The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
Nous avons analyse 887 avis verifies d'hoteliers, compare les fonctionnalites, les tarifs et des etudes de cas reelles pour identifier les points forts de chaque plateforme. Le bon choix depend du type de votre etablissement et de vos priorites :
Ciaobooking se distingue .
Mews se distingue en ease of use and customer support — en particulier pour les etablissements independent (4.9/5) , avec des fonctionnalites exclusives comme Revenue management module and Guest CRM.
Notes comparees basees sur 887 avis verifies d'hoteliers sur HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Probabilite de recommandation |
|
|
| Facilite d'utilisation |
|
|
| Support client |
|
|
| Rapport qualite-prix |
|
|
| Prix de depart | Contact sales | From $900/mo |
| Avis verifies | 0 | 887 |
Apres analyse de 887 avis verifies, les utilisateurs de Ciaobooking apprecient surtout , tandis que ceux de Mews mettent en avant ease of use, automation and integrations, customizability and flexibility. Cliquez sur un theme pour voir ce que disent les evaluateurs.
| Ciaobooking |
|
|---|---|
| Avantages | |
|
+
Ease of Use
▾
|
|
|
+
Automation and Integrations
▾
|
|
|
+
Customizability and Flexibility
▾
|
|
|
+
Intégration et soutien
▾
|
|
| Inconvenients | |
|
−
Billing and Invoicing
▾
|
|
|
−
Rapports et analyses
▾
|
|
|
−
Multi-Property Management
▾
|
|
Comment chaque produit se classe parmi les fournisseurs Systèmes de gestion immobilière pour differentes tailles d'etablissements, types et regions — base sur les avis verifies d'hoteliers dans chaque segment.
Par taille d'hotel
| Segment | Ciaobooking |
|
|---|---|---|
| Petit (10-24 chambres) ▾ | — | #3 329 avis |
| Moyen (25-74 chambres) ▾ | — | #1 397 avis |
| Grand (75-199 chambres) ▾ | — | #3 45 avis |
| Tres grand (200+ chambres) ▾ | — | #3 49 avis |
Par type d'etablissement
| Segment | Ciaobooking |
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | — | #1 483 avis |
| Luxe ▾ | — | #5 220 avis |
| Enseigne / Chaine ▾ | — | #2 170 avis |
| Sejour prolonge ▾ | — | #1 130 avis |
Par region
| Segment | Ciaobooking |
|
|---|---|---|
| Amerique du Nord ▾ | — | #8 106 avis |
| Europe ▾ | — | #1 660 avis |
| Asie-Pacifique ▾ | — | #10 17 avis |
| Moyen-Orient ▾ | — | #28 8 avis |
Choosing the right property management system (PMS) is crucial for your hotel’s efficiency, guest experience, and revenue growth. Both Ciaobooking by Ciaobooking and Mews PMS aim to streamline operations, but they diverge significantly in maturity, features, and market presence. While Ciaobooking promises automation and guest insights, its lack of reviews and regional presence make it less credible than Mews, which boasts a solid foundation, extensive integrations, and over 750 recent reviews. Are you prepared to prioritize proven reliability over untested promise?
Ciaobooking positions itself as an all-in-one solution with AI-driven guest review analysis and automation, but its credibility is limited by zero reviews and no regional footprint. Mews, on the other hand, is a globally recognized leader with over 750 recent reviews, a 4.62/5 overall rating, and a 9.12/5 NPS score, confirming its trusted status among hoteliers. Where Ciaobooking offers vague promises, Mews delivers a well-established, trusted platform with proven results.
Do you want a system with no reviews or one backed by the voice of hundreds of hoteliers?
If your hotel needs a scalable, feature-rich PMS with a proven track record, go with Mews. Its extensive marketplace of over 336 verified integrations, a global presence covering 54 countries, and a high user satisfaction rating make it ideal for properties seeking reliability and adaptability. If, however, your hotel is very small, regionally focused, or willing to experiment with unverified vendors, Ciaobooking might seem attractive—but beware of the lack of reviews, regional support, and comprehensive features.
In summary, for most hotels aiming for stability and growth, Mews is the safer choice.
Mews scores a 4.7/5 in ease of use, supported by a modern, intuitive interface, comprehensive onboarding, and a support team rated at 4.27/5. Multiple reviewers praise Mews for its user-friendly design, fast setup, and ongoing support, making staff adoption straightforward. Conversely, Ciaobooking offers no review data, leaving its usability unverified and potentially risky for staff training and adoption.
Edge: Mews.
