The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
Nous avons analyse 887 avis verifies d'hoteliers, compare les fonctionnalites, les tarifs et des etudes de cas reelles pour identifier les points forts de chaque plateforme. Le bon choix depend du type de votre etablissement et de vos priorites :
Eptera se distingue , avec des fonctionnalites exclusives comme On premise.
Mews se distingue en ease of use and customer support — en particulier pour les etablissements independent (4.9/5) , avec des fonctionnalites exclusives comme Guest CRM and Guest profiles.
Notes comparees basees sur 887 avis verifies d'hoteliers sur HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Probabilite de recommandation |
|
|
| Facilite d'utilisation |
|
|
| Support client |
|
|
| Rapport qualite-prix |
|
|
| Prix de depart | From $1,100/mo | From $900/mo |
| Avis verifies | 0 | 887 |
Apres analyse de 887 avis verifies, les utilisateurs de Eptera apprecient surtout , tandis que ceux de Mews mettent en avant ease of use, automation and integrations, customizability and flexibility. Cliquez sur un theme pour voir ce que disent les evaluateurs.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Avantages | |
|
+
Ease of Use
▾
|
|
|
+
Automation and Integrations
▾
|
|
|
+
Customizability and Flexibility
▾
|
|
|
+
Intégration et soutien
▾
|
|
| Inconvenients | |
|
−
Billing and Invoicing
▾
|
|
|
−
Rapports et analyses
▾
|
|
|
−
Multi-Property Management
▾
|
|
Comment chaque produit se classe parmi les fournisseurs Systèmes de gestion immobilière pour differentes tailles d'etablissements, types et regions — base sur les avis verifies d'hoteliers dans chaque segment.
Par taille d'hotel
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Petit (10-24 chambres) ▾ | — | #3 329 avis |
| Moyen (25-74 chambres) ▾ | — | #1 397 avis |
| Grand (75-199 chambres) ▾ | — | #3 45 avis |
| Tres grand (200+ chambres) ▾ | — | #3 49 avis |
Par type d'etablissement
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | — | #1 483 avis |
| Luxe ▾ | — | #5 220 avis |
| Enseigne / Chaine ▾ | — | #2 170 avis |
| Sejour prolonge ▾ | — | #1 130 avis |
Par region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Amerique du Nord ▾ | — | #8 106 avis |
| Europe ▾ | — | #1 660 avis |
| Asie-Pacifique ▾ | — | #10 17 avis |
| Moyen-Orient ▾ | — | #28 8 avis |
Choosing the right property management system (PMS) can significantly influence your hotel's operational efficiency and guest experience. Eptera PMS by Eptera and Mews PMS by Mews aim to address core hospitality management challenges, but they differ markedly in market presence, features, and user feedback. Your decision should hinge on which platform aligns best with your hotel’s size, complexity, and growth plans.
Eptera offers a modular, on-premise solution, while Mews delivers a cloud-native, highly scalable system with extensive integrations. Given the current review data and recent feedback, which product will truly support your hotel’s future?
Eptera PMS is an emerging, Turkish-founded system with a comprehensive modular approach, allowing you to select only the functionalities you need. However, with no recent reviews and a zero-star rating, its market traction and user feedback are virtually nonexistent.
In contrast, Mews PMS boasts over 758 recent reviews and a 4.62/5 overall rating, reflecting broad adoption and trusted performance across diverse hotel types. Its user-friendly design and extensive integration ecosystem have earned industry praise, making it the more reliable choice for hotels seeking proven technology.
Do you want a lesser-known, potentially customizable system, or a widely adopted, highly rated platform with proven success?
If your hotel requires a flexible, cloud-based system with extensive third-party integrations, go with Mews. Its marketplace of over 1,000 partners and strong support for automation make it ideal for scalable operations, especially if you plan multi-property growth or want real-time data access.
If your hotel needs a modular, on-premise platform and is comfortable with a less proven ecosystem, Eptera could suffice. But given the absence of recent reviews and the lack of detailed user feedback, Mews clearly has the edge for hotels seeking a dependable, modern platform.
For hotels prioritizing stability, extensive integrations, and proven customer satisfaction, Mews is the clear choice.
Mews scores a 4.7/5 for ease of use, with recent reviews praising its intuitive interface, quick onboarding, and minimal staff training. Users highlight its modern design and straightforward workflows, making staff adoption swift and seamless.
Eptera, on the other hand, has a zero rating for ease of use, with no recent reviews to validate its user experience. Its on-premise nature and limited feedback suggest it may require more effort to implement and learn.
Edge: Mews.
Mews offers 50 shared features, including automation, reservations, billing, and guest communications. Its unique features include multi-lingual support, guest CRM, integrated payment terminals, tablet/kiosk check-in, and ID scanning—features that Eptera does not provide.
Eptera’s only standout features are its on-premise deployment and a spa & wellness module, but these are niche compared to Mews’ broