The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
Nous avons analyse 887 avis verifies d'hoteliers, compare les fonctionnalites, les tarifs et des etudes de cas reelles pour identifier les points forts de chaque plateforme. Le bon choix depend du type de votre etablissement et de vos priorites :
Bookster se distingue .
Mews se distingue en ease of use and customer support — en particulier pour les etablissements independent (4.9/5) , avec des fonctionnalites exclusives comme Revenue management module and Guest CRM.
Notes comparees basees sur 887 avis verifies d'hoteliers sur HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Probabilite de recommandation |
|
|
| Facilite d'utilisation |
|
|
| Support client |
|
|
| Rapport qualite-prix |
|
|
| Prix de depart | Contact sales | From $900/mo |
| Avis verifies | 0 | 887 |
Apres analyse de 887 avis verifies, les utilisateurs de Bookster apprecient surtout , tandis que ceux de Mews mettent en avant ease of use, automation and integrations, customizability and flexibility. Cliquez sur un theme pour voir ce que disent les evaluateurs.
| Bookster |
|
|---|---|
| Avantages | |
|
+
Ease of Use
▾
|
|
|
+
Automation and Integrations
▾
|
|
|
+
Customizability and Flexibility
▾
|
|
|
+
Intégration et soutien
▾
|
|
| Inconvenients | |
|
−
Billing and Invoicing
▾
|
|
|
−
Rapports et analyses
▾
|
|
|
−
Multi-Property Management
▾
|
|
Comment chaque produit se classe parmi les fournisseurs Systèmes de gestion immobilière pour differentes tailles d'etablissements, types et regions — base sur les avis verifies d'hoteliers dans chaque segment.
Par taille d'hotel
| Segment | Bookster |
|
|---|---|---|
| Petit (10-24 chambres) ▾ | — | #3 329 avis |
| Moyen (25-74 chambres) ▾ | — | #1 397 avis |
| Grand (75-199 chambres) ▾ | — | #3 45 avis |
| Tres grand (200+ chambres) ▾ | — | #3 49 avis |
Par type d'etablissement
| Segment | Bookster |
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | — | #1 483 avis |
| Luxe ▾ | — | #5 220 avis |
| Enseigne / Chaine ▾ | — | #2 170 avis |
| Sejour prolonge ▾ | — | #1 130 avis |
Par region
| Segment | Bookster |
|
|---|---|---|
| Amerique du Nord ▾ | — | #8 106 avis |
| Europe ▾ | — | #1 660 avis |
| Asie-Pacifique ▾ | — | #10 17 avis |
| Moyen-Orient ▾ | — | #28 8 avis |
When choosing a property management system (PMS), your goal is to streamline operations, enhance guest experiences, and maximize revenue. Both Bookster and Mews PMS promise to address these challenges, but they do so with very different levels of maturity and scope. Bookster, with zero recent reviews and a limited presence, seems more like a niche or untested solution, whereas Mews offers a comprehensive, proven platform with over 750 recent reviews and a high user satisfaction rate. So, which product better fits your hotel’s needs?
Bookster aims to serve property managers in vacation rentals and small boutique hotels, focusing on guest reviews and analytics. Mews, on the other hand, supports a wide range of hotel types—from boutique to large chains—and is clearly more established in the market. Do you want to rely on a lesser-known system, or lean on a platform with a proven track record and extensive integrations?
Both products seek to simplify property management, but they diverge sharply in execution. Bookster is described as an intuitive platform tailored to vacation rentals, with features for guest communication and analytics, but it lacks recent review data to confirm ongoing support or feature updates. Mews, by contrast, is a cloud-native PMS with a broad feature set, over 336 verified integrations, and a 4.62/5 rating from 758 recent reviews, emphasizing automation and flexibility.
Mews also has a global presence in 54 countries and multiple awards, whereas Bookster’s regional footprint appears nonexistent. Would you trust a product with no recent customer feedback or one backed by thousands of hotel operators worldwide?
If your hotel needs a scalable, multi-property system with extensive automation, integrations, and a proven track record, go with Mews. Its user-friendly interface and over 98% recommendation rate from recent reviews make it the clear choice for hotels seeking operational efficiency and guest satisfaction.
If your property is a small, independent vacation rental or boutique with a very limited scope and budget, and you’re comfortable with an untested platform, Bookster might suffice. However, given Mews’ superior ratings, reviews, and feature richness, it’s the more reliable choice for most hotels aiming for growth and resilience.
Mews scores a 4.7/5 in ease of use, supported by extensive positive reviews praising its intuitive interface, quick onboarding, and minimal staff training needs. Its onboarding score of 4.39/5 and detailed support infrastructure contribute to a smooth transition for teams.
Bookster, with a 0/5 rating in ease of use and no recent reviews, presents an unknown usability profile. Its lack of recent feedback makes it difficult to assess, but the absence of a strong user base suggests it may not match Mews’ user-friendliness.
Edge: Mews.
Mews offers 59 unique features, including multi-lingual support, revenue management, guest CRM, online check-in, integrated CRS, automated night audit, and a host of operational modules—features that are absent in Bookster. These capabilities empower your team to manage reservations, guest communication, revenue, and operations from a single platform.
Bookster, by comparison, only offers a handful of features focused on guest reviews and analytics, lacking the depth and breadth of automation and operational tools found in Mews. For a hotel seeking a comprehensive management solution, Mews’s feature set is unmatched.
Edge: Mews.
Mews boasts a 4.27/5 customer support score from over 750 recent reviews, with many customers highlighting quick, helpful responses and dedicated onboarding. Reviewers frequently mention that Mews’ support team sets new standards for responsiveness and problem-solving.
Bookster’s support quality remains unverified, with no recent reviews available to assess its responsiveness or effectiveness. Given Mews’ proven track record, it clearly leads in customer support.
Edge: Mews.
Mews integrates with over 336 verified partners, including channel managers, revenue tools, and payment systems, giving your hotel the flexibility to build a tailored tech ecosystem. The Mews Marketplace offers over 1,000 third-party integrations, enabling advanced customization.
Bookster, with no verified integrations, limits your system’s expandability and adaptability. For hotels wishing to incorporate a broad range of tools seamlessly, Mews is the obvious choice.
Edge: Mews.
Mews’s recent reviews reflect a 4.62/5 rating from 758 reviews, with industry-rated satisfaction including high praise from boutique, independent, and chain hotels. The platform’s recent NPS of 9.12 and 93% likelihood to recommend demonstrate strong customer loyalty.
Bookster’s review count is zero; therefore, no recent or reliable ratings exist. For a hotelier seeking validation from peers, Mews’s high rating and recent feedback make it the more trusted option.
Edge: Mews.
Bookster’s pricing details are unavailable, suggesting it may lack transparent or scalable pricing. Mews charges a base fee of $900/month, with no implementation or hidden costs, making it easier to budget.
If cost transparency is crucial, Mews’s clear pricing model supports a better financial planning process.
Mews is a comprehensive, widely adopted PMS with proven results, extensive features, and a strong customer support reputation. It helps hotels automate operations, improve guest satisfaction, and scale efficiently—making it the clear leader.
Bookster, while potentially suitable for very small or niche properties, lacks recent validation, extensive features, and support data. For serious hotels looking for reliability and growth, Mews is the smarter choice.
In sum, if your hotel is seeking a mature, feature-rich platform with proven customer satisfaction, Mews dominates. Its broad integrations, ease of use, and global presence provide the foundation your team needs to succeed in today’s competitive hospitality landscape.
La tarification des Systèmes de gestion immobilière est rarement simple. Voici ce que nous savons a partir des donnees tarifaires publiques de chaque fournisseur. Demandez toujours un devis personnalise pour la taille de votre etablissement.
| Bookster |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $900/mo |
Selon la base de donnees produits de HTR, Bookster et Mews PMS partagent 0 fonctionnalites. Voici les differences cles — les fonctionnalites que l'un possede et que l'autre n'a pas.
| Fonctionnalite | Bookster |
|
|---|---|---|
| CRM invité | ||
| Module de gestion des revenus | ||
| Moteur de réservation | ||
| Multi-devise | ||
| Multilingue | ||
| Profils d'invités |
Affichage des principales differences. 47 fonctionnalites supplementaires different entre ces produits.
Nous avons analyse 8 etudes de cas verifiees pour comparer ce que les hotels obtiennent reellement avec chaque plateforme sur quatre objectifs commerciaux cles.
Aucune etude de cas publiee pour cet objectif pour le moment.
"It was vital for us to find a hospitality cloud that would give us the freedom to innovate and move quickly with new technology – that’s one of the main reasons we chose Mews."
Aucune etude de cas publiee pour cet objectif pour le moment.
"Since moving to Mews, we can be so much more agile in how we operate, both in terms of how we engage with guests and testing out new integrations and tools through Mews Marketplace..."
Aucune etude de cas publiee pour cet objectif pour le moment.
"We want to provide the best hospitality for guests anywhere in the country, and Mews is definitely the right solution to help us achieve that goal."
Ce que les hoteliers apprecient
Many reviews highlight the user-friendliness of Mews, citing its intuitive interface that simplifies tasks across various hotel operations. Users find... Many reviews highlight the user-friendliness of Mews, citing its intuitive interface that simplifies tasks across various hotel operations. Users find the platform easy to navigate, which aids in quicker team onboarding and daily use.
Reviews frequently praise Mews for its automation of routine tasks like check-in, billing, and invoicing, reducing manual workload and minimizing erro... Reviews frequently praise Mews for its automation of routine tasks like check-in, billing, and invoicing, reducing manual workload and minimizing errors. Users appreciate the extensive integration options with other tools, which streamline overall operations and enhance efficiency.
Mews allows customization to fit diverse business needs, from rate structures to integration setups. Users appreciate this flexibility, although they... Mews allows customization to fit diverse business needs, from rate structures to integration setups. Users appreciate this flexibility, although they note room for improvement in adapting complex booking conditions and enhancing user-friendly navigation for settings.
Les points de friction pour les hoteliers
Users point out that while Mews offers efficient billing processes, there are complexities and areas needing improvement, such as handling group billi... Users point out that while Mews offers efficient billing processes, there are complexities and areas needing improvement, such as handling group billings, splits, and providing more customizable invoice formats. This can affect the ease of financial operations within the system.
Bien que Mews offre des fonctionnalités de reporting et d'analyse performantes, plusieurs avis soulignent le besoin de fonctionnalités de reporting pl... Bien que Mews offre des fonctionnalités de reporting et d'analyse performantes, plusieurs avis soulignent le besoin de fonctionnalités de reporting plus personnalisables et flexibles. Les utilisateurs souhaitent des analyses de données plus fines, notamment en matière de réservations et de revenus.
Fonctionnalites uniques
Ou les notes divergent le plus
Cela depend de vos besoins. Bookster et Mews PMS partagent de nombreuses fonctionnalites Property Management Systems de base, mais chacun a des capacites uniques. Bookster propose 0 partenaires d'integration verifies, tandis que Mews PMS en propose 335. Consultez la comparaison des fonctionnalites ci-dessus pour voir les differences avant de changer.
Les petits hotels devraient privilegier la facilite d'utilisation et une mise en service rapide. Mews PMS est en tete pour la facilite d'utilisation avec 4.7/5 contre 0.0/5. Recherchez une tarification transparente et une option d'essai ou de demonstration. Filtrez les avis sur chaque page produit par taille d'etablissement pour lire les retours d'hotels similaires au votre.
Bookster : Non. Mews PMS : Non. Aucun des deux produits ne propose actuellement d'offre gratuite. La plupart des fournisseurs Property Management Systems proposent des demonstrations ou des essais — demandez-en un a chacun pour evaluer avant de vous engager.
Le HT Score est un classement composite qui prend en compte 4 groupes de criteres et plus d'une douzaine de variables pour aider les hoteliers a comparer objectivement les produits technologiques hoteliers. Bookster a un HT Score de 0 et Mews a 99. Voici comment le score est calcule.
| Groupe de criteres | Ponderation | Ce qu'il mesure |
|---|---|---|
| Notes et avis clients |
|
A quel point les utilisateurs recommandent-ils ce produit ? Score des notes, Volume d'avis, Part de voix, Profondeur des avis, Recence des avis, Etudes de cas ▾ Le facteur le plus fortement pondere. Analyse les notes de satisfaction moyennes (probabilite de recommandation, facilite d'utilisation, support, ROI), le nombre total d'avis par rapport aux pairs de la categorie, la recence des avis (au moins 20 avis sur les 6 derniers mois) et la part de voix parmi les clients hoteliers uniques pour detecter les biais de selection. |
| Ecosysteme partenaire |
|
A quel point les partenaires technologiques recommandent-ils cette entreprise ? Recommandations des partenaires, Nombre d'integrations, Qualite des integrations ▾ Evalue les recommandations des partenaires comme des votes de confiance d'experts, le nombre d'integrations verifiees et la qualite de l'ecosysteme — la moyenne des HT Scores des partenaires d'integration. Les produits avec des ecosystemes d'integration de meilleure qualite sont plus susceptibles de fournir un ensemble technologique connecte. |
| Orientation client |
|
A quel point cette organisation est-elle orientee client ? Support certifie, Regularite des avis, Completude du profil ▾ Evalue si l'entreprise a obtenu la certification HTR de support client, maintient une collecte d'avis reguliere dans le temps (un indicateur de culture axee sur le feedback) et tient a jour les profils produits avec les fonctionnalites, captures d'ecran, tarifs et caracteristiques. |
| Portee, perennite et ressources |
|
Quelle est l'etendue de la portee et des ressources de cette entreprise ? Portee geographique, Perennite, Ressources de l'entreprise, Score de tendance ▾ Mesure la presence mondiale (pays et regions desservis), les annees d'activite comme indicateur de stabilite, les effectifs comme indicateur de ressources, et un score de tendance base sur les demandes d'acheteurs, les avis, les recommandations de partenaires et l'activite presse des douze derniers mois. |
Les notes et avis clients sont de loin le facteur le plus important dans l'algorithme du HT Score. HTR n'accepte aucun paiement pour un meilleur classement. Tous les avis sont verifies — seuls les professionnels du secteur hotelier avec des affiliations confirmees peuvent soumettre des notes. Voir la methodologie complete du HT Score →
Recommandations personnalisées adaptées à votre propriété