The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
Nous avons analyse 887 avis verifies d'hoteliers, compare les fonctionnalites, les tarifs et des etudes de cas reelles pour identifier les points forts de chaque plateforme. Le bon choix depend du type de votre etablissement et de vos priorites :
Acigroup se distingue .
Mews se distingue en ease of use and customer support — en particulier pour les etablissements independent (4.9/5) , avec des fonctionnalites exclusives comme Revenue management module and Guest CRM.
Notes comparees basees sur 887 avis verifies d'hoteliers sur HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Probabilite de recommandation |
|
|
| Facilite d'utilisation |
|
|
| Support client |
|
|
| Rapport qualite-prix |
|
|
| Prix de depart | Contact sales | From $900/mo |
| Avis verifies | 0 | 887 |
Apres analyse de 887 avis verifies, les utilisateurs de Acigroup apprecient surtout , tandis que ceux de Mews mettent en avant ease of use, automation and integrations, customizability and flexibility. Cliquez sur un theme pour voir ce que disent les evaluateurs.
| Acigroup |
|
|---|---|
| Avantages | |
|
+
Ease of Use
▾
|
|
|
+
Automation and Integrations
▾
|
|
|
+
Customizability and Flexibility
▾
|
|
|
+
Intégration et soutien
▾
|
|
| Inconvenients | |
|
−
Billing and Invoicing
▾
|
|
|
−
Rapports et analyses
▾
|
|
|
−
Multi-Property Management
▾
|
|
Comment chaque produit se classe parmi les fournisseurs Systèmes de gestion immobilière pour differentes tailles d'etablissements, types et regions — base sur les avis verifies d'hoteliers dans chaque segment.
Par taille d'hotel
| Segment | Acigroup |
|
|---|---|---|
| Petit (10-24 chambres) ▾ | — | #3 329 avis |
| Moyen (25-74 chambres) ▾ | — | #1 397 avis |
| Grand (75-199 chambres) ▾ | — | #3 45 avis |
| Tres grand (200+ chambres) ▾ | — | #3 49 avis |
Par type d'etablissement
| Segment | Acigroup |
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | — | #1 483 avis |
| Luxe ▾ | — | #5 220 avis |
| Enseigne / Chaine ▾ | — | #2 170 avis |
| Sejour prolonge ▾ | — | #1 130 avis |
Par region
| Segment | Acigroup |
|
|---|---|---|
| Amerique du Nord ▾ | — | #8 106 avis |
| Europe ▾ | — | #1 660 avis |
| Asie-Pacifique ▾ | — | #10 17 avis |
| Moyen-Orient ▾ | — | #28 8 avis |
Choosing the right property management system is critical for your hotel’s efficiency, guest satisfaction, and revenue growth. Both Acigrup PMS and Mews PMS aim to streamline operations, but their core differences are striking: Acigrup offers a less proven, less reviewed product, while Mews provides a highly rated, widely adopted platform with a robust ecosystem. With more recent reviews and a larger user base, Mews is clearly the more reliable choice. Are you ready to prioritize proven technology and extensive support?
Both systems address fundamental hotel management needs—reservations, check-ins, billing, and housekeeping—but they diverge sharply in maturity and feature depth. Acigrup PMS, with zero reviews and no recent user feedback, offers little transparency on its capabilities or scalability, leaving hoteliers in the dark about its true performance. Meanwhile, Mews PMS boasts over 750 recent reviews, a 4.62/5 overall rating, and a 93% likelihood to recommend, making its proven track record clear. Which system aligns with your need for stability and proven success?
Acigrup’s lack of recent data suggests it’s an untested option, whereas Mews leads with a comprehensive cloud-native platform supported by a vast ecosystem of integrations. Mews’s features include over 59 exclusive modules like revenue management, guest CRM, online check-in, and digital ordering—none of which Acigrup currently offers or has demonstrated. Do you want a reliable platform with proven capabilities, or a product with little market validation?
If your hotel needs a flexible, feature-rich PMS with a proven track record and extensive third-party integrations, go with Mews. Its customer base includes boutique, city-center, and hostel properties, with many praising its ease of automation and guest experience features. Conversely, if your hotel is a small, simple operation willing to risk unverified technology with no recent reviews, Acigrup might seem attractive, but its lack of support and functionality makes it less advisable.
Given that Mews has significantly more reviews—758 compared to none for Acigrup—and consistently high ratings, it’s the stronger choice for hotels seeking reliability, scalability, and ongoing innovation. Do you prefer investing in a platform with clear validation, or taking a gamble on an untested system?
Mews scores 4.7/5 for ease of use based on recent reviews from a diverse array of hotels, highlighting its modern interface and straightforward onboarding process. Reviewers describe it as “intuitive,” “thoughtfully designed,” and “easy to adapt,” even for staff with limited tech experience. In contrast, Acigrup’s usability is untested, with no recent reviews, making it impossible to judge whether it will be simple for your team.
The Mews onboarding process is supported by detailed training and responsive support, which many users praise for minimizing ramp-up time. Edge: Mews.
Mews offers a suite of 59 exclusive features including revenue management, guest CRM, online check-in, and an extensive marketplace of over 1,000 integrations, making it ideal for modern, tech-driven hotels. Acigrup, with no documented features or third-party integrations, provides no evidence of comparable capabilities. Its lack of data makes assessing its potential features impossible.
For hotels wanting a fully integrated, scalable system with advanced automation, Mews’s feature set is unmatched. Edge: Mews.
Mews’s customer support receives a 4.27/5 rating from over 98 recent reviews, with hoteliers praising their rapid response and helpful training. Many note that issues are addressed swiftly, and support is proactive in onboarding. Conversely, Acigrup’s support is unreviewed and unverified, with no recent feedback to suggest it can meet your hotel’s needs.
Given the importance of reliable support in technology adoption, Mews’s proven track record makes it the safer choice. Edge: Mews.
Mews integrates with 336 verified third-party partners—including channel managers, POS, revenue tools, and more—allowing for flexible customization. Acigrup has zero verified integrations documented, limiting its capability to adapt to your existing tech environment.
The extensive ecosystem of Mews ensures your hotel can scale and innovate without being locked into a siloed system. Edge: Mews.
Mews’s overall rating of 4.62/5, based on 758 recent reviews, indicates strong user satisfaction across segments like boutique hotels, hostels, and city-center properties. Hotels frequently mention its ease of use, automation, and support as key strengths. Acigrup, with no reviews, offers no data on user satisfaction.
The recent positive feedback for Mews demonstrates its reliability and value in the field. Edge: Mews.
Acigrup’s pricing details are unavailable, and the system appears to be offered without clear pricing models, which raises concerns about transparency. Mews charges a fixed monthly fee of $900, with no implementation or additional fees, providing clear cost expectations.
Given the importance of predictable budgeting and ROI, Mews’s transparent pricing makes it easier to evaluate value. Edge: Mews.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if:
Mews is a mature, feature-rich platform trusted by hundreds of hotels worldwide, supported by recent reviews and a large ecosystem. Its extensive automation, integrations, and proven support make it the clear choice for hotels aiming for operational excellence today and scalability tomorrow.
If your hotel needs a reliable, well-reviewed, and continuously innovating PMS, choose Mews. Its vast ecosystem and user satisfaction ensure your investment will support growth, efficiency, and guest loyalty.
However, if your operation is very small, with minimal needs, and you’re comfortable risking support and future scalability, Acigrup could be considered. But without recent validation, it’s a gamble.
In conclusion, go with Mews for peace of mind, proven results, and a future-proof platform that adapts to your needs.
La tarification des Systèmes de gestion immobilière est rarement simple. Voici ce que nous savons a partir des donnees tarifaires publiques de chaque fournisseur. Demandez toujours un devis personnalise pour la taille de votre etablissement.
| Acigroup |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $900/mo |
Selon la base de donnees produits de HTR, Acigrup PMS et Mews PMS partagent 0 fonctionnalites. Voici les differences cles — les fonctionnalites que l'un possede et que l'autre n'a pas.
| Fonctionnalite | Acigroup |
|
|---|---|---|
| CRM invité | ||
| Module de gestion des revenus | ||
| Moteur de réservation | ||
| Multi-devise | ||
| Multilingue | ||
| Profils d'invités |
Affichage des principales differences. 47 fonctionnalites supplementaires different entre ces produits.
Nous avons analyse 8 etudes de cas verifiees pour comparer ce que les hotels obtiennent reellement avec chaque plateforme sur quatre objectifs commerciaux cles.
Aucune etude de cas publiee pour cet objectif pour le moment.
"It was vital for us to find a hospitality cloud that would give us the freedom to innovate and move quickly with new technology – that’s one of the main reasons we chose Mews."
Aucune etude de cas publiee pour cet objectif pour le moment.
"Since moving to Mews, we can be so much more agile in how we operate, both in terms of how we engage with guests and testing out new integrations and tools through Mews Marketplace..."
Aucune etude de cas publiee pour cet objectif pour le moment.
"We want to provide the best hospitality for guests anywhere in the country, and Mews is definitely the right solution to help us achieve that goal."
Ce que les hoteliers apprecient
Many reviews highlight the user-friendliness of Mews, citing its intuitive interface that simplifies tasks across various hotel operations. Users find... Many reviews highlight the user-friendliness of Mews, citing its intuitive interface that simplifies tasks across various hotel operations. Users find the platform easy to navigate, which aids in quicker team onboarding and daily use.
Reviews frequently praise Mews for its automation of routine tasks like check-in, billing, and invoicing, reducing manual workload and minimizing erro... Reviews frequently praise Mews for its automation of routine tasks like check-in, billing, and invoicing, reducing manual workload and minimizing errors. Users appreciate the extensive integration options with other tools, which streamline overall operations and enhance efficiency.
Mews allows customization to fit diverse business needs, from rate structures to integration setups. Users appreciate this flexibility, although they... Mews allows customization to fit diverse business needs, from rate structures to integration setups. Users appreciate this flexibility, although they note room for improvement in adapting complex booking conditions and enhancing user-friendly navigation for settings.
Les points de friction pour les hoteliers
Users point out that while Mews offers efficient billing processes, there are complexities and areas needing improvement, such as handling group billi... Users point out that while Mews offers efficient billing processes, there are complexities and areas needing improvement, such as handling group billings, splits, and providing more customizable invoice formats. This can affect the ease of financial operations within the system.
Bien que Mews offre des fonctionnalités de reporting et d'analyse performantes, plusieurs avis soulignent le besoin de fonctionnalités de reporting pl... Bien que Mews offre des fonctionnalités de reporting et d'analyse performantes, plusieurs avis soulignent le besoin de fonctionnalités de reporting plus personnalisables et flexibles. Les utilisateurs souhaitent des analyses de données plus fines, notamment en matière de réservations et de revenus.
Fonctionnalites uniques
Ou les notes divergent le plus
Cela depend de vos besoins. Acigrup PMS et Mews PMS partagent de nombreuses fonctionnalites Property Management Systems de base, mais chacun a des capacites uniques. Acigrup PMS propose 0 partenaires d'integration verifies, tandis que Mews PMS en propose 335. Consultez la comparaison des fonctionnalites ci-dessus pour voir les differences avant de changer.
Les petits hotels devraient privilegier la facilite d'utilisation et une mise en service rapide. Mews PMS est en tete pour la facilite d'utilisation avec 4.7/5 contre 0.0/5. Recherchez une tarification transparente et une option d'essai ou de demonstration. Filtrez les avis sur chaque page produit par taille d'etablissement pour lire les retours d'hotels similaires au votre.
Acigrup PMS : Non. Mews PMS : Non. Aucun des deux produits ne propose actuellement d'offre gratuite. La plupart des fournisseurs Property Management Systems proposent des demonstrations ou des essais — demandez-en un a chacun pour evaluer avant de vous engager.
Le HT Score est un classement composite qui prend en compte 4 groupes de criteres et plus d'une douzaine de variables pour aider les hoteliers a comparer objectivement les produits technologiques hoteliers. Acigroup a un HT Score de 0 et Mews a 100. Voici comment le score est calcule.
| Groupe de criteres | Ponderation | Ce qu'il mesure |
|---|---|---|
| Notes et avis clients |
|
A quel point les utilisateurs recommandent-ils ce produit ? Score des notes, Volume d'avis, Part de voix, Profondeur des avis, Recence des avis, Etudes de cas ▾ Le facteur le plus fortement pondere. Analyse les notes de satisfaction moyennes (probabilite de recommandation, facilite d'utilisation, support, ROI), le nombre total d'avis par rapport aux pairs de la categorie, la recence des avis (au moins 20 avis sur les 6 derniers mois) et la part de voix parmi les clients hoteliers uniques pour detecter les biais de selection. |
| Ecosysteme partenaire |
|
A quel point les partenaires technologiques recommandent-ils cette entreprise ? Recommandations des partenaires, Nombre d'integrations, Qualite des integrations ▾ Evalue les recommandations des partenaires comme des votes de confiance d'experts, le nombre d'integrations verifiees et la qualite de l'ecosysteme — la moyenne des HT Scores des partenaires d'integration. Les produits avec des ecosystemes d'integration de meilleure qualite sont plus susceptibles de fournir un ensemble technologique connecte. |
| Orientation client |
|
A quel point cette organisation est-elle orientee client ? Support certifie, Regularite des avis, Completude du profil ▾ Evalue si l'entreprise a obtenu la certification HTR de support client, maintient une collecte d'avis reguliere dans le temps (un indicateur de culture axee sur le feedback) et tient a jour les profils produits avec les fonctionnalites, captures d'ecran, tarifs et caracteristiques. |
| Portee, perennite et ressources |
|
Quelle est l'etendue de la portee et des ressources de cette entreprise ? Portee geographique, Perennite, Ressources de l'entreprise, Score de tendance ▾ Mesure la presence mondiale (pays et regions desservis), les annees d'activite comme indicateur de stabilite, les effectifs comme indicateur de ressources, et un score de tendance base sur les demandes d'acheteurs, les avis, les recommandations de partenaires et l'activite presse des douze derniers mois. |
Les notes et avis clients sont de loin le facteur le plus important dans l'algorithme du HT Score. HTR n'accepte aucun paiement pour un meilleur classement. Tous les avis sont verifies — seuls les professionnels du secteur hotelier avec des affiliations confirmees peuvent soumettre des notes. Voir la methodologie complete du HT Score →
Conseiller en recommandations de produits