The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
Resumen
Analizamos 550 reseñas verificadas de hoteleros, comparamos funcionalidades, precios y casos de estudio reales para desglosar dónde destaca cada plataforma. La elección correcta depende de tu tipo de propiedad y prioridades:
HOTELTIME destaca en ease of use and customer support — especialmente para propiedades brand (4.9/5) , con funcionalidades exclusivas como Payment processing and Guest CRM.
Marriott International destaca .
Calificaciones comparadas basadas en 550 reseñas verificadas de hoteleros en HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Probabilidad de recomendar |
|
|
| Facilidad de uso |
|
|
| Soporte al cliente |
|
|
| Relación calidad-precio |
|
|
| Precio inicial | From $600/mo | Contact sales |
| Reseñas verificadas | 549 | 1 |
Tras analizar 550 reseñas verificadas, los usuarios de HOTELTIME valoran más su user interface and learning curve, apoyo técnico, reporting and analytics, mientras que los usuarios de Marriott International destacan . Haz clic en cualquier tema para ver qué dicen los evaluadores.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
User Interface and Learning Curve
▾
|
|
|
+
Apoyo técnico
▾
|
|
|
+
Reporting and Analytics
▾
|
|
|
+
System Stability and Updates
▾
|
|
| Contras | |
|
−
Customization Options
▾
|
|
|
−
Automation Features
▾
|
|
|
−
Optimización móvil
▾
|
|
Cómo se posiciona cada producto entre los proveedores de Sistemas de gestión de propiedades para diferentes tamaños de propiedad, tipos y regiones, basado en reseñas verificadas de hoteleros en cada segmento.
Por tamaño de hotel
| Segmento |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Pequeño (10-24 habitaciones) ▾ | #5 219 reseñas | — |
| Mediano (25-74 habitaciones) ▾ | #3 238 reseñas | #59 1 reseñas |
| Grande (75-199 habitaciones) ▾ | #2 46 reseñas | — |
| Extra grande (200+ habitaciones) ▾ | #8 7 reseñas | — |
Por tipo de propiedad
| Segmento |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #5 239 reseñas | #68 1 reseñas |
| Lujo ▾ | #3 241 reseñas | — |
| Cadena / Marca ▾ | #4 143 reseñas | #60 1 reseñas |
| Estancia prolongada ▾ | #4 49 reseñas | — |
Por región
| Segmento |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Norteamérica | #52 4 reseñas | #43 1 reseñas |
| Europa ▾ | #2 384 reseñas | — |
| Asia Pacífico ▾ | #5 111 reseñas | — |
| Medio Oriente ▾ | #1 21 reseñas | — |
Choosing between HotelTime PMS by HOTELTIME and FOSSE by Marriott International hinges on your hotel’s size, operational complexity, and your team's needs. Both systems aim to streamline hotel operations, but they differ significantly in features, user experience, and support. HotelTime offers a comprehensive, cloud-based platform with a high user rating, whereas FOSSE is a proprietary system with limited recent reviews and a narrower feature set. Which aligns better with your hotel’s goals?
HotelTime PMS stands out with over 430 recent reviews, a 4.83/5 overall rating, and a 93% likelihood to recommend, making it the more trusted and validated option. FOSSE, by contrast, has only a single review in the past six months and a low 2/5 rating, indicating limited recent user satisfaction. For hotels seeking a proven, well-supported PMS, HotelTime is the more reliable choice.
HotelTime PMS and FOSSE are designed to automate and simplify hotel management, but they approach this goal differently. HotelTime provides a feature-rich, cloud-based system with extensive integrations, automation, and a broad user base. FOSSE, as Marriott’s proprietary solution, offers core reservation and guest management capabilities but lacks many advanced features found in HotelTime.
Where they diverge most sharply is in user feedback and system maturity. HotelTime’s recent reviews emphasize its stability, customer support, and ease of use, while FOSSE’s reviews are sparse, older, and critical of usability. Do you prioritize a system with a significant, recent user base and continuous improvements? Or are you comfortable with a more limited, internally managed solution?
If your hotel needs a flexible, scalable PMS with extensive third-party integrations, choose HotelTime. It’s suitable for properties of all sizes, including resorts, boutique hotels, and chains, thanks to its 51 unique features and widespread adoption across 20+ countries.
If your hotel is part of Marriott’s ecosystem and you prioritize a system designed for motels or similar properties, FOSSE might seem appropriate. However, given its limited reviews and low satisfaction ratings, HotelTime’s proven track record makes it the safer investment for most hotels.
HotelTime’s user interface is highly rated at 4.66/5, with many reviews praising its intuitive design and quick onboarding process. Its support team is known for responsiveness, helping staff adopt the system efficiently.
FOSSE, with a 2/5 ease-of-use rating and no recent reviews, faces criticism for its lack of a graphical user interface and complex, menu-heavy operation. Users report that FOSSE is less accessible and more time-consuming to learn and operate.
Edge: HotelTime PMS.
