The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 1,255 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
Cloudbeds shines in ease of use and customer support — especially for independent properties (4.5/5) , with exclusive features like Integrated Payment Processing and Booking Performance and Pace Reporting.
Szallas shines .
Side-by-side ratings based on 1,255 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | From $200/mo | Contact sales |
| Verified Reviews | 1,255 | 0 |
After analyzing 1,255 verified reviews, Cloudbeds users most value its ease of use and intuitive design, real-time synchronization, all-in-one platform integration, while Szallas users highlight . Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
Szallas |
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Ease of use and intuitive design
▾
|
|
|
+
Real-time synchronization
▾
|
|
|
+
All-in-one platform integration
▾
|
|
|
+
Reporting and analytics
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Customization limitations
▾
|
|
|
−
Speed and performance issues
▾
|
|
|
−
Website builder limitations
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Channel Managers vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
Szallas |
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | #3 572 reviews | — |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | #5 171 reviews | — |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | #4 42 reviews | — |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) | #11 4 reviews | — |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
Szallas |
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #2 484 reviews | — |
| Luxury ▾ | #4 213 reviews | — |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | #4 108 reviews | — |
| Extended Stay ▾ | #2 92 reviews | — |
By Region
| Segment |
|
Szallas |
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | #1 405 reviews | — |
| Europe ▾ | #4 183 reviews | — |
| Asia Pacific ▾ | #4 231 reviews | — |
| Middle East ▾ | #6 14 reviews | — |
Choosing between Cloudbeds’ Channel Manager (myallocator) and Szallas hinges on your hotel’s specific needs for integration, features, and support. Cloudbeds, with its extensive history and proven track record, addresses a broad spectrum of hotel operations, while Szallas offers a more limited feature set without recent user reviews to validate its performance. Which one aligns better with your operational goals?
If your focus is on a highly reliable, feature-rich platform with a large user base and proven support, Cloudbeds is the clear leader. Szallas’s lack of recent reviews and limited integrations make it a less certain choice for hotels aiming to scale or optimize distribution.
Cloudbeds serves a wide array of hotel types, from boutique hotels and hostels to larger resorts, with over 1,062 recent reviews and a 4.64/5 overall rating. Szallas, by comparison, has no publicly available reviews or ratings, making its performance and reliability unverified.
Cloudbeds offers a comprehensive platform that combines PMS connectivity, analytics, inventory management, and multi-channel distribution—all within a single system. Szallas’s limited feature set and absence of verified integrations suggest it may lack the robustness needed for complex operations. Are you willing to rely on a platform with no recent user feedback?
If your hotel needs an integrated platform that manages reservations, distribution, and reporting in one place, go with Cloudbeds. Its extensive features, verified partner network, and proven scalability make it suitable for small independents to larger properties seeking growth.
If your primary goal is simple distribution without extensive feature needs, Szallas might seem attractive, but with no recent reviews or verified integrations, your team risks deploying a platform lacking proven reliability. For hotels planning to expand or optimize operations, Cloudbeds’s established reputation is the safer bet.
Cloudbeds boasts a 4.6/5 ease-of-use rating based on over 1,000 recent reviews, with many users citing its intuitive interface and straightforward onboarding. Its design minimizes staff training time, and users praise its clear dashboards and automation capabilities, though some mention occasional speed issues during peak periods.
Szallas has no recent reviews or user ratings available, preventing a meaningful comparison. However, the lack of publicly shared user experiences suggests it may not have been tested at scale or by diverse hotel teams. Edge: Cloudbeds.
Cloudbeds features 17 exclusive functionalities, including PMS connectivity, analytics dashboards, multi-currency support, yield management, and integrated payment processing. Szallas offers no such features or documented capabilities, making it difficult to evaluate its functionality.
Cloudbeds’s feature set supports complex multi-property management, automation, and detailed reporting, unlike Szallas’s unspecified offerings. When considering scalability and operational control, Cloudbeds’s features clearly provide an advantage. Edge: Cloudbeds.
Cloudbeds maintains a customer support rating of 4.41/5, with many reviews emphasizing responsive support and effective onboarding. Users frequently mention its “miles ahead” customer service, with rapid help and dedicated onboarding.
Szallas has no recent reviews or support ratings available, so its support quality remains unverified. Given the importance of reliable support in SaaS platforms, Cloudbeds’s established reputation makes it the more dependable choice. Edge: Cloudbeds.
Cloudbeds offers 190 verified partner integrations, spanning PMS, revenue management, payment gateways, and marketing tools. Szallas lacks publicly documented integrations, and there are no verified partner connections available.
This extensive integration network allows your hotel to customize and expand its tech stack, ensuring compatibility with existing systems. Szallas’s limited or unverified integrations could hinder operational flexibility. Edge: Cloudbeds.
