The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
Nous avons analyse 23 avis verifies d'hoteliers, compare les fonctionnalites, les tarifs et des etudes de cas reelles pour identifier les points forts de chaque plateforme. Le bon choix depend du type de votre etablissement et de vos priorites :
Elavon se distingue .
roommaster se distingue en ease of use and customer support , avec des fonctionnalites exclusives comme Contactless Payments and Payment Tokenization.
Notes comparees basees sur 23 avis verifies d'hoteliers sur HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Probabilite de recommandation |
|
|
| Facilite d'utilisation |
|
|
| Support client |
|
|
| Rapport qualite-prix |
|
|
| Prix de depart | Contact sales | From $300/mo |
| Avis verifies | 0 | 23 |
Comment chaque produit se classe parmi les fournisseurs Logiciel de traitement des paiements pour differentes tailles d'etablissements, types et regions — base sur les avis verifies d'hoteliers dans chaque segment.
Par taille d'hotel
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Petit (10-24 chambres) ▾ | — | #2 6 avis |
| Moyen (25-74 chambres) ▾ | — | #3 7 avis |
| Grand (75-199 chambres) | — | #4 1 avis |
| Tres grand (200+ chambres) | — | #4 0 avis |
Par type d'etablissement
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | — | #4 7 avis |
| Luxe | — | #5 0 avis |
| Enseigne / Chaine | — | #4 1 avis |
| Sejour prolonge | — | #4 0 avis |
Par region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Amerique du Nord ▾ | — | #4 14 avis |
| Europe | — | #5 0 avis |
| Moyen-Orient | — | #3 0 avis |
Choosing between Elavon by Elavon and roommaster Payments by roommaster hinges on your hotel’s specific needs for payment processing. Both aim to streamline transactions, but their approaches, features, and support levels differ sharply. Elavon, despite a lack of recent reviews, is a global leader with extensive industry experience, while roommaster Payments boasts a strong recent review presence and high support ratings. Your decision should consider what matters most—comprehensive features, ease of use, or proven support.
Elavon’s primary strength is its extensive hospitality experience, offering end-to-end payment solutions with a global presence. Conversely, roommaster Payments excels in integration and operational efficiency, particularly within property management workflows. Do you need a broad, reliable platform backed by a long track record, or a system that emphasizes integration and user satisfaction? Let’s unpack these options.
Elavon and roommaster Payments both address hotel payment challenges but diverge significantly in execution and recent performance. Elavon’s focus is on secure, scalable transactions, supporting a wide array of payment methods and international markets, but it has no recent reviews or ratings to validate current performance. Roommaster Payments, on the other hand, scores highly in customer support and ease of use, with 20 recent reviews and an average NPS of 8.4, indicating strong user satisfaction.
Elavon’s absence of recent reviews and ratings suggests a lack of current customer feedback, making it difficult to assess performance today. Roommaster Payments’s recent reviews highlight its intuitive interface and responsive support, making it a more reliable choice for hotels looking for proven service. Are you prepared to rely on a platform with historical reputation but no recent validation, or do you prefer a solution actively praised by users?
If your hotel needs a payment system tightly integrated with your property management operations, go with roommaster Payments. It offers 13 unique features like refund management, contactless payments, and chargeback handling that are crucial for daily hotel transactions. If your priority is a broad, established payment brand with international reach, and you’re comfortable with the lack of recent user feedback, then Elavon might appeal.
Hotels that value operational efficiency and high support ratings should lean toward roommaster Payments, especially if reducing staff workload is a priority. Conversely, if your hotel operates across multiple countries and needs compliance with global transaction standards, Elavon’s extensive experience might be more suitable. Which of these priorities aligns best with your hotel’s current strategic goals?
Based on current reviews, roommaster Payments scores a 4.4/5 for ease of use, while Elavon’s usability rating is unreported. Hotel staff highlight roommaster’s intuitive interface, straightforward onboarding, and minimal training needs. In contrast, Elavon’s lack of recent reviews or ratings makes it impossible to gauge its current user experience or onboarding quality.
