The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
Nous avons analyse 887 avis verifies d'hoteliers, compare les fonctionnalites, les tarifs et des etudes de cas reelles pour identifier les points forts de chaque plateforme. Le bon choix depend du type de votre etablissement et de vos priorites :
ButikSoft se distingue .
Mews se distingue en ease of use and customer support — en particulier pour les etablissements independent (4.9/5) , avec des fonctionnalites exclusives comme Revenue management module and Guest CRM.
Notes comparees basees sur 887 avis verifies d'hoteliers sur HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Probabilite de recommandation |
|
|
| Facilite d'utilisation |
|
|
| Support client |
|
|
| Rapport qualite-prix |
|
|
| Prix de depart | Contact sales | From $900/mo |
| Avis verifies | 0 | 887 |
Apres analyse de 887 avis verifies, les utilisateurs de ButikSoft apprecient surtout , tandis que ceux de Mews mettent en avant ease of use, automation and integrations, customizability and flexibility. Cliquez sur un theme pour voir ce que disent les evaluateurs.
| ButikSoft |
|
|---|---|
| Avantages | |
|
+
Ease of Use
▾
|
|
|
+
Automation and Integrations
▾
|
|
|
+
Customizability and Flexibility
▾
|
|
|
+
Intégration et soutien
▾
|
|
| Inconvenients | |
|
−
Billing and Invoicing
▾
|
|
|
−
Rapports et analyses
▾
|
|
|
−
Multi-Property Management
▾
|
|
Comment chaque produit se classe parmi les fournisseurs Systèmes de gestion immobilière pour differentes tailles d'etablissements, types et regions — base sur les avis verifies d'hoteliers dans chaque segment.
Par taille d'hotel
| Segment | ButikSoft |
|
|---|---|---|
| Petit (10-24 chambres) ▾ | — | #3 329 avis |
| Moyen (25-74 chambres) ▾ | — | #1 397 avis |
| Grand (75-199 chambres) ▾ | — | #3 45 avis |
| Tres grand (200+ chambres) ▾ | — | #3 49 avis |
Par type d'etablissement
| Segment | ButikSoft |
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | — | #1 483 avis |
| Luxe ▾ | — | #5 220 avis |
| Enseigne / Chaine ▾ | — | #2 170 avis |
| Sejour prolonge ▾ | — | #1 130 avis |
Par region
| Segment | ButikSoft |
|
|---|---|---|
| Amerique du Nord ▾ | — | #8 106 avis |
| Europe ▾ | — | #1 660 avis |
| Asie-Pacifique ▾ | — | #10 17 avis |
| Moyen-Orient ▾ | — | #28 8 avis |
When choosing a property management system (PMS) for your hotel, you want a solution that improves operational efficiency, enhances guest experiences, and offers reliable support. Both ButikSoft PMS and Mews PMS aim to meet these needs but diverge significantly in their market presence, reviews, and feature sets. Are you looking for a proven, widely adopted platform with modern features? Or are you considering a less-established system with unknown reliability? The choice hinges on your hotel’s size, complexity, and growth plans.
While ButikSoft claims to serve the hotel industry, it boasts no recent reviews or ratings, making it impossible to assess its real-world performance. Mews, on the other hand, commands over 750 reviews with an overall rating of 4.62 out of 5, and most recent feedback is highly positive, indicating its standing as a leading PMS provider. Do you want a solution backed by a large, active user base and ongoing support? Or are you comfortable with an untested system?
Both systems aim to streamline hotel operations but for entirely different reasons. ButikSoft is a little-known PMS with no recent reviews or ratings, implying limited market traction and unknown functionality. Conversely, Mews is a cloud-based platform with over 750 recent reviews, a high NPS score of 9.12, and a 4.62/5 overall rating, reflecting widespread user satisfaction and consistent updates.
Mews excels in core areas such as ease of use, support, and integrations, backed by a substantial presence in multiple regions—including North America, Europe, and Asia Pacific—serving a diverse hotel portfolio. ButikSoft appears to lack regional coverage and verified integrations, raising questions about its scalability and adaptability. Is your priority to choose a tested, trusted solution or to gamble on an unverified system?
If your hotel needs a reliable, scalable PMS with a vast ecosystem of integrations and proven high performance, go with Mews. Its extensive features, active user community, and industry recognition make it the clear leader. For boutique hotels, hostels, or properties seeking rapid digital transformation, Mews’ modern interface and high user ratings (4.64/5 for boutique hotels) make it the better choice.
If your hotel operates at a small scale and prefers to explore untested options or has very niche requirements, ButikSoft might be worth considering—though the lack of recent reviews makes this a risky play. For most hotels, especially those planning growth, Mews provides more certainty, proven performance, and ongoing innovation.
Mews offers a highly-rated user interface with a 4.7/5 ease of use score and recent reviews praising its intuitive design and quick onboarding process. Support experiences are positive, with many users noting prompt, helpful assistance and comprehensive onboarding valued at a 4.39/5 rating.
