The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 58 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
Webxpay shines .
Zil Money shines in ease of use and customer support , with exclusive features like Recurring Payments and Mail Order Telephone Order (MOTO) Payments.
Side-by-side ratings based on 58 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | Contact sales | From $400/mo |
| Verified Reviews | 0 | 58 |
After analyzing 58 verified reviews, Webxpay users most value its , while Zil Money users highlight user-friendly interface, customer experience enhancements, payment processing speed. Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
| Webxpay |
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
User-Friendly Interface
▾
|
|
|
+
Customer Experience Enhancements
▾
|
|
|
+
Payment Processing Speed
▾
|
|
|
+
Customer Support
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Integration Capabilities
▾
|
|
|
−
Third-Party Integrations
▾
|
|
|
−
Approval Process
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Payments Processing Software vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment | Webxpay |
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | — | #1 9 reviews |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | — | #2 27 reviews |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | — | #3 12 reviews |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) | — | #3 2 reviews |
By Property Type
| Segment | Webxpay |
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | — | #3 17 reviews |
| Luxury ▾ | — | #3 15 reviews |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | — | #3 25 reviews |
| Extended Stay ▾ | — | #1 9 reviews |
By Region
| Segment | Webxpay |
|
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | — | #3 51 reviews |
| Asia Pacific | — | #3 0 reviews |
| Middle East | — | #2 1 reviews |
When evaluating payment processing software for your hotel, the core question is: which platform offers better reliability, features, and support? Webxpay and Zil Money serve similar needs but diverge significantly in their market presence, reviews, and feature sets. Webxpay, despite its zero reviews and ratings, presents a blank slate, whereas Zil Money has accumulated 54 recent reviews and a high customer recommendation score. Given this disparity, the more established and reviewed platform, Zil Money, clearly holds a stronger position for hoteliers seeking dependable payment solutions.
Are you looking for a platform with proven customer satisfaction and a broad feature set, or are you willing to explore an unreviewed provider? This comparison will help you determine which fits your hotel's needs based on usability, features, support, and overall value.
Webxpay and Zil Money aim to streamline hotel payments but approach this differently. Webxpay offers no reviews, features, or customer feedback, which makes assessing its practical value difficult. Zil Money, by contrast, boasts a comprehensive suite of 15 features, including pay-by-link, recurring payments, multi-currency support, and contactless payments, all backed by 54 recent hotel reviews.
The absence of user feedback on Webxpay raises questions about its operational stability and user experience, while Zil Money’s active review base suggests a trusted platform with proven capabilities. Do you prioritize a product with a track record, or are you comfortable experimenting with an untested solution?
If your hotel needs a straightforward, minimalistic payment platform, Webxpay might seem tempting—though its lack of reviews and features makes this uncertain. However, if your hotel requires a robust, multi-faceted payment system that integrates multiple payment types and supports international transactions, Zil Money is the clear choice, especially considering its 4.5/5 customer support rating and 87% likelihood to recommend.
For hotels seeking reliable, well-reviewed software with a proven track record, Zil Money offers verified integrations like Yanolja Cloud, extensive payment methods, and a user-friendly interface. Conversely, Webxpay’s untested platform is more suitable for hotels willing to take a risk on an unreviewed product with no demonstrated operational history.
Webxpay’s user experience is impossible to evaluate due to zero reviews and no publicly available usability ratings. Zil Money, on the other hand, scores 4.5 out of 5 for ease of use, with recent reviews praising its intuitive interface and simplified payment processes. Users highlight quick onboarding and straightforward navigation, which reduces setup time and accelerates adoption.
Given the clarity of positive feedback, Zil Money’s platform is more likely to be easily adopted by your team. Edge: Zil Money.
Webxpay offers no features, making it impossible to compare beyond the basic premise of payment processing. Zil Money provides 15 distinct features, including pay-by-link, recurring payments, multi-currency settlements, contactless payments, and payment splitting—capabilities that support complex hotel payment needs.
The absence of features in Webxpay makes Zil Money the more versatile option for hotels wanting comprehensive financial transaction management. Edge: Zil Money.
Webxpay’s customer support ratings are non-existent, providing no data on responsiveness or quality. Zil Money, with a support rating of 4.5/5, receives consistent praise for its responsiveness and professional service, though some reviews suggest room for faster responses.