HotelTime boasts 51 exclusive features, including integrated CRS, payment processing, guest CRM, automated night audits, mobile check-in, and more—covering operational needs comprehensively. It also supports ancillary revenue tracking, custom rates, and real-time reporting.
FOSSE offers the core functions—reservations, check-ins, billing—but lacks many of the advanced capabilities available in HotelTime. Its feature set appears minimal and not well documented, which limits its usefulness for complex operations.
Edge: HotelTime PMS.
HotelTime’s support team scores 4.73/5, with reviews highlighting quick responses, helpful training, and ongoing assistance. Users commend its responsiveness, especially for international hotels needing timely help.
FOSSE’s support ratings and recent feedback are unavailable, and the limited reviews suggest a less proactive or responsive support system. Given the importance of reliable support for hotel operations, HotelTime’s customer service provides a decisive advantage.
Edge: HotelTime PMS.
HotelTime integrates with 58 verified partners, including third-party booking engines, revenue management tools, and POS systems. Its wide-ranging integrations allow hotels to customize their tech stack effectively.
FOSSE, with only 2 verified partners, offers limited connectivity, primarily within the Marriott ecosystem. Its narrow integration scope constrains flexibility and adaptability for hotels using multiple third-party solutions.
Edge: HotelTime PMS.
HotelTime’s recent reviews indicate a 4.83/5 rating, with 27 reviews in the last six months, and a 93% likelihood to recommend, showing strong, current user satisfaction. Hotels across various segments, especially boutique and resort properties, praise its ease of use and support.
FOSSE has only one recent review, rating it 2/5, and no current feedback, reflecting limited or declining satisfaction. Hotels seeking a highly-rated system should favor HotelTime.
Edge: HotelTime PMS.
HotelTime charges a flat monthly fee of $600, with no implementation or trial fees. Pricing includes a broad set of features appropriate for diverse property types.
FOSSE’s pricing details are unavailable publicly, but as a Marriott proprietary system, it’s likely included within broader corporate agreements or licensing fees. The explicit cost is less transparent and may involve contractual commitments.
Not ideal if your hotel is very small or operates with minimal technology needs, as HotelTime’s extensive features may be more than necessary.
Not ideal if your hotel requires modern UI, extensive integrations, or comprehensive automation—FOSSE’s limited features and older review data suggest it may not meet evolving hotel needs.
The core difference is that HotelTime offers a modern, cloud-based, feature-packed system with a strong user base and recent positive reviews. FOSSE, by comparison, is an older, internal Marriott system with limited recent feedback and fewer features.
For hotels seeking a proven, versatile, and well-supported PMS, HotelTime is the clear winner due to its extensive features, ease of use, and recent high ratings. It suits properties of all sizes, especially those wanting to automate and integrate their operations.
If your hotel is part of Marriott and your needs are basic, FOSSE might suffice, but its limited recent reviews and user dissatisfaction suggest it’s not the best choice for most independent or competitive properties.
In summary, HotelTime provides a more reliable, scalable, and user-rated solution, making it the better investment for most hotels aiming to improve operational efficiency and guest experience.
Los precios de Sistemas de gestión de propiedades rara vez son sencillos. Esto es lo que sabemos de los datos de precios públicos de cada proveedor. Solicita siempre un presupuesto personalizado para el tamaño de tu propiedad.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $600/mo | — |
Según la base de datos de productos de HTR, HotelTime PMS y FOSSE comparten 0 funcionalidades. Estas son las diferencias clave: funcionalidades que uno tiene y el otro no.
| Funcionalidad |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| CRM invitado | ||
| CRS integrado | ||
| Epopeya | ||
| Procesando pago | ||
| Seguimiento de ingresos auxiliares | ||
| Vista de calendario |
Mostrando las principales diferencias. 39 funcionalidades más difieren entre estos productos.
Analizamos 8 casos de estudio verificados para comparar lo que los hoteles realmente logran con cada plataforma en cuatro objetivos clave de negocio.
"We needed to change an on-site system we were using as we wanted to move our operation forward. We achieved that with HotelTime systems. They are reliable, and stable and offer fea..."
Aún no hay caso de estudio publicado para este objetivo.
"In 2018 we were choosing a system for our first completely self-service ART and design hotel. We decided on HotelTime and after 4 years I have to say that the choice was the right..."
Aún no hay caso de estudio publicado para este objetivo.
Lo que les encanta a los hoteleros
While the system’s intuitive interface and ease of learning are generally appreciated, a few users mention initial challenges due to the complexity of... While the system’s intuitive interface and ease of learning are generally appreciated, a few users mention initial challenges due to the complexity of features offered. Overall, once users become familiar with the system, it significantly enhances efficiency and simplifies hotel operations.
Si bien se agradece la naturaleza receptiva y servicial del equipo de soporte, algunas reseñas sugieren que un horario extendido para el soporte técni... Si bien se agradece la naturaleza receptiva y servicial del equipo de soporte, algunas reseñas sugieren que un horario extendido para el soporte técnico mejoraría aún más la experiencia del usuario, garantizando asistencia en todo momento, especialmente para los usuarios internacionales.
