The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
Nous avons analyse 887 avis verifies d'hoteliers, compare les fonctionnalites, les tarifs et des etudes de cas reelles pour identifier les points forts de chaque plateforme. Le bon choix depend du type de votre etablissement et de vos priorites :
AsyaSoft se distingue .
Mews se distingue en ease of use and customer support — en particulier pour les etablissements independent (4.9/5) , avec des fonctionnalites exclusives comme Revenue management module and Guest CRM.
Notes comparees basees sur 887 avis verifies d'hoteliers sur HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Probabilite de recommandation |
|
|
| Facilite d'utilisation |
|
|
| Support client |
|
|
| Rapport qualite-prix |
|
|
| Prix de depart | Contact sales | From $900/mo |
| Avis verifies | 0 | 887 |
Apres analyse de 887 avis verifies, les utilisateurs de AsyaSoft apprecient surtout , tandis que ceux de Mews mettent en avant ease of use, automation and integrations, customizability and flexibility. Cliquez sur un theme pour voir ce que disent les evaluateurs.
| AsyaSoft |
|
|---|---|
| Avantages | |
|
+
Ease of Use
▾
|
|
|
+
Automation and Integrations
▾
|
|
|
+
Customizability and Flexibility
▾
|
|
|
+
Intégration et soutien
▾
|
|
| Inconvenients | |
|
−
Billing and Invoicing
▾
|
|
|
−
Rapports et analyses
▾
|
|
|
−
Multi-Property Management
▾
|
|
Comment chaque produit se classe parmi les fournisseurs Systèmes de gestion immobilière pour differentes tailles d'etablissements, types et regions — base sur les avis verifies d'hoteliers dans chaque segment.
Par taille d'hotel
| Segment | AsyaSoft |
|
|---|---|---|
| Petit (10-24 chambres) ▾ | — | #3 329 avis |
| Moyen (25-74 chambres) ▾ | — | #1 397 avis |
| Grand (75-199 chambres) ▾ | — | #3 45 avis |
| Tres grand (200+ chambres) ▾ | — | #3 49 avis |
Par type d'etablissement
| Segment | AsyaSoft |
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | — | #1 483 avis |
| Luxe ▾ | — | #5 220 avis |
| Enseigne / Chaine ▾ | — | #2 170 avis |
| Sejour prolonge ▾ | — | #1 130 avis |
Par region
| Segment | AsyaSoft |
|
|---|---|---|
| Amerique du Nord ▾ | — | #8 106 avis |
| Europe ▾ | — | #1 660 avis |
| Asie-Pacifique ▾ | — | #10 17 avis |
| Moyen-Orient ▾ | — | #28 8 avis |
Choosing between AsyaSoft PMS and Mews PMS hinges on your hotel’s specific needs, the size of your operation, and your growth ambitions. While both promise to manage reservations and operations, their core strengths diverge significantly—AsyaSoft offers a minimal presence and limited features, whereas Mews is a comprehensive, cloud-based platform with a large, recent review base. Which solution better aligns with your hotel’s future?
AsyaSoft by AsyaSoft appears to target small, possibly local hotels with limited operational scope, evident from its zero reviews and lack of regional presence. In contrast, Mews boasts over 750 reviews, a 4.62/5 overall rating, and a presence in 54 countries, making it a globally recognized industry leader. Do you want a system that’s tried, tested, and widely adopted?
While AsyaSoft’s rating is nonexistent, Mews’s high scores in ease of use, support, and value—each above 4.2/5—highlight its maturity and user satisfaction. Mews’s recent reviews, especially those from hotels emphasizing enhanced operational efficiency, reinforce its reliability. Are you ready to invest in a proven platform with a broad ecosystem?
If your hotel needs a flexible, feature-rich system capable of scaling across multiple properties, Mews is the clear choice. It’s especially suitable for boutique hotels, hostels, and chains eager for automation, integrations, and modern guest experiences. If your hotel is small, with limited operations and no regional expansion plans, AsyaSoft could suffice—though its lack of recent reviews raises questions about long-term viability.
For hotels prioritizing guest convenience, automation, and growth, Mews’s extensive feature set—including booking engine, guest CRM, channel management, and reporting—delivers immediate value. Conversely, AsyaSoft’s limited profile suggests it’s more of a local, perhaps legacy, solution without the capacity to support complex or expanding operations. Which aligns better with your strategic goals?
Mews scores 4.7/5 for ease of use, with recent reviews praising its intuitive interface and straightforward onboarding. Hotels like Leven Manchester and The Neighborhood Hotel commend its modern design and simple navigation, with many noting quick setup times. Its cloud-native platform allows staff to work remotely, further enhancing usability.
AsyaSoft’s UI and onboarding experience are unreviewed, but given its negligible review count, user feedback is unavailable. The absence of recent data suggests it may lack the refinements and modern design features that make Mews so user-friendly. Edge: Mews.
Mews offers 59 unique features, including multi-lingual and multi-currency support, revenue management, integrated channel management, guest CRM, online check-in, and real-time reporting. Its open API and marketplace enable extensive customization, with integrations that cover payments, housekeeping, group bookings, and more.
AsyaSoft has no verified features or integrations listed, indicating a minimal or legacy system that likely lacks the advanced functionalities needed for today’s hospitality demands. The sheer volume and depth of Mews’s features provide your team with tools to optimize operations and guest experiences. Edge: Mews.
Mews’s support scores 4.27/5, with recent reviews reflecting prompt responsiveness and ongoing updates. Hotels like The Julius Prague and Hotel Lancaster appreciate Mews’s support teams, citing quick bug fixes and helpful onboarding, especially through its 24/7 live chat and onboarding programs.
AsyaSoft’s review score is unrecorded; with no recent reviews, support quality remains unverified. The lack of feedback and regional presence suggests limited support options, which could hinder your team’s adoption and troubleshooting. Edge: Mews.
Mews integrates with over 336 verified partners, including top channel managers, revenue management systems, and payment providers. Its open API and Mews Marketplace offer access to over 1,000 third-party apps, enabling a tailored tech stack for your hotel.
AsyaSoft has no listed verified integrations, likely limiting its ability to connect with other essential hotel systems. For hotels seeking a connected, scalable ecosystem, Mews’s extensive integrations are a decisive advantage. Edge: Mews.
With over 750 reviews, Mews’s hotelier ratings—4.62/5 overall—are both recent and consistent. Hotels across segments, from boutique to large chains, praise its ease of use, support, and feature set.
AsyaSoft’s rating is nonexistent, and there are no recent reviews or property ratings to consider. The Mews user base’s positive feedback underscores its reliability for modern hotels. Edge: Mews.
AsyaSoft does not publicly disclose pricing, which suggests a bespoke or limited model, possibly with high customization costs. Mews charges a base fee of $900/month, with no implementation or setup fees, providing a transparent, predictable cost structure.
Without clear pricing for AsyaSoft, it’s difficult to compare value directly. However, Mews’s known pricing aligns with its comprehensive features and global support, making it a worthwhile investment for scalable growth. Edge: Mews.
Not ideal if your hotel aims for expansion, automation, or integration with third-party tools. AsyaSoft’s limited features and lack of recent reviews make it less suitable for modern, growth-oriented operations.
Not ideal if your property is very small, with minimal operational complexity, or if you prefer a legacy system with limited support. Mews’s broad capabilities and recent positive reviews suit ambitious hotels aiming for operational excellence.
Mews offers a modern, feature-rich platform supported by a large, active user base and recent reviews. Its cloud-native design supports automation, integrations, and scalability—crucial for hotels wanting to grow efficiently.
Choose Mews if your hotel needs advanced tools, international support, and a system that evolves with hospitality technology. If your operation is tiny, local, and needs only basic management, AsyaSoft might suffice, though its lack of recent reviews signals caution.
For most growing or modern hotels, Mews stands out as the more reliable, scalable, and feature-packed choice. It’s the platform designed to meet the demands of today’s hospitality industry—and tomorrow’s.
La tarification des Systèmes de gestion immobilière est rarement simple. Voici ce que nous savons a partir des donnees tarifaires publiques de chaque fournisseur. Demandez toujours un devis personnalise pour la taille de votre etablissement.
| AsyaSoft |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $900/mo |
Selon la base de donnees produits de HTR, AsyaSoft PMS et Mews PMS partagent 0 fonctionnalites. Voici les differences cles — les fonctionnalites que l'un possede et que l'autre n'a pas.
| Fonctionnalite | AsyaSoft |
|
|---|---|---|
| CRM invité | ||
| Module de gestion des revenus | ||
| Moteur de réservation | ||
| Multi-devise | ||
| Multilingue | ||
| Profils d'invités |
Affichage des principales differences. 47 fonctionnalites supplementaires different entre ces produits.
Nous avons analyse 8 etudes de cas verifiees pour comparer ce que les hotels obtiennent reellement avec chaque plateforme sur quatre objectifs commerciaux cles.
Aucune etude de cas publiee pour cet objectif pour le moment.
"It was vital for us to find a hospitality cloud that would give us the freedom to innovate and move quickly with new technology – that’s one of the main reasons we chose Mews."
Aucune etude de cas publiee pour cet objectif pour le moment.
"Since moving to Mews, we can be so much more agile in how we operate, both in terms of how we engage with guests and testing out new integrations and tools through Mews Marketplace..."
Aucune etude de cas publiee pour cet objectif pour le moment.
"We want to provide the best hospitality for guests anywhere in the country, and Mews is definitely the right solution to help us achieve that goal."
Ce que les hoteliers apprecient
Many reviews highlight the user-friendliness of Mews, citing its intuitive interface that simplifies tasks across various hotel operations. Users find... Many reviews highlight the user-friendliness of Mews, citing its intuitive interface that simplifies tasks across various hotel operations. Users find the platform easy to navigate, which aids in quicker team onboarding and daily use.
