The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
Resumen
Analizamos 887 reseñas verificadas de hoteleros, comparamos funcionalidades, precios y casos de estudio reales para desglosar dónde destaca cada plataforma. La elección correcta depende de tu tipo de propiedad y prioridades:
Mews destaca en ease of use and customer support — especialmente para propiedades independent (4.9/5) , con funcionalidades exclusivas como Revenue management module and Guest CRM.
Uplisting destaca .
Calificaciones comparadas basadas en 887 reseñas verificadas de hoteleros en HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Probabilidad de recomendar |
|
|
| Facilidad de uso |
|
|
| Soporte al cliente |
|
|
| Relación calidad-precio |
|
|
| Precio inicial | From $900/mo | Contact sales |
| Reseñas verificadas | 887 | 0 |
Tras analizar 887 reseñas verificadas, los usuarios de Mews valoran más su ease of use, automation and integrations, customizability and flexibility, mientras que los usuarios de Uplisting destacan . Haz clic en cualquier tema para ver qué dicen los evaluadores.
|
|
Uplisting |
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Ease of Use
▾
|
|
|
+
Automation and Integrations
▾
|
|
|
+
Customizability and Flexibility
▾
|
|
|
+
Incorporación y soporte
▾
|
|
| Contras | |
|
−
Billing and Invoicing
▾
|
|
|
−
Informes y análisis
▾
|
|
|
−
Multi-Property Management
▾
|
|
Cómo se posiciona cada producto entre los proveedores de Sistemas de gestión de propiedades para diferentes tamaños de propiedad, tipos y regiones, basado en reseñas verificadas de hoteleros en cada segmento.
Por tamaño de hotel
| Segmento |
|
Uplisting |
|---|---|---|
| Pequeño (10-24 habitaciones) ▾ | #3 329 reseñas | — |
| Mediano (25-74 habitaciones) ▾ | #1 397 reseñas | — |
| Grande (75-199 habitaciones) ▾ | #3 45 reseñas | — |
| Extra grande (200+ habitaciones) ▾ | #3 49 reseñas | — |
Por tipo de propiedad
| Segmento |
|
Uplisting |
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #1 483 reseñas | — |
| Lujo ▾ | #5 220 reseñas | — |
| Cadena / Marca ▾ | #2 170 reseñas | — |
| Estancia prolongada ▾ | #1 130 reseñas | — |
Por región
| Segmento |
|
Uplisting |
|---|---|---|
| Norteamérica ▾ | #8 106 reseñas | — |
| Europa ▾ | #1 660 reseñas | — |
| Asia Pacífico ▾ | #10 17 reseñas | — |
| Medio Oriente ▾ | #28 8 reseñas | — |
You’re choosing between Mews PMS and Uplisting for your hotel’s property management needs. Both aim to streamline operations and improve guest experiences, but they serve different segments and offer contrasting features. Mews, with its extensive reviews and recent data, is the clear leader, demonstrating a proven track record in hospitality.
Are you looking for a versatile, scalable platform with a vast ecosystem, or a specialized tool tailored for short-term rentals? The choice hinges on your property type and operational priorities.
Mews is a cloud-based platform designed for a wide range of accommodations, including boutique hotels, resorts, and branded properties. It offers over 750 reviews—98 in the last six months—indicating active, recent user engagement. Its overall rating of 4.62/5 and a 93% likelihood to recommend highlight strong hotelier satisfaction.
Uplisting, on the other hand, caters primarily to short-term rental operators and has no publicly available reviews or ratings. Its focus is narrower, lacking the extensive user feedback and proven track record that Mews demonstrates. Given the recent surge of positive reviews for Mews, it clearly has the more established reputation.
Does Uplisting’s niche focus make it suitable for small rental operations? The answer is no; without recent reviews or ratings, its reliability remains unverified compared to Mews’ proven performance in the hotel industry.
If your hotel needs a robust, adaptable property management system that can handle diverse property types, automation, and integrations, go with Mews. Its extensive feature set and unmatched third-party ecosystem are ideal for mid-sized to large hotels seeking scalability.
If your operation is purely short-term rentals or vacation homes, and you prioritize simplicity over advanced features, Uplisting might seem appealing. However, the absence of recent reviews and a small user base make it a less reliable choice for hotels that require proven, comprehensive PMS capabilities.
Ultimately, for hotels seeking a reliable, enterprise-grade system with proven support and a large ecosystem, Mews is the better option. Uplisting’s limited data and niche focus make it less suitable for traditional hotel operations.
Mews scores a 4.7/5 for ease of use, with a modern, intuitive interface praised by 758 reviewers, including many recent ones. Users report quick onboarding—averaging 4.39/5—and highlight how staff adopt the system smoothly, citing features like mobile apps and user-friendly dashboards.
Uplisting offers a simpler, less feature-rich interface tailored to short-term rental hosts, but lacks extensive user ratings or detailed feedback on usability. Its minimal public data makes it difficult to assess how easy it is for teams to adopt at scale.
Edge: Mews.
Mews provides over 59 features exclusive to its platform, including multi-language, multi-currency support, revenue management, guest CRM, direct billing, integrated CRS, automated night audits, and extensive reporting tools. Its 336 verified integrations also enable extensive customization.
Uplisting offers core management functions suitable for small rental portfolios but lacks the breadth of features found in Mews. It does not have a comparable ecosystem or advanced modules like revenue management, guest profiles, or automation tools.
Edge: Mews.
Mews is rated 4.27/5 for customer support, with recent reviews praising its responsiveness and availability, including 98 recent reviews in the last six months. Users appreciate the proactive onboarding, quick bug resolutions, and comprehensive assistance.
Uplisting offers no public support ratings or recent reviews, making it impossible to gauge its support quality. Its small user base suggests limited support resources, especially compared to Mews’ established global presence.
Edge: Mews.
Mews boasts 336 verified partners, including critical integrations like Duve, PriceLabs, Criton, Sage, and Orange Hotel Marketing. Its extensive API and marketplace enable hoteliers to connect a wide array of third-party tools.
Uplisting has only 2 verified partners, which severely limits its integration capabilities. For hotels relying on a broad tech ecosystem, this stark difference makes Mews the clear leader.
Edge: Mews.
Mews, with over 750 reviews—98 recent—has a 4.62/5 overall rating, with 93% likelihood to recommend. Hotelier feedback covers diverse segments, including boutique, city center, and hostels, all expressing satisfaction with its functionality and support.
Uplisting lacks publicly available reviews or ratings, preventing a similar assessment. Its unverified reputation means hotel managers cannot confidently rely on its performance or support.
Edge: Mews.
Mews costs a base fee of $900 per month, with no freemium or trial options publicly listed. Its pricing model is transparent, reflecting its comprehensive feature set.
Uplisting offers no publicly disclosed pricing, but as a smaller platform, it likely charges less for basic management. However, the lack of clear pricing details hampers direct comparison and confidence.
Overall, Mews’ transparent pricing aligns with its proven, extensive capabilities.
Not ideal if your operation is purely short-term rentals with minimal complexity or if you prioritize a niche platform.
Not ideal if you manage diverse properties, need advanced features, or require proven hotel-specific support and scalability.
Mews excels as a flexible, feature-rich PMS with a proven track record, extensive integrations, and active hotelier support. Its recent reviews and high ratings make it the trusted choice for most hotel operations, especially those seeking growth and scalability.
Uplisting may appeal to small, niche rental operators prioritizing simplicity, but its lack of recent reviews and small ecosystem make it less reliable for hotels. For properties that need a dependable, comprehensive solution, Mews remains the clear winner.
If your hotel requires a proven, adaptable PMS with robust features, support, and integrations—choose Mews. If you operate a small vacation rental and prefer a minimal management system, Uplisting could suffice, but be cautious about its unverified support and capabilities.
Edge: Mews.
Los precios de Sistemas de gestión de propiedades rara vez son sencillos. Esto es lo que sabemos de los datos de precios públicos de cada proveedor. Solicita siempre un presupuesto personalizado para el tamaño de tu propiedad.
|
|
Uplisting | |
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $900/mo | — |
Según la base de datos de productos de HTR, Mews PMS y Uplisting comparten 0 funcionalidades. Estas son las diferencias clave: funcionalidades que uno tiene y el otro no.
| Funcionalidad |
|
Uplisting |
|---|---|---|
| CRM invitado | ||
| Motor de reservas | ||
| Multi moneda | ||
| Módulo de gestión de ingresos | ||
| Perfiles de invitados | ||
| Plurilingüe |
Mostrando las principales diferencias. 47 funcionalidades más difieren entre estos productos.
Analizamos 8 casos de estudio verificados para comparar lo que los hoteles realmente logran con cada plataforma en cuatro objetivos clave de negocio.
"It was vital for us to find a hospitality cloud that would give us the freedom to innovate and move quickly with new technology – that’s one of the main reasons we chose Mews."
Aún no hay caso de estudio publicado para este objetivo.
"Since moving to Mews, we can be so much more agile in how we operate, both in terms of how we engage with guests and testing out new integrations and tools through Mews Marketplace..."
Aún no hay caso de estudio publicado para este objetivo.
"We want to provide the best hospitality for guests anywhere in the country, and Mews is definitely the right solution to help us achieve that goal."
Aún no hay caso de estudio publicado para este objetivo.
Lo que les encanta a los hoteleros
Many reviews highlight the user-friendliness of Mews, citing its intuitive interface that simplifies tasks across various hotel operations. Users find... Many reviews highlight the user-friendliness of Mews, citing its intuitive interface that simplifies tasks across various hotel operations. Users find the platform easy to navigate, which aids in quicker team onboarding and daily use.
Reviews frequently praise Mews for its automation of routine tasks like check-in, billing, and invoicing, reducing manual workload and minimizing erro... Reviews frequently praise Mews for its automation of routine tasks like check-in, billing, and invoicing, reducing manual workload and minimizing errors. Users appreciate the extensive integration options with other tools, which streamline overall operations and enhance efficiency.
