The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
Nous avons analyse 36 avis verifies d'hoteliers, compare les fonctionnalites, les tarifs et des etudes de cas reelles pour identifier les points forts de chaque plateforme. Le bon choix depend du type de votre etablissement et de vos priorites :
Beekeeper se distingue , avec des fonctionnalites exclusives comme Mobile Access and SMS text messaging.
LIKE MAGIC se distingue , avec des fonctionnalites exclusives comme Work Prioritization and File Library Support (images, documents and videos).
Notes comparees basees sur 36 avis verifies d'hoteliers sur HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Probabilite de recommandation |
|
|
| Facilite d'utilisation |
|
|
| Support client |
|
|
| Rapport qualite-prix |
|
|
| Prix de depart | Contact sales | From $1,100/mo |
| Avis verifies | 20 | 16 |
Comment chaque produit se classe parmi les fournisseurs Outils de collaboration du personnel pour differentes tailles d'etablissements, types et regions — base sur les avis verifies d'hoteliers dans chaque segment.
Par taille d'hotel
| Segment |
Beekeeper
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Petit (10-24 chambres) ▾ | #17 1 avis | #7 7 avis |
| Moyen (25-74 chambres) ▾ | #14 8 avis | #16 5 avis |
| Grand (75-199 chambres) ▾ | #12 5 avis | #19 2 avis |
| Tres grand (200+ chambres) ▾ | #11 4 avis | — |
Par type d'etablissement
| Segment |
Beekeeper
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #16 8 avis | #17 5 avis |
| Luxe ▾ | #14 11 avis | #24 2 avis |
| Enseigne / Chaine ▾ | #12 9 avis | #25 1 avis |
| Sejour prolonge ▾ | #19 1 avis | #8 8 avis |
Par region
| Segment |
Beekeeper
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Amerique du Nord ▾ | #10 18 avis | #33 0 avis |
| Europe ▾ | #19 1 avis | #6 15 avis |
| Asie-Pacifique | #13 0 avis | — |
| Moyen-Orient | #7 1 avis | — |
Choosing the right staff collaboration tool can significantly impact your hotel's operational efficiency, employee engagement, and guest satisfaction. Both Beekeeper and LIKE MAGIC aim to streamline communication and automation, but they do so in different ways and cater to varying hotel profiles.
Beekeeper functions as a comprehensive employee communication platform, focusing on internal engagement across all hierarchies and departments. LIKE MAGIC, in contrast, automates guest journey tasks, integrating operational systems for a seamless guest experience. Which of these solutions aligns better with your hotel's goals?
Are you seeking a robust internal communication hub for your staff, or a platform that automates guest interactions and operational workflows? The answer determines your ideal choice.
Beekeeper offers a broad communication infrastructure, supporting multilingual messaging, employee onboarding, recognition, and engagement analytics. Its focus is on uniting employees across shifts and departments, making it ideal for hotels prioritizing staff communication.
LIKE MAGIC, however, concentrates on automating the guest journey, integrating PMS, messaging, and access systems to reduce manual work. It’s best suited for hotels aiming to improve operational efficiency and deliver contactless guest experiences.
Given their design, Beekeeper's strengths lie in internal engagement, while LIKE MAGIC’s core value is automating guest-facing processes. Do you need to better connect your team or enhance your guest's digital experience?
If your hotel needs a versatile employee communication platform that enhances engagement across shifts and departments, Beekeeper is your best fit. It supports multilingual messaging, employee surveys, recognition, and detailed analytics, making it ideal for hotels with diverse staff or multiple locations.
Conversely, if your hotel requires automation of routine operational tasks, such as check-ins, messaging, or service requests, LIKE MAGIC is the clear choice. Its platform reduces staffing needs, increases digital guest engagement, and integrates directly with your PMS and access systems.
For hotels with a large, dispersed staff, or those seeking to boost internal morale, go with Beekeeper. If operational automation and guest self-service are your priorities, LIKE MAGIC is more suitable.
Beekeeper boasts a high ease-of-use rating of 4.78/5, praised for its intuitive interface, smooth onboarding, and mobile access. Reviewers highlight the platform’s social media-like model, which staff find engaging and simple to adopt.
LIKE MAGIC, on the other hand, scores a perfect 5/5 for ease of use, with recent reviews emphasizing its straightforward setup and automation features. Staff appreciate the platform's seamless integration with their existing systems, making daily operations less manual.
Given the recent reviews, LIKE MAGIC’s focus on automation makes it slightly easier to operate, especially for teams looking to implement quick, effective digital workflows. Edge: LIKE MAGIC.
Beekeeper offers 19 features, including employee onboarding, multilingual support, file management, and engagement analytics. Its extensive feature set supports comprehensive internal communication and staff management.
LIKE MAGIC provides 8 features, focusing on automation and task management such as real-time task tracking, case management, and self-service guest features. Its capabilities are tailored for operational automation rather than internal engagement.
If your hotel needs a broad suite of internal communication tools, Beekeeper’s richer feature set is advantageous. For automation-focused operations, LIKE MAGIC's targeted features are more powerful. Edge: Beekeeper.
Beekeeper’s support ratings are slightly higher at 4.83/5, with reviews praising their quick, personal, and effective assistance. Hotel staff appreciate the proactive onboarding support and the availability of resources.
LIKE MAGIC’s support is rated at 4.88/5, with reviewers emphasizing their responsiveness and ongoing product evolution. Reviewers see LIKE MAGIC’s team as highly committed and helpful, particularly in customizing the platform.
Both platforms excel here, but Beekeeper’s longer market presence and larger customer base contribute to its slightly stronger support reputation. Edge: Beekeeper.
Beekeeper integrates with 9 verified partners, including major players like Oracle Hospitality, Revinate, and Amadeus. Its integrations support a variety of HR, communication, and engagement tools.
LIKE MAGIC offers 10 verified integrations, including Mews, SALTO Systems, and Adyen, supporting PMS, access, and payment systems. Its focus is on operational automation, with integrations aligned to streamline workflows.
Both platforms are well-connected, but LIKE MAGIC’s slightly broader integration set, especially in automation and payment, makes it better suited for hotels seeking operational streamlining. Edge: LIKE MAGIC.
Beekeeper has a higher overall rating of 4.85/5, based on 20 reviews, mostly from established hotels with longer usage histories. Hotels from diverse segments, especially branded and independent properties, rate it highly.
LIKE MAGIC’s recent reviews show a perfect 5/5 rating from 16 users, with newer reviews emphasizing rapid implementation and guest satisfaction improvements. Its focus on automation resonates strongly with forward-thinking hotels.
While Beekeeper's broader user base and longer track record make it more proven, LIKE MAGIC’s recent momentum and high ratings indicate a very strong user satisfaction level. Edge: Beekeeper.
Beekeeper does not publicly list pricing, indicating a tailored quote based on your hotel’s size and needs. It likely involves an implementation fee and a per-user or per-device subscription.
LIKE MAGIC charges a base price of $1,100, with no public details on ongoing costs, but appears to be a straightforward subscription model. Its clear pricing makes budgeting easier.
If transparency and predictable costs matter, LIKE MAGIC’s pricing clarity is advantageous. For larger, customized implementations, Beekeeper’s flexible pricing structure may be better suited.
Hotels that:
Not ideal if your hotel primarily needs guest automation or operational workflows.
Hotels that:
Not ideal if your hotel’s main goal is internal staff engagement or long-term internal communication strategies.
Beekeeper is a comprehensive internal communication platform with a rich feature set, ideal for hotels prioritizing staff engagement, culture, and internal workflows. It’s best suited for larger or multi-location hotels that want to unify their team communications and build a connected workplace.
LIKE MAGIC is a streamlined automation platform that reduces manual work and enhances the guest experience through integrated, contactless operations. It excels in properties seeking operational efficiency, automation, and digital guest engagement.
If your hotel values internal communication and employee morale, go with Beekeeper. For hotels aiming to enhance operational automation, reduce staffing, and deliver seamless guest services, LIKE MAGIC is the more appropriate choice.
The choice ultimately hinges on your hotel’s primary needs: internal staff engagement or operational automation. Beekeeper’s proven track record and extensive features make it a safe, versatile bet, especially for larger properties.
LIKE MAGIC’s recent reviews and perfect ease-of-use rating suggest it’s a rising star for hotels focusing on digitizing guest interactions and automating workflows. As both platforms continue to evolve, your decision should align with your hotel’s strategic priorities: people or processes.
La tarification des Outils de collaboration du personnel est rarement simple. Voici ce que nous savons a partir des donnees tarifaires publiques de chaque fournisseur. Demandez toujours un devis personnalise pour la taille de votre etablissement.
Beekeeper
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $1,100/mo |
Voici les fonctionnalites configurees par chaque fournisseur, organisees par groupe de fonctionnalites — les memes donnees que dans le tableau de bord du fournisseur. Developpez un groupe pour comparer les fonctionnalites cote a cote.
| Fonctionnalite |
Beekeeper
|
|
|---|---|---|
|
▾
Gestion des tâches
|
|
|
| Priorisation des travaux | ||
| Prise en charge de la bibliothèque de fichiers (images, documents et vidéos) | ||
| Suivi des actifs | ||
| La gestion de cas | ||
| Inspection | ||
| Nettoyage en profondeur | ||
| Module de maintenance préventive | ||
| Suivi des tâches en temps réel | ||
| Journal de bord virtuel | ||
| Module perdu & trouvé | ||
| Départs tardifs | ||
|
▾
Messagerie et collaboration
|
|
|
| Routage des messages | ||
| Définition des objectifs de l'équipe (par exemple, inscriptions aux récompenses, satisfaction) | ||
| Traduction dans l'application | ||
| Accès mobile sur n'importe quel appareil | ||
|
▾
Escalades et alertes
|
|
|
| Récupération/escalade de service | ||
|
▾
Rapports
|
|
|
| Tableau de bord analytique | ||
| Suivi de portefeuille multi-immeubles | ||
| Imprimer les anciens enregistrements | ||
| Relevé de compteur | ||
| Suivi de la rémunération | ||
|
▾
Automatisation
|
|
|
| Automated Replies | ||
| Message Templates | ||
| API ouverte | ||
|
▾
Modèles
|
|
|
| Message Templates |
Nous avons analyse 4 etudes de cas verifiees pour comparer ce que les hotels obtiennent reellement avec chaque plateforme sur quatre objectifs commerciaux cles.
Beekeeper
Aucune etude de cas publiee pour cet objectif pour le moment.
"Like Magic allowed us to operate with just six staff members, without compromising guest experience. The platform is easy to use, fun to work with, and has revolutionized how we ru..."
Beekeeper
Aucune etude de cas publiee pour cet objectif pour le moment.
"LIKE MAGIC isn't just a tool for us, it's the backbone of our overall guest experience. If I ever worked somewhere else, I'd bring it with me."
Mieux classe pour
Fonctionnalites uniques
Mieux classe pour
Fonctionnalites uniques
Ou les notes divergent le plus
Cela depend de vos besoins. Beekeeper (Digital Workspace) et LIKE MAGIC (Staff App) partagent de nombreuses fonctionnalites Staff Collaboration Tools de base, mais chacun a des capacites uniques. Beekeeper (Digital Workspace) propose 9 partenaires d'integration verifies, tandis que LIKE MAGIC (Staff App) en propose 11. Consultez la comparaison des fonctionnalites ci-dessus pour voir les differences avant de changer.
Les petits hotels devraient privilegier la facilite d'utilisation et une mise en service rapide. LIKE MAGIC (Staff App) est en tete pour la facilite d'utilisation avec 5.0/5 contre 4.8/5. Recherchez une tarification transparente et une option d'essai ou de demonstration. Filtrez les avis sur chaque page produit par taille d'etablissement pour lire les retours d'hotels similaires au votre.
Beekeeper (Digital Workspace) : Non. LIKE MAGIC (Staff App) : Non. Aucun des deux produits ne propose actuellement d'offre gratuite. La plupart des fournisseurs Staff Collaboration Tools proposent des demonstrations ou des essais — demandez-en un a chacun pour evaluer avant de vous engager.
Le HT Score est un classement composite qui prend en compte 4 groupes de criteres et plus d'une douzaine de variables pour aider les hoteliers a comparer objectivement les produits technologiques hoteliers. Beekeeper a un HT Score de 0 et LIKE MAGIC a 0. Voici comment le score est calcule.
| Groupe de criteres | Ponderation | Ce qu'il mesure |
|---|---|---|
| Notes et avis clients |
|
A quel point les utilisateurs recommandent-ils ce produit ? Score des notes, Volume d'avis, Part de voix, Profondeur des avis, Recence des avis, Etudes de cas ▾ Le facteur le plus fortement pondere. Analyse les notes de satisfaction moyennes (probabilite de recommandation, facilite d'utilisation, support, ROI), le nombre total d'avis par rapport aux pairs de la categorie, la recence des avis (au moins 20 avis sur les 6 derniers mois) et la part de voix parmi les clients hoteliers uniques pour detecter les biais de selection. |
| Ecosysteme partenaire |
|
A quel point les partenaires technologiques recommandent-ils cette entreprise ? Recommandations des partenaires, Nombre d'integrations, Qualite des integrations ▾ Evalue les recommandations des partenaires comme des votes de confiance d'experts, le nombre d'integrations verifiees et la qualite de l'ecosysteme — la moyenne des HT Scores des partenaires d'integration. Les produits avec des ecosystemes d'integration de meilleure qualite sont plus susceptibles de fournir un ensemble technologique connecte. |
| Orientation client |
|
A quel point cette organisation est-elle orientee client ? Support certifie, Regularite des avis, Completude du profil ▾ Evalue si l'entreprise a obtenu la certification HTR de support client, maintient une collecte d'avis reguliere dans le temps (un indicateur de culture axee sur le feedback) et tient a jour les profils produits avec les fonctionnalites, captures d'ecran, tarifs et caracteristiques. |
| Portee, perennite et ressources |
|
Quelle est l'etendue de la portee et des ressources de cette entreprise ? Portee geographique, Perennite, Ressources de l'entreprise, Score de tendance ▾ Mesure la presence mondiale (pays et regions desservis), les annees d'activite comme indicateur de stabilite, les effectifs comme indicateur de ressources, et un score de tendance base sur les demandes d'acheteurs, les avis, les recommandations de partenaires et l'activite presse des douze derniers mois. |
Les notes et avis clients sont de loin le facteur le plus important dans l'algorithme du HT Score. HTR n'accepte aucun paiement pour un meilleur classement. Tous les avis sont verifies — seuls les professionnels du secteur hotelier avec des affiliations confirmees peuvent soumettre des notes. Voir la methodologie complete du HT Score →
Recommandations personnalisées adaptées à votre propriété