The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
Nous avons analyse 552 avis verifies d'hoteliers, compare les fonctionnalites, les tarifs et des etudes de cas reelles pour identifier les points forts de chaque plateforme. Le bon choix depend du type de votre etablissement et de vos priorites :
AutoClerk, Inc. se distingue .
HOTELTIME se distingue en ease of use and customer support — en particulier pour les etablissements brand (4.9/5) , avec des fonctionnalites exclusives comme Payment processing and Guest CRM.
Notes comparees basees sur 552 avis verifies d'hoteliers sur HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Probabilite de recommandation |
|
|
| Facilite d'utilisation |
|
|
| Support client |
|
|
| Rapport qualite-prix |
|
|
| Prix de depart | Contact sales | From $600/mo |
| Avis verifies | 3 | 549 |
Apres analyse de 552 avis verifies, les utilisateurs de AutoClerk, Inc. apprecient surtout , tandis que ceux de HOTELTIME mettent en avant user interface and learning curve, assistance technique, reporting and analytics. Cliquez sur un theme pour voir ce que disent les evaluateurs.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Avantages | |
|
+
User Interface and Learning Curve
▾
|
|
|
+
Assistance technique
▾
|
|
|
+
Reporting and Analytics
▾
|
|
|
+
System Stability and Updates
▾
|
|
| Inconvenients | |
|
−
Customization Options
▾
|
|
|
−
Automation Features
▾
|
|
|
−
Optimisation mobile
▾
|
|
Comment chaque produit se classe parmi les fournisseurs Systèmes de gestion immobilière pour differentes tailles d'etablissements, types et regions — base sur les avis verifies d'hoteliers dans chaque segment.
Par taille d'hotel
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Petit (10-24 chambres) ▾ | — | #5 219 avis |
| Moyen (25-74 chambres) ▾ | #60 1 avis | #3 238 avis |
| Grand (75-199 chambres) ▾ | #54 0 avis | #2 46 avis |
| Tres grand (200+ chambres) ▾ | — | #8 7 avis |
Par type d'etablissement
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #72 1 avis | #5 239 avis |
| Luxe ▾ | #67 0 avis | #3 241 avis |
| Enseigne / Chaine ▾ | #64 0 avis | #4 143 avis |
| Sejour prolonge ▾ | — | #4 49 avis |
Par region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Amerique du Nord | #57 1 avis | #52 4 avis |
| Europe ▾ | — | #2 384 avis |
| Asie-Pacifique ▾ | — | #5 111 avis |
| Moyen-Orient ▾ | — | #1 21 avis |
Choosing between AutoClerk and HotelTime PMS depends on your hotel’s size, operational complexity, and regional presence. Both solutions aim to streamline hotel management, but they diverge significantly in offerings, user experience, and scale. AutoClerk targets independent properties with a focus on simplicity and support, while HotelTime emphasizes extensive features and global reach. Which system aligns better with your hotel’s needs and growth plans?
AutoClerk offers a straightforward, cloud-based property management system designed primarily for small to mid-size hotels, especially those in the U.S. Its simplicity makes onboarding quick and staff adoption easier. Conversely, HotelTime provides a feature-rich platform with extensive integrations and modules, crafted to serve a broad spectrum of hotel types worldwide, including resorts and chains. Do you need a simple, reliable system or a comprehensive platform that can scale with your growth?
AutoClerk’s strengths lie in its ease of use, intuitive interface, and excellent support, making it suitable if your team prefers a straightforward PMS. HotelTime, on the other hand, excels in delivering a wide array of tools—from POS to guest CRM—making it ideal if your hotel demands more integrated operational management. Which of these priorities is more critical for your property?
Finally, AutoClerk’s smaller review base and older review data limit insight into recent performance, whereas HotelTime benefits from a large, recent review pool, confirming its ongoing user satisfaction. Given the volume and recency, HotelTime’s current standing is a stronger indicator of its performance.
Edge: HotelTime.
