Ciaobooking vs. Counter:
Lequel vous convient le mieux ?

The Decision

Choosing between Ciaobooking and Counter hinges on your hotel’s specific needs. Both aim to streamline operations, but they serve very different segments and offer contrasting features and support levels. Your decision should reflect your property type, operational complexity, and growth plans.

Ciaobooking is a lesser-known platform with no recent reviews, while Counter has a strong presence with 54 recent reviews and a high 4.73/5 rating. Given the recent and numerous reviews, Counter’s data provides a more reliable gauge of current performance and user satisfaction.

Are you seeking a highly rated, actively supported PMS with broad functionalities, or a more niche, potentially simpler solution? Let’s compare these two options to find which suits your hotel best.

Is Ciaobooking or Counter Better for Hotels?

Ciaobooking offers a basic property management system, primarily targeting small operations or niche markets, with no recent reviews or confirmed active support. Its zero reviews in the last six months mean there’s limited recent feedback to gauge its current effectiveness or user satisfaction.

Counter, contrastingly, is well-rated with 54 recent reviews, a 4.73/5 overall score, and high ratings for ease of use and support (4.6/5 and 4.96/5 respectively). It’s an established PMS with verified integrations, robust features, and active customer feedback, indicating ongoing development and support.

If your hotel needs a broad, modern PMS with strong support and features, Counter is the safer choice. Is your property looking for a simpler, possibly more affordable option, or is your priority on proven, recent user satisfaction?

Edge: Counter

Counter vs Ciaobooking: Which Should Your Hotel Choose?

For properties like hostels or small boutique hotels that need an easy-to-adopt system, Counter’s extensive feature set and recent positive reviews make it an ideal fit. Its functionalities such as channel management, automated night audits, and guest CRM are tailored for high-volume, fast-paced environments.

If your hotel requires a more niche, lightweight platform with minimal features, or if you are exploring options without a significant need for advanced integrations, Ciaobooking might seem appealing. However, the lack of recent reviews and support data makes Counter the more reliable choice for most operational needs.

Hotels that prioritize active support, regular updates, and comprehensive features should select Counter. Conversely, hotels with very simple operations or in early stages of digitalization might consider Ciaobooking, but be cautious about the lack of recent user feedback.

Edge: Counter

Is Ciaobooking or Counter Easier to Use?

Ciaobooking’s user interface and onboarding process are undocumented in recent reviews, suggesting limited recent feedback on usability. Its zero review count indicates either very low adoption or limited user engagement, making it difficult to assess ease of use today.

Counter, on the other hand, boasts a high 4.6/5 rating for ease of use and a 4.7/5 onboarding rating from numerous recent reviews. Users highlight its clean, intuitive interface, straightforward calendar management, and quick staff training. Support from the Counter team is consistently praised for responsiveness.

Edge: Counter

Which Has Better Features: Ciaobooking or Counter?

Counter offers a comprehensive suite of 19 features exclusive to its platform, including channel management, payment processing, booking engine, housekeeper modules, group functionality, multi-currency support, and guest CRM. These features are tailored for mid-sized and large properties, especially hostels and small hotels needing robust operational tools.

Ciaobooking provides no documented features or unique functionalities, which suggests a minimal or outdated feature set. Its lack of integrations and limited automation options make it less suitable for hotels seeking a full-featured system.

If your hotel needs advanced, integrated features to manage multiple channels, revenue, and guest data, Counter is clearly superior. Ciaobooking’s absence of documented features means it’s unlikely to meet more complex operational requirements.

Edge: Counter

Which Has Better Customer Support: Ciaobooking or Counter?

Counter’s support rating is 4.96/5, with reviewers citing fast, helpful, and professional service from team members like Evelyn and Max. Hoteliers appreciate its responsiveness, especially for troubleshooting and onboarding, even amid bugs.

Ciaobooking’s support details are absent, with no recent reviews to gauge responsiveness or quality. The lack of recent feedback suggests it may not offer the same level of support or active engagement as Counter.

For hotel teams that rely heavily on dependable support and quick issue resolution, Counter’s support is a decisive advantage. Ciaobooking’s support quality remains unverified in recent data.