HotelTime's robust reporting features are praised for providing comprehensive data insights into occupancy, revenue, and customer satisfaction. Users... HotelTime's robust reporting features are praised for providing comprehensive data insights into occupancy, revenue, and customer satisfaction. Users appreciate the variety of reports available for management, yet some desire more customization and advanced visualizations within the tool itself to better suit individual hotel needs.
Donde los hoteleros objetan
Some users voice a need for more customizable features, particularly in terms of reporting and interface personalization, which would allow hotels to... Some users voice a need for more customizable features, particularly in terms of reporting and interface personalization, which would allow hotels to better tailor the PMS to their specific operational strategies and guest services.
The automation capabilities in HotelTime, such as invoice processing and reservation management, are frequently mentioned for saving significant time... The automation capabilities in HotelTime, such as invoice processing and reservation management, are frequently mentioned for saving significant time for staff. Users highlight these features as reducing manual workload and minimizing the risk of human error, although they also express a desire for enhanced automation in guest communication and reporting.
Mejor posicionado en
Capacidades únicas
Mejor posicionado en
Donde más difieren las calificaciones
Depende de tus requerimientos. HotelTime PMS y FOSSE comparten muchas funcionalidades principales de Property Management Systems, pero cada uno tiene capacidades únicas. HotelTime PMS ofrece 58 socios de integración verificados, mientras que FOSSE ofrece 2. Revisa la comparativa de funcionalidades anterior para ver en qué difieren antes de cambiar.
Los hoteles pequeños deben priorizar la facilidad de uso y una incorporación rápida. HotelTime PMS lidera en facilidad de uso con 4.7/5 vs 2.0/5. Busca precios transparentes y una opción de prueba o demostración. Filtra las reseñas en la página de cada producto por tamaño de propiedad para conocer la opinión de hoteles como el tuyo.
HotelTime PMS: No. FOSSE: No. Ninguno de los dos productos ofrece actualmente un nivel gratuito. La mayoría de los proveedores de Property Management Systems ofrecen demostraciones o pruebas. Solicita una de cada uno para evaluar antes de comprometerte.
El HT Score es un ranking compuesto que considera 4 grupos de criterios y más de una docena de variables para ayudar a los hoteleros a comparar objetivamente los productos de tecnología hotelera. HOTELTIME tiene un HT Score de 92 y Marriott International tiene 0. Así se calcula la puntuación.
| Grupo de criterios | Peso | Qué mide |
|---|---|---|
| Calificaciones y reseñas de clientes |
|
¿Qué tanto recomiendan los usuarios este producto? Puntuación de calificaciones, Volumen de reseñas, Participación de voz, Profundidad de reseñas, Antigüedad de reseñas, Casos de éxito ▾ El factor con mayor ponderación. Analiza las calificaciones promedio de satisfacción (probabilidad de recomendar, facilidad de uso, soporte, ROI), el total de reseñas en relación con los competidores de la categoría, la antigüedad de las reseñas (al menos 20 reseñas en los últimos 6 meses) y la participación de voz entre clientes hoteleros únicos para detectar sesgo de selección. |
| Ecosistema de socios |
|
¿Qué tanto recomiendan los socios tecnológicos a esta empresa? Recomendaciones de socios, Cantidad de integraciones, Calidad de integraciones ▾ Evalúa las recomendaciones de socios como votos de confianza de expertos, la cantidad de integraciones verificadas y la calidad del ecosistema, es decir, el promedio de HT Scores de los socios de integración. Los productos con ecosistemas de integración de mayor calidad tienen más probabilidades de ofrecer un stack tecnológico conectado. |
| Enfoque en el cliente |
|
¿Qué tan centrada en el cliente es esta organización? Soporte certificado, Consistencia de reseñas, Completitud del perfil ▾ Evalúa si la empresa ha obtenido la Certificación de Soporte al Cliente de HTR, mantiene una recolección consistente de reseñas a lo largo del tiempo (un indicador de cultura orientada al feedback) y mantiene los perfiles de producto completos con capacidades, capturas de pantalla, precios y funcionalidades. |
| Alcance, solidez y recursos |
|
¿Qué tan extenso es el alcance y los recursos de esta empresa? Alcance geográfico, Solidez, Recursos de la empresa, Puntuación de tendencia ▾ Mide la presencia global (países y regiones atendidos), los años en el negocio como indicador de estabilidad, el tamaño del equipo como indicador de recursos y una puntuación de tendencia basada en consultas de compradores, reseñas, recomendaciones de socios y actividad en prensa de los últimos doce meses. |
Las calificaciones y reseñas de clientes son con diferencia el factor más importante en el algoritmo del HT Score. HTR no acepta pagos a cambio de mejores posiciones en el ranking. Todas las reseñas son verificadas: solo profesionales de la industria hotelera con afiliaciones confirmadas pueden enviar calificaciones. Ver metodología completa del HT Score →
Asesor de recomendaciones de productos