The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
Nous avons analyse 549 avis verifies d'hoteliers, compare les fonctionnalites, les tarifs et des etudes de cas reelles pour identifier les points forts de chaque plateforme. Le bon choix depend du type de votre etablissement et de vos priorites :
AsyaSoft se distingue .
HOTELTIME se distingue en ease of use and customer support — en particulier pour les etablissements brand (4.9/5) , avec des fonctionnalites exclusives comme Payment processing and Guest CRM.
Notes comparees basees sur 549 avis verifies d'hoteliers sur HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Probabilite de recommandation |
|
|
| Facilite d'utilisation |
|
|
| Support client |
|
|
| Rapport qualite-prix |
|
|
| Prix de depart | Contact sales | From $600/mo |
| Avis verifies | 0 | 549 |
Apres analyse de 549 avis verifies, les utilisateurs de AsyaSoft apprecient surtout , tandis que ceux de HOTELTIME mettent en avant user interface and learning curve, assistance technique, reporting and analytics. Cliquez sur un theme pour voir ce que disent les evaluateurs.
| AsyaSoft |
|
|---|---|
| Avantages | |
|
+
User Interface and Learning Curve
▾
|
|
|
+
Assistance technique
▾
|
|
|
+
Reporting and Analytics
▾
|
|
|
+
System Stability and Updates
▾
|
|
| Inconvenients | |
|
−
Customization Options
▾
|
|
|
−
Automation Features
▾
|
|
|
−
Optimisation mobile
▾
|
|
Comment chaque produit se classe parmi les fournisseurs Systèmes de gestion immobilière pour differentes tailles d'etablissements, types et regions — base sur les avis verifies d'hoteliers dans chaque segment.
Par taille d'hotel
| Segment | AsyaSoft |
|
|---|---|---|
| Petit (10-24 chambres) ▾ | — | #5 219 avis |
| Moyen (25-74 chambres) ▾ | — | #3 238 avis |
| Grand (75-199 chambres) ▾ | — | #2 46 avis |
| Tres grand (200+ chambres) ▾ | — | #8 7 avis |
Par type d'etablissement
| Segment | AsyaSoft |
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | — | #5 239 avis |
| Luxe ▾ | — | #3 241 avis |
| Enseigne / Chaine ▾ | — | #4 143 avis |
| Sejour prolonge ▾ | — | #4 49 avis |
Par region
| Segment | AsyaSoft |
|
|---|---|---|
| Amerique du Nord | — | #52 4 avis |
| Europe ▾ | — | #2 384 avis |
| Asie-Pacifique ▾ | — | #5 111 avis |
| Moyen-Orient ▾ | — | #1 21 avis |
Choosing the right property management system (PMS) is critical for your hotel's efficiency and guest experience. You’re evaluating AsyaSoft PMS by AsyaSoft and HotelTime PMS by HOTELTIME, both designed to streamline operations and improve management. While AsyaSoft offers no recent reviews or a clear customer base, HotelTime boasts over 400 reviews, a high recent review score, and a broad feature set. Which one best suits your hotel’s needs?
Both products aim to automate reservations, billing, and guest management. But where they diverge is in their market presence, feature depth, and user feedback—HotelTime clearly leads in recent user satisfaction and functionality.
AsyaSoft PMS has zero reviews and no publicly available ratings, making it impossible to gauge user satisfaction or real-world performance. HotelTime, by contrast, has over 430 reviews with an overall rating of 4.83 out of 5, and recent feedback from 27 users in the last six months, indicating active, current use.
While AsyaSoft’s lack of recent reviews makes it a risky choice, HotelTime’s consistently high ratings across ease of use, support, and value highlight its reliability. The real-world feedback on HotelTime emphasizes its operational benefits, unlike AsyaSoft’s minimal publicly available data. Are you comfortable choosing a PMS without recent user insights?
If your hotel needs a feature-rich, well-supported, cloud-based solution with proven customer satisfaction, HotelTime is the clear candidate. Its strong market presence, extensive reviews, and recent positive feedback make it trustworthy for properties of all sizes, especially those seeking comprehensive operational tools.
Conversely, if your hotel has very niche requirements or prefers a local, possibly bespoke solution, AsyaSoft’s lack of recent data might be acceptable. But in most cases, HotelTime’s broad feature set—including integrations, automation, and management tools—makes it the better choice for hotels seeking growth and efficiency.
HotelTime scores 4.66 out of 5 for ease of use, with reviewers praising its intuitive interface and straightforward onboarding. Its recent review highlights, like “simple, clear, and intuitive,” reinforce this, along with positive support interactions.
AsyaSoft, meanwhile, has no available ratings or reviews, leaving its user-friendliness unverified. Given the extensive positive user feedback on HotelTime’s usability, it is the safer bet for your team’s quick adoption. Edge: HotelTime.
HotelTime offers 51 unique features, including integrated CRS, payment processing, guest CRM, online check-in, automated night audit, and digital registration—capabilities that AsyaSoft lacks entirely. This comprehensive suite supports multi-channel management, revenue tracking, and guest engagement, making it suitable for complex hotel operations.
AsyaSoft’s offering is unverified, with no notable features listed or supported. With HotelTime’s broad feature set proven by user reviews, it’s the obvious choice for hotels that need more than just basic management. Edge: HotelTime.
HotelTime’s support is rated 4.73 out of 5, with reviews noting quick, helpful responses and ongoing assistance. Users praise the support team’s responsiveness and willingness to customize solutions, which translates into smoother onboarding and fewer operational headaches.
AsyaSoft’s customer support ratings are unavailable, and without recent reviews, support quality remains unverified. In a critical area like support, HotelTime’s transparent, high ratings make it the clear leader. Edge: HotelTime.
HotelTime has 58 verified integrations, including popular channels like Profitroom, Bookboost, and STR. These integrations facilitate smoother data flow, automation, and revenue management, making it easier to connect with existing systems.
AsyaSoft’s integration count is zero, indicating a likely reliance on manual processes or limited external connectivity. For a modern hotel looking to expand or optimize its tech stack, HotelTime’s extensive integrations provide a significant advantage. Edge: HotelTime.
With over 430 recent reviews, HotelTime’s 4.83/5 rating and a 93% likelihood to recommend reflect high satisfaction among diverse property types, from resorts to boutique hotels. Hotels particularly praise its ease of management, automation, and support.
AsyaSoft has no recent reviews or ratings, so hoteliers’ opinions are unavailable. Given the robust recent feedback for HotelTime, it clearly meets user expectations. Edge: HotelTime.
AsyaSoft’s pricing details are unavailable, suggesting it may not follow a standard SaaS model or lacks transparency. HotelTime charges $600 monthly, with no free tier or trial, reflecting a predictable, scalable pricing structure aligned with its extensive features.
If budget is a concern, the lack of pricing transparency for AsyaSoft complicates comparison. HotelTime’s transparent $600/month fee offers predictable value, especially given its feature set and support quality.
Not ideal if:
Edge: AsyaSoft.
Not ideal if:
Edge: HotelTime.
The core difference lies in their market presence and feature offerings. HotelTime is a modern, well-supported, feature-rich PMS with proven user satisfaction, while AsyaSoft provides no recent data or customer feedback, making it a risky choice.
If your hotel prioritizes reliability, automation, and extensive integrations, HotelTime is the clear winner with its proven track record and recent reviews. It supports your growth ambitions, reduces manual work, and enhances guest experiences.
Choose HotelTime if you want a system that’s trusted by hundreds of properties across continents, backed by active support, and continuously improved. If you’re comfortable with limited data and a potentially bespoke approach, AsyaSoft might suffice—but be aware of the risks involved.
Note: This comparison is based on the most recent and available data. Continuous review updates should be monitored to ensure your decision aligns with current product performance.
La tarification des Systèmes de gestion immobilière est rarement simple. Voici ce que nous savons a partir des donnees tarifaires publiques de chaque fournisseur. Demandez toujours un devis personnalise pour la taille de votre etablissement.
| AsyaSoft |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $600/mo |
Selon la base de donnees produits de HTR, AsyaSoft PMS et HotelTime PMS partagent 0 fonctionnalites. Voici les differences cles — les fonctionnalites que l'un possede et que l'autre n'a pas.
| Fonctionnalite | AsyaSoft |
|
|---|---|---|
| CRM invité | ||
| CRS intégré | ||
| Suivi des revenus annexes | ||
| Traitement des paiements | ||
| Vue Calendrier | ||
| Épopée |
Affichage des principales differences. 39 fonctionnalites supplementaires different entre ces produits.
Nous avons analyse 8 etudes de cas verifiees pour comparer ce que les hotels obtiennent reellement avec chaque plateforme sur quatre objectifs commerciaux cles.
Aucune etude de cas publiee pour cet objectif pour le moment.
"We needed to change an on-site system we were using as we wanted to move our operation forward. We achieved that with HotelTime systems. They are reliable, and stable and offer fea..."
Aucune etude de cas publiee pour cet objectif pour le moment.
"In 2018 we were choosing a system for our first completely self-service ART and design hotel. We decided on HotelTime and after 4 years I have to say that the choice was the right..."
Ce que les hoteliers apprecient
While the system’s intuitive interface and ease of learning are generally appreciated, a few users mention initial challenges due to the complexity of... While the system’s intuitive interface and ease of learning are generally appreciated, a few users mention initial challenges due to the complexity of features offered. Overall, once users become familiar with the system, it significantly enhances efficiency and simplifies hotel operations.
Bien que la réactivité et l'efficacité de l'équipe d'assistance soient appréciées, certains avis suggèrent que l'extension des horaires d'assistance t... Bien que la réactivité et l'efficacité de l'équipe d'assistance soient appréciées, certains avis suggèrent que l'extension des horaires d'assistance technique améliorerait encore l'expérience utilisateur, en garantissant une assistance permanente, notamment pour les utilisateurs internationaux.
HotelTime's robust reporting features are praised for providing comprehensive data insights into occupancy, revenue, and customer satisfaction. Users... HotelTime's robust reporting features are praised for providing comprehensive data insights into occupancy, revenue, and customer satisfaction. Users appreciate the variety of reports available for management, yet some desire more customization and advanced visualizations within the tool itself to better suit individual hotel needs.
Les points de friction pour les hoteliers
Some users voice a need for more customizable features, particularly in terms of reporting and interface personalization, which would allow hotels to... Some users voice a need for more customizable features, particularly in terms of reporting and interface personalization, which would allow hotels to better tailor the PMS to their specific operational strategies and guest services.
The automation capabilities in HotelTime, such as invoice processing and reservation management, are frequently mentioned for saving significant time... The automation capabilities in HotelTime, such as invoice processing and reservation management, are frequently mentioned for saving significant time for staff. Users highlight these features as reducing manual workload and minimizing the risk of human error, although they also express a desire for enhanced automation in guest communication and reporting.
Fonctionnalites uniques
Ou les notes divergent le plus
Cela depend de vos besoins. AsyaSoft PMS et HotelTime PMS partagent de nombreuses fonctionnalites Property Management Systems de base, mais chacun a des capacites uniques. AsyaSoft PMS propose 0 partenaires d'integration verifies, tandis que HotelTime PMS en propose 58. Consultez la comparaison des fonctionnalites ci-dessus pour voir les differences avant de changer.
Les petits hotels devraient privilegier la facilite d'utilisation et une mise en service rapide. HotelTime PMS est en tete pour la facilite d'utilisation avec 4.7/5 contre 0.0/5. Recherchez une tarification transparente et une option d'essai ou de demonstration. Filtrez les avis sur chaque page produit par taille d'etablissement pour lire les retours d'hotels similaires au votre.
AsyaSoft PMS : Non. HotelTime PMS : Non. Aucun des deux produits ne propose actuellement d'offre gratuite. La plupart des fournisseurs Property Management Systems proposent des demonstrations ou des essais — demandez-en un a chacun pour evaluer avant de vous engager.
Le HT Score est un classement composite qui prend en compte 4 groupes de criteres et plus d'une douzaine de variables pour aider les hoteliers a comparer objectivement les produits technologiques hoteliers. AsyaSoft a un HT Score de 0 et HOTELTIME a 92. Voici comment le score est calcule.
| Groupe de criteres | Ponderation | Ce qu'il mesure |
|---|---|---|
| Notes et avis clients |
|
A quel point les utilisateurs recommandent-ils ce produit ? Score des notes, Volume d'avis, Part de voix, Profondeur des avis, Recence des avis, Etudes de cas ▾ Le facteur le plus fortement pondere. Analyse les notes de satisfaction moyennes (probabilite de recommandation, facilite d'utilisation, support, ROI), le nombre total d'avis par rapport aux pairs de la categorie, la recence des avis (au moins 20 avis sur les 6 derniers mois) et la part de voix parmi les clients hoteliers uniques pour detecter les biais de selection. |
| Ecosysteme partenaire |
|
A quel point les partenaires technologiques recommandent-ils cette entreprise ? Recommandations des partenaires, Nombre d'integrations, Qualite des integrations ▾ Evalue les recommandations des partenaires comme des votes de confiance d'experts, le nombre d'integrations verifiees et la qualite de l'ecosysteme — la moyenne des HT Scores des partenaires d'integration. Les produits avec des ecosystemes d'integration de meilleure qualite sont plus susceptibles de fournir un ensemble technologique connecte. |
| Orientation client |
|
A quel point cette organisation est-elle orientee client ? Support certifie, Regularite des avis, Completude du profil ▾ Evalue si l'entreprise a obtenu la certification HTR de support client, maintient une collecte d'avis reguliere dans le temps (un indicateur de culture axee sur le feedback) et tient a jour les profils produits avec les fonctionnalites, captures d'ecran, tarifs et caracteristiques. |
| Portee, perennite et ressources |
|
Quelle est l'etendue de la portee et des ressources de cette entreprise ? Portee geographique, Perennite, Ressources de l'entreprise, Score de tendance ▾ Mesure la presence mondiale (pays et regions desservis), les annees d'activite comme indicateur de stabilite, les effectifs comme indicateur de ressources, et un score de tendance base sur les demandes d'acheteurs, les avis, les recommandations de partenaires et l'activite presse des douze derniers mois. |
Les notes et avis clients sont de loin le facteur le plus important dans l'algorithme du HT Score. HTR n'accepte aucun paiement pour un meilleur classement. Tous les avis sont verifies — seuls les professionnels du secteur hotelier avec des affiliations confirmees peuvent soumettre des notes. Voir la methodologie complete du HT Score →
Conseiller en recommandations de produits