Edge: Counter

Which Do Hoteliers Rate Higher: Ciaobooking or Counter?

Counter’s recent reviews show a high 4.73/5 overall rating, with users in the hostel segment particularly satisfied, rating it 4.75/5. Hoteliers praise its usability, support, and feature set, with many noting ongoing improvements.

Ciaobooking has zero reviews—no recent data or ratings—making it impossible to assess user sentiment or satisfaction levels today.

Given the robust recent review base and high ratings, Counter is clearly favored among hoteliers actively using the system. Its consistent feedback confirms it’s currently delivering value.

Edge: Counter

How Much Do Ciaobooking and Counter Cost?

Ciaobooking does not list any pricing details, nor does it offer a free trial or mention any subscription or implementation costs. Its lack of transparent pricing suggests it may be a niche or less commercially scaled product.

Counter also does not specify a standard pricing model, but its free-to-try model and widespread adoption imply a flexible, potentially scalable pricing structure. Additional features and integrations may come at extra cost, but the platform's broad feature set suggests a paid plan.

Without concrete pricing data, your best bet is to contact both vendors directly to clarify costs. However, Counter’s established market presence often correlates with clearer pricing options.

What Type of Hotel Should Use Ciaobooking?

• Hotels that operate on a very small scale or in niche markets with minimal operational complexity.
• Teams seeking a simple, straightforward booking management system without extensive integrations.
• Properties with limited budgets looking for a no-frills solution.
• Hotels that do not require advanced revenue management, channel management, or detailed guest profiles.
• Not ideal if you need active support, frequent updates, or integrations with multiple platforms.

Given the absence of recent reviews and detailed features, Ciaobooking might suit very small or specialized operations but lacks the scalability for growing or complex hotels.

• Hotels that want a proven, supported platform with a broad feature set.
• Hostels, boutique hotels, or small properties that need reliable automation and guest management.
• Hotels prioritizing ease of use, high support responsiveness, and ongoing software improvements.
• Hotels seeking an active, well-rated platform with recent user feedback.
• Not ideal if your hotel requires extensive customization, integrations, or advanced revenue features.

Edge: Hotels that fit the latter profile should choose Counter.

What Type of Hotel Should Use Counter?

• Hostels, boutique hotels, and small-to-mid-sized properties needing comprehensive operational tools.
• Hotels that want channel management, automated night audits, and guest CRM integrated into one system.
• Teams looking for a mobile-friendly platform that simplifies check-ins, bookings, and payments.
• Hotels prioritizing high support quality, regular updates, and active user communities.
• Not ideal if your property operates with very limited staff, or if you prefer a minimal, lightweight system without extensive features.

Counter’s broad feature set and active reviews make it suitable for properties that want a future-proof, scalable property management solution.

• Hotels that need multi-currency, multi-lingual support, or group booking capabilities.
• Hostels or small hotels that want to automate revenue streams, manage online channels, and reduce manual tasks.
• Hotels aiming for a system with strong integrations like Stripe, Goki, and Channel Managers.
• Hotels seeking a well-established, highly-rated platform with recent positive feedback.
• Not ideal if your operation is highly manual, or you prefer a free, no-cost tool with limited features.

Edge: Hotels fitting these criteria should select Counter.

The Bottom Line for Hotels

Counter stands out as a full-featured, actively supported PMS with a high user rating and recent positive reviews, making it the best choice for most hotels today. Its extensive functionalities, ease of use, and proven support system provide confidence for property owners seeking growth and efficiency.

Ciaobooking offers a minimal, less documented platform with no recent reviews or feature disclosures. It may be suitable for very small or niche operations with simple needs, but it lacks the active user base and feature depth that modern hotel management demands.

Hotels prioritizing a well-supported, feature-rich system should choose Counter, especially given its high recent ratings and broad industry presence. For very small or specialized properties, Ciaobooking might suffice, but caution is advised due to limited recent data.

In summary, if your hotel aims for operational excellence, scalability, and reliable support, Counter is the clear choice. Ciaobooking might serve niche or early-stage properties but falls short in recent validation and feature set.

Note: For detailed pricing and tailored demos, reach out directly to each platform. Your choice should align with your hotel's current size, operational complexity, and future ambitions.