Cloudbeds’s review score of 4.64/5 reflects consistent positive feedback from over 1,000 recent reviews, with hoteliers praising its ease of use and support across various hotel segments. Smaller hotels, boutique properties, and hostels specifically highlight its scalability and intuitive interface.
Szallas’s absence of recent reviews means its user satisfaction remains unverified. Without validation from hotelier feedback, Cloudbeds’s high rating underscores its proven value. Edge: Cloudbeds.
Cloudbeds charges a base monthly fee of $200, with no freemium or trial options listed. Pricing for Szallas is not publicly available, and no trial information is provided.
While Cloudbeds’s clear pricing helps with budgeting, the lack of transparent costs for Szallas makes it harder to evaluate ROI. For informed decision-making, Cloudbeds’s straightforward pricing is advantageous.
Not ideal if you prefer a minimalistic approach with only basic online distribution or are content with a less proven system.
Not ideal if your hotel plans to scale, require advanced automation, or need verified support and integrations.
Cloudbeds stands out as the most established and feature-rich channel management solution, backed by over a thousand recent reviews and a 4.64/5 rating. Its extensive integrations, support, and proven scalability make it ideal for hotels seeking operational efficiency and growth.
Szallas, lacking recent reviews and documented features, presents a more uncertain choice. Its absence of verified performance data makes it unsuitable for hotels prioritizing reliability and advanced management capabilities.
If you want a platform with proven performance, extensive features, and reliable support, Cloudbeds is the clear choice. For simple distribution needs and a lower-cost entry, Szallas might suffice—but with significant risks of unverified performance.
According to HTR's product database, Cloudbeds Channel Manager (myallocator) and Szallas share 0 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
|
Szallas |
|---|---|---|
| 2-way real time integrations | ||
| Analytics dashboard | ||
| Centralized user & role management | ||
| Inventory Management | ||
| Multi-lingual | ||
| PMS connectivity |
Showing top differences. 5 more features differ between these products.
We analyzed 8 verified case studies to compare what hotels actually achieve with each platform across four key business objectives.
"I have not worked with a company that has such good customer service as Cloudbeds has. It's miles ahead."
No published case study for this goal yet.
"The biggest benefit of Cloudbeds' platform is its flexibility. I can access reporting online from anywhere. Everything is smoother with Cloudbeds."
No published case study for this goal yet.
"Cloudbeds is like if Apple made a property management system. The ease of use is super simple and straightforward for guests and our staff. It’s very intuitive and just makes sense..."
No published case study for this goal yet.
What hoteliers love
The intuitive interface of Cloudbeds is highlighted positively by many users, who find it user-friendly for staff across all levels. This advantage re... The intuitive interface of Cloudbeds is highlighted positively by many users, who find it user-friendly for staff across all levels. This advantage reduces training time and enhances operational consistency, though some users still see room for improvement in advanced feature navigation.
The platform's real-time synchronization across different channels is highlighted as a critical feature. This provides users with up-to-date inventory... The platform's real-time synchronization across different channels is highlighted as a critical feature. This provides users with up-to-date inventory management, significantly reducing overbookings. Reviewers emphasize its importance in maintaining consistency across platforms like OTAs and direct bookings.
Many users praise Cloudbeds for its seamless integration of PMS, channel management, and booking engine, simplifying operations by reducing the need f... Many users praise Cloudbeds for its seamless integration of PMS, channel management, and booking engine, simplifying operations by reducing the need for multiple systems. This integration helps staff efficiently manage reservations, rates, and guest interactions in a centralized manner, boosting productivity and reducing errors.
Where hoteliers push back
While Cloudbeds supports essential functionalities, its customization options in areas such as website design, messaging, and reporting have been crit... While Cloudbeds supports essential functionalities, its customization options in areas such as website design, messaging, and reporting have been critiqued. Users seek more flexibility and control in tailoring these features to better meet specific business needs and improve guest experiences.
Though the platform generally performs well, some users report occasional speed bottlenecks and lag during peak operations, which can affect productiv... Though the platform generally performs well, some users report occasional speed bottlenecks and lag during peak operations, which can affect productivity. Faster load times and increased system responsiveness during high-traffic periods are desired improvements.
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. Cloudbeds Channel Manager (myallocator) and Szallas share many core Channel Managers features, but each has unique capabilities. Cloudbeds Channel Manager (myallocator) offers 189 verified integration partners, while Szallas offers 0. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. Cloudbeds Channel Manager (myallocator) leads in ease of use at 4.6/5 vs 0.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
Cloudbeds Channel Manager (myallocator): No. Szallas: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Channel Managers vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. Cloudbeds has an HT Score of 99 and Szallas has 0. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor