The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
Nous avons analyse 43 avis verifies d'hoteliers, compare les fonctionnalites, les tarifs et des etudes de cas reelles pour identifier les points forts de chaque plateforme. Le bon choix depend du type de votre etablissement et de vos priorites :
DJUBO se distingue , avec des fonctionnalites exclusives comme Housekeeping module and Guest Feedback Management.
GuestCentric se distingue .
Notes comparees basees sur 43 avis verifies d'hoteliers sur HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Probabilite de recommandation |
|
|
| Facilite d'utilisation |
|
|
| Support client |
|
|
| Rapport qualite-prix |
|
|
| Prix de depart | Contact sales | Contact sales |
| Avis verifies | 20 | 23 |
Comment chaque produit se classe parmi les fournisseurs Logiciel de réservation hôtelière pour differentes tailles d'etablissements, types et regions — base sur les avis verifies d'hoteliers dans chaque segment.
Par taille d'hotel
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Petit (10-24 chambres) ▾ | #7 5 avis | #3 9 avis |
| Moyen (25-74 chambres) ▾ | #16 0 avis | #7 5 avis |
| Grand (75-199 chambres) | — | #9 0 avis |
| Tres grand (200+ chambres) | #12 0 avis | #6 1 avis |
Par type d'etablissement
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #10 3 avis | #4 11 avis |
| Luxe ▾ | #11 2 avis | #7 8 avis |
| Enseigne / Chaine | #13 0 avis | #7 4 avis |
| Sejour prolonge ▾ | #10 0 avis | #3 5 avis |
Par region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Amerique du Nord | #13 0 avis | #15 4 avis |
| Europe ▾ | — | #14 17 avis |
| Asie-Pacifique ▾ | #2 5 avis | #12 0 avis |
| Moyen-Orient | #11 0 avis | #10 0 avis |
Choosing between DJUBO and GuestCentric for your hotel’s reservations and management needs hinges on your operational complexity, regional focus, and feature priorities. Both products aim to streamline reservations, inventory, and revenue, but they do so differently. DJUBO offers an all-in-one platform with extensive features and a strong global presence, while GuestCentric emphasizes a user-friendly CRS with a focus on direct booking growth. Which aligns better with your hotel’s specific needs?
Both DJUBO and GuestCentric cater to hotels seeking to centralize reservations and operational management. DJUBO’s platform integrates PMS, channel management, POS, revenue, and guest feedback modules—effectively replacing several systems with one. GuestCentric, on the other hand, specializes in a CRS and booking engine designed to maximize direct bookings and simplify inventory management.
While DJUBO boasts a wide-ranging feature set—30 unique features—GuestCentric offers a streamlined interface with fewer features but a focus on conversion-driven reservations. DJUBO’s platform is more suited for hotels needing an all-in-one solution across multiple operational facets, especially if regional coverage in Asia, Africa, or North America is critical. GuestCentric excels in providing a highly rated CRS with strong customer support and is preferred by boutique and city center hotels.
The core divergence lies in scope versus specialization. DJUBO’s broad feature set makes it an ideal choice for hotels seeking comprehensive management under one roof. GuestCentric’s targeted reservation system is better if your hotel prioritizes direct bookings and ease of use.
Are you looking for a complete management platform or a focused CRS to boost direct reservations?
If your hotel needs a full-stack hospitality platform that combines PMS, channel management, POS, revenue management, and guest feedback, DJUBO is the clear choice. Its 20 reviews in the last six months, with a 5/5 overall rating, reflect a high level of satisfaction among users of various property types, especially independent hotels in Asia Pacific and North America.
Conversely, if you require a user-friendly CRS and booking engine primarily for increasing direct reservations, GuestCentric’s platform, with 19 recent reviews and a 4.75/5 rating, is preferable. It is particularly favored by boutique hotels and city center properties, emphasizing ease of use and customer support.
For multi-property operations or hotels needing integrated management, DJUBO’s extensive features and regional coverage make it the better fit. For smaller properties or those emphasizing direct bookings with a simple interface, GuestCentric is a more targeted solution.
Would your hotel benefit from a complete operational system or a focused reservation engine?
Both products score nearly identically on ease of use—DJUBO at 4.65/5 and GuestCentric at 4.66/5—indicating that users find both platforms intuitive. DJUBO’s interface is praised for its look and feel, particularly its mobile app, with reviews highlighting its practicality for multi-property management.
GuestCentric’s platform is lauded for being highly user-friendly, reducing clicks and simplifying the reservation process, especially appreciated by smaller teams or boutique hotels. Training and onboarding are rated similarly, at approximately 4.57/5, with some reviewers noting a need for clearer communication during setup.
Edge: GuestCentric.
DJUBO’s platform includes 30 unique features, covering channel management, multi-currency, PMS, POS, revenue management, guest feedback, and advanced rate shopping. It offers modules that support group bookings, housecleaning, metasearch connectivity, and mobile apps—making it a robust, all-in-one solution.
GuestCentric’s CRS does not list additional features beyond its core reservation and booking engine, focusing on direct reservation conversion and inventory management. Its core strength is the booking engine and website integration, but it doesn’t provide the extensive modules DJUBO offers.
Edge: DJUBO.
GuestCentric’s support scores 4.76/5, with reviews emphasizing its responsiveness and helpfulness, especially for larger properties or those needing quick resolutions. Users frequently praise its friendly and competent team, with consistent praise for solving issues promptly.
DJUBO’s support, rated at 4.63/5, is also well-reviewed, with comments noting responsive, helpful service. However, some reviews suggest reporting could be more robust, and additional customization options would be beneficial.
Edge: GuestCentric.
GuestCentric integrates with 44 verified partners, including third-party booking engines, payment gateways, and distribution channels—making it highly flexible for larger, complex properties. Its integrations include platforms like Omnibees, WebRezPro, and yieldPlanet, alongside shared partners like Tripadvisor.
DJUBO’s integration pool is narrower, with 3 verified partners, including Tripadvisor and Simplotel, but it covers core needs like channel management and PMS connectivity. Its fewer integrations may limit flexibility for properties relying on diverse third-party tools.
Edge: GuestCentric.
DJUBO has a 5/5 overall rating from 20 recent reviews, primarily from independent hotels and properties across Asia Pacific and North America. Reviewers praise its comprehensive management features and cost-effectiveness, with many emphasizing its suitability for multi-property operations.
GuestCentric boasts a 4.75/5 rating from 19 recent reviews, with a majority from boutique and city center hotels. Customers commend its ease of use, customer support, and effective reservation system.
Overall, DJUBO’s higher review count and recent ratings tilt the scales in its favor, indicating broader hotel satisfaction across segments.
Edge: DJUBO.
Pricing details for both products are not publicly available, and neither offers a freemium or subscription model. They operate on custom quotes based on hotel size and feature needs, so costs can vary significantly.
Your team should request personalized quotes to compare total costs, considering the scope of features needed and support levels.
Not ideal if your hotel only requires a simple booking engine or minimal operational management.
Not ideal if your hotel needs extensive management modules or operates across multiple regions with complex distribution needs.
DJUBO offers a comprehensive, all-in-one hospitality platform with a broad feature set, suited for hotels seeking operational integration and multi-property management. Its higher review count and recent ratings confirm its strong position in the market, especially for independently operated properties.
GuestCentric excels as a CRS with a focus on direct reservations, high customer support ratings, and ease of use, making it ideal for boutique hotels and properties emphasizing online booking growth. Its extensive integrations are advantageous if your hotel relies on multiple third-party partners.
If your property needs a robust, full-featured management system with regional coverage, DJUBO is the better choice. For hotels focused on boosting direct reservations with minimal operational fuss, GuestCentric remains a compelling option.
In conclusion, for most hotels evaluating between these two, DJUBO’s broader capabilities and recent review momentum tip the scales in its favor.
La tarification des Logiciel de réservation hôtelière est rarement simple. Voici ce que nous savons a partir des donnees tarifaires publiques de chaque fournisseur. Demandez toujours un devis personnalise pour la taille de votre etablissement.
|
|
|
|---|
Selon la base de donnees produits de HTR, Djubo (CRS) et GuestCentric CRS partagent 0 fonctionnalites. Voici les differences cles — les fonctionnalites que l'un possede et que l'autre n'a pas.
| Fonctionnalite |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Gestion des canaux et distribution OTA | ||
| Gestionnaire de canaux | ||
| Moteur de réservation | ||
| Multi-devise | ||
| Multilingue | ||
| Système de gestion immobilière |
Affichage des principales differences. 18 fonctionnalites supplementaires different entre ces produits.
Mieux classe pour
Fonctionnalites uniques
Mieux classe pour
Cela depend de vos besoins. Djubo (CRS) et GuestCentric CRS partagent de nombreuses fonctionnalites Hotel Reservations Software de base, mais chacun a des capacites uniques. Djubo (CRS) propose 3 partenaires d'integration verifies, tandis que GuestCentric CRS en propose 44. Consultez la comparaison des fonctionnalites ci-dessus pour voir les differences avant de changer.
Les petits hotels devraient privilegier la facilite d'utilisation et une mise en service rapide. Djubo (CRS) est en tete pour la facilite d'utilisation avec 4.6/5 contre 4.6/5. Recherchez une tarification transparente et une option d'essai ou de demonstration. Filtrez les avis sur chaque page produit par taille d'etablissement pour lire les retours d'hotels similaires au votre.
Djubo (CRS) : Non. GuestCentric CRS : Non. Aucun des deux produits ne propose actuellement d'offre gratuite. La plupart des fournisseurs Hotel Reservations Software proposent des demonstrations ou des essais — demandez-en un a chacun pour evaluer avant de vous engager.
Le HT Score est un classement composite qui prend en compte 4 groupes de criteres et plus d'une douzaine de variables pour aider les hoteliers a comparer objectivement les produits technologiques hoteliers. DJUBO a un HT Score de 0 et GuestCentric a 0. Voici comment le score est calcule.
| Groupe de criteres | Ponderation | Ce qu'il mesure |
|---|---|---|
| Notes et avis clients |
|
A quel point les utilisateurs recommandent-ils ce produit ? Score des notes, Volume d'avis, Part de voix, Profondeur des avis, Recence des avis, Etudes de cas ▾ Le facteur le plus fortement pondere. Analyse les notes de satisfaction moyennes (probabilite de recommandation, facilite d'utilisation, support, ROI), le nombre total d'avis par rapport aux pairs de la categorie, la recence des avis (au moins 20 avis sur les 6 derniers mois) et la part de voix parmi les clients hoteliers uniques pour detecter les biais de selection. |
| Ecosysteme partenaire |
|
A quel point les partenaires technologiques recommandent-ils cette entreprise ? Recommandations des partenaires, Nombre d'integrations, Qualite des integrations ▾ Evalue les recommandations des partenaires comme des votes de confiance d'experts, le nombre d'integrations verifiees et la qualite de l'ecosysteme — la moyenne des HT Scores des partenaires d'integration. Les produits avec des ecosystemes d'integration de meilleure qualite sont plus susceptibles de fournir un ensemble technologique connecte. |
| Orientation client |
|
A quel point cette organisation est-elle orientee client ? Support certifie, Regularite des avis, Completude du profil ▾ Evalue si l'entreprise a obtenu la certification HTR de support client, maintient une collecte d'avis reguliere dans le temps (un indicateur de culture axee sur le feedback) et tient a jour les profils produits avec les fonctionnalites, captures d'ecran, tarifs et caracteristiques. |
| Portee, perennite et ressources |
|
Quelle est l'etendue de la portee et des ressources de cette entreprise ? Portee geographique, Perennite, Ressources de l'entreprise, Score de tendance ▾ Mesure la presence mondiale (pays et regions desservis), les annees d'activite comme indicateur de stabilite, les effectifs comme indicateur de ressources, et un score de tendance base sur les demandes d'acheteurs, les avis, les recommandations de partenaires et l'activite presse des douze derniers mois. |
Les notes et avis clients sont de loin le facteur le plus important dans l'algorithme du HT Score. HTR n'accepte aucun paiement pour un meilleur classement. Tous les avis sont verifies — seuls les professionnels du secteur hotelier avec des affiliations confirmees peuvent soumettre des notes. Voir la methodologie complete du HT Score →
Conseiller en recommandations de produits