The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
Nous avons analyse 169 avis verifies d'hoteliers, compare les fonctionnalites, les tarifs et des etudes de cas reelles pour identifier les points forts de chaque plateforme. Le bon choix depend du type de votre etablissement et de vos priorites :
Cashpad se distingue .
Mews se distingue en ease of use and customer support , avec des fonctionnalites exclusives comme Payment Log Reports and Mobile Ordering.
Notes comparees basees sur 169 avis verifies d'hoteliers sur HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Probabilite de recommandation |
|
|
| Facilite d'utilisation |
|
|
| Support client |
|
|
| Rapport qualite-prix |
|
|
| Prix de depart | Contact sales | From $200/mo |
| Avis verifies | 0 | 169 |
Apres analyse de 169 avis verifies, les utilisateurs de Cashpad apprecient surtout , tandis que ceux de Mews mettent en avant interface utilisateur et rapports, integration with third-party systems, seamless pms integration. Cliquez sur un theme pour voir ce que disent les evaluateurs.
| Cashpad |
|
|---|---|
| Avantages | |
|
+
Interface utilisateur et rapports
▾
|
|
|
+
Integration with Third-Party Systems
▾
|
|
|
+
Seamless PMS Integration
▾
|
|
|
+
Automation and Efficiency
▾
|
|
| Inconvenients | |
|
−
Product Development and Feature Evolution
▾
|
|
|
−
Personnalisation et flexibilité
▾
|
|
|
−
Améliorations opérationnelles
▾
|
|
Comment chaque produit se classe parmi les fournisseurs Systèmes de point de vente hôteliers pour differentes tailles d'etablissements, types et regions — base sur les avis verifies d'hoteliers dans chaque segment.
Par taille d'hotel
| Segment | Cashpad |
|
|---|---|---|
| Petit (10-24 chambres) ▾ | — | #2 44 avis |
| Moyen (25-74 chambres) ▾ | — | #3 94 avis |
| Grand (75-199 chambres) ▾ | — | #5 7 avis |
| Tres grand (200+ chambres) ▾ | — | #2 9 avis |
Par type d'etablissement
| Segment | Cashpad |
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | — | #3 74 avis |
| Luxe ▾ | — | #3 41 avis |
| Enseigne / Chaine ▾ | — | #3 31 avis |
| Sejour prolonge ▾ | — | #2 12 avis |
Par region
| Segment | Cashpad |
|
|---|---|---|
| Amerique du Nord ▾ | — | #3 14 avis |
| Europe ▾ | — | #2 130 avis |
| Asie-Pacifique | — | #5 4 avis |
| Moyen-Orient | — | #6 0 avis |
Choosing the right hotel POS system can significantly impact your operational efficiency and guest experience. Both Cashpad and Mews POS aim to streamline restaurant and front desk operations; however, their core strengths differ. Cashpad offers a basic platform with no recent reviews or user feedback, making its effectiveness uncertain. Mews POS, on the other hand, boasts a substantial review base, recent positive feedback, and proven integration within a broader hotel management ecosystem. Which product will truly meet your hotel’s needs?
Cashpad promises an all-in-one property management approach, focusing on reservation handling, guest communications, and operational oversight. Yet, with zero reviews or ratings, its reliability and usability in real-world settings remain unverified. Mews POS, with over 156 recent reviews and a high NPS score of 9.32, demonstrates strong user confidence, especially in hotel restaurant operations. This clear difference in review volume and recency indicates Mews’ superior market presence and trustworthiness.
Both products aim to improve transactional workflows; Cashpad markets itself as a comprehensive system, while Mews POS emphasizes seamless restaurant integrations and real-time reporting. However, without verified customer feedback on Cashpad, it’s difficult to assess its actual performance or user satisfaction. Mews POS’s positive reviews highlight its ease of use, automation capabilities, and extensive feature set, making it a more proven choice for hoteliers. Are you willing to gamble on a product with no reviews, or prefer a solution with proven success?
If your hotel needs a reliable, well-supported POS system with extensive third-party integrations, go with Mews POS. Its 336 verified partners, including popular channel managers and payment providers, make it versatile and adaptable. For properties seeking a flexible, feature-rich platform proven to improve operational flow, Mews is the clear choice.
If your hotel is looking for a simple, all-in-one property management solution with basic POS features, Cashpad might seem appealing; however, the lack of recent reviews or substantial customer feedback makes it a risky pick. Without verified user experiences or a proven track record, Mews POS remains the more dependable option. Would you invest in a system with extensive positive reviews or a new, untested platform?
Mews POS excels with a user rating of 4.74 out of 5, backed by 66 recent reviews, many praising its intuitive interface and smooth onboarding. Reviewers from various hotel types emphasize its mobile capabilities, flexibility, and quick staff adoption, with comments like “the user interface is very intuitive, allowing new colleagues to be trained quickly.” The onboarding process is smooth, supported by comprehensive training resources.
Cashpad, with a rating of 0/5 and no reviews, provides no data on usability or onboarding experience. The absence of feedback leaves uncertainty about how easily staff can learn or adapt to the platform. Given the clear user satisfaction with Mews, edge: Mews POS.
Mews POS offers 29 unique features, including PCI compliance, digital menus, advanced ordering, inventory management, recipe costing, and extensive reporting tools—covering a broad range of restaurant and hotel needs. In contrast, Cashpad has no listed or verified features, making its capabilities uncertain.
Mews’ feature set enables your team to automate tasks, manage inventory, analyze sales, and enhance guest engagement—all within a single platform. Cashpad’s limited or unverified feature list suggests it may not support the advanced operational demands of modern hotels. For a feature-rich experience, edge: Mews POS.
Mews support scores highly, with an average rating of 4.43 out of 5 and recent reviews praising its reliability and helpfulness. Customers highlight quick responses and effective onboarding support, with comments like “support team has consistently been reliable and solution-oriented.”
Cashpad provides no verifiable support ratings or recent feedback, leaving its support quality unknown. Without confirmed customer service data, you risk poor or unresponsive support from an untested platform. Edge: Mews POS.
Mews offers 336 verified integrations, including major channel managers, payment gateways, and revenue management tools, providing a flexible and connected system. Cashpad, with zero verified integrations, limits your options and potentially complicates workflows.
The extensive integration network of Mews allows your hotel to customize and expand its tech stack effortlessly, ensuring smooth data flow and operational cohesion. Without proven integrations, Cashpad’s capability to serve as a central hub remains questionable. Edge: Mews POS.
With 156 recent reviews and a 9.32 NPS score, Mews POS is highly rated, especially among hotels with diverse portfolios—including boutique, city center, and conference hotels. Reviewers consistently praise its usability, automation, and support for complex operations.
Cashpad’s review count is zero, meaning there’s no recent data to gauge user satisfaction. Given the positive, recent feedback for Mews, it’s clear that hoteliers rate Mews more favorably. Edge: Mews POS.
Cashpad’s pricing details are unavailable, and it’s unclear whether it operates on a subscription, freemium, or custom pricing model. Mews POS charges a base fee of $200 per month, with no free tier or trial, making its cost transparent but potentially higher.
Given Mews’s comprehensive features and support, its cost is justified for hotels seeking proven performance and extensive integrations. Lack of pricing transparency on Cashpad makes it difficult to assess its value. Edge: Mews POS.
Cashpad may appeal if your hotel’s focus is on minimal setup and simplicity, but the absence of verified customer feedback limits confidence in its capabilities.
Mews POS suits mid-sized to large hotels, boutique properties, and multi-property groups looking for a trusted, feature-rich solution.
The core difference lies in market presence and proven success: Mews POS, with over 156 recent reviews and a 9.32 NPS score, is clearly more validated and trusted by hoteliers. Cashpad, without recent reviews or verified features, remains unproven and risky.
Choose Mews POS if your hotel values reliable support, extensive integrations, and a feature-rich system that’s rated highly by users. If your hotel prioritizes simplicity and minimal setup, Cashpad might seem appealing—yet, the lack of user feedback makes it a gamble.
In summary, for most hotels seeking stability, scalability, and proven performance, Mews POS is the recommended solution. Its comprehensive capabilities and positive user feedback make it the safer, smarter investment for your team.
La tarification des Systèmes de point de vente hôteliers est rarement simple. Voici ce que nous savons a partir des donnees tarifaires publiques de chaque fournisseur. Demandez toujours un devis personnalise pour la taille de votre etablissement.
| Cashpad |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $200/mo |
Selon la base de donnees produits de HTR, Cashpad et Mews POS partagent 0 fonctionnalites. Voici les differences cles — les fonctionnalites que l'un possede et que l'autre n'a pas.
| Fonctionnalite | Cashpad |
|
|---|---|---|
| Conforme PCI | ||
| Fractionnement des chèques | ||
| Menus numériques | ||
| Rapports de journal de paiement | ||
| Réductions et promotions | ||
| Vente incitative |
Affichage des principales differences. 17 fonctionnalites supplementaires different entre ces produits.
Nous avons analyse 8 etudes de cas verifiees pour comparer ce que les hotels obtiennent reellement avec chaque plateforme sur quatre objectifs commerciaux cles.
Aucune etude de cas publiee pour cet objectif pour le moment.
"We’ve been with Mews for a few years now and it helped to transform the way we operate. It’s very intuitive to work with and saves our team so much time."
Aucune etude de cas publiee pour cet objectif pour le moment.
"In an industry where human contact is more important than digital contact, having a platform like Mews that not only reduces time at a screen but also gives us more face time with..."
Aucune etude de cas publiee pour cet objectif pour le moment.
"Self-check-in kiosks are integral to LyLo's DNA. Coupled with Mews capabilities like guest messaging and online check-out, they form the essence of our guest experience. In fact, t..."
Ce que les hoteliers apprecient
L'interface de Mews est décrite comme moderne et intuitive, facilitant une navigation fluide. Cependant, certains avis suggèrent des améliorations con... L'interface de Mews est décrite comme moderne et intuitive, facilitant une navigation fluide. Cependant, certains avis suggèrent des améliorations concernant la complexité et la flexibilité des outils de reporting, notamment pour les configurations multi-établissements et l'analyse opérationnelle détaillée.
Mews provides strong connectivity with various third-party systems like channel managers and payment gateways. These integrations facilitate centraliz... Mews provides strong connectivity with various third-party systems like channel managers and payment gateways. These integrations facilitate centralized operations, real-time booking management, and accurate financial reporting, although occasional synchronization issues are noted.
Reviews highlight Mews' outstanding integration between its POS and PMS, allowing direct posting of charges to guest rooms and synchronized guest data... Reviews highlight Mews' outstanding integration between its POS and PMS, allowing direct posting of charges to guest rooms and synchronized guest data. This integration is praised for improving billing accuracy, reducing departmental friction, and enhancing guest service experience by personalizing interactions.
Les points de friction pour les hoteliers
Mews' commitment to developing new features and evolving its product is seen positively. Users appreciate its openness to feedback, though there is a... Mews' commitment to developing new features and evolving its product is seen positively. Users appreciate its openness to feedback, though there is a need for more polished features and quicker implementation of user suggestions.
La plateforme est appréciée pour ses options de personnalisation, permettant des flux de travail et des alertes sur mesure afin d'améliorer l'expérien... La plateforme est appréciée pour ses options de personnalisation, permettant des flux de travail et des alertes sur mesure afin d'améliorer l'expérience client. Cependant, les utilisateurs expriment également le besoin de fonctionnalités de personnalisation plus intuitives pour répondre à des besoins opérationnels spécifiques et aux interactions avec les clients.
Fonctionnalites uniques
Ou les notes divergent le plus
Cela depend de vos besoins. Cashpad et Mews POS partagent de nombreuses fonctionnalites Hotel POS Systems de base, mais chacun a des capacites uniques. Cashpad propose 0 partenaires d'integration verifies, tandis que Mews POS en propose 335. Consultez la comparaison des fonctionnalites ci-dessus pour voir les differences avant de changer.
Les petits hotels devraient privilegier la facilite d'utilisation et une mise en service rapide. Mews POS est en tete pour la facilite d'utilisation avec 4.7/5 contre 0.0/5. Recherchez une tarification transparente et une option d'essai ou de demonstration. Filtrez les avis sur chaque page produit par taille d'etablissement pour lire les retours d'hotels similaires au votre.
Cashpad : Non. Mews POS : Non. Aucun des deux produits ne propose actuellement d'offre gratuite. La plupart des fournisseurs Hotel POS Systems proposent des demonstrations ou des essais — demandez-en un a chacun pour evaluer avant de vous engager.
Le HT Score est un classement composite qui prend en compte 4 groupes de criteres et plus d'une douzaine de variables pour aider les hoteliers a comparer objectivement les produits technologiques hoteliers. Cashpad a un HT Score de 0 et Mews a 100. Voici comment le score est calcule.
| Groupe de criteres | Ponderation | Ce qu'il mesure |
|---|---|---|
| Notes et avis clients |
|
A quel point les utilisateurs recommandent-ils ce produit ? Score des notes, Volume d'avis, Part de voix, Profondeur des avis, Recence des avis, Etudes de cas ▾ Le facteur le plus fortement pondere. Analyse les notes de satisfaction moyennes (probabilite de recommandation, facilite d'utilisation, support, ROI), le nombre total d'avis par rapport aux pairs de la categorie, la recence des avis (au moins 20 avis sur les 6 derniers mois) et la part de voix parmi les clients hoteliers uniques pour detecter les biais de selection. |
| Ecosysteme partenaire |
|
A quel point les partenaires technologiques recommandent-ils cette entreprise ? Recommandations des partenaires, Nombre d'integrations, Qualite des integrations ▾ Evalue les recommandations des partenaires comme des votes de confiance d'experts, le nombre d'integrations verifiees et la qualite de l'ecosysteme — la moyenne des HT Scores des partenaires d'integration. Les produits avec des ecosystemes d'integration de meilleure qualite sont plus susceptibles de fournir un ensemble technologique connecte. |
| Orientation client |
|
A quel point cette organisation est-elle orientee client ? Support certifie, Regularite des avis, Completude du profil ▾ Evalue si l'entreprise a obtenu la certification HTR de support client, maintient une collecte d'avis reguliere dans le temps (un indicateur de culture axee sur le feedback) et tient a jour les profils produits avec les fonctionnalites, captures d'ecran, tarifs et caracteristiques. |
| Portee, perennite et ressources |
|
Quelle est l'etendue de la portee et des ressources de cette entreprise ? Portee geographique, Perennite, Ressources de l'entreprise, Score de tendance ▾ Mesure la presence mondiale (pays et regions desservis), les annees d'activite comme indicateur de stabilite, les effectifs comme indicateur de ressources, et un score de tendance base sur les demandes d'acheteurs, les avis, les recommandations de partenaires et l'activite presse des douze derniers mois. |
Les notes et avis clients sont de loin le facteur le plus important dans l'algorithme du HT Score. HTR n'accepte aucun paiement pour un meilleur classement. Tous les avis sont verifies — seuls les professionnels du secteur hotelier avec des affiliations confirmees peuvent soumettre des notes. Voir la methodologie complete du HT Score →
Conseiller en recommandations de produits