The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 85 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
Blastness shines in ease of use and customer support , with exclusive features like Integrated Payment Processing and Booking Performance and Pace Reporting.
Stay247 shines .
Side-by-side ratings based on 85 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | Contact sales | Contact sales |
| Verified Reviews | 85 | 0 |
After analyzing 85 verified reviews, Blastness users most value its channel management, support and assistance, revenue management, while Stay247 users highlight . Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
Stay247 |
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Channel Management
▾
|
|
|
+
Support and Assistance
▾
|
|
|
+
Revenue Management
▾
|
|
|
+
System Integration
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
How each product ranks among Channel Managers vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
Stay247 |
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | #11 32 reviews | — |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | #7 48 reviews | — |
| Large (75-199 rooms) | #33 0 reviews | — |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
Stay247 |
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #14 25 reviews | — |
| Luxury ▾ | #9 36 reviews | — |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | #11 18 reviews | — |
| Extended Stay | #17 3 reviews | — |
By Region
| Segment |
|
Stay247 |
|---|---|---|
| North America | #16 2 reviews | — |
| Europe ▾ | #7 83 reviews | — |
| Asia Pacific | #21 0 reviews | — |
Choosing between Blastness Channel Manager and Stay247 Channel Management hinges on your hotel’s specific needs and your team's priorities. Both aim to streamline distribution, but Blastness offers a comprehensive, feature-rich platform backed by active user feedback, while Stay247 remains unreviewed and less established. Your decision should consider which product aligns best with your operational complexity and growth ambitions.
Blastness’s extensive review history and high satisfaction ratings make it the more reliable choice for hoteliers seeking proven, support-backed solutions. Conversely, Stay247, with no reviews or recent user feedback, offers limited insight into its performance or user experience.
Blastness and Stay247 both target hotel distribution management, aiming to reduce manual work and prevent overbooking. However, Blastness’s platform is extensively reviewed, with 81 recent reviews, highlighting its strong reputation and ongoing improvements. Stay247, with zero reviews, offers no feedback on user satisfaction or system performance.
Blastness’s core strength lies in its detailed feature set, including inventory management, yield rules, multi-currency support, and real-time integrations, making it suitable for hotels with complex distribution needs. Stay247’s lack of review data leaves its capabilities and reliability unverified, raising questions about its effectiveness and support.
Are you looking for a tried-and-true solution with proven results, or are you open to exploring newer options that lack user validation?
If your hotel needs a dependable channel manager with proven customer satisfaction and a feature set that supports large and small properties alike, go with Blastness. Its 81 reviews and 4.88/5 support rating demonstrate a trusted solution with ongoing improvements and active customer engagement.
If your hotel is smaller, with less complex distribution needs, and you prefer a solution that might be less costly or less established, Stay247 could be considered—though the absence of reviews makes this a high-risk choice. For now, Blastness’s recent, detailed feedback makes it the safer, more effective investment.
Hoteliers prioritizing reliability, support, and advanced features should lean toward Blastness. Those willing to gamble on an unreviewed platform may consider Stay247, but with caution.
Blastness’s platform boasts a 4.84/5 ease of use rating based on reviews, with users describing its interface as intuitive and straightforward. Onboarding is rated at 4.76/5, and support team responsiveness is highly praised, with comments about quick replies and attentive service.
Stay247, however, has no available review data on ease of use or onboarding, making it impossible to assess how user-friendly or supportive its platform is. Without this information, you cannot confidently gauge whether Stay247 will be easy for your team to adopt.
Edge: Blastness.
Blastness offers 15 unique features, including yield rules, support for weekly/monthly rates, derived rates, inventory management, channel self-mapping, bulk updates, real-time integrations, PMS connectivity, multi-lingual support, and analytics dashboards. These functionalities address a broad range of distribution management needs, especially for hotels with complex operations.
Stay247, with no documented features or unique capabilities, lacks transparency about its offerings. Its absence of detailed feature information makes it impossible to compare directly, but Blastness’s clear advantage in capability and innovation is evident.
Edge: Blastness.
Blastness’s customer support is rated 4.88/5, with reviews emphasizing quick, professional, and helpful responses. Customers appreciate their proactive support, recurring meetings, and ongoing system improvements, highlighting a strong, committed support team.
Stay247 has no reviews or ratings regarding customer support, leaving its responsiveness and service quality unverified. Without user feedback, it’s impossible to assess its support standards.
