The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
Nous avons analyse 1,414 avis verifies d'hoteliers, compare les fonctionnalites, les tarifs et des etudes de cas reelles pour identifier les points forts de chaque plateforme. Le bon choix depend du type de votre etablissement et de vos priorites :
Cloudbeds se distingue en ease of use and customer support — en particulier pour les etablissements brand (4.5/5) , avec des fonctionnalites exclusives comme Mobile optimized/responsive and Revenue management module.
Slique se distingue .
Notes comparees basees sur 1,414 avis verifies d'hoteliers sur HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Probabilite de recommandation |
|
|
| Facilite d'utilisation |
|
|
| Support client |
|
|
| Rapport qualite-prix |
|
|
| Prix de depart | From $500/mo | Contact sales |
| Avis verifies | 1,414 | 0 |
Apres analyse de 1,414 avis verifies, les utilisateurs de Cloudbeds apprecient surtout intuitiveness and ease of use, automation and efficiency, reservations and channel management, tandis que ceux de Slique mettent en avant . Cliquez sur un theme pour voir ce que disent les evaluateurs.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Avantages | |
|
+
Intuitiveness and Ease of Use
▾
|
|
|
+
Automation and Efficiency
▾
|
|
|
+
Reservations and Channel Management
▾
|
|
|
+
Reporting and Analytics
▾
|
|
| Inconvenients | |
|
−
Reservation Flexibility and Editing
▾
|
|
|
−
Conversion de devises et opérations financières
▾
|
|
|
−
Fonctionnalités mobiles
▾
|
|
Comment chaque produit se classe parmi les fournisseurs Logiciel de gestion hôtelière pour differentes tailles d'etablissements, types et regions — base sur les avis verifies d'hoteliers dans chaque segment.
Par taille d'hotel
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Petit (10-24 chambres) ▾ | #2 675 avis | — |
| Moyen (25-74 chambres) ▾ | #1 235 avis | — |
| Grand (75-199 chambres) ▾ | #1 51 avis | — |
| Tres grand (200+ chambres) ▾ | #4 5 avis | — |
Par type d'etablissement
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #1 546 avis | — |
| Luxe ▾ | #3 245 avis | — |
| Enseigne / Chaine ▾ | #2 145 avis | — |
| Sejour prolonge ▾ | #2 96 avis | — |
Par region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Amerique du Nord ▾ | #2 532 avis | — |
| Europe ▾ | #4 166 avis | — |
| Asie-Pacifique ▾ | #3 201 avis | — |
| Moyen-Orient ▾ | #3 13 avis | — |
Choosing between Cloudbeds HMS by Cloudbeds and sliQue GRM by Slique ultimately hinges on your hotel’s operational needs and growth ambitions. Cloudbeds addresses the core challenges of hotel management—reservation, distribution, and guest experience—within a unified platform, whereas sliQue's DataBarn centers on data-driven insights and automation tailored more toward real estate and property management sectors. How do these different focuses align with your hotel's goals?
If your team seeks an established, feature-rich management system with widespread industry adoption, Cloudbeds is the more proven choice. Conversely, if your hotel requires a highly customizable, automation-driven platform with advanced analytics, sliQue could appeal—though its hotel-specific capabilities are less mature.
Cloudbeds is designed specifically for hotels, offering a broad suite of functionalities like reservation management, channel distribution, guest communication, and revenue tools. sliQue’s DataBarn platform is more generalized, integrating robotics, IoT, and data analytics, primarily suited for real estate or property portfolios—not specifically tailored for hotel operations.
Cloudbeds’s extensive feature set—over 85 unique functionalities—supports daily hotel tasks, while sliQue’s focus on automation and analytics, despite its impressive technological scope, lacks dedicated hotel modules. Would your hotel benefit more from an all-in-one PMS built for hospitality or from a flexible, tech-centric platform with a broader industrial focus?
Cloudbeds boasts a user rating of 4.58/5 for ease of use, with over 1,200 reviews and recent feedback highlighting its intuitive interface, quick onboarding, and staff-friendly design. Users frequently mention how even less tech-savvy team members find it accessible, and onboarding averages 4.41/5—indicative of a smooth setup.
sliQue’s DataBarn, however, is a complex platform designed for technical teams managing multiple systems and devices. With only five employees, sliQue’s interface appears less tailored for front-line hotel staff, and its usability for non-technical users remains untested in the hospitality space. Edge: Cloudbeds.
Cloudbeds offers an expansive feature library—85 exclusive hotel features like PMS connectivity, inventory management, multi-currency, integrated CRS, automated night audits, and guest messaging. It also supports unlimited channels and custom rates, making daily operations more efficient.
sliQue’s DataBarn provides advanced IoT integration, real-time data analytics, and automation capabilities, but these are not hotel-specific and lack the breadth of features necessary for hotel management. For hotel-focused functionalities, Cloudbeds’s dedicated modules clearly outperform sliQue’s industrial tech. Edge: Cloudbeds.
