #33 17 reviews | — |
| Luxury ▾ | #24 25 reviews | — |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | #22 19 reviews | — |
| Extended Stay | #45 2 reviews | — |
By Region
| Segment |
|
Sciener Smart Technology Co.,Ltd |
|---|---|---|
| North America | #33 4 reviews | — |
| Europe ▾ | #30 8 reviews | — |
| Asia Pacific ▾ | #14 5 reviews | — |
| Middle East ▾ | #5 14 reviews | — |
Choosing between Shiji Daylight PMS and TTLock hinges on your hotel’s operational complexity and integration needs. Shiji Daylight PMS aims to streamline property management with a full suite of features, while TTLock primarily offers access control solutions that may lack comprehensive PMS capabilities. Your decision depends on whether you need a full-property system or a simple access solution.
Both address different needs: Shiji Daylight PMS provides an integrated platform for reservations, guest data, and operations, whereas TTLock focuses on smart lock management. Have you clearly defined whether your priority is overall management or access control?
Shiji Daylight PMS is designed to serve hotels seeking a complete, cloud-based property management system with extensive features like guest profiles, group bookings, multi-currency handling, and integrations with CRS and payment systems. Its recent reviews, totaling 32 with a 74.68 score, highlight ease of use, support, and a broad feature set, making it suitable for hotels that want centralized control.
TTLock, on the other hand, is a specialized access control solution with zero reviews and a minimal feature set focused solely on lock management and access security. It lacks the depth of hotel management features found in Shiji PMS. Do you require a comprehensive management platform or a straightforward lock control system?
If your hotel needs an all-in-one management system that handles reservations, guest data, billing, and operations, Shiji Daylight PMS is the clear choice. Its 98 features and strong regional presence support scalability, making it ideal for larger or growing hotels.
If your primary concern is access control—such as key management for rooms or facilities—TTLock might suffice. However, with no reviews or detailed features, it’s less proven and less capable of supporting holistic hotel operations. Are you looking for a full management platform or just access control?
Shiji Daylight PMS scores 4.63 out of 5 for ease of use, with positive reviews emphasizing its user-friendly interface, helpful training materials, and straightforward onboarding. Users appreciate how quickly staff adapt, citing accessible features and detailed documentation.
TTLock offers no user reviews or ratings, so its ease of use remains unverified. Given the complexity of hotel PMS, an unreviewed access system offers little insight into its user experience. Which system do you prefer having proven usability data for?
Shiji Daylight PMS boasts 98 features, including guest profiles, multi-lingual support, online check-in/out, integrated CRS, payment processing, housekeeping modules, and automation tools. Many features enable operational efficiency and guest personalization, supporting complex hotel workflows.
TTLock does not list any features or integrations, focusing solely on lock management. Its limited scope makes it unsuitable for managing reservations, billing, or guest data. Do you need a feature-rich management system or just access control?
Shiji Daylight PMS has a 4.53 out of 5 support rating from 32 reviews, with hoteliers praising its responsiveness, professionalism, and helpful training materials. Review quotes mention that the support team is a key asset in smooth operations.
TTLock has no available reviews or support ratings, making it impossible to gauge customer service quality. Reliable support is critical for hotel operations; without evidence, TTLock’s support is unverified. Do you prioritize proven support?
Shiji Daylight PMS integrates with 64 verified partners—including well-known solutions like SiteMinder, IDeaS, and Amadeus—facilitating seamless operation across booking engines, revenue management, and POS systems. This extensive ecosystem supports scalable and connected hotel management.
TTLock has only one verified partner, offering minimal integration potential and little support for comprehensive hotel workflows. If your hotel relies on multiple systems, Shiji’s more extensive integrations are indispensable. Which platform better aligns with your existing tech stack?
Shiji Daylight PMS’s review score of 74.68 and a 90% likelihood to recommend reflect strong user satisfaction, especially among luxury and branded hotels. Recent reviews emphasize its ease of use, support, and advanced features.
TTLock has no reviews or ratings, making it impossible to assess hotel satisfaction. Without user feedback, its value remains unverified. Would you trust a solution with proven positive reviews over an untested product?
Shiji Daylight PMS charges a base price of $1,200, with no mention of ongoing fees or trial options. Its pricing suggests a typical enterprise SaaS model, aligned with its feature complexity.
TTLock provides no pricing information, nor any details about licensing or subscription costs. Its lack of transparency and reviews makes it difficult to evaluate cost-effectiveness. Are you comfortable investing in a product with clear pricing versus an unknown?
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if:
Shiji Daylight PMS offers a complete, feature-rich property management system that has been widely adopted and positively reviewed. It’s best suited for hotels looking to streamline operations, enhance guest experience, and integrate with other hotel tech.
TTLock, in contrast, is a niche product limited to access control, with no reviews or detailed features available. Its simplicity may appeal to small properties only needing basic key management, but it lacks the scalability and proven support of Shiji.
If your hotel needs an all-in-one management solution, Shiji Daylight PMS is the more reliable choice. For straightforward access security without management complexity, TTLock might suffice, but with considerable limitations.
This comparison prioritizes the more widely adopted and reviewed product, Shiji Daylight PMS, based on current data and recent reviews.
Property Management Systems pricing is rarely straightforward. Here is what we know from each vendor's public pricing data. Always request a custom quote for your property size.
|
|
Sciener Smart Technology Co.,Ltd | |
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $1,200/mo | — |
According to HTR's product database, Shiji Daylight PMS and TTLock share 0 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
|
Sciener Smart Technology Co.,Ltd |
|---|---|---|
| Centralized user & role management | ||
| Guest profiles | ||
| Multi-lingual | ||
| Online Check-in | ||
| Tablet/Kiosk Check-in | ||
| Task Management |
Showing top differences. 86 more features differ between these products.
We analyzed 4 verified case studies to compare what hotels actually achieve with each platform across four key business objectives.
"All the big players don't offer the level of API connectivity we need, but Shiji does. From the early stages of our design process, we were confident that Shiji could provide us wi..."
No published case study for this goal yet.
"We reduced check-in time by over 80%, from up to eight minutes to just about one minute with the new system."
No published case study for this goal yet.
What hoteliers love
Users frequently praise Shiji PMS for its user-friendly interface, which simplifies daily operations and reduces the learning curve for new users. Thi... Users frequently praise Shiji PMS for its user-friendly interface, which simplifies daily operations and reduces the learning curve for new users. This ease of use is highlighted in reviews citing accessible training materials, intuitive design, and efficient task performance.
The supportive and responsive nature of the Shiji PMS support team is consistently mentioned positively. Users appreciate the professionalism and help... The supportive and responsive nature of the Shiji PMS support team is consistently mentioned positively. Users appreciate the professionalism and helpfulness of the support personnel, which greatly aids in smoother operations.
The implementation process of Shiji PMS is noted as smooth and efficient by several reviewers, who appreciate the knowledgeable and proactive implemen... The implementation process of Shiji PMS is noted as smooth and efficient by several reviewers, who appreciate the knowledgeable and proactive implementation team. However, a few users suggest that reducing the implementation timeline could further improve the experience.
Where hoteliers push back
While the detailed reporting features of Shiji PMS are largely appreciated, several users demand more advanced and faster reporting tools. Specific re... While the detailed reporting features of Shiji PMS are largely appreciated, several users demand more advanced and faster reporting tools. Specific requests include enhanced summary reports, detailed billing, and faster report generation processes.
Performance issues related to system speed and consistency are common concerns among users, with several noting slow response times during peak operat... Performance issues related to system speed and consistency are common concerns among users, with several noting slow response times during peak operations. Users urge improvements in system speed to enhance overall efficiency.
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. Shiji Daylight PMS and TTLock share many core Property Management Systems features, but each has unique capabilities. Shiji Daylight PMS offers 65 verified integration partners, while TTLock offers 1. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. Shiji Daylight PMS leads in ease of use at 4.6/5 vs 0.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
Shiji Daylight PMS: No. TTLock: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Property Management Systems vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. Shiji Group has an HT Score of 75 and Sciener Smart Technology Co.,Ltd has 0. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Custom recommendations tailored to your property