The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
Nous avons analyse 890 avis verifies d'hoteliers, compare les fonctionnalites, les tarifs et des etudes de cas reelles pour identifier les points forts de chaque plateforme. Le bon choix depend du type de votre etablissement et de vos priorites :
AutoClerk, Inc. se distingue .
Mews se distingue en ease of use and ROI — en particulier pour les etablissements independent (4.9/5) , avec des fonctionnalites exclusives comme Revenue management module and Guest CRM.
Notes comparees basees sur 890 avis verifies d'hoteliers sur HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Probabilite de recommandation |
|
|
| Facilite d'utilisation |
|
|
| Support client |
|
|
| Rapport qualite-prix |
|
|
| Prix de depart | Contact sales | From $900/mo |
| Avis verifies | 3 | 887 |
Apres analyse de 890 avis verifies, les utilisateurs de AutoClerk, Inc. apprecient surtout , tandis que ceux de Mews mettent en avant ease of use, automation and integrations, customizability and flexibility. Cliquez sur un theme pour voir ce que disent les evaluateurs.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Avantages | |
|
+
Ease of Use
▾
|
|
|
+
Automation and Integrations
▾
|
|
|
+
Customizability and Flexibility
▾
|
|
|
+
Intégration et soutien
▾
|
|
| Inconvenients | |
|
−
Billing and Invoicing
▾
|
|
|
−
Rapports et analyses
▾
|
|
|
−
Multi-Property Management
▾
|
|
Comment chaque produit se classe parmi les fournisseurs Systèmes de gestion immobilière pour differentes tailles d'etablissements, types et regions — base sur les avis verifies d'hoteliers dans chaque segment.
Par taille d'hotel
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Petit (10-24 chambres) ▾ | — | #3 329 avis |
| Moyen (25-74 chambres) ▾ | #60 1 avis | #1 397 avis |
| Grand (75-199 chambres) ▾ | #54 0 avis | #3 45 avis |
| Tres grand (200+ chambres) ▾ | — | #3 49 avis |
Par type d'etablissement
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #72 1 avis | #1 483 avis |
| Luxe ▾ | #67 0 avis | #5 220 avis |
| Enseigne / Chaine ▾ | #64 0 avis | #2 170 avis |
| Sejour prolonge ▾ | — | #1 130 avis |
Par region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Amerique du Nord ▾ | #57 1 avis | #8 106 avis |
| Europe ▾ | — | #1 660 avis |
| Asie-Pacifique ▾ | — | #10 17 avis |
| Moyen-Orient ▾ | — | #28 8 avis |
Choosing between AutoClerk (PMS) and Mews PMS ultimately hinges on your hotel’s size, operational complexity, and growth ambitions. AutoClerk offers a straightforward, easy-to-use solution ideal for small to mid-sized independent properties, while Mews provides a broad, integrated platform favored by multi-property groups and tech-forward hotels. Both address core property management needs, but only one is truly designed for modern, scalable hospitality.
Are you looking for a simple, reliable system for a couple of properties or a comprehensive tech ecosystem for rapid growth? Let’s explore how these two products stack up.
AutoClerk has been in the market since 1985, offering a familiar, easy-to-learn system with a focus on core PMS features. Mews, founded in 2012 and now a winner of the HotelTechReport award, emphasizes automation, integrations, and a scalable cloud-native architecture. The key divergence is their review volume and recency: Mews boasts over 750 reviews, 98 from the last six months, and a high 9.12 NPS score, making its customer feedback far more current and extensive than AutoClerk’s three reviews.
AutoClerk’s overall rating of 3.5/5 reflects limited recent praise, while Mews’s 4.62/5 and 99.53/100 HTR Score showcase broad, positive sentiment. Do you want a mature but limited system, or a leading-edge platform with proven recent satisfaction?
If your hotel needs a straightforward, cost-effective PMS with dependable support, AutoClerk is suitable—especially for small resorts or standalone properties that prioritize ease of use. Conversely, if you require a flexible, highly integrated platform capable of managing multiple properties, guest engagement, and revenue optimization, Mews is the clear leader, particularly for hotels with growth plans or complex operations.
For boutique hotels or independent resorts seeking simplicity, AutoClerk’s interface and 24/7 support will serve well. But if your hotel aims to modernize operations, scale quickly, or leverage automation, Mews provides more advanced features and a larger partner ecosystem.
AutoClerk’s UI is rated 4.33/5, praised for its simplicity and ease of learning, but some users find its reporting capabilities limited. Mews scores even higher at 4.7/5, with recent reviews emphasizing its modern, intuitive design that minimizes onboarding and training time.
AutoClerk’s onboarding experience is rated 4.33/5, and Mews edges slightly ahead at 4.39/5, reflecting its user-friendly interface and robust support channels. Overall, Mews’s modern UI and frequent updates make it easier for your team to adopt.
Edge: Mews.
AutoClerk’s feature set is primarily focused on core PMS functions, lacking the extensive capabilities of Mews’s 59+ features. Mews offers modules for revenue management, CRM, online check-in, mobile housekeeping, digital registration, guest messaging, and advanced reporting, among others.
Notably, Mews supports multi-lingual, multi-currency operations, automated night audits, and a marketplace with over 1,000 integrations—features absent in AutoClerk. If you need sophisticated automation and guest engagement tools, Mews is the superior choice.
Edge: Mews.
AutoClerk’s reviews highlight their 24/7 support with quick resolutions, leaving positive impressions about their responsiveness. Mews supports its users with a dedicated onboarding team, extensive online resources, and a support rating of 4.27/5, though some recent reviews mention occasional bugs.
AutoClerk’s limited review count makes it difficult to gauge support consistency, while Mews’s larger user base and recent feedback suggest a more reliable, scalable support experience. For ongoing operational assurance, Mews’s support network is more robust.
Edge: Mews.
AutoClerk integrates with 8 verified partners, including channel managers and revenue tools, but its ecosystem remains small and less adaptable. Mews’s marketplace features over 336 verified integrations, including major channel managers, POS systems, and revenue tools, providing extensive flexibility.
Shared integrations include SiteMinder, Duetto, and Cendyn, but Mews’s broader ecosystem allows more customization and future-proofing. If integrations and automation matter, Mews’s extensive partner network gives it a clear advantage.
Edge: Mews.
AutoClerk’s reviews are sparse, with only three recent opinions, averaging 3/5, and predominantly small hotel segments. Mews, on the other hand, has nearly 760 reviews, with a 4.62/5 rating from a diverse mix of boutique, independent, and branded hotels, especially in recent months.
Hotels of all types consistently praise Mews for operational ease, automation, and support, whereas AutoClerk’s limited, older reviews suggest less recent satisfaction. For guest satisfaction and modern functionality, Mews scores higher across hotel segments.
AutoClerk does not publicly list its pricing, but historically it has operated on custom quotes, often favoring smaller properties. Mews charges a base fee of $900/month, with no implementation or extra fees, making its pricing transparent and predictable.
While AutoClerk might be more affordable upfront, Mews’s value lies in its rich feature set and scalability, which can justify the higher price for growing or multi-property hotels. For newer hotels seeking clarity on costs, Mews’s straightforward pricing model is advantageous.
AutoClerk works best for small-scale independent hotels with limited operational complexity.
Mews suits hotels ready to embrace digital transformation and future growth.
AutoClerk is a straightforward, easy-to-use PMS ideal for small, independent properties that need reliable core functionality without the bells and whistles. Its limited recent reviews and narrow ecosystem make it less suited for hotels with complex operations or aggressive growth plans.
Mews, with its extensive features, recent high ratings, and wide integration network, is the better choice for hotels focused on automation, guest experience, and scalability. Its cloud-native architecture and ongoing innovation position it as a future-proof platform for the modern hospitality industry.
If your hotel values ease and familiarity, AutoClerk can serve well. But for those aiming for operational agility and guest-centric technology, Mews is the clear winner.
La tarification des Systèmes de gestion immobilière est rarement simple. Voici ce que nous savons a partir des donnees tarifaires publiques de chaque fournisseur. Demandez toujours un devis personnalise pour la taille de votre etablissement.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $900/mo |
Selon la base de donnees produits de HTR, Autoclerk (PMS) et Mews PMS partagent 0 fonctionnalites. Voici les differences cles — les fonctionnalites que l'un possede et que l'autre n'a pas.
| Fonctionnalite |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| CRM invité | ||
| Module de gestion des revenus | ||
| Moteur de réservation | ||
| Multi-devise | ||
| Multilingue | ||
| Profils d'invités |
Affichage des principales differences. 47 fonctionnalites supplementaires different entre ces produits.
Nous avons analyse 8 etudes de cas verifiees pour comparer ce que les hotels obtiennent reellement avec chaque plateforme sur quatre objectifs commerciaux cles.
Aucune etude de cas publiee pour cet objectif pour le moment.
"It was vital for us to find a hospitality cloud that would give us the freedom to innovate and move quickly with new technology – that’s one of the main reasons we chose Mews."
Aucune etude de cas publiee pour cet objectif pour le moment.
"Since moving to Mews, we can be so much more agile in how we operate, both in terms of how we engage with guests and testing out new integrations and tools through Mews Marketplace..."
Aucune etude de cas publiee pour cet objectif pour le moment.
"We want to provide the best hospitality for guests anywhere in the country, and Mews is definitely the right solution to help us achieve that goal."
Ce que les hoteliers apprecient
Many reviews highlight the user-friendliness of Mews, citing its intuitive interface that simplifies tasks across various hotel operations. Users find... Many reviews highlight the user-friendliness of Mews, citing its intuitive interface that simplifies tasks across various hotel operations. Users find the platform easy to navigate, which aids in quicker team onboarding and daily use.
Reviews frequently praise Mews for its automation of routine tasks like check-in, billing, and invoicing, reducing manual workload and minimizing erro... Reviews frequently praise Mews for its automation of routine tasks like check-in, billing, and invoicing, reducing manual workload and minimizing errors. Users appreciate the extensive integration options with other tools, which streamline overall operations and enhance efficiency.
Mews allows customization to fit diverse business needs, from rate structures to integration setups. Users appreciate this flexibility, although they... Mews allows customization to fit diverse business needs, from rate structures to integration setups. Users appreciate this flexibility, although they note room for improvement in adapting complex booking conditions and enhancing user-friendly navigation for settings.
Les points de friction pour les hoteliers
Users point out that while Mews offers efficient billing processes, there are complexities and areas needing improvement, such as handling group billi... Users point out that while Mews offers efficient billing processes, there are complexities and areas needing improvement, such as handling group billings, splits, and providing more customizable invoice formats. This can affect the ease of financial operations within the system.
Bien que Mews offre des fonctionnalités de reporting et d'analyse performantes, plusieurs avis soulignent le besoin de fonctionnalités de reporting pl... Bien que Mews offre des fonctionnalités de reporting et d'analyse performantes, plusieurs avis soulignent le besoin de fonctionnalités de reporting plus personnalisables et flexibles. Les utilisateurs souhaitent des analyses de données plus fines, notamment en matière de réservations et de revenus.
Mieux classe pour
Fonctionnalites uniques
Ou les notes divergent le plus
Cela depend de vos besoins. Autoclerk (PMS) et Mews PMS partagent de nombreuses fonctionnalites Property Management Systems de base, mais chacun a des capacites uniques. Autoclerk (PMS) propose 8 partenaires d'integration verifies, tandis que Mews PMS en propose 335. Consultez la comparaison des fonctionnalites ci-dessus pour voir les differences avant de changer.
Les petits hotels devraient privilegier la facilite d'utilisation et une mise en service rapide. Mews PMS est en tete pour la facilite d'utilisation avec 4.7/5 contre 4.3/5. Recherchez une tarification transparente et une option d'essai ou de demonstration. Filtrez les avis sur chaque page produit par taille d'etablissement pour lire les retours d'hotels similaires au votre.
Autoclerk (PMS) : Non. Mews PMS : Non. Aucun des deux produits ne propose actuellement d'offre gratuite. La plupart des fournisseurs Property Management Systems proposent des demonstrations ou des essais — demandez-en un a chacun pour evaluer avant de vous engager.
Le HT Score est un classement composite qui prend en compte 4 groupes de criteres et plus d'une douzaine de variables pour aider les hoteliers a comparer objectivement les produits technologiques hoteliers. AutoClerk, Inc. a un HT Score de 0 et Mews a 100. Voici comment le score est calcule.
| Groupe de criteres | Ponderation | Ce qu'il mesure |
|---|---|---|
| Notes et avis clients |
|
A quel point les utilisateurs recommandent-ils ce produit ? Score des notes, Volume d'avis, Part de voix, Profondeur des avis, Recence des avis, Etudes de cas ▾ Le facteur le plus fortement pondere. Analyse les notes de satisfaction moyennes (probabilite de recommandation, facilite d'utilisation, support, ROI), le nombre total d'avis par rapport aux pairs de la categorie, la recence des avis (au moins 20 avis sur les 6 derniers mois) et la part de voix parmi les clients hoteliers uniques pour detecter les biais de selection. |
| Ecosysteme partenaire |
|
A quel point les partenaires technologiques recommandent-ils cette entreprise ? Recommandations des partenaires, Nombre d'integrations, Qualite des integrations ▾ Evalue les recommandations des partenaires comme des votes de confiance d'experts, le nombre d'integrations verifiees et la qualite de l'ecosysteme — la moyenne des HT Scores des partenaires d'integration. Les produits avec des ecosystemes d'integration de meilleure qualite sont plus susceptibles de fournir un ensemble technologique connecte. |
| Orientation client |
|
A quel point cette organisation est-elle orientee client ? Support certifie, Regularite des avis, Completude du profil ▾ Evalue si l'entreprise a obtenu la certification HTR de support client, maintient une collecte d'avis reguliere dans le temps (un indicateur de culture axee sur le feedback) et tient a jour les profils produits avec les fonctionnalites, captures d'ecran, tarifs et caracteristiques. |
| Portee, perennite et ressources |
|
Quelle est l'etendue de la portee et des ressources de cette entreprise ? Portee geographique, Perennite, Ressources de l'entreprise, Score de tendance ▾ Mesure la presence mondiale (pays et regions desservis), les annees d'activite comme indicateur de stabilite, les effectifs comme indicateur de ressources, et un score de tendance base sur les demandes d'acheteurs, les avis, les recommandations de partenaires et l'activite presse des douze derniers mois. |
Les notes et avis clients sont de loin le facteur le plus important dans l'algorithme du HT Score. HTR n'accepte aucun paiement pour un meilleur classement. Tous les avis sont verifies — seuls les professionnels du secteur hotelier avec des affiliations confirmees peuvent soumettre des notes. Voir la methodologie complete du HT Score →
Conseiller en recommandations de produits