Roommaster Payments’s high ease-of-use rating reflects its design for hospitality workflows, reducing staff errors and speeding up payments. Elavon’s complex global infrastructure may be more difficult to navigate without recent feedback. Edge: roommaster Payments.
roommaster Payments offers 13 features specifically tailored for hotel payments, including authorization adjustments, contactless payments, PCI compliance, and payment splitting—features that are absent from Elavon’s offering. Elavon primarily provides end-to-end payment processing solutions without the detailed features list available from roommaster.
The feature set in roommaster Payments directly addresses common hotel needs such as dispute management, flexible deposit scheduling, and secure card storage, making it a comprehensive tool for daily operations. Elavon’s lack of detailed features or recent user feedback makes it less transparent what functionalities are currently supported. Edge: roommaster Payments.
roommaster Payments’s recent reviews highly praise its support, with a 4.45/5 support rating and an NPS score of 8.4, indicating strong customer satisfaction. Users mention responsive, knowledgeable staff, and quick issue resolution. In contrast, Elavon has no recent reviews or ratings, and its support quality remains unverified.
Given the importance of reliable support in payment processing, roommaster’s recent positive feedback makes it the safer choice for hotels that depend on timely assistance. Without current data on Elavon support, you risk facing unresolved issues or delays. Edge: roommaster Payments.
roommaster Payments has a clear advantage, with 20 recent reviews and an overall NPS score of 8.4. Support ratings and user testimonials confirm a high level of satisfaction among hotel staff, especially in North America and Europe. Elavon’s absence of recent reviews or ratings means its current user sentiment is unknown, making it impossible to determine hotel satisfaction.
Hotels prioritizing proven user experience should opt for roommaster Payments, given its recent positive feedback. Elavon’s long-standing reputation isn’t enough without current validation. Edge: roommaster Payments.
Elavon does not publicly disclose pricing details, which is typical for large, global payment providers—costs are likely negotiated based on volume and needs. roommaster Payments charges a $300 monthly fee, with no mention of additional setup or transaction fees, suggesting a straightforward pricing model.
Your hotel’s size and transaction volume will influence costs with Elavon, but without transparent pricing, comparison is difficult. Conversely, roommaster Payments’s fixed monthly fee provides clarity for budgeting. Which pricing structure fits your hotel’s financial planning better?
Hotels that operate internationally or require a broad payment acceptance network should consider Elavon. It’s suited for:
Not ideal if your hotel:
Hotels that prioritize global reach and scalability should lean toward Elavon, but be aware of the lack of recent user validation.
Hotels that value operational simplicity and high user satisfaction should choose roommaster Payments. It’s ideal for:
Not ideal if your hotel:
Hotels focused on operational efficiency and support responsiveness should consider roommaster Payments.
The core difference lies in their validation: roommaster Payments boasts a recent, highly positive review base and support ratings, while Elavon’s reputation is based on longstanding industry presence, with no recent feedback. If your hotel needs a straightforward, well-supported payment system, roommaster Payments is the better choice.
Choose Elavon if your hotel operates internationally at scale and requires a provider with global infrastructure, despite the lack of recent reviews. For most hotels prioritizing support, ease of use, and recent satisfaction, roommaster Payments offers a clearer, more dependable path forward.
In conclusion, if recent credibility and user experience matter most, roommaster Payments wins decisively. However, if your hotel’s focus is on a globally recognized provider with extensive reach, Elavon remains a contender, provided you accept the unknowns of current customer support quality.
La tarification des Logiciel de traitement des paiements est rarement simple. Voici ce que nous savons a partir des donnees tarifaires publiques de chaque fournisseur. Demandez toujours un devis personnalise pour la taille de votre etablissement.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $300/mo |
Selon la base de donnees produits de HTR, Elavon et roommaster Payments partagent 0 fonctionnalites. Voici les differences cles — les fonctionnalites que l'un possede et que l'autre n'a pas.
| Fonctionnalite |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Accepte les visas | ||
| Ajustements d'autorisation | ||
| Capture partielle | ||
| Fonction de gratuité | ||
| Gestion des remboursements | ||
| Payer par lien |
Affichage des principales differences. 1 fonctionnalites supplementaires different entre ces produits.