Reviews frequently praise Mews for its automation of routine tasks like check-in, billing, and invoicing, reducing manual workload and minimizing erro... Reviews frequently praise Mews for its automation of routine tasks like check-in, billing, and invoicing, reducing manual workload and minimizing errors. Users appreciate the extensive integration options with other tools, which streamline overall operations and enhance efficiency.
Mews allows customization to fit diverse business needs, from rate structures to integration setups. Users appreciate this flexibility, although they... Mews allows customization to fit diverse business needs, from rate structures to integration setups. Users appreciate this flexibility, although they note room for improvement in adapting complex booking conditions and enhancing user-friendly navigation for settings.
Les points de friction pour les hoteliers
Users point out that while Mews offers efficient billing processes, there are complexities and areas needing improvement, such as handling group billi... Users point out that while Mews offers efficient billing processes, there are complexities and areas needing improvement, such as handling group billings, splits, and providing more customizable invoice formats. This can affect the ease of financial operations within the system.
Bien que Mews offre des fonctionnalités de reporting et d'analyse performantes, plusieurs avis soulignent le besoin de fonctionnalités de reporting pl... Bien que Mews offre des fonctionnalités de reporting et d'analyse performantes, plusieurs avis soulignent le besoin de fonctionnalités de reporting plus personnalisables et flexibles. Les utilisateurs souhaitent des analyses de données plus fines, notamment en matière de réservations et de revenus.
Fonctionnalites uniques
Ou les notes divergent le plus
Cela depend de vos besoins. AsyaSoft PMS et Mews PMS partagent de nombreuses fonctionnalites Property Management Systems de base, mais chacun a des capacites uniques. AsyaSoft PMS propose 0 partenaires d'integration verifies, tandis que Mews PMS en propose 335. Consultez la comparaison des fonctionnalites ci-dessus pour voir les differences avant de changer.
Les petits hotels devraient privilegier la facilite d'utilisation et une mise en service rapide. Mews PMS est en tete pour la facilite d'utilisation avec 4.7/5 contre 0.0/5. Recherchez une tarification transparente et une option d'essai ou de demonstration. Filtrez les avis sur chaque page produit par taille d'etablissement pour lire les retours d'hotels similaires au votre.
AsyaSoft PMS : Non. Mews PMS : Non. Aucun des deux produits ne propose actuellement d'offre gratuite. La plupart des fournisseurs Property Management Systems proposent des demonstrations ou des essais — demandez-en un a chacun pour evaluer avant de vous engager.
Le HT Score est un classement composite qui prend en compte 4 groupes de criteres et plus d'une douzaine de variables pour aider les hoteliers a comparer objectivement les produits technologiques hoteliers. AsyaSoft a un HT Score de 0 et Mews a 100. Voici comment le score est calcule.
| Groupe de criteres | Ponderation | Ce qu'il mesure |
|---|---|---|
| Notes et avis clients |
|
A quel point les utilisateurs recommandent-ils ce produit ? Score des notes, Volume d'avis, Part de voix, Profondeur des avis, Recence des avis, Etudes de cas ▾ Le facteur le plus fortement pondere. Analyse les notes de satisfaction moyennes (probabilite de recommandation, facilite d'utilisation, support, ROI), le nombre total d'avis par rapport aux pairs de la categorie, la recence des avis (au moins 20 avis sur les 6 derniers mois) et la part de voix parmi les clients hoteliers uniques pour detecter les biais de selection. |
| Ecosysteme partenaire |
|
A quel point les partenaires technologiques recommandent-ils cette entreprise ? Recommandations des partenaires, Nombre d'integrations, Qualite des integrations ▾ Evalue les recommandations des partenaires comme des votes de confiance d'experts, le nombre d'integrations verifiees et la qualite de l'ecosysteme — la moyenne des HT Scores des partenaires d'integration. Les produits avec des ecosystemes d'integration de meilleure qualite sont plus susceptibles de fournir un ensemble technologique connecte. |
| Orientation client |
|
A quel point cette organisation est-elle orientee client ? Support certifie, Regularite des avis, Completude du profil ▾ Evalue si l'entreprise a obtenu la certification HTR de support client, maintient une collecte d'avis reguliere dans le temps (un indicateur de culture axee sur le feedback) et tient a jour les profils produits avec les fonctionnalites, captures d'ecran, tarifs et caracteristiques. |
| Portee, perennite et ressources |
|
Quelle est l'etendue de la portee et des ressources de cette entreprise ? Portee geographique, Perennite, Ressources de l'entreprise, Score de tendance ▾ Mesure la presence mondiale (pays et regions desservis), les annees d'activite comme indicateur de stabilite, les effectifs comme indicateur de ressources, et un score de tendance base sur les demandes d'acheteurs, les avis, les recommandations de partenaires et l'activite presse des douze derniers mois. |
Les notes et avis clients sont de loin le facteur le plus important dans l'algorithme du HT Score. HTR n'accepte aucun paiement pour un meilleur classement. Tous les avis sont verifies — seuls les professionnels du secteur hotelier avec des affiliations confirmees peuvent soumettre des notes. Voir la methodologie complete du HT Score →
Conseiller en recommandations de produits