If your hotel needs a straightforward, user-friendly PMS with reliable support and minimal complexity, AutoClerk is your choice. It’s best suited for small hotels, independent properties, or management companies seeking quick deployment and dependable customer service.
Choose HotelTime if your property requires a broad feature set—such as integrated POS, guest CRM, revenue management, and channel management—and operates across multiple locations or regions. Its scalable architecture makes it suitable for boutique hotels, chains, and resorts that value extensive automation and detailed reporting.
For hotels prioritizing simplicity, quick onboarding, and support in North America, AutoClerk wins. Conversely, if your hotel needs a flexible, all-in-one platform with global capabilities and a rich feature library, HotelTime is the better fit.
Edge: HotelTime.
AutoClerk boasts a high ease-of-use rating of 4.33/5, with reviews highlighting its simple, intuitive interface that’s easy for staff to learn. Support is also rated highly, with 24/7 availability and quick resolution times, making staff adoption smoother.
HotelTime’s ease of use is slightly higher at 4.66/5, with many users praising its user-friendly design and streamlined workflows. The onboarding process is rated at 4.63/5, with support teams frequently commended for their responsiveness, especially in complex setups.
Edge: HotelTime.
HotelTime offers 51 unique features not found in AutoClerk, including integrated CRS, EPoS, guest CRM, revenue management, online check-in, and mobile app functionality. These modules support a diverse range of operations, especially for larger or multi-property hotels.
AutoClerk provides core PMS features, emphasizing simplicity and basic hotel management tools, but lacks the extensive modules found in HotelTime. Its strengths are in essential operational functions and straightforward reporting.
In terms of feature depth, HotelTime’s comprehensive suite stands out. Its ability to handle complex operations and multi-channel integrations makes it the clear leader here.
Edge: HotelTime.
AutoClerk’s support is rated at 4.33/5, with reviews emphasizing 24/7 availability and effective resolution on initial contact. Support staff are described as responsive, especially during critical operational issues.
HotelTime’s customer support surpasses this slightly at 4.73/5, with reviews praising rapid response times, thorough onboarding, and ongoing assistance. Many users highlight the support team’s proactive approach to ensuring system stability and functionality.
Given the recent reviews and higher ratings, HotelTime’s support is currently more trusted by users.
Edge: HotelTime.
HotelTime offers a substantial number of verified partners—58—compared to AutoClerk’s 8. This includes integrations with major systems like SiteMinder, Duetto, and Cendyn, alongside niche partners such as Profitroom and STR.
AutoClerk’s integrations focus on core hotel functions with fewer third-party interfaces, mainly catering to independent properties with standard needs. HotelTime’s extensive partner network enables a more connected, scalable hotel ecosystem.
For hotels requiring a broad array of integrations, HotelTime’s platform is clearly more capable.
Edge: HotelTime.
HotelTime’s user ratings are significantly higher at 4.83/5, with over 430 reviews, many recent, indicating strong ongoing satisfaction. Reviews emphasize its robust features, ease of use, and support, especially for larger or growing properties.
AutoClerk’s rating is 3.5/5 based on just 3 reviews, with older feedback focusing on its simplicity and support but limited recent data. The small review count and lack of recent feedback weaken confidence in its current performance.
Thus, HotelTime’s higher and more recent ratings make it the preferred choice among hoteliers.
Edge: HotelTime.
AutoClerk does not list specific pricing publicly, and its model typically involves custom quotes based on property needs. There are no details on free trials or tiered plans, making direct comparison difficult.
HotelTime charges a flat $600 monthly fee, with no mention of setup or additional costs, indicating a predictable pricing model suitable for budgeting.
If transparent, fixed pricing is essential, HotelTime provides clarity. AutoClerk’s pricing may vary based on negotiations and property size.
Not ideal if your hotel:
AutoClerk’s simplicity suits small hotels, but it may lack scalability for larger, more complex operations.
Not ideal if your hotel:
HotelTime suits hotels aiming for a comprehensive, scalable platform with ongoing innovation.