ButikSoft, however, has no publicly available ratings or recent reviews, making usability assumptions impossible. Its lack of feedback suggests uncertainty about whether staff adoption or onboarding will be smooth. Edge: Mews.
Mews provides an extensive suite of over 59 features, including multi-lingual support, revenue management, integrated CRS, guest CRM, online check-in, automated night audit, task management, and real-time reporting. Its marketplace offers over 1,000 integrations, supporting a flexible, dynamic hotel ecosystem.
In contrast, ButikSoft claims no exclusive features and offers no verified integrations. Its limited feature set, combined with no recent reviews, means it likely lacks the depth and sophistication needed for modern hotel management. Edge: Mews.
Mews is rated 4.27/5 for customer support, with recent reviews highlighting quick responses, helpful onboarding, and continuous platform improvements. Users report that Mews support is a key factor in their satisfaction, especially with their 24/7 live chat and dedicated onboarding.
ButikSoft offers no verifiable support ratings or recent user feedback, leaving its support quality uncertain. Without recent reviews, you cannot confidently gauge its responsiveness or effectiveness. Edge: Mews.
Mews boasts 336 verified integrations, including popular partners like Criton, Sage, and Orange Hotel Marketing. Its open API and expansive marketplace allow hotels to customize and scale their tech stack efficiently.
ButikSoft has no listed verified partners, and with no recent reviews or mention of integrations, it’s unlikely to meet the needs of hotels requiring seamless connectivity. Edge: Mews.
Mews consistently receives high ratings across segments, with a 4.64/5 average from 679 reviews, and an overall NPS of 9.12/5. Hoteliers in boutique, independent, and branded hotels praise its ease of use, reliability, and support.
ButikSoft has no recent reviews or ratings, making it impossible to determine user satisfaction. Given the data, Mews’s established reputation suggests it is the preferred choice among hoteliers. Edge: Mews.
Mews charges a flat $900 monthly subscription, with no mention of implementation fees or trial options, which suggests a clear pricing structure for medium to large hotels. ButikSoft’s pricing is unavailable, and no trial information exists, indicating opacity or potential hidden costs.
For hotels seeking transparent, predictable pricing, Mews’s model provides clarity. Without pricing data, ButikSoft remains an uncertain option.
Mews is a comprehensive, well-rated PMS trusted by hundreds of hotels worldwide, with a proven track record of high guest satisfaction and operational efficiency. Its extensive features, integrations, and support make it the clear choice for hotels serious about growth and innovation.
Choose Mews if you want a modern, reliable system with a strong market presence, active user feedback, and ongoing updates. It’s especially suitable if your hotel values scalability, automation, and a thriving ecosystem.
ButikSoft, lacking recent reviews and verified features, remains an uncertain option. It could be considered only by niche hotels with specific needs or those willing to accept the risks of an untested platform.
In conclusion, for most hotels, Mews offers a safer, more proven path to operational excellence and guest satisfaction. Its reputation, feature depth, and support infrastructure make it the definitive choice in today’s competitive hospitality landscape.
La tarification des Systèmes de gestion immobilière est rarement simple. Voici ce que nous savons a partir des donnees tarifaires publiques de chaque fournisseur. Demandez toujours un devis personnalise pour la taille de votre etablissement.
| ButikSoft |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $900/mo |
Selon la base de donnees produits de HTR, ButikSoft PMS et Mews PMS partagent 0 fonctionnalites. Voici les differences cles — les fonctionnalites que l'un possede et que l'autre n'a pas.
| Fonctionnalite | ButikSoft |
|
|---|---|---|
| CRM invité | ||
| Module de gestion des revenus | ||
| Moteur de réservation | ||
| Multi-devise | ||
| Multilingue | ||
| Profils d'invités |
Affichage des principales differences. 47 fonctionnalites supplementaires different entre ces produits.
Nous avons analyse 8 etudes de cas verifiees pour comparer ce que les hotels obtiennent reellement avec chaque plateforme sur quatre objectifs commerciaux cles.
Aucune etude de cas publiee pour cet objectif pour le moment.
"It was vital for us to find a hospitality cloud that would give us the freedom to innovate and move quickly with new technology – that’s one of the main reasons we chose Mews."
Aucune etude de cas publiee pour cet objectif pour le moment.
"Since moving to Mews, we can be so much more agile in how we operate, both in terms of how we engage with guests and testing out new integrations and tools through Mews Marketplace..."
Aucune etude de cas publiee pour cet objectif pour le moment.
"We want to provide the best hospitality for guests anywhere in the country, and Mews is definitely the right solution to help us achieve that goal."
Ce que les hoteliers apprecient
Many reviews highlight the user-friendliness of Mews, citing its intuitive interface that simplifies tasks across various hotel operations. Users find... Many reviews highlight the user-friendliness of Mews, citing its intuitive interface that simplifies tasks across various hotel operations. Users find the platform easy to navigate, which aids in quicker team onboarding and daily use.
Reviews frequently praise Mews for its automation of routine tasks like check-in, billing, and invoicing, reducing manual workload and minimizing erro... Reviews frequently praise Mews for its automation of routine tasks like check-in, billing, and invoicing, reducing manual workload and minimizing errors. Users appreciate the extensive integration options with other tools, which streamline overall operations and enhance efficiency.
Mews allows customization to fit diverse business needs, from rate structures to integration setups. Users appreciate this flexibility, although they... Mews allows customization to fit diverse business needs, from rate structures to integration setups. Users appreciate this flexibility, although they note room for improvement in adapting complex booking conditions and enhancing user-friendly navigation for settings.
Les points de friction pour les hoteliers
Users point out that while Mews offers efficient billing processes, there are complexities and areas needing improvement, such as handling group billi... Users point out that while Mews offers efficient billing processes, there are complexities and areas needing improvement, such as handling group billings, splits, and providing more customizable invoice formats. This can affect the ease of financial operations within the system.
Bien que Mews offre des fonctionnalités de reporting et d'analyse performantes, plusieurs avis soulignent le besoin de fonctionnalités de reporting pl... Bien que Mews offre des fonctionnalités de reporting et d'analyse performantes, plusieurs avis soulignent le besoin de fonctionnalités de reporting plus personnalisables et flexibles. Les utilisateurs souhaitent des analyses de données plus fines, notamment en matière de réservations et de revenus.
Fonctionnalites uniques
Ou les notes divergent le plus
Cela depend de vos besoins. ButikSoft PMS et Mews PMS partagent de nombreuses fonctionnalites Property Management Systems de base, mais chacun a des capacites uniques. ButikSoft PMS propose 0 partenaires d'integration verifies, tandis que Mews PMS en propose 335. Consultez la comparaison des fonctionnalites ci-dessus pour voir les differences avant de changer.
Les petits hotels devraient privilegier la facilite d'utilisation et une mise en service rapide. Mews PMS est en tete pour la facilite d'utilisation avec 4.7/5 contre 0.0/5. Recherchez une tarification transparente et une option d'essai ou de demonstration. Filtrez les avis sur chaque page produit par taille d'etablissement pour lire les retours d'hotels similaires au votre.
ButikSoft PMS : Non. Mews PMS : Non. Aucun des deux produits ne propose actuellement d'offre gratuite. La plupart des fournisseurs Property Management Systems proposent des demonstrations ou des essais — demandez-en un a chacun pour evaluer avant de vous engager.
Le HT Score est un classement composite qui prend en compte 4 groupes de criteres et plus d'une douzaine de variables pour aider les hoteliers a comparer objectivement les produits technologiques hoteliers. ButikSoft a un HT Score de 0 et Mews a 100. Voici comment le score est calcule.
| Groupe de criteres | Ponderation | Ce qu'il mesure |
|---|---|---|
| Notes et avis clients |
|
A quel point les utilisateurs recommandent-ils ce produit ? Score des notes, Volume d'avis, Part de voix, Profondeur des avis, Recence des avis, Etudes de cas ▾ Le facteur le plus fortement pondere. Analyse les notes de satisfaction moyennes (probabilite de recommandation, facilite d'utilisation, support, ROI), le nombre total d'avis par rapport aux pairs de la categorie, la recence des avis (au moins 20 avis sur les 6 derniers mois) et la part de voix parmi les clients hoteliers uniques pour detecter les biais de selection. |
| Ecosysteme partenaire |
|
A quel point les partenaires technologiques recommandent-ils cette entreprise ? Recommandations des partenaires, Nombre d'integrations, Qualite des integrations ▾ Evalue les recommandations des partenaires comme des votes de confiance d'experts, le nombre d'integrations verifiees et la qualite de l'ecosysteme — la moyenne des HT Scores des partenaires d'integration. Les produits avec des ecosystemes d'integration de meilleure qualite sont plus susceptibles de fournir un ensemble technologique connecte. |
| Orientation client |
|
A quel point cette organisation est-elle orientee client ? Support certifie, Regularite des avis, Completude du profil ▾ Evalue si l'entreprise a obtenu la certification HTR de support client, maintient une collecte d'avis reguliere dans le temps (un indicateur de culture axee sur le feedback) et tient a jour les profils produits avec les fonctionnalites, captures d'ecran, tarifs et caracteristiques. |
| Portee, perennite et ressources |
|
Quelle est l'etendue de la portee et des ressources de cette entreprise ? Portee geographique, Perennite, Ressources de l'entreprise, Score de tendance ▾ Mesure la presence mondiale (pays et regions desservis), les annees d'activite comme indicateur de stabilite, les effectifs comme indicateur de ressources, et un score de tendance base sur les demandes d'acheteurs, les avis, les recommandations de partenaires et l'activite presse des douze derniers mois. |
Les notes et avis clients sont de loin le facteur le plus important dans l'algorithme du HT Score. HTR n'accepte aucun paiement pour un meilleur classement. Tous les avis sont verifies — seuls les professionnels du secteur hotelier avec des affiliations confirmees peuvent soumettre des notes. Voir la methodologie complete du HT Score →
Conseiller en recommandations de produits