Mews offers 59 features, including multi-lingual support, revenue management, booking engine, guest CRM, integrated CRS, and advanced automation tools—many of which are absent in Ciaobooking. Ciaobooking, by comparison, provides no documented features, placing it at a significant disadvantage. The depth and breadth of Mews’ features provide your team with a versatile toolkit to adapt to diverse operational needs.
Edge: Mews.
Mews is rated 4.27/5 for customer support, with many reviews highlighting responsive onboarding and ongoing assistance, even amidst occasional technical issues. Ciaobooking’s support ratings are unavailable, making it impossible to assess its reliability or responsiveness. Given the importance of dependable support in hotel operations, Mews clearly leads in this category.
Edge: Mews.
Mews boasts over 336 verified integrations, including popular channel managers, POS systems, and revenue tools, enabling extensive customization. Ciaobooking has zero verified partners documented, limiting its ability to connect with other essential hotel systems. For hotels seeking a flexible tech ecosystem, Mews’ expansive suite of integrations is a decisive advantage.
Edge: Mews.
Mews’ recent reviews reflect a 4.62/5 rating with high scores across ease of use, support, and value. Hoteliers from boutique to large properties praise Mews for its reliability, innovation, and positive impact on operations. Ciaobooking’s lack of reviews leaves its user satisfaction unverified and unlikely to match Mews’ proven reputation.
Edge: Mews.
Ciaobooking’s pricing details are absent, and it does not offer a trial, raising concerns about transparency and value. Mews charges a starting price of $900 per month, with no implementation fees or trial options listed. Its predictable pricing structure and documented value make it easier to justify a long-term investment.
In conclusion, Mews offers clearer, more transparent pricing aligned with its comprehensive feature set.
Mews is a tried-and-true, feature-packed PMS trusted by thousands of hotels worldwide, with recent reviews confirming its effectiveness. Its extensive integrations, support, and proven impact on hotel operations clearly position it as the better choice for most properties.
If your hotel needs a dependable, scalable, and well-supported system, choose Mews. Its large user base, ongoing innovation, and high satisfaction scores make it the logical option.
However, if you operate a very small property with minimal tech needs and are willing to accept an unverified platform, Ciaobooking might suffice—though the risk remains high without reviews or proven support.
In summary, for long-term stability and growth, Mews is the clear winner—an investment in your hotel’s future.
La tarification des Systèmes de gestion immobilière est rarement simple. Voici ce que nous savons a partir des donnees tarifaires publiques de chaque fournisseur. Demandez toujours un devis personnalise pour la taille de votre etablissement.
| Ciaobooking |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $900/mo |
Selon la base de donnees produits de HTR, Ciaobooking et Mews PMS partagent 0 fonctionnalites. Voici les differences cles — les fonctionnalites que l'un possede et que l'autre n'a pas.
| Fonctionnalite | Ciaobooking |
|
|---|---|---|
| CRM invité | ||
| Module de gestion des revenus | ||
| Moteur de réservation | ||
| Multi-devise | ||
| Multilingue | ||
| Profils d'invités |
Affichage des principales differences. 47 fonctionnalites supplementaires different entre ces produits.
Nous avons analyse 8 etudes de cas verifiees pour comparer ce que les hotels obtiennent reellement avec chaque plateforme sur quatre objectifs commerciaux cles.
Aucune etude de cas publiee pour cet objectif pour le moment.
"It was vital for us to find a hospitality cloud that would give us the freedom to innovate and move quickly with new technology – that’s one of the main reasons we chose Mews."
Aucune etude de cas publiee pour cet objectif pour le moment.
"Since moving to Mews, we can be so much more agile in how we operate, both in terms of how we engage with guests and testing out new integrations and tools through Mews Marketplace..."
Aucune etude de cas publiee pour cet objectif pour le moment.
"We want to provide the best hospitality for guests anywhere in the country, and Mews is definitely the right solution to help us achieve that goal."
Ce que les hoteliers apprecient
Many reviews highlight the user-friendliness of Mews, citing its intuitive interface that simplifies tasks across various hotel operations. Users find... Many reviews highlight the user-friendliness of Mews, citing its intuitive interface that simplifies tasks across various hotel operations. Users find the platform easy to navigate, which aids in quicker team onboarding and daily use.
Reviews frequently praise Mews for its automation of routine tasks like check-in, billing, and invoicing, reducing manual workload and minimizing erro... Reviews frequently praise Mews for its automation of routine tasks like check-in, billing, and invoicing, reducing manual workload and minimizing errors. Users appreciate the extensive integration options with other tools, which streamline overall operations and enhance efficiency.
Mews allows customization to fit diverse business needs, from rate structures to integration setups. Users appreciate this flexibility, although they... Mews allows customization to fit diverse business needs, from rate structures to integration setups. Users appreciate this flexibility, although they note room for improvement in adapting complex booking conditions and enhancing user-friendly navigation for settings.
Les points de friction pour les hoteliers
Users point out that while Mews offers efficient billing processes, there are complexities and areas needing improvement, such as handling group billi... Users point out that while Mews offers efficient billing processes, there are complexities and areas needing improvement, such as handling group billings, splits, and providing more customizable invoice formats. This can affect the ease of financial operations within the system.
Bien que Mews offre des fonctionnalités de reporting et d'analyse performantes, plusieurs avis soulignent le besoin de fonctionnalités de reporting pl... Bien que Mews offre des fonctionnalités de reporting et d'analyse performantes, plusieurs avis soulignent le besoin de fonctionnalités de reporting plus personnalisables et flexibles. Les utilisateurs souhaitent des analyses de données plus fines, notamment en matière de réservations et de revenus.
Fonctionnalites uniques
Ou les notes divergent le plus
Cela depend de vos besoins. Ciaobooking et Mews PMS partagent de nombreuses fonctionnalites Property Management Systems de base, mais chacun a des capacites uniques. Ciaobooking propose 0 partenaires d'integration verifies, tandis que Mews PMS en propose 335. Consultez la comparaison des fonctionnalites ci-dessus pour voir les differences avant de changer.
Les petits hotels devraient privilegier la facilite d'utilisation et une mise en service rapide. Mews PMS est en tete pour la facilite d'utilisation avec 4.7/5 contre 0.0/5. Recherchez une tarification transparente et une option d'essai ou de demonstration. Filtrez les avis sur chaque page produit par taille d'etablissement pour lire les retours d'hotels similaires au votre.
Ciaobooking : Non. Mews PMS : Non. Aucun des deux produits ne propose actuellement d'offre gratuite. La plupart des fournisseurs Property Management Systems proposent des demonstrations ou des essais — demandez-en un a chacun pour evaluer avant de vous engager.
Le HT Score est un classement composite qui prend en compte 4 groupes de criteres et plus d'une douzaine de variables pour aider les hoteliers a comparer objectivement les produits technologiques hoteliers. Ciaobooking a un HT Score de 0 et Mews a 100. Voici comment le score est calcule.
| Groupe de criteres | Ponderation | Ce qu'il mesure |
|---|---|---|
| Notes et avis clients |
|
A quel point les utilisateurs recommandent-ils ce produit ? Score des notes, Volume d'avis, Part de voix, Profondeur des avis, Recence des avis, Etudes de cas ▾ Le facteur le plus fortement pondere. Analyse les notes de satisfaction moyennes (probabilite de recommandation, facilite d'utilisation, support, ROI), le nombre total d'avis par rapport aux pairs de la categorie, la recence des avis (au moins 20 avis sur les 6 derniers mois) et la part de voix parmi les clients hoteliers uniques pour detecter les biais de selection. |
| Ecosysteme partenaire |
|
A quel point les partenaires technologiques recommandent-ils cette entreprise ? Recommandations des partenaires, Nombre d'integrations, Qualite des integrations ▾ Evalue les recommandations des partenaires comme des votes de confiance d'experts, le nombre d'integrations verifiees et la qualite de l'ecosysteme — la moyenne des HT Scores des partenaires d'integration. Les produits avec des ecosystemes d'integration de meilleure qualite sont plus susceptibles de fournir un ensemble technologique connecte. |
| Orientation client |
|
A quel point cette organisation est-elle orientee client ? Support certifie, Regularite des avis, Completude du profil ▾ Evalue si l'entreprise a obtenu la certification HTR de support client, maintient une collecte d'avis reguliere dans le temps (un indicateur de culture axee sur le feedback) et tient a jour les profils produits avec les fonctionnalites, captures d'ecran, tarifs et caracteristiques. |
| Portee, perennite et ressources |
|
Quelle est l'etendue de la portee et des ressources de cette entreprise ? Portee geographique, Perennite, Ressources de l'entreprise, Score de tendance ▾ Mesure la presence mondiale (pays et regions desservis), les annees d'activite comme indicateur de stabilite, les effectifs comme indicateur de ressources, et un score de tendance base sur les demandes d'acheteurs, les avis, les recommandations de partenaires et l'activite presse des douze derniers mois. |
Les notes et avis clients sont de loin le facteur le plus important dans l'algorithme du HT Score. HTR n'accepte aucun paiement pour un meilleur classement. Tous les avis sont verifies — seuls les professionnels du secteur hotelier avec des affiliations confirmees peuvent soumettre des notes. Voir la methodologie complete du HT Score →
Conseiller en recommandations de produits