The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
Nous avons analyse 549 avis verifies d'hoteliers, compare les fonctionnalites, les tarifs et des etudes de cas reelles pour identifier les points forts de chaque plateforme. Le bon choix depend du type de votre etablissement et de vos priorites :
Ciaobooking se distingue .
HOTELTIME se distingue en ease of use and customer support — en particulier pour les etablissements brand (4.9/5) , avec des fonctionnalites exclusives comme Payment processing and Guest CRM.
Notes comparees basees sur 549 avis verifies d'hoteliers sur HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Probabilite de recommandation |
|
|
| Facilite d'utilisation |
|
|
| Support client |
|
|
| Rapport qualite-prix |
|
|
| Prix de depart | Contact sales | From $600/mo |
| Avis verifies | 0 | 549 |
Apres analyse de 549 avis verifies, les utilisateurs de Ciaobooking apprecient surtout , tandis que ceux de HOTELTIME mettent en avant user interface and learning curve, assistance technique, reporting and analytics. Cliquez sur un theme pour voir ce que disent les evaluateurs.
| Ciaobooking |
|
|---|---|
| Avantages | |
|
+
User Interface and Learning Curve
▾
|
|
|
+
Assistance technique
▾
|
|
|
+
Reporting and Analytics
▾
|
|
|
+
System Stability and Updates
▾
|
|
| Inconvenients | |
|
−
Customization Options
▾
|
|
|
−
Automation Features
▾
|
|
|
−
Optimisation mobile
▾
|
|
Comment chaque produit se classe parmi les fournisseurs Systèmes de gestion immobilière pour differentes tailles d'etablissements, types et regions — base sur les avis verifies d'hoteliers dans chaque segment.
Par taille d'hotel
| Segment | Ciaobooking |
|
|---|---|---|
| Petit (10-24 chambres) ▾ | — | #5 219 avis |
| Moyen (25-74 chambres) ▾ | — | #3 238 avis |
| Grand (75-199 chambres) ▾ | — | #2 46 avis |
| Tres grand (200+ chambres) ▾ | — | #8 7 avis |
Par type d'etablissement
| Segment | Ciaobooking |
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | — | #5 239 avis |
| Luxe ▾ | — | #3 241 avis |
| Enseigne / Chaine ▾ | — | #4 143 avis |
| Sejour prolonge ▾ | — | #4 49 avis |
Par region
| Segment | Ciaobooking |
|
|---|---|---|
| Amerique du Nord | — | #52 4 avis |
| Europe ▾ | — | #2 384 avis |
| Asie-Pacifique ▾ | — | #5 111 avis |
| Moyen-Orient ▾ | — | #1 21 avis |
Choosing the right property management system (PMS) is critical for your hotel’s efficiency and guest experience. You are weighing Ciaobooking by Ciaobooking and HotelTime PMS by HOTELTIME—two platforms designed to streamline operations but differing significantly in features, support, and market presence. Your decision hinges on which solution aligns best with your hotel’s size, complexity, and growth plans.
Remember, with more recent reviews and a larger user base, HotelTime PMS provides a more reliable snapshot of current performance. Which product truly fits your hotel’s needs?
Both Ciaobooking and HotelTime aim to automate hotel management, but they diverge sharply in execution and maturity. Ciaobooking, with zero reviews and no recent data, offers no detailed insights into its real-world performance or customer satisfaction levels. Meanwhile, HotelTime boasts 433 reviews, with 27 recent ones in the past six months, providing a clearer picture of ongoing support, usability, and feature reliability.
HotelTime’s high ratings—4.83 out of 5 overall and a 9.26/5 NPS score—indicate strong user satisfaction and consistent support. Conversely, Ciaobooking’s lack of reviews and scores suggests it’s either very new or not widely adopted, making it difficult to assess its suitability.
Are you comfortable choosing a product without recent user feedback, or do you prefer a solution with proven performance?
If your hotel needs a mature, feature-rich platform capable of supporting complex operations and scaling across multiple properties, HotelTime is the clear choice. Its extensive capabilities—over 51 unique features like integrated CRS, guest CRM, payment processing, and housekeeper modules—are proven across thousands of properties worldwide. It caters well to mid-sized and large hotels seeking robust automation and integrations.
Ciaobooking, with no available features or user reviews, might suit very small or niche operations willing to accept a less proven solution. If your focus is on foundational reservation management without advanced features, Ciaobooking could suffice, but the risk remains high given the lack of data.
For most hotels seeking stability, proven support, and a broad feature set, HotelTime is the definitive recommendation.
HotelTime’s user experience scores—4.66/5 for ease of use and 4.73/5 for support—highlight its intuitive interface and positive onboarding feedback. Review quotes praise its simple, clear management reporting and seamless reservation handling, which allows staff to learn quickly and perform efficiently.
Ciaobooking, on the other hand, has no available usability data or reviews. The lack of user feedback makes it impossible to assess its interface, onboarding process, or staff adoption effectiveness.
Edge: HotelTime.
HotelTime offers 51 verified features, including integrated POS, guest profiles, automated night audit, revenue management, and online check-in—covering most operational needs. Its comprehensive suite supports multi-lingual, multi-currency transactions, automation, and extensive integrations with third-party systems like channel managers, payment terminals, and CRM tools.
Ciaobooking has no listed features or integrations, indicating limited or undeclared functionality. This makes HotelTime the obvious leader for feature depth and versatility.
Edge: HotelTime.
HotelTime’s reviews consistently highlight its responsive, knowledgeable support team, with an average rating of 4.73/5. Comments mention helpful onboarding, continuous updates, and a proactive approach to customer needs, making it easier for hotels to maximize system potential.
Ciaobooking offers no review data or customer feedback, so support quality remains unknown. Without recent user experiences, HotelTime’s support reputation strongly favors it.
Edge: HotelTime.
HotelTime integrates with 58 verified partners, including major channel managers, payment providers, and third-party systems essential for streamlined operations. Shared integrations are nonexistent, but HotelTime’s extensive partner network supports comprehensive hotel tech stacks.
Ciaobooking has no verified integrations or partner data, suggesting limited connectivity or that integrations are not a focus. For hotels needing a connected ecosystem, HotelTime’s integrations are a significant advantage.
Edge: HotelTime.
HotelTime’s reviews—4.83/5 rating from 433 reviews—reflect a broad, recent positive sentiment across diverse property types. Hotels ranging from boutique city hotels to resorts and chains praise its ease of use, automation, and support.
Ciaobooking lacks reviews altogether, meaning no peer feedback exists to gauge user satisfaction. Given the recent and plentiful HotelTime reviews, its higher rating is a clear indicator of reliability and user approval.
Edge: HotelTime.
Ciaobooking’s pricing details are unavailable, leaving questions about affordability and value. Conversely, HotelTime charges a base fee of $600, with no mention of additional implementation or recurring costs, indicating a straightforward pricing model.
While HotelTime’s cost may be higher upfront, its extensive features and proven support justify the investment for most hotels. Ciaobooking’s lack of transparency makes it a risky choice from a value perspective.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if:
HotelTime stands out as a proven, feature-rich PMS with extensive integrations, strong support, and a large, recent review base. Its comprehensive tools support hotels in automating and streamlining operations across departments, making it suitable for properties of all sizes.
Ciaobooking, with no recent reviews or detailed features, appears to be an untested or emerging solution. If your hotel values stability, proven performance, and robust support, HotelTime is the safer, more reliable choice.
For hotels seeking a mature, well-supported PMS capable of supporting growth and complexity, HotelTime is the clear winner. Conversely, if your operation is minimal, budget-constrained, or experimental, Ciaobooking might be worth a cautious look—though the risks are significant.
La tarification des Systèmes de gestion immobilière est rarement simple. Voici ce que nous savons a partir des donnees tarifaires publiques de chaque fournisseur. Demandez toujours un devis personnalise pour la taille de votre etablissement.
| Ciaobooking |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $600/mo |
Selon la base de donnees produits de HTR, Ciaobooking et HotelTime PMS partagent 0 fonctionnalites. Voici les differences cles — les fonctionnalites que l'un possede et que l'autre n'a pas.
| Fonctionnalite | Ciaobooking |
|
|---|---|---|
| CRM invité | ||
| CRS intégré | ||
| Suivi des revenus annexes | ||
| Traitement des paiements | ||
| Vue Calendrier | ||
| Épopée |
Affichage des principales differences. 39 fonctionnalites supplementaires different entre ces produits.
Nous avons analyse 8 etudes de cas verifiees pour comparer ce que les hotels obtiennent reellement avec chaque plateforme sur quatre objectifs commerciaux cles.
Aucune etude de cas publiee pour cet objectif pour le moment.
"We needed to change an on-site system we were using as we wanted to move our operation forward. We achieved that with HotelTime systems. They are reliable, and stable and offer fea..."
Aucune etude de cas publiee pour cet objectif pour le moment.
"In 2018 we were choosing a system for our first completely self-service ART and design hotel. We decided on HotelTime and after 4 years I have to say that the choice was the right..."
Ce que les hoteliers apprecient
While the system’s intuitive interface and ease of learning are generally appreciated, a few users mention initial challenges due to the complexity of... While the system’s intuitive interface and ease of learning are generally appreciated, a few users mention initial challenges due to the complexity of features offered. Overall, once users become familiar with the system, it significantly enhances efficiency and simplifies hotel operations.
Bien que la réactivité et l'efficacité de l'équipe d'assistance soient appréciées, certains avis suggèrent que l'extension des horaires d'assistance t... Bien que la réactivité et l'efficacité de l'équipe d'assistance soient appréciées, certains avis suggèrent que l'extension des horaires d'assistance technique améliorerait encore l'expérience utilisateur, en garantissant une assistance permanente, notamment pour les utilisateurs internationaux.
HotelTime's robust reporting features are praised for providing comprehensive data insights into occupancy, revenue, and customer satisfaction. Users... HotelTime's robust reporting features are praised for providing comprehensive data insights into occupancy, revenue, and customer satisfaction. Users appreciate the variety of reports available for management, yet some desire more customization and advanced visualizations within the tool itself to better suit individual hotel needs.
Les points de friction pour les hoteliers
Some users voice a need for more customizable features, particularly in terms of reporting and interface personalization, which would allow hotels to... Some users voice a need for more customizable features, particularly in terms of reporting and interface personalization, which would allow hotels to better tailor the PMS to their specific operational strategies and guest services.
The automation capabilities in HotelTime, such as invoice processing and reservation management, are frequently mentioned for saving significant time... The automation capabilities in HotelTime, such as invoice processing and reservation management, are frequently mentioned for saving significant time for staff. Users highlight these features as reducing manual workload and minimizing the risk of human error, although they also express a desire for enhanced automation in guest communication and reporting.
Fonctionnalites uniques
Ou les notes divergent le plus
Cela depend de vos besoins. Ciaobooking et HotelTime PMS partagent de nombreuses fonctionnalites Property Management Systems de base, mais chacun a des capacites uniques. Ciaobooking propose 0 partenaires d'integration verifies, tandis que HotelTime PMS en propose 58. Consultez la comparaison des fonctionnalites ci-dessus pour voir les differences avant de changer.
Les petits hotels devraient privilegier la facilite d'utilisation et une mise en service rapide. HotelTime PMS est en tete pour la facilite d'utilisation avec 4.7/5 contre 0.0/5. Recherchez une tarification transparente et une option d'essai ou de demonstration. Filtrez les avis sur chaque page produit par taille d'etablissement pour lire les retours d'hotels similaires au votre.
Ciaobooking : Non. HotelTime PMS : Non. Aucun des deux produits ne propose actuellement d'offre gratuite. La plupart des fournisseurs Property Management Systems proposent des demonstrations ou des essais — demandez-en un a chacun pour evaluer avant de vous engager.
Le HT Score est un classement composite qui prend en compte 4 groupes de criteres et plus d'une douzaine de variables pour aider les hoteliers a comparer objectivement les produits technologiques hoteliers. Ciaobooking a un HT Score de 0 et HOTELTIME a 92. Voici comment le score est calcule.
| Groupe de criteres | Ponderation | Ce qu'il mesure |
|---|---|---|
| Notes et avis clients |
|
A quel point les utilisateurs recommandent-ils ce produit ? Score des notes, Volume d'avis, Part de voix, Profondeur des avis, Recence des avis, Etudes de cas ▾ Le facteur le plus fortement pondere. Analyse les notes de satisfaction moyennes (probabilite de recommandation, facilite d'utilisation, support, ROI), le nombre total d'avis par rapport aux pairs de la categorie, la recence des avis (au moins 20 avis sur les 6 derniers mois) et la part de voix parmi les clients hoteliers uniques pour detecter les biais de selection. |
| Ecosysteme partenaire |
|
A quel point les partenaires technologiques recommandent-ils cette entreprise ? Recommandations des partenaires, Nombre d'integrations, Qualite des integrations ▾ Evalue les recommandations des partenaires comme des votes de confiance d'experts, le nombre d'integrations verifiees et la qualite de l'ecosysteme — la moyenne des HT Scores des partenaires d'integration. Les produits avec des ecosystemes d'integration de meilleure qualite sont plus susceptibles de fournir un ensemble technologique connecte. |
| Orientation client |
|
A quel point cette organisation est-elle orientee client ? Support certifie, Regularite des avis, Completude du profil ▾ Evalue si l'entreprise a obtenu la certification HTR de support client, maintient une collecte d'avis reguliere dans le temps (un indicateur de culture axee sur le feedback) et tient a jour les profils produits avec les fonctionnalites, captures d'ecran, tarifs et caracteristiques. |
| Portee, perennite et ressources |
|
Quelle est l'etendue de la portee et des ressources de cette entreprise ? Portee geographique, Perennite, Ressources de l'entreprise, Score de tendance ▾ Mesure la presence mondiale (pays et regions desservis), les annees d'activite comme indicateur de stabilite, les effectifs comme indicateur de ressources, et un score de tendance base sur les demandes d'acheteurs, les avis, les recommandations de partenaires et l'activite presse des douze derniers mois. |
Les notes et avis clients sont de loin le facteur le plus important dans l'algorithme du HT Score. HTR n'accepte aucun paiement pour un meilleur classement. Tous les avis sont verifies — seuls les professionnels du secteur hotelier avec des affiliations confirmees peuvent soumettre des notes. Voir la methodologie complete du HT Score →
Conseiller en recommandations de produits