Beekeeper (Digital Workspace) vs. LIKE MAGIC (Staff App): Lequel vous convient le mieux ?

Mis a jour le September 3, 2026  ·  36 avis verifies analyses

TLDR

Nous avons analyse 36 avis verifies d'hoteliers, compare les fonctionnalites, les tarifs et des etudes de cas reelles pour identifier les points forts de chaque plateforme. Le bon choix depend du type de votre etablissement et de vos priorites :

Beekeeper se distingue , avec des fonctionnalites exclusives comme Mobile Access and SMS text messaging.

LIKE MAGIC se distingue , avec des fonctionnalites exclusives comme Work Prioritization and File Library Support (images, documents and videos).

Voir l'analyse complete ci-dessous ↓

Comment Beekeeper (Digital Workspace) se compare-t-il a LIKE MAGIC (Staff App) ?

Notes comparees basees sur 36 avis verifies d'hoteliers sur HTR.

HTScore
0
0
Probabilite de recommandation
98%
99%
Facilite d'utilisation
4.8/5
5.0/5
Support client
4.8/5
4.9/5
Rapport qualite-prix
4.8/5
4.9/5
Prix de depart Contact sales From $1,100/mo
Avis verifies 20 16

Beekeeper vs LIKE MAGIC : Classement par segment hotelier

Comment chaque produit se classe parmi les fournisseurs Outils de collaboration du personnel pour differentes tailles d'etablissements, types et regions — base sur les avis verifies d'hoteliers dans chaque segment.

Par taille d'hotel

Segment Beekeeper Beekeeper LIKE MAGIC LIKE MAGIC
Petit (10-24 chambres) #17 1 avis #7 7 avis
Moyen (25-74 chambres) #14 8 avis #16 5 avis
Grand (75-199 chambres) #12 5 avis #19 2 avis
Tres grand (200+ chambres) #11 4 avis

Par type d'etablissement

Segment Beekeeper Beekeeper LIKE MAGIC LIKE MAGIC
Boutique #16 8 avis #17 5 avis
Luxe #14 11 avis #24 2 avis
Enseigne / Chaine #12 9 avis #25 1 avis
Sejour prolonge #19 1 avis #8 8 avis

Par region

Segment Beekeeper Beekeeper LIKE MAGIC LIKE MAGIC
Amerique du Nord #10 18 avis #33 0 avis
Europe #19 1 avis #6 15 avis
Asie-Pacifique #13 0 avis
Moyen-Orient #7 1 avis

The Decision

Choosing the right staff collaboration tool can significantly impact your hotel's operational efficiency, employee engagement, and guest satisfaction. Both Beekeeper and LIKE MAGIC aim to streamline communication and automation, but they do so in different ways and cater to varying hotel profiles.

Beekeeper functions as a comprehensive employee communication platform, focusing on internal engagement across all hierarchies and departments. LIKE MAGIC, in contrast, automates guest journey tasks, integrating operational systems for a seamless guest experience. Which of these solutions aligns better with your hotel's goals?

Are you seeking a robust internal communication hub for your staff, or a platform that automates guest interactions and operational workflows? The answer determines your ideal choice.

Is Beekeeper or LIKE MAGIC Better for Hotels?

Beekeeper offers a broad communication infrastructure, supporting multilingual messaging, employee onboarding, recognition, and engagement analytics. Its focus is on uniting employees across shifts and departments, making it ideal for hotels prioritizing staff communication.

LIKE MAGIC, however, concentrates on automating the guest journey, integrating PMS, messaging, and access systems to reduce manual work. It’s best suited for hotels aiming to improve operational efficiency and deliver contactless guest experiences.

Given their design, Beekeeper's strengths lie in internal engagement, while LIKE MAGIC’s core value is automating guest-facing processes. Do you need to better connect your team or enhance your guest's digital experience?

Beekeeper vs LIKE MAGIC: Which Should Your Hotel Choose?

If your hotel needs a versatile employee communication platform that enhances engagement across shifts and departments, Beekeeper is your best fit. It supports multilingual messaging, employee surveys, recognition, and detailed analytics, making it ideal for hotels with diverse staff or multiple locations.

Conversely, if your hotel requires automation of routine operational tasks, such as check-ins, messaging, or service requests, LIKE MAGIC is the clear choice. Its platform reduces staffing needs, increases digital guest engagement, and integrates directly with your PMS and access systems.

For hotels with a large, dispersed staff, or those seeking to boost internal morale, go with Beekeeper. If operational automation and guest self-service are your priorities, LIKE MAGIC is more suitable.

Is Beekeeper or LIKE MAGIC Easier to Use?

Beekeeper boasts a high ease-of-use rating of 4.78/5, praised for its intuitive interface, smooth onboarding, and mobile access. Reviewers highlight the platform’s social media-like model, which staff find engaging and simple to adopt.

LIKE MAGIC, on the other hand, scores a perfect 5/5 for ease of use, with recent reviews emphasizing its straightforward setup and automation features. Staff appreciate the platform's seamless integration with their existing systems, making daily operations less manual.

Given the recent reviews, LIKE MAGIC’s focus on automation makes it slightly easier to operate, especially for teams looking to implement quick, effective digital workflows. Edge: LIKE MAGIC.

Which Has Better Features: Beekeeper or LIKE MAGIC?

Beekeeper offers 19 features, including employee onboarding, multilingual support, file management, and engagement analytics. Its extensive feature set supports comprehensive internal communication and staff management.

LIKE MAGIC provides 8 features, focusing on automation and task management such as real-time task tracking, case management, and self-service guest features. Its capabilities are tailored for operational automation rather than internal engagement.

If your hotel needs a broad suite of internal communication tools, Beekeeper’s richer feature set is advantageous. For automation-focused operations, LIKE MAGIC's targeted features are more powerful. Edge: Beekeeper.

Which Has Better Customer Support: Beekeeper or LIKE MAGIC?

Beekeeper’s support ratings are slightly higher at 4.83/5, with reviews praising their quick, personal, and effective assistance. Hotel staff appreciate the proactive onboarding support and the availability of resources.

LIKE MAGIC’s support is rated at 4.88/5, with reviewers emphasizing their responsiveness and ongoing product evolution. Reviewers see LIKE MAGIC’s team as highly committed and helpful, particularly in customizing the platform.

Both platforms excel here, but Beekeeper’s longer market presence and larger customer base contribute to its slightly stronger support reputation. Edge: Beekeeper.

Which Has More Integrations: Beekeeper or LIKE MAGIC?

Beekeeper integrates with 9 verified partners, including major players like Oracle Hospitality, Revinate, and Amadeus. Its integrations support a variety of HR, communication, and engagement tools.

LIKE MAGIC offers 10 verified integrations, including Mews, SALTO Systems, and Adyen, supporting PMS, access, and payment systems. Its focus is on operational automation, with integrations aligned to streamline workflows.

Both platforms are well-connected, but LIKE MAGIC’s slightly broader integration set, especially in automation and payment, makes it better suited for hotels seeking operational streamlining. Edge: LIKE MAGIC.

Which Do Hoteliers Rate Higher: Beekeeper or LIKE MAGIC?

Beekeeper has a higher overall rating of 4.85/5, based on 20 reviews, mostly from established hotels with longer usage histories. Hotels from diverse segments, especially branded and independent properties, rate it highly.

LIKE MAGIC’s recent reviews show a perfect 5/5 rating from 16 users, with newer reviews emphasizing rapid implementation and guest satisfaction improvements. Its focus on automation resonates strongly with forward-thinking hotels.

While Beekeeper's broader user base and longer track record make it more proven, LIKE MAGIC’s recent momentum and high ratings indicate a very strong user satisfaction level. Edge: Beekeeper.

How Much Do Beekeeper and LIKE MAGIC Cost?

Beekeeper does not publicly list pricing, indicating a tailored quote based on your hotel’s size and needs. It likely involves an implementation fee and a per-user or per-device subscription.

LIKE MAGIC charges a base price of $1,100, with no public details on ongoing costs, but appears to be a straightforward subscription model. Its clear pricing makes budgeting easier.

If transparency and predictable costs matter, LIKE MAGIC’s pricing clarity is advantageous. For larger, customized implementations, Beekeeper’s flexible pricing structure may be better suited.

What Type of Hotel Should Use Beekeeper?

Hotels that:

  • Have a large, dispersed staff needing internal communication and engagement.
  • Prioritize employee morale, recognition, and culture-building.
  • Operate across multiple locations or with diverse departments.
  • Value multilingual communication and engagement analytics.
  • Seek a platform with extensive internal features like surveys, recognition, and onboarding.

Not ideal if your hotel primarily needs guest automation or operational workflows.

What Type of Hotel Should Use LIKE MAGIC?

Hotels that:

  • Focus on automating guest interactions, from booking to check-out.
  • Want to reduce staffing needs through operational automation.
  • Prioritize contactless check-in, messaging, and service requests.
  • Need seamless integration with PMS, access control, and payment systems.
  • Have a lean team looking to optimize efficiency without extensive internal communication tools.

Not ideal if your hotel’s main goal is internal staff engagement or long-term internal communication strategies.

LIKE MAGIC vs Beekeeper: The Bottom Line for Hotels

Beekeeper is a comprehensive internal communication platform with a rich feature set, ideal for hotels prioritizing staff engagement, culture, and internal workflows. It’s best suited for larger or multi-location hotels that want to unify their team communications and build a connected workplace.

LIKE MAGIC is a streamlined automation platform that reduces manual work and enhances the guest experience through integrated, contactless operations. It excels in properties seeking operational efficiency, automation, and digital guest engagement.

If your hotel values internal communication and employee morale, go with Beekeeper. For hotels aiming to enhance operational automation, reduce staffing, and deliver seamless guest services, LIKE MAGIC is the more appropriate choice.

Final Thoughts

The choice ultimately hinges on your hotel’s primary needs: internal staff engagement or operational automation. Beekeeper’s proven track record and extensive features make it a safe, versatile bet, especially for larger properties.

LIKE MAGIC’s recent reviews and perfect ease-of-use rating suggest it’s a rising star for hotels focusing on digitizing guest interactions and automating workflows. As both platforms continue to evolve, your decision should align with your hotel’s strategic priorities: people or processes.

Combien coutent Beekeeper (Digital Workspace) et LIKE MAGIC (Staff App) ?

La tarification des Outils de collaboration du personnel est rarement simple. Voici ce que nous savons a partir des donnees tarifaires publiques de chaque fournisseur. Demandez toujours un devis personnalise pour la taille de votre etablissement.

Beekeeper Beekeeper LIKE MAGIC LIKE MAGIC
Starting Price From $1,100/mo

Comparaison des fonctionnalites : Beekeeper (Digital Workspace) vs LIKE MAGIC (Staff App)

Voici les fonctionnalites configurees par chaque fournisseur, organisees par groupe de fonctionnalites — les memes donnees que dans le tableau de bord du fournisseur. Developpez un groupe pour comparer les fonctionnalites cote a cote.

Fonctionnalite Beekeeper Beekeeper LIKE MAGIC LIKE MAGIC
Gestion des tâches
0%
55%
Priorisation des travaux
Prise en charge de la bibliothèque de fichiers (images, documents et vidéos)
Suivi des actifs
La gestion de cas
Inspection
Nettoyage en profondeur
Module de maintenance préventive
Suivi des tâches en temps réel
Journal de bord virtuel
Module perdu & trouvé
Départs tardifs
Messagerie et collaboration
50%
25%
Routage des messages
Définition des objectifs de l'équipe (par exemple, inscriptions aux récompenses, satisfaction)
Traduction dans l'application
Accès mobile sur n'importe quel appareil
Escalades et alertes
0%
0%
Récupération/escalade de service
Rapports
40%
40%
Tableau de bord analytique
Suivi de portefeuille multi-immeubles
Imprimer les anciens enregistrements
Relevé de compteur
Suivi de la rémunération
Automatisation
34%
100%
Automated Replies
Message Templates
API ouverte
Modèles
0%
100%
Message Templates

Resultats concrets : Beekeeper vs LIKE MAGIC par objectif commercial

Nous avons analyse 4 etudes de cas verifiees pour comparer ce que les hotels obtiennent reellement avec chaque plateforme sur quatre objectifs commerciaux cles.

Augmenter l'efficacite operationnelle
Beekeeper Beekeeper

Aucune etude de cas publiee pour cet objectif pour le moment.

LIKE MAGIC The Zipper Hotel & Apartments Petit
+ 80% fewer staff while maintaining operational efficiency
+ 4.6/5 rating on Google, 8.8+ on Booking.com
+ Easy to understand and use - employees have fun to work with. Fully trained staff in just 1.5 days.

"Like Magic allowed us to operate with just six staff members, without compromising guest experience. The platform is easy to use, fun to work with, and has revolutionized how we ru..."

Ameliorer l'experience client
Beekeeper Beekeeper

Aucune etude de cas publiee pour cet objectif pour le moment.

LIKE MAGIC Stay Kooook Petit
+ Lean operations: Reduced staffing needs to 2.5 FTE for an 85-room property
+ Guest Journey adoption: Enabled 95% of guests to manage their entire stay digitally.
+ Decreased staff training time to under four hours for new employees.

"LIKE MAGIC isn't just a tool for us, it's the backbone of our overall guest experience. If I ever worked somewhere else, I'd bring it with me."

Cedric Maderer
Cedric Maderer
Product Manager

Beekeeper vs LIKE MAGIC : Le verdict final

Beekeeper
Beekeeper
4.9/5 sur 20 avis

Mieux classe pour

Grand (75-199 chambres) #12 vs #19
Moyen (25-74 chambres) #14 vs #16
Tres petit (< 10 chambres) #7 vs #14
Chambres d'hotes et auberges #13 vs #18

Fonctionnalites uniques

Intégration des employés Personnalisation et sécurité Support client et ressources Accès mobile messagerie texte SMS
4.8/5 facilite d'utilisation 4.8/5 support 9 integrations
Voir le profil
LIKE MAGIC
LIKE MAGIC
5.0/5 sur 16 avis

Mieux classe pour

Petit (10-24 chambres) #7 vs #17
Sejour prolonge #8 vs #19
DE #3 vs #8
Europe #6 vs #19

Fonctionnalites uniques

Priorisation des travaux Prise en charge de la bibliothèque de fichiers (images, documents et vidéos) La gestion de cas Suivi des tâches en temps réel Journal de bord virtuel
5.0/5 facilite d'utilisation 4.9/5 support 11 integrations
Visiter le site web

Ou les notes divergent le plus

Note globale Beekeeper 4.9 vs 0.0 (+4.9)

Questions frequentes sur Beekeeper (Digital Workspace) vs LIKE MAGIC (Staff App)

Beekeeper (Digital Workspace) peut-il remplacer LIKE MAGIC (Staff App) ?

Cela depend de vos besoins. Beekeeper (Digital Workspace) et LIKE MAGIC (Staff App) partagent de nombreuses fonctionnalites Staff Collaboration Tools de base, mais chacun a des capacites uniques. Beekeeper (Digital Workspace) propose 9 partenaires d'integration verifies, tandis que LIKE MAGIC (Staff App) en propose 11. Consultez la comparaison des fonctionnalites ci-dessus pour voir les differences avant de changer.

Lequel est le mieux adapte aux petits hotels ou hotels independants ?

Les petits hotels devraient privilegier la facilite d'utilisation et une mise en service rapide. LIKE MAGIC (Staff App) est en tete pour la facilite d'utilisation avec 5.0/5 contre 4.8/5. Recherchez une tarification transparente et une option d'essai ou de demonstration. Filtrez les avis sur chaque page produit par taille d'etablissement pour lire les retours d'hotels similaires au votre.

Beekeeper (Digital Workspace) ou LIKE MAGIC (Staff App) proposent-ils une offre gratuite ?

Beekeeper (Digital Workspace) : Non. LIKE MAGIC (Staff App) : Non. Aucun des deux produits ne propose actuellement d'offre gratuite. La plupart des fournisseurs Staff Collaboration Tools proposent des demonstrations ou des essais — demandez-en un a chacun pour evaluer avant de vous engager.

Comment HTR evalue-t-il et classe-t-il Beekeeper (Digital Workspace) et LIKE MAGIC (Staff App) ?

Le HT Score est un classement composite qui prend en compte 4 groupes de criteres et plus d'une douzaine de variables pour aider les hoteliers a comparer objectivement les produits technologiques hoteliers. Beekeeper a un HT Score de 0 et LIKE MAGIC a 0. Voici comment le score est calcule.

Groupe de criteres Ponderation Ce qu'il mesure
Notes et avis clients

A quel point les utilisateurs recommandent-ils ce produit ?

Score des notes, Volume d'avis, Part de voix, Profondeur des avis, Recence des avis, Etudes de cas

Le facteur le plus fortement pondere. Analyse les notes de satisfaction moyennes (probabilite de recommandation, facilite d'utilisation, support, ROI), le nombre total d'avis par rapport aux pairs de la categorie, la recence des avis (au moins 20 avis sur les 6 derniers mois) et la part de voix parmi les clients hoteliers uniques pour detecter les biais de selection.

Ecosysteme partenaire

A quel point les partenaires technologiques recommandent-ils cette entreprise ?

Recommandations des partenaires, Nombre d'integrations, Qualite des integrations

Evalue les recommandations des partenaires comme des votes de confiance d'experts, le nombre d'integrations verifiees et la qualite de l'ecosysteme — la moyenne des HT Scores des partenaires d'integration. Les produits avec des ecosystemes d'integration de meilleure qualite sont plus susceptibles de fournir un ensemble technologique connecte.

Orientation client

A quel point cette organisation est-elle orientee client ?

Support certifie, Regularite des avis, Completude du profil

Evalue si l'entreprise a obtenu la certification HTR de support client, maintient une collecte d'avis reguliere dans le temps (un indicateur de culture axee sur le feedback) et tient a jour les profils produits avec les fonctionnalites, captures d'ecran, tarifs et caracteristiques.

Portee, perennite et ressources

Quelle est l'etendue de la portee et des ressources de cette entreprise ?

Portee geographique, Perennite, Ressources de l'entreprise, Score de tendance

Mesure la presence mondiale (pays et regions desservis), les annees d'activite comme indicateur de stabilite, les effectifs comme indicateur de ressources, et un score de tendance base sur les demandes d'acheteurs, les avis, les recommandations de partenaires et l'activite presse des douze derniers mois.

Les notes et avis clients sont de loin le facteur le plus important dans l'algorithme du HT Score. HTR n'accepte aucun paiement pour un meilleur classement. Tous les avis sont verifies — seuls les professionnels du secteur hotelier avec des affiliations confirmees peuvent soumettre des notes. Voir la methodologie complete du HT Score →

Obtenez votre rapport d'analyste IA gratuit

Recommandations personnalisées adaptées à votre propriété

Ghostel icon
Approuvé par
footer image 1 footer image 2 footer image 3 footer image 4 footer image 5 footer image 6 footer image 7

Cherchons les informations sur votre hôtel