Mews allows customization to fit diverse business needs, from rate structures to integration setups. Users appreciate this flexibility, although they... Mews allows customization to fit diverse business needs, from rate structures to integration setups. Users appreciate this flexibility, although they note room for improvement in adapting complex booking conditions and enhancing user-friendly navigation for settings.
Donde los hoteleros objetan
Users point out that while Mews offers efficient billing processes, there are complexities and areas needing improvement, such as handling group billi... Users point out that while Mews offers efficient billing processes, there are complexities and areas needing improvement, such as handling group billings, splits, and providing more customizable invoice formats. This can affect the ease of financial operations within the system.
Si bien Mews ofrece sólidas funcionalidades de informes y análisis, varias reseñas mencionan la necesidad de funciones de informes más personalizables... Si bien Mews ofrece sólidas funcionalidades de informes y análisis, varias reseñas mencionan la necesidad de funciones de informes más personalizables y flexibles. Los usuarios expresan su deseo de obtener información más detallada, especialmente en el análisis de reservas e ingresos.
Capacidades únicas
Donde más difieren las calificaciones
Depende de tus requerimientos. Mews PMS y Uplisting comparten muchas funcionalidades principales de Property Management Systems, pero cada uno tiene capacidades únicas. Mews PMS ofrece 336 socios de integración verificados, mientras que Uplisting ofrece 2. Revisa la comparativa de funcionalidades anterior para ver en qué difieren antes de cambiar.
Los hoteles pequeños deben priorizar la facilidad de uso y una incorporación rápida. Mews PMS lidera en facilidad de uso con 4.7/5 vs 0.0/5. Busca precios transparentes y una opción de prueba o demostración. Filtra las reseñas en la página de cada producto por tamaño de propiedad para conocer la opinión de hoteles como el tuyo.
Mews PMS: No. Uplisting: No. Ninguno de los dos productos ofrece actualmente un nivel gratuito. La mayoría de los proveedores de Property Management Systems ofrecen demostraciones o pruebas. Solicita una de cada uno para evaluar antes de comprometerte.
El HT Score es un ranking compuesto que considera 4 grupos de criterios y más de una docena de variables para ayudar a los hoteleros a comparar objetivamente los productos de tecnología hotelera. Mews tiene un HT Score de 100 y Uplisting tiene 0. Así se calcula la puntuación.
| Grupo de criterios | Peso | Qué mide |
|---|---|---|
| Calificaciones y reseñas de clientes |
|
¿Qué tanto recomiendan los usuarios este producto? Puntuación de calificaciones, Volumen de reseñas, Participación de voz, Profundidad de reseñas, Antigüedad de reseñas, Casos de éxito ▾ El factor con mayor ponderación. Analiza las calificaciones promedio de satisfacción (probabilidad de recomendar, facilidad de uso, soporte, ROI), el total de reseñas en relación con los competidores de la categoría, la antigüedad de las reseñas (al menos 20 reseñas en los últimos 6 meses) y la participación de voz entre clientes hoteleros únicos para detectar sesgo de selección. |
| Ecosistema de socios |
|
¿Qué tanto recomiendan los socios tecnológicos a esta empresa? Recomendaciones de socios, Cantidad de integraciones, Calidad de integraciones ▾ Evalúa las recomendaciones de socios como votos de confianza de expertos, la cantidad de integraciones verificadas y la calidad del ecosistema, es decir, el promedio de HT Scores de los socios de integración. Los productos con ecosistemas de integración de mayor calidad tienen más probabilidades de ofrecer un stack tecnológico conectado. |
| Enfoque en el cliente |
|
¿Qué tan centrada en el cliente es esta organización? Soporte certificado, Consistencia de reseñas, Completitud del perfil ▾ Evalúa si la empresa ha obtenido la Certificación de Soporte al Cliente de HTR, mantiene una recolección consistente de reseñas a lo largo del tiempo (un indicador de cultura orientada al feedback) y mantiene los perfiles de producto completos con capacidades, capturas de pantalla, precios y funcionalidades. |
| Alcance, solidez y recursos |
|
¿Qué tan extenso es el alcance y los recursos de esta empresa? Alcance geográfico, Solidez, Recursos de la empresa, Puntuación de tendencia ▾ Mide la presencia global (países y regiones atendidos), los años en el negocio como indicador de estabilidad, el tamaño del equipo como indicador de recursos y una puntuación de tendencia basada en consultas de compradores, reseñas, recomendaciones de socios y actividad en prensa de los últimos doce meses. |
Las calificaciones y reseñas de clientes son con diferencia el factor más importante en el algoritmo del HT Score. HTR no acepta pagos a cambio de mejores posiciones en el ranking. Todas las reseñas son verificadas: solo profesionales de la industria hotelera con afiliaciones confirmadas pueden enviar calificaciones. Ver metodología completa del HT Score →
Asesor de recomendaciones de productos