Cloudbeds maintains a customer support rating of 4.38/5, with reviews praising its quick, friendly, and professional service. Users appreciate the responsive support team, especially during onboarding and troubleshooting, with many citing timely responses and ongoing assistance.
sliQue, with a tiny team of five, offers limited support infrastructure—no publicly available review data or customer testimonials highlight its support quality in the hotel context. Given Cloudbeds’s extensive user base and recent reviews, its support system is more reliable and proven. Edge: Cloudbeds.
Cloudbeds has established partnerships with over 190 verified technology providers, including major OTAs, POS systems, and revenue management tools, enabling seamless data synchronization. It supports integrations like HotelTime, Sirvoy, HiJiffy, and even Oracle Hospitality, covering most hotel needs.
sliQue’s DataBarn offers IoT and automation integrations, but with only one verified partner—Oracle Hospitality—its ecosystem is limited. For comprehensive, hotel-specific integrations, Cloudbeds’s extensive partner network is far superior. Edge: Cloudbeds.
Cloudbeds’s 4.62/5 overall rating, with recent reviews from over 1,200 users, demonstrates broad satisfaction across hotel segments, especially boutique hotels, hostels, and resorts. Users emphasize its ease of use, reliable support, and effect on revenue growth.
sliQue’s ratings are unavailable due to lack of hotel-specific reviews, making it difficult to evaluate hoteliers’ satisfaction. Given the current data, Cloudbeds’s reputation among hoteliers remains unmatched. Edge: Cloudbeds.
Cloudbeds’s baseline pricing starts at $500/month, with no free tier or trial, reflecting its enterprise-grade nature. sliQue’s DataBarn does not publicly list pricing, but given its industrial focus, costs are likely customized based on system complexity and integrations.
Cloudbeds’s transparent pricing allows for better budgeting, while sliQue’s custom quotes require direct contact. For most hotels, Cloudbeds’s predictable fee structure offers clearer value. Edge: Cloudbeds.
Not ideal if your property relies heavily on custom automation or IoT device integration outside hospitality, as Cloudbeds primarily focuses on hotel management features rather than industrial automation.
Not ideal if your hotel requires a dedicated PMS, reservation engine, or direct guest communication tools—sliQue’s platform is better suited to industrial or property management sectors outside hospitality.
Cloudbeds and sliQue serve fundamentally different needs. Cloudbeds is a proven, hotel-specific platform that simplifies operations, enhances guest experiences, and scales with your property. sliQue’s DataBarn offers powerful automation and analytics, but more suited for industrial applications and real estate management.
If your hotel needs an integrated, easy-to-use management system with proven support, Cloudbeds is the clear choice. For properties seeking advanced automation and data insights—particularly in non-hospitality sectors—sliQue may be more suitable, albeit with less hotel-specific functionality.
Choose Cloudbeds if you want a reliable, feature-rich platform built for hotels, with extensive integrations and a strong reputation. Opt for sliQue if your property management is heavily automation-driven and your team has the technical capacity to implement a broader industrial tech stack.
In conclusion, for the average hotelier, Cloudbeds’s current review count, recent feedback, and comprehensive hotel focus make it the more dependable and scalable choice.
La tarification des Logiciel de gestion hôtelière est rarement simple. Voici ce que nous savons a partir des donnees tarifaires publiques de chaque fournisseur. Demandez toujours un devis personnalise pour la taille de votre etablissement.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $500/mo | — |
Selon la base de donnees produits de HTR, Cloudbeds HMS et sliQue GRM partagent 5 fonctionnalites. Voici les differences cles — les fonctionnalites que l'un possede et que l'autre n'a pas.
| Fonctionnalite |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Connectivité PMS | ||
| Gestion centralisée des utilisateurs et des rôles | ||
| Gestion de l'inventaire | ||
| Intégrations bidirectionnelles en temps réel | ||
| Multilingue | ||
| Tableau de bord analytique |
Affichage des principales differences. 73 fonctionnalites supplementaires different entre ces produits.
Nous avons analyse 8 etudes de cas verifiees pour comparer ce que les hotels obtiennent reellement avec chaque plateforme sur quatre objectifs commerciaux cles.
"I have not worked with a company that has such good customer service as Cloudbeds has. It's miles ahead."
Aucune etude de cas publiee pour cet objectif pour le moment.
"The biggest benefit of Cloudbeds' platform is its flexibility. I can access reporting online from anywhere. Everything is smoother with Cloudbeds."
Aucune etude de cas publiee pour cet objectif pour le moment.
"Cloudbeds is like if Apple made a property management system. The ease of use is super simple and straightforward for guests and our staff. It’s very intuitive and just makes sense..."
Aucune etude de cas publiee pour cet objectif pour le moment.
Ce que les hoteliers apprecient
Cloudbeds is consistently praised for its user-friendly interface, which helps quick onboarding and reduces training times. Even users new to hotel ma... Cloudbeds is consistently praised for its user-friendly interface, which helps quick onboarding and reduces training times. Even users new to hotel management software find it intuitive, making operations smoother and more consistent for staff across the board.
The platform's automation tools significantly enhance daily operations, automating repetitive tasks like rate updates and payment processing. This not... The platform's automation tools significantly enhance daily operations, automating repetitive tasks like rate updates and payment processing. This not only saves time but also minimizes human errors, resulting in increased productivity and a focus on improving guest experiences.
Cloudbeds excels in integrating reservations and channel management, centralizing OTA distributions while reducing overbookings and errors. Users appr... Cloudbeds excels in integrating reservations and channel management, centralizing OTA distributions while reducing overbookings and errors. Users appreciate the streamlined handling of bookings and distribution, which boosts operational efficiency and helps in maintaining optimal occupancy rates.
Les points de friction pour les hoteliers
The ability to edit and restructure reservations is seen as area for improvement, with users desiring more flexibility. Suggestions include splitting... The ability to edit and restructure reservations is seen as area for improvement, with users desiring more flexibility. Suggestions include splitting bookings or rearranging stays, which would better accommodate real-time changes such as guest extensions or cancellations.
Des inquiétudes subsistent quant à la précision des conversions de devises, notamment dans le cadre d'opérations multidevises. Les utilisateurs ont si... Des inquiétudes subsistent quant à la précision des conversions de devises, notamment dans le cadre d'opérations multidevises. Les utilisateurs ont signalé des écarts qui impactent les processus de rapprochement. Des configurations améliorées pour la conversion des devises pourraient simplifier la gestion financière.
Fonctionnalites uniques
Ou les notes divergent le plus
Cela depend de vos besoins. Cloudbeds HMS et sliQue GRM partagent de nombreuses fonctionnalites Hotel Management Software de base, mais chacun a des capacites uniques. Cloudbeds HMS propose 189 partenaires d'integration verifies, tandis que sliQue GRM en propose 1. Consultez la comparaison des fonctionnalites ci-dessus pour voir les differences avant de changer.
Les petits hotels devraient privilegier la facilite d'utilisation et une mise en service rapide. Cloudbeds HMS est en tete pour la facilite d'utilisation avec 4.6/5 contre 0.0/5. Recherchez une tarification transparente et une option d'essai ou de demonstration. Filtrez les avis sur chaque page produit par taille d'etablissement pour lire les retours d'hotels similaires au votre.
Cloudbeds HMS : Non. sliQue GRM : Non. Aucun des deux produits ne propose actuellement d'offre gratuite. La plupart des fournisseurs Hotel Management Software proposent des demonstrations ou des essais — demandez-en un a chacun pour evaluer avant de vous engager.
Le HT Score est un classement composite qui prend en compte 4 groupes de criteres et plus d'une douzaine de variables pour aider les hoteliers a comparer objectivement les produits technologiques hoteliers. Cloudbeds a un HT Score de 100 et Slique a 0. Voici comment le score est calcule.
| Groupe de criteres | Ponderation | Ce qu'il mesure |
|---|---|---|
| Notes et avis clients |
|
A quel point les utilisateurs recommandent-ils ce produit ? Score des notes, Volume d'avis, Part de voix, Profondeur des avis, Recence des avis, Etudes de cas ▾ Le facteur le plus fortement pondere. Analyse les notes de satisfaction moyennes (probabilite de recommandation, facilite d'utilisation, support, ROI), le nombre total d'avis par rapport aux pairs de la categorie, la recence des avis (au moins 20 avis sur les 6 derniers mois) et la part de voix parmi les clients hoteliers uniques pour detecter les biais de selection. |
| Ecosysteme partenaire |
|
A quel point les partenaires technologiques recommandent-ils cette entreprise ? Recommandations des partenaires, Nombre d'integrations, Qualite des integrations ▾ Evalue les recommandations des partenaires comme des votes de confiance d'experts, le nombre d'integrations verifiees et la qualite de l'ecosysteme — la moyenne des HT Scores des partenaires d'integration. Les produits avec des ecosystemes d'integration de meilleure qualite sont plus susceptibles de fournir un ensemble technologique connecte. |
| Orientation client |
|
A quel point cette organisation est-elle orientee client ? Support certifie, Regularite des avis, Completude du profil ▾ Evalue si l'entreprise a obtenu la certification HTR de support client, maintient une collecte d'avis reguliere dans le temps (un indicateur de culture axee sur le feedback) et tient a jour les profils produits avec les fonctionnalites, captures d'ecran, tarifs et caracteristiques. |
| Portee, perennite et ressources |
|
Quelle est l'etendue de la portee et des ressources de cette entreprise ? Portee geographique, Perennite, Ressources de l'entreprise, Score de tendance ▾ Mesure la presence mondiale (pays et regions desservis), les annees d'activite comme indicateur de stabilite, les effectifs comme indicateur de ressources, et un score de tendance base sur les demandes d'acheteurs, les avis, les recommandations de partenaires et l'activite presse des douze derniers mois. |
Les notes et avis clients sont de loin le facteur le plus important dans l'algorithme du HT Score. HTR n'accepte aucun paiement pour un meilleur classement. Tous les avis sont verifies — seuls les professionnels du secteur hotelier avec des affiliations confirmees peuvent soumettre des notes. Voir la methodologie complete du HT Score →
Conseiller en recommandations de produits