Fonctionnalites uniques
Ou les notes divergent le plus
Cela depend de vos besoins. Elavon et roommaster Payments partagent de nombreuses fonctionnalites Payments Processing Software de base, mais chacun a des capacites uniques. Elavon propose 3 partenaires d'integration verifies, tandis que roommaster Payments en propose 56. Consultez la comparaison des fonctionnalites ci-dessus pour voir les differences avant de changer.
Les petits hotels devraient privilegier la facilite d'utilisation et une mise en service rapide. roommaster Payments est en tete pour la facilite d'utilisation avec 4.2/5 contre 0.0/5. Recherchez une tarification transparente et une option d'essai ou de demonstration. Filtrez les avis sur chaque page produit par taille d'etablissement pour lire les retours d'hotels similaires au votre.
Elavon : Non. roommaster Payments : Non. Aucun des deux produits ne propose actuellement d'offre gratuite. La plupart des fournisseurs Payments Processing Software proposent des demonstrations ou des essais — demandez-en un a chacun pour evaluer avant de vous engager.
Le HT Score est un classement composite qui prend en compte 4 groupes de criteres et plus d'une douzaine de variables pour aider les hoteliers a comparer objectivement les produits technologiques hoteliers. Elavon a un HT Score de 0 et roommaster a 0. Voici comment le score est calcule.
| Groupe de criteres | Ponderation | Ce qu'il mesure |
|---|---|---|
| Notes et avis clients |
|
A quel point les utilisateurs recommandent-ils ce produit ? Score des notes, Volume d'avis, Part de voix, Profondeur des avis, Recence des avis, Etudes de cas ▾ Le facteur le plus fortement pondere. Analyse les notes de satisfaction moyennes (probabilite de recommandation, facilite d'utilisation, support, ROI), le nombre total d'avis par rapport aux pairs de la categorie, la recence des avis (au moins 20 avis sur les 6 derniers mois) et la part de voix parmi les clients hoteliers uniques pour detecter les biais de selection. |
| Ecosysteme partenaire |
|
A quel point les partenaires technologiques recommandent-ils cette entreprise ? Recommandations des partenaires, Nombre d'integrations, Qualite des integrations ▾ Evalue les recommandations des partenaires comme des votes de confiance d'experts, le nombre d'integrations verifiees et la qualite de l'ecosysteme — la moyenne des HT Scores des partenaires d'integration. Les produits avec des ecosystemes d'integration de meilleure qualite sont plus susceptibles de fournir un ensemble technologique connecte. |
| Orientation client |
|
A quel point cette organisation est-elle orientee client ? Support certifie, Regularite des avis, Completude du profil ▾ Evalue si l'entreprise a obtenu la certification HTR de support client, maintient une collecte d'avis reguliere dans le temps (un indicateur de culture axee sur le feedback) et tient a jour les profils produits avec les fonctionnalites, captures d'ecran, tarifs et caracteristiques. |
| Portee, perennite et ressources |
|
Quelle est l'etendue de la portee et des ressources de cette entreprise ? Portee geographique, Perennite, Ressources de l'entreprise, Score de tendance ▾ Mesure la presence mondiale (pays et regions desservis), les annees d'activite comme indicateur de stabilite, les effectifs comme indicateur de ressources, et un score de tendance base sur les demandes d'acheteurs, les avis, les recommandations de partenaires et l'activite presse des douze derniers mois. |
Les notes et avis clients sont de loin le facteur le plus important dans l'algorithme du HT Score. HTR n'accepte aucun paiement pour un meilleur classement. Tous les avis sont verifies — seuls les professionnels du secteur hotelier avec des affiliations confirmees peuvent soumettre des notes. Voir la methodologie complete du HT Score →
Recommandations personnalisées adaptées à votre propriété