The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
Nous avons analyse 17 avis verifies d'hoteliers, compare les fonctionnalites, les tarifs et des etudes de cas reelles pour identifier les points forts de chaque plateforme. Le bon choix depend du type de votre etablissement et de vos priorites :
Building Link se distingue .
LIKE MAGIC se distingue , avec des fonctionnalites exclusives comme Mobile access on any device.
Notes comparees basees sur 17 avis verifies d'hoteliers sur HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Probabilite de recommandation |
|
|
| Facilite d'utilisation |
|
|
| Support client |
|
|
| Rapport qualite-prix |
|
|
| Prix de depart | Contact sales | From $1,100/mo |
| Avis verifies | 1 | 16 |
Comment chaque produit se classe parmi les fournisseurs Outils de collaboration du personnel pour differentes tailles d'etablissements, types et regions — base sur les avis verifies d'hoteliers dans chaque segment.
Par taille d'hotel
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Petit (10-24 chambres) ▾ | — | #7 7 avis |
| Moyen (25-74 chambres) ▾ | — | #16 5 avis |
| Grand (75-199 chambres) | #23 1 avis | #19 2 avis |
Par type d'etablissement
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | — | #17 5 avis |
| Luxe | #25 1 avis | #24 2 avis |
| Enseigne / Chaine | — | #25 1 avis |
| Sejour prolonge ▾ | #23 0 avis | #8 8 avis |
Par region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Amerique du Nord | #29 1 avis | #33 0 avis |
| Europe ▾ | — | #6 15 avis |
Choosing between BuildingLink and LIKE MAGIC hinges on your hotel’s specific operational needs and growth stage. Both aim to streamline staff collaboration, but they approach this goal differently: BuildingLink focuses on property management for residential settings, while LIKE MAGIC targets automating guest interactions and operational workflows. Your decision should be guided by whether your priority is resident management or guest experience automation.
BuildingLink offers a broad set of tools for managing large-scale residential or multifamily properties, while LIKE MAGIC leans into automating the guest journey with a highly feature-rich platform. Which aligns better with your hotel’s core operations?
BuildingLink is a mature platform with a focus on property management, offering comprehensive tools for communication, maintenance, and resident management. Its high ease of use rating (5/5) and extensive support make it suitable for large residential properties, but it’s less tailored to the hospitality sector.
LIKE MAGIC, on the other hand, is a newer, hotel-specific platform with 16 reviews favoring its automation features. It integrates PMS, messaging, and access systems to streamline guest interactions, with a focus on reducing staffing needs and enhancing guest satisfaction.
Both platforms facilitate staff collaboration, but BuildingLink’s strength lies in managing property details and resident communication, whereas LIKE MAGIC excels at automating the guest experience and operational workflows. Which problem is more urgent for your team?
If your hotel operates like a residential community or multifamily property, prioritizing maintenance, resident communication, and property management, BuildingLink is the better choice. It’s proven in over 3,200 properties worldwide, with a 5/5 overall rating backed by just one review but a solid reputation for ease of management.
If your hotel needs to automate guest check-ins, streamline service requests, or reduce staffing costs, LIKE MAGIC’s 16 reviews and near-perfect 4.94/5 value score suggest it’s more suited. Its automation features, like digital check-in, guest messaging, and real-time task tracking, make it ideal for properties aiming to deliver a seamless, contactless guest experience.
In essence, choose BuildingLink for property management complexity, and LIKE MAGIC for operational automation and guest-centric workflows.
BuildingLink boasts a perfect 5/5 ease of use rating, with reviews emphasizing its user-friendly interface and straightforward onboarding process. Its focus on customization and management features makes it accessible even for large teams, with no significant complaints about its usability.
LIKE MAGIC also scores 5/5 in ease of use, with recent reviews highlighting its intuitive mobile-first platform and seamless integration capabilities. Guests and staff find the system efficient, though some users express a desire for more self-service options.
Edge: BuildingLink.
BuildingLink provides essential property management features like maintenance requests, package tracking, resident portals, and customizable profiles—no exclusive features. It has zero unique features compared to LIKE MAGIC.
LIKE MAGIC, however, offers 12 distinct features such as work prioritization, real-time task tracking, file libraries, automation replies, and an open API, enabling more sophisticated workflows. Its automation and guest engagement tools are unmatched, with capabilities designed to reduce staff workload and improve guest satisfaction.
Edge: LIKE MAGIC.
BuildingLink’s support scores a perfect 5/5, with reviews praising its comprehensive onboarding, responsive support team, and ongoing training. Users report that support is attentive and proactive, making adoption smooth.
LIKE MAGIC’s support is also excellent, with a 4.88/5 rating and recent reviews emphasizing quick response times and helpful assistance. Some users mention that more self-service support options could enhance their experience further.
Edge: BuildingLink.
BuildingLink currently has no verified integrations, limiting its ability to connect with PMS or other third-party systems—this can be a constraint depending on your existing infrastructure.
LIKE MAGIC boasts 10 verified integrations, including major PMS providers and technology partners like Mews, Oracle Hospitality, and SALTO Systems. Its open API and extensive partner network allow for more seamless data flow and automation across your hotel’s tech stack.
Edge: LIKE MAGIC.
BuildingLink, with only one review, has a perfect 5/5 rating, but its limited sample size makes it less reliable for broader decision-making.
LIKE MAGIC has 16 reviews with an average of 4.94/5, and recent feedback from diverse property types—such as boutique hotels, city centers, and extended stays—confirms high satisfaction levels. This larger, more recent review base indicates stronger confidence in user experience.
Edge: LIKE MAGIC.
BuildingLink does not publicly disclose pricing, but it’s generally marketed as a premium property management solution, often customized per property, which can imply higher costs.
LIKE MAGIC charges $1,100 per month, with no free tier, making it a transparent option with predictable costs. Additional setup or customization may incur further charges.
If budget transparency is critical, LIKE MAGIC’s straightforward pricing is advantageous.
Hotels that:
Not ideal if:
Hotels that:
Not ideal if:
BuildingLink is a seasoned property management platform with a focus on resident and building management, appealing to large residential or multifamily properties. Its strengths lie in customization, support, and management features suited for complex property portfolios.
LIKE MAGIC, by contrast, is a highly rated, automation-focused platform designed to enhance guest experiences and operational efficiency. Its rich feature set and integrations make it the better choice for hotels looking to streamline guest interactions and reduce staffing.
Choose BuildingLink if your hotel’s core needs revolve around property management, resident communication, and maintenance. Opt for LIKE MAGIC if your priority is automating the guest journey, cutting operational costs, and improving satisfaction through digital workflows.
In conclusion, both platforms excel in their domains, but for hoteliers seeking a solution with more recent reviews and broader functionality tailored to hospitality, LIKE MAGIC’s superior review count and higher recent user ratings make it the stronger option.
La tarification des Outils de collaboration du personnel est rarement simple. Voici ce que nous savons a partir des donnees tarifaires publiques de chaque fournisseur. Demandez toujours un devis personnalise pour la taille de votre etablissement.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $1,100/mo |
Voici les fonctionnalites configurees par chaque fournisseur, organisees par groupe de fonctionnalites — les memes donnees que dans le tableau de bord du fournisseur. Developpez un groupe pour comparer les fonctionnalites cote a cote.
| Fonctionnalite |
|
|
|---|---|---|
|
▾
Gestion des tâches
|
|
|
| Priorisation des travaux | ||
| Prise en charge de la bibliothèque de fichiers (images, documents et vidéos) | ||
| Suivi des actifs | ||
| La gestion de cas | ||
| Inspection | ||
| Nettoyage en profondeur | ||
| Module de maintenance préventive | ||
| Suivi des tâches en temps réel | ||
| Journal de bord virtuel | ||
| Module perdu & trouvé | ||
| Départs tardifs | ||
|
▾
Messagerie et collaboration
|
|
|
| Routage des messages | ||
| Définition des objectifs de l'équipe (par exemple, inscriptions aux récompenses, satisfaction) | ||
| Traduction dans l'application | ||
| Accès mobile sur n'importe quel appareil | ||
|
▾
Escalades et alertes
|
|
|
| Récupération/escalade de service | ||
|
▾
Rapports
|
|
|
| Tableau de bord analytique | ||
| Suivi de portefeuille multi-immeubles | ||
| Imprimer les anciens enregistrements | ||
| Relevé de compteur | ||
| Suivi de la rémunération | ||
|
▾
Automatisation
|
|
|
| Automated Replies | ||
| Message Templates | ||
| API ouverte | ||
|
▾
Modèles
|
|
|
| Message Templates |
Nous avons analyse 4 etudes de cas verifiees pour comparer ce que les hotels obtiennent reellement avec chaque plateforme sur quatre objectifs commerciaux cles.
Aucune etude de cas publiee pour cet objectif pour le moment.
"Like Magic allowed us to operate with just six staff members, without compromising guest experience. The platform is easy to use, fun to work with, and has revolutionized how we ru..."
Aucune etude de cas publiee pour cet objectif pour le moment.
"LIKE MAGIC isn't just a tool for us, it's the backbone of our overall guest experience. If I ever worked somewhere else, I'd bring it with me."
Mieux classe pour
Mieux classe pour
Fonctionnalites uniques
Ou les notes divergent le plus
Cela depend de vos besoins. BuildingLink et LIKE MAGIC (Staff App) partagent de nombreuses fonctionnalites Staff Collaboration Tools de base, mais chacun a des capacites uniques. BuildingLink propose 0 partenaires d'integration verifies, tandis que LIKE MAGIC (Staff App) en propose 10. Consultez la comparaison des fonctionnalites ci-dessus pour voir les differences avant de changer.
Les petits hotels devraient privilegier la facilite d'utilisation et une mise en service rapide. BuildingLink est en tete pour la facilite d'utilisation avec 5.0/5 contre 5.0/5. Recherchez une tarification transparente et une option d'essai ou de demonstration. Filtrez les avis sur chaque page produit par taille d'etablissement pour lire les retours d'hotels similaires au votre.
BuildingLink : Non. LIKE MAGIC (Staff App) : Non. Aucun des deux produits ne propose actuellement d'offre gratuite. La plupart des fournisseurs Staff Collaboration Tools proposent des demonstrations ou des essais — demandez-en un a chacun pour evaluer avant de vous engager.
Le HT Score est un classement composite qui prend en compte 4 groupes de criteres et plus d'une douzaine de variables pour aider les hoteliers a comparer objectivement les produits technologiques hoteliers. Building Link a un HT Score de 0 et LIKE MAGIC a 0. Voici comment le score est calcule.
| Groupe de criteres | Ponderation | Ce qu'il mesure |
|---|---|---|
| Notes et avis clients |
|
A quel point les utilisateurs recommandent-ils ce produit ? Score des notes, Volume d'avis, Part de voix, Profondeur des avis, Recence des avis, Etudes de cas ▾ Le facteur le plus fortement pondere. Analyse les notes de satisfaction moyennes (probabilite de recommandation, facilite d'utilisation, support, ROI), le nombre total d'avis par rapport aux pairs de la categorie, la recence des avis (au moins 20 avis sur les 6 derniers mois) et la part de voix parmi les clients hoteliers uniques pour detecter les biais de selection. |
| Ecosysteme partenaire |
|
A quel point les partenaires technologiques recommandent-ils cette entreprise ? Recommandations des partenaires, Nombre d'integrations, Qualite des integrations ▾ Evalue les recommandations des partenaires comme des votes de confiance d'experts, le nombre d'integrations verifiees et la qualite de l'ecosysteme — la moyenne des HT Scores des partenaires d'integration. Les produits avec des ecosystemes d'integration de meilleure qualite sont plus susceptibles de fournir un ensemble technologique connecte. |
| Orientation client |
|
A quel point cette organisation est-elle orientee client ? Support certifie, Regularite des avis, Completude du profil ▾ Evalue si l'entreprise a obtenu la certification HTR de support client, maintient une collecte d'avis reguliere dans le temps (un indicateur de culture axee sur le feedback) et tient a jour les profils produits avec les fonctionnalites, captures d'ecran, tarifs et caracteristiques. |
| Portee, perennite et ressources |
|
Quelle est l'etendue de la portee et des ressources de cette entreprise ? Portee geographique, Perennite, Ressources de l'entreprise, Score de tendance ▾ Mesure la presence mondiale (pays et regions desservis), les annees d'activite comme indicateur de stabilite, les effectifs comme indicateur de ressources, et un score de tendance base sur les demandes d'acheteurs, les avis, les recommandations de partenaires et l'activite presse des douze derniers mois. |
Les notes et avis clients sont de loin le facteur le plus important dans l'algorithme du HT Score. HTR n'accepte aucun paiement pour un meilleur classement. Tous les avis sont verifies — seuls les professionnels du secteur hotelier avec des affiliations confirmees peuvent soumettre des notes. Voir la methodologie complete du HT Score →
Recommandations personnalisées adaptées à votre propriété