Edge: Blastness.
Blastness boasts 15 verified integration partners, including Upsellguru, Oracle Hospitality, hotelcube, and others, facilitating seamless connectivity with multiple systems. These integrations enable comprehensive automation and data sharing across platforms, essential for larger or multi-property operations.
Stay247 has no verified integrations or partner data, which raises concerns about its connectivity and support ecosystem. Without established integrations, your team might face manual workarounds or limited automation.
Edge: Blastness.
Blastness’s high ratings, including a 79.32/100 overall score and a 98% likelihood of recommendation, reflect strong satisfaction among users. The reviews cover diverse hotel segments, with particularly positive feedback from properties seeking reliable, feature-rich solutions.
Stay247’s lack of reviews makes it impossible to gauge user perceptions or satisfaction. Until real users provide feedback, Blastness’s reputation remains the clear leader.
Edge: Blastness.
Blastness does not publicly disclose pricing, but it is typically offered as a paid service without a free trial, suggesting a premium model based on features and support. Stay247 lacks available pricing information, with no mention of subscription models or costs.
Given the absence of transparency, your best bet is to contact Blastness directly for a quote. Stay247’s unknown pricing makes it difficult to assess value or budget alignment.
Not ideal if your hotel is very small with minimal distribution needs or limited budget, especially given Blastness’s emphasis on advanced features and support.
Not ideal if your hotel requires robust features, proven reliability, extensive integrations, or active user support, given the lack of review data.
Blastness offers a mature, feature-rich platform with a strong user base, proven support, and recent, positive reviews. Its comprehensive functionalities make it suitable for hotels of all sizes seeking reliable distribution management, revenue optimization, and seamless integrations.
Stay247, lacking user feedback and detailed capabilities, remains an untested option. Its unverified status suggests caution—unless your hotel’s needs are minimal and you’re willing to accept higher risk.
If your priority is proven performance and ongoing support, Blastness is the clear choice. If you’re exploring untested solutions with no reviews, Stay247 might be worth considering, but only with a clear understanding of its unverified status.
In conclusion, for most hotels looking for confidence backed by recent reviews and detailed features, Blastness stands out as the more dependable, well-supported platform.
According to HTR's product database, Blastness Channel Manager and Stay247 Channel Management share 0 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
|
Stay247 |
|---|---|---|
| Channel Self-Mapping | ||
| Derived Rates | ||
| Inventory Management | ||
| Inventory grid | ||
| Support for Weekly & Monthly Rates | ||
| Yield Rules |
Showing top differences. 3 more features differ between these products.
We analyzed 3 verified case studies to compare what hotels actually achieve with each platform across four key business objectives.
"The constant evolution of tools such as Business Intelligence and RMS, which my team and I use on a daily basis, has led to very interesting results."
No published case study for this goal yet.
"Thanks to Blastness, we not only increased our direct bookings and RevPAR, but also gained the confidence to make smarter, data-driven decisions that shape the future of our resort..."
No published case study for this goal yet.
What hoteliers love
The Blastness Channel Manager is noted for its real-time synchronization, consistent availability and pricing, reducing overbooking risks. Users find... The Blastness Channel Manager is noted for its real-time synchronization, consistent availability and pricing, reducing overbooking risks. Users find it intuitive and crucial for streamlined distribution management across multiple channels.
While Blastness is commended for its excellent and prompt customer support, a few users suggest extending support hours, including weekends, to better... While Blastness is commended for its excellent and prompt customer support, a few users suggest extending support hours, including weekends, to better address urgent issues.
Reviewers highlight the effectiveness of Blastness' Revenue Management System (RMS) in optimizing pricing strategies and forecasting. Its data-driven... Reviewers highlight the effectiveness of Blastness' Revenue Management System (RMS) in optimizing pricing strategies and forecasting. Its data-driven approach allows for dynamic pricing, enhancing overall profitability.
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. Blastness Channel Manager and Stay247 Channel Management share many core Channel Managers features, but each has unique capabilities. Blastness Channel Manager offers 15 verified integration partners, while Stay247 Channel Management offers 0. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. Blastness Channel Manager leads in ease of use at 4.8/5 vs 0.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
Blastness Channel Manager: No. Stay247 Channel Management: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Channel Managers vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. Blastness has an HT Score of 79 and Stay247 has 0. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor