The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
Nous avons analyse 889 avis verifies d'hoteliers, compare les fonctionnalites, les tarifs et des etudes de cas reelles pour identifier les points forts de chaque plateforme. Le bon choix depend du type de votre etablissement et de vos priorites :
Bnovo (Биново) se distingue .
Mews se distingue en ease of use and customer support — en particulier pour les etablissements independent (4.9/5) , avec des fonctionnalites exclusives comme Guest CRM and Guest profiles.
Notes comparees basees sur 889 avis verifies d'hoteliers sur HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Probabilite de recommandation |
|
|
| Facilite d'utilisation |
|
|
| Support client |
|
|
| Rapport qualite-prix |
|
|
| Prix de depart | Contact sales | From $900/mo |
| Avis verifies | 2 | 887 |
Apres analyse de 889 avis verifies, les utilisateurs de Bnovo (Биново) apprecient surtout , tandis que ceux de Mews mettent en avant ease of use, automation and integrations, customizability and flexibility. Cliquez sur un theme pour voir ce que disent les evaluateurs.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Avantages | |
|
+
Ease of Use
▾
|
|
|
+
Automation and Integrations
▾
|
|
|
+
Customizability and Flexibility
▾
|
|
|
+
Intégration et soutien
▾
|
|
| Inconvenients | |
|
−
Billing and Invoicing
▾
|
|
|
−
Rapports et analyses
▾
|
|
|
−
Multi-Property Management
▾
|
|
Comment chaque produit se classe parmi les fournisseurs Systèmes de gestion immobilière pour differentes tailles d'etablissements, types et regions — base sur les avis verifies d'hoteliers dans chaque segment.
Par taille d'hotel
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Petit (10-24 chambres) ▾ | #55 1 avis | #3 329 avis |
| Moyen (25-74 chambres) ▾ | — | #1 397 avis |
| Grand (75-199 chambres) ▾ | #51 0 avis | #3 45 avis |
| Tres grand (200+ chambres) ▾ | — | #3 49 avis |
Par type d'etablissement
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #70 1 avis | #1 483 avis |
| Luxe ▾ | #70 0 avis | #5 220 avis |
| Enseigne / Chaine ▾ | — | #2 170 avis |
| Sejour prolonge ▾ | — | #1 130 avis |
Par region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Amerique du Nord ▾ | — | #8 106 avis |
| Europe ▾ | #39 2 avis | #1 660 avis |
| Asie-Pacifique ▾ | — | #10 17 avis |
| Moyen-Orient ▾ | — | #28 8 avis |
Choosing the right property management system (PMS) is crucial for streamlining your hotel operations, improving guest experiences, and increasing revenue. Both Bnovo PMS by Bnovo and Mews PMS aim to address these needs, but they diverge significantly in maturity, features, and support quality. Do you prioritize a more established platform with extensive integrations and proven results, or are you looking for a newer, highly flexible system with innovative automation?
While Bnovo is a smaller, less-reviewed option focused on specific regions, Mews boasts a globally recognized presence, a vast number of recent reviews, and a broader feature set. Are you ready to make a decision based on data-backed performance and real user feedback?
Bnovo PMS is a cloud-based platform that offers essential property management functionalities with a focus on connectivity and basic automation, primarily serving Europe, the Middle East, and parts of Asia. Its review volume is minimal, with only 2 reviews, none recent, and an overall poor rating of 2.25/5, mainly due to server crashes, poor support, and limited features.
In contrast, Mews PMS has over 750 reviews, with 98 recent ones, and a high rating of 4.62/5. It provides a comprehensive suite of features, including automation, integrations, and guest-centric tools, supported by a global presence across 54 countries. Does your hotel need a mature, well-supported platform that continually evolves?
Edge: Mews.
If your hotel needs a scalable, feature-rich platform that supports multi-property management, automation, and a broad ecosystem of integrations, go with Mews. Its extensive features, including guest CRM, online check-in, automated night audit, and over 336 verified integrations, make it suitable for mid-sized to large hotels and boutique properties wanting advanced tools.
If, however, your property is a smaller operation, primarily serving regional markets and seeking a basic system with limited but essential connectivity, Bnovo might suffice—though its limited review data suggests less reliability and support. Do you require a platform with a proven track record and ongoing innovation?
Edge: Mews.
Bnovo’s usability ratings are modest, with a 3/5 ease of use score, and reviews highlight a frustrating interface, server crashes, and poor support responsiveness. Its onboarding experience receives mixed feedback, often citing technical issues and bugs, which hinder staff adoption.
Mews scores impressively at 4.7/5 for ease of use, with users praising its modern, intuitive interface, quick onboarding, and smooth operation even in multi-property settings. Recent reviews confirm that staff find Mews easy to learn, with its cloud-based platform enabling remote access and management.
Edge: Mews.
Bnovo offers a core set of features, but the total feature count remains unknown and lacks many advanced tools. It does, however, connect to sales channels and provides capacity management, which is valuable but limited.
Mews provides over 40 unique features, including multi-lingual and multi-currency support, guest CRM, automated night audit, digital registration, guest messaging, real-time reporting, task management, and a marketplace with over 1,000 integrations. The platform is designed for automation and guest engagement, setting a high standard.
Edge: Mews.
Bnovo’s support scores a dismal 1.25/5, with reviews criticizing slow responses, unhelpful support staff, and support that does not meet expectations. Multiple reviews describe support as a major pain point, especially during system crashes and bugs.
Mews, on the other hand, scores 4.27/5 for customer support, with users citing prompt, knowledgeable assistance, and active onboarding. Many reviews highlight Mews’ support team as a key advantage, with some mentioning 24/7 live chat and proactive issue resolution.
Edge: Mews.
With only 2 reviews, Bnovo’s ratings are unreliable, and the few reviews are negative, citing bugs and support issues. Mews, however, has 679 reviews from diverse property types, with 93% likelihood to recommend, and ratings consistently above 4.5/5 across segments—independent hotels, boutique, and branded hotels alike.
Mews’s recent reviews from users managing boutique hotels and hostels emphasize its ease of use, automation, and support, while Bnovo’s reviews are mostly negative and outdated. Is your hotel looking for a trusted, highly-rated platform?
Edge: Mews.
Bnovo does not publicly list pricing, implying it may operate on a custom quote or a less transparent model. Mews charges a flat $900 monthly fee, with no implementation or setup costs disclosed, but the pricing model suggests a predictable, scalable approach.
Given the extensive features and support, Mews’s pricing aligns with its premium service level, suitable for hotels seeking comprehensive management tools. Is predictable, feature-rich pricing important for your hotel?
Edge: Mews.
Mews is a mature, feature-rich platform with a broad global footprint and a large, recent review base supporting its reliability. It excels in automation, integrations, and support, making it suitable for hotels aiming to scale and innovate.
Bnovo, while offering connectivity and some automation, suffers from limited reviews, outdated feedback, and support issues, making it less suitable for hotels that need stability and growth-oriented tools.
If your hotel prioritizes proven performance, scalability, and a thriving ecosystem, Mews is the clear choice. For smaller, regional properties with straightforward needs, Bnovo might be considered, but its limited support makes it a risk.
Final recommendation: For most hotels ready to invest in a reliable, comprehensive PMS with extensive features and support, Mews is the stronger option.
La tarification des Systèmes de gestion immobilière est rarement simple. Voici ce que nous savons a partir des donnees tarifaires publiques de chaque fournisseur. Demandez toujours un devis personnalise pour la taille de votre etablissement.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $900/mo |
Selon la base de donnees produits de HTR, Bnovo PMS et Mews PMS partagent 19 fonctionnalites. Voici les differences cles — les fonctionnalites que l'un possede et que l'autre n'a pas.
| Fonctionnalite |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Audit de nuit automatisé | ||
| CRM invité | ||
| Multi-devise | ||
| Multilingue | ||
| Profils d'invités | ||
| Suivi des revenus annexes |
Affichage des principales differences. 28 fonctionnalites supplementaires different entre ces produits.
Nous avons analyse 8 etudes de cas verifiees pour comparer ce que les hotels obtiennent reellement avec chaque plateforme sur quatre objectifs commerciaux cles.
Aucune etude de cas publiee pour cet objectif pour le moment.
"It was vital for us to find a hospitality cloud that would give us the freedom to innovate and move quickly with new technology – that’s one of the main reasons we chose Mews."
Aucune etude de cas publiee pour cet objectif pour le moment.
"Since moving to Mews, we can be so much more agile in how we operate, both in terms of how we engage with guests and testing out new integrations and tools through Mews Marketplace..."
Aucune etude de cas publiee pour cet objectif pour le moment.
"We want to provide the best hospitality for guests anywhere in the country, and Mews is definitely the right solution to help us achieve that goal."
Ce que les hoteliers apprecient
Many reviews highlight the user-friendliness of Mews, citing its intuitive interface that simplifies tasks across various hotel operations. Users find... Many reviews highlight the user-friendliness of Mews, citing its intuitive interface that simplifies tasks across various hotel operations. Users find the platform easy to navigate, which aids in quicker team onboarding and daily use.
Reviews frequently praise Mews for its automation of routine tasks like check-in, billing, and invoicing, reducing manual workload and minimizing erro... Reviews frequently praise Mews for its automation of routine tasks like check-in, billing, and invoicing, reducing manual workload and minimizing errors. Users appreciate the extensive integration options with other tools, which streamline overall operations and enhance efficiency.
Mews allows customization to fit diverse business needs, from rate structures to integration setups. Users appreciate this flexibility, although they... Mews allows customization to fit diverse business needs, from rate structures to integration setups. Users appreciate this flexibility, although they note room for improvement in adapting complex booking conditions and enhancing user-friendly navigation for settings.
Les points de friction pour les hoteliers
Users point out that while Mews offers efficient billing processes, there are complexities and areas needing improvement, such as handling group billi... Users point out that while Mews offers efficient billing processes, there are complexities and areas needing improvement, such as handling group billings, splits, and providing more customizable invoice formats. This can affect the ease of financial operations within the system.
Bien que Mews offre des fonctionnalités de reporting et d'analyse performantes, plusieurs avis soulignent le besoin de fonctionnalités de reporting pl... Bien que Mews offre des fonctionnalités de reporting et d'analyse performantes, plusieurs avis soulignent le besoin de fonctionnalités de reporting plus personnalisables et flexibles. Les utilisateurs souhaitent des analyses de données plus fines, notamment en matière de réservations et de revenus.
Mieux classe pour
Fonctionnalites uniques
Ou les notes divergent le plus
Cela depend de vos besoins. Bnovo PMS et Mews PMS partagent de nombreuses fonctionnalites Property Management Systems de base, mais chacun a des capacites uniques. Bnovo PMS propose 2 partenaires d'integration verifies, tandis que Mews PMS en propose 335. Consultez la comparaison des fonctionnalites ci-dessus pour voir les differences avant de changer.
Les petits hotels devraient privilegier la facilite d'utilisation et une mise en service rapide. Mews PMS est en tete pour la facilite d'utilisation avec 4.7/5 contre 3.0/5. Recherchez une tarification transparente et une option d'essai ou de demonstration. Filtrez les avis sur chaque page produit par taille d'etablissement pour lire les retours d'hotels similaires au votre.
Bnovo PMS : Non. Mews PMS : Non. Aucun des deux produits ne propose actuellement d'offre gratuite. La plupart des fournisseurs Property Management Systems proposent des demonstrations ou des essais — demandez-en un a chacun pour evaluer avant de vous engager.
Le HT Score est un classement composite qui prend en compte 4 groupes de criteres et plus d'une douzaine de variables pour aider les hoteliers a comparer objectivement les produits technologiques hoteliers. Bnovo (Биново) a un HT Score de 0 et Mews a 100. Voici comment le score est calcule.
| Groupe de criteres | Ponderation | Ce qu'il mesure |
|---|---|---|
| Notes et avis clients |
|
A quel point les utilisateurs recommandent-ils ce produit ? Score des notes, Volume d'avis, Part de voix, Profondeur des avis, Recence des avis, Etudes de cas ▾ Le facteur le plus fortement pondere. Analyse les notes de satisfaction moyennes (probabilite de recommandation, facilite d'utilisation, support, ROI), le nombre total d'avis par rapport aux pairs de la categorie, la recence des avis (au moins 20 avis sur les 6 derniers mois) et la part de voix parmi les clients hoteliers uniques pour detecter les biais de selection. |
| Ecosysteme partenaire |
|
A quel point les partenaires technologiques recommandent-ils cette entreprise ? Recommandations des partenaires, Nombre d'integrations, Qualite des integrations ▾ Evalue les recommandations des partenaires comme des votes de confiance d'experts, le nombre d'integrations verifiees et la qualite de l'ecosysteme — la moyenne des HT Scores des partenaires d'integration. Les produits avec des ecosystemes d'integration de meilleure qualite sont plus susceptibles de fournir un ensemble technologique connecte. |
| Orientation client |
|
A quel point cette organisation est-elle orientee client ? Support certifie, Regularite des avis, Completude du profil ▾ Evalue si l'entreprise a obtenu la certification HTR de support client, maintient une collecte d'avis reguliere dans le temps (un indicateur de culture axee sur le feedback) et tient a jour les profils produits avec les fonctionnalites, captures d'ecran, tarifs et caracteristiques. |
| Portee, perennite et ressources |
|
Quelle est l'etendue de la portee et des ressources de cette entreprise ? Portee geographique, Perennite, Ressources de l'entreprise, Score de tendance ▾ Mesure la presence mondiale (pays et regions desservis), les annees d'activite comme indicateur de stabilite, les effectifs comme indicateur de ressources, et un score de tendance base sur les demandes d'acheteurs, les avis, les recommandations de partenaires et l'activite presse des douze derniers mois. |
Les notes et avis clients sont de loin le facteur le plus important dans l'algorithme du HT Score. HTR n'accepte aucun paiement pour un meilleur classement. Tous les avis sont verifies — seuls les professionnels du secteur hotelier avec des affiliations confirmees peuvent soumettre des notes. Voir la methodologie complete du HT Score →
Conseiller en recommandations de produits