AutoClerk provides a simple, reliable PMS primarily for small, independent hotels in North America. Its ease of use and support are strengths, but it lacks the extensive features and integrations needed for larger or multi-property operations.
HotelTime offers a feature-rich, globally available platform capable of managing complex hotel ecosystems across regions. Its high user ratings, broad integrations, and comprehensive modules make it the premier choice for hotels aiming to scale or improve operational efficiency.
If your hotel values simplicity and support above all, AutoClerk is a solid pick. But for most hotels seeking a future-proof, adaptable solution, HotelTime is the clear leader.
In conclusion, your decision should align with your hotel’s size, operational scope, and regional needs. Given the recent and high-volume feedback, HotelTime’s platform offers more value and confidence for growing or multi-property hotels.
This comparison is based on current reviews, feature sets, and available data as of October 2023. Always verify with vendors for the latest offerings and prices.
La tarification des Systèmes de gestion immobilière est rarement simple. Voici ce que nous savons a partir des donnees tarifaires publiques de chaque fournisseur. Demandez toujours un devis personnalise pour la taille de votre etablissement.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $600/mo |
Selon la base de donnees produits de HTR, Autoclerk (PMS) et HotelTime PMS partagent 0 fonctionnalites. Voici les differences cles — les fonctionnalites que l'un possede et que l'autre n'a pas.
| Fonctionnalite |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| CRM invité | ||
| CRS intégré | ||
| Suivi des revenus annexes | ||
| Traitement des paiements | ||
| Vue Calendrier | ||
| Épopée |
Affichage des principales differences. 39 fonctionnalites supplementaires different entre ces produits.
Nous avons analyse 8 etudes de cas verifiees pour comparer ce que les hotels obtiennent reellement avec chaque plateforme sur quatre objectifs commerciaux cles.
Aucune etude de cas publiee pour cet objectif pour le moment.
"We needed to change an on-site system we were using as we wanted to move our operation forward. We achieved that with HotelTime systems. They are reliable, and stable and offer fea..."
Aucune etude de cas publiee pour cet objectif pour le moment.
"In 2018 we were choosing a system for our first completely self-service ART and design hotel. We decided on HotelTime and after 4 years I have to say that the choice was the right..."
Mieux classe pour
Ce que les hoteliers apprecient
While the system’s intuitive interface and ease of learning are generally appreciated, a few users mention initial challenges due to the complexity of... While the system’s intuitive interface and ease of learning are generally appreciated, a few users mention initial challenges due to the complexity of features offered. Overall, once users become familiar with the system, it significantly enhances efficiency and simplifies hotel operations.
Bien que la réactivité et l'efficacité de l'équipe d'assistance soient appréciées, certains avis suggèrent que l'extension des horaires d'assistance t... Bien que la réactivité et l'efficacité de l'équipe d'assistance soient appréciées, certains avis suggèrent que l'extension des horaires d'assistance technique améliorerait encore l'expérience utilisateur, en garantissant une assistance permanente, notamment pour les utilisateurs internationaux.
HotelTime's robust reporting features are praised for providing comprehensive data insights into occupancy, revenue, and customer satisfaction. Users... HotelTime's robust reporting features are praised for providing comprehensive data insights into occupancy, revenue, and customer satisfaction. Users appreciate the variety of reports available for management, yet some desire more customization and advanced visualizations within the tool itself to better suit individual hotel needs.
Les points de friction pour les hoteliers
Some users voice a need for more customizable features, particularly in terms of reporting and interface personalization, which would allow hotels to... Some users voice a need for more customizable features, particularly in terms of reporting and interface personalization, which would allow hotels to better tailor the PMS to their specific operational strategies and guest services.
The automation capabilities in HotelTime, such as invoice processing and reservation management, are frequently mentioned for saving significant time... The automation capabilities in HotelTime, such as invoice processing and reservation management, are frequently mentioned for saving significant time for staff. Users highlight these features as reducing manual workload and minimizing the risk of human error, although they also express a desire for enhanced automation in guest communication and reporting.
Mieux classe pour
Fonctionnalites uniques
Ou les notes divergent le plus
Cela depend de vos besoins. Autoclerk (PMS) et HotelTime PMS partagent de nombreuses fonctionnalites Property Management Systems de base, mais chacun a des capacites uniques. Autoclerk (PMS) propose 8 partenaires d'integration verifies, tandis que HotelTime PMS en propose 58. Consultez la comparaison des fonctionnalites ci-dessus pour voir les differences avant de changer.
Les petits hotels devraient privilegier la facilite d'utilisation et une mise en service rapide. HotelTime PMS est en tete pour la facilite d'utilisation avec 4.7/5 contre 4.3/5. Recherchez une tarification transparente et une option d'essai ou de demonstration. Filtrez les avis sur chaque page produit par taille d'etablissement pour lire les retours d'hotels similaires au votre.
Autoclerk (PMS) : Non. HotelTime PMS : Non. Aucun des deux produits ne propose actuellement d'offre gratuite. La plupart des fournisseurs Property Management Systems proposent des demonstrations ou des essais — demandez-en un a chacun pour evaluer avant de vous engager.
Le HT Score est un classement composite qui prend en compte 4 groupes de criteres et plus d'une douzaine de variables pour aider les hoteliers a comparer objectivement les produits technologiques hoteliers. AutoClerk, Inc. a un HT Score de 0 et HOTELTIME a 92. Voici comment le score est calcule.
| Groupe de criteres | Ponderation | Ce qu'il mesure |
|---|---|---|
| Notes et avis clients |
|
A quel point les utilisateurs recommandent-ils ce produit ? Score des notes, Volume d'avis, Part de voix, Profondeur des avis, Recence des avis, Etudes de cas ▾ Le facteur le plus fortement pondere. Analyse les notes de satisfaction moyennes (probabilite de recommandation, facilite d'utilisation, support, ROI), le nombre total d'avis par rapport aux pairs de la categorie, la recence des avis (au moins 20 avis sur les 6 derniers mois) et la part de voix parmi les clients hoteliers uniques pour detecter les biais de selection. |
| Ecosysteme partenaire |
|
A quel point les partenaires technologiques recommandent-ils cette entreprise ? Recommandations des partenaires, Nombre d'integrations, Qualite des integrations ▾ Evalue les recommandations des partenaires comme des votes de confiance d'experts, le nombre d'integrations verifiees et la qualite de l'ecosysteme — la moyenne des HT Scores des partenaires d'integration. Les produits avec des ecosystemes d'integration de meilleure qualite sont plus susceptibles de fournir un ensemble technologique connecte. |
| Orientation client |
|
A quel point cette organisation est-elle orientee client ? Support certifie, Regularite des avis, Completude du profil ▾ Evalue si l'entreprise a obtenu la certification HTR de support client, maintient une collecte d'avis reguliere dans le temps (un indicateur de culture axee sur le feedback) et tient a jour les profils produits avec les fonctionnalites, captures d'ecran, tarifs et caracteristiques. |
| Portee, perennite et ressources |
|
Quelle est l'etendue de la portee et des ressources de cette entreprise ? Portee geographique, Perennite, Ressources de l'entreprise, Score de tendance ▾ Mesure la presence mondiale (pays et regions desservis), les annees d'activite comme indicateur de stabilite, les effectifs comme indicateur de ressources, et un score de tendance base sur les demandes d'acheteurs, les avis, les recommandations de partenaires et l'activite presse des douze derniers mois. |
Les notes et avis clients sont de loin le facteur le plus important dans l'algorithme du HT Score. HTR n'accepte aucun paiement pour un meilleur classement. Tous les avis sont verifies — seuls les professionnels du secteur hotelier avec des affiliations confirmees peuvent soumettre des notes. Voir la methodologie complete du HT Score →
Conseiller en recommandations de produits