Since support quality is essential for resolving payment issues swiftly, Zil Money’s established support infrastructure makes it the more reliable choice. Edge: Zil Money.
Webxpay has only one verified integration—Yanolja Cloud Solution—limiting its connectivity options. Zil Money offers no verified integrations currently, but its open API and extensive feature set suggest future expansion potential.
While Webxpay’s single integration may suffice for niche needs, Zil Money’s broader capabilities and existing partner network make it more adaptable as your hotel’s operational requirements grow. Edge: Webxpay (by a narrow margin due to current confirmed integrations).
Webxpay’s review count is zero, so it cannot be rated by hoteliers. Zil Money, with 54 recent reviews and an 87% likelihood to recommend, enjoys high customer satisfaction across various hotel segments, including luxury, mid-range, and budget hotels. Reviewers praise its ease of use, reliability, and customer support.
This high rating and recent feedback indicate Zil Money’s strong market presence and trustworthiness. Edge: Zil Money.
Webxpay does not disclose pricing details, and no trial or subscription information is available. Zil Money charges a $400 base price, with no free trial or tiered pricing listed, which could be a barrier for smaller hotels.
While Webxpay’s lack of pricing data makes comparison difficult, Zil Money’s transparent fee provides clarity for budgeting. Your hotel must weigh whether the platform’s features justify the upfront cost.
Not ideal if your hotel requires multiple payment methods, international support, or proven reliability. Due to lack of reviews and features, Webxpay is best for experimental or very small operations.
Not ideal if your hotel has very limited budgets or prefers a free, open-source system. Zil Money fits hotels that prioritize comprehensive payment management and reliable customer service.
Webxpay is an unreviewed, featureless platform with minimal information, making it unsuitable for hotels seeking reliability and proven capabilities. Zil Money, with its 54 recent reviews, high customer satisfaction, and extensive features, stands out as a dependable choice for hotels of all sizes.
Choosing Webxpay might be appropriate if you’re experimenting with minimal payment needs. However, for hotels aiming for stability, broad functionality, and strong support, Zil Money remains the clear leader.
This comparison underscores the importance of review-backed data and feature richness. Zil Money’s established presence and positive hotel reviews make it the safer, more effective choice for your hotel’s payment processing needs.
According to HTR's product database, Webxpay and Zil Money share 0 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature | Webxpay |
|
|---|---|---|
| Authorization Adjustments | ||
| Gratuity Function | ||
| Multi-Currency Settlements | ||
| Partial Capture | ||
| Pay by Link | ||
| Recurring Payments |
Showing top differences. 3 more features differ between these products.
What hoteliers love
Users frequently praise Zil Money for its intuitive and straightforward interface that simplifies invoicing, expense tracking, and other financial tas... Users frequently praise Zil Money for its intuitive and straightforward interface that simplifies invoicing, expense tracking, and other financial tasks. The platform’s ease of use reduces the onboarding time and enhances operational efficiency.
Several reviews indicate that minor improvements in customer experience, such as easing the verification process and reducing the time taken for setup... Several reviews indicate that minor improvements in customer experience, such as easing the verification process and reducing the time taken for setup, could make the platform even more efficient and user-friendly.
Several users highlight the speed and reliability of Zil Money's payment processing feature, which ensures timely transactions and supports the hotels... Several users highlight the speed and reliability of Zil Money's payment processing feature, which ensures timely transactions and supports the hotels' cash flow management.
Where hoteliers push back
Users value Zil Money's ability to integrate seamlessly with various accounting and financial software, which helps consolidate financial operations a... Users value Zil Money's ability to integrate seamlessly with various accounting and financial software, which helps consolidate financial operations and enhances efficiency.
Expanding integrations with more third-party applications is suggested by users, which would offer more flexibility and customization, catering to var... Expanding integrations with more third-party applications is suggested by users, which would offer more flexibility and customization, catering to varying business needs.
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. Webxpay and Zil Money share many core Payments Processing Software features, but each has unique capabilities. Webxpay offers 1 verified integration partners, while Zil Money offers 0. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. Zil Money leads in ease of use at 4.5/5 vs 0.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
Webxpay: No. Zil Money: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Payments Processing Software vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. Webxpay has an HT Score of 0 and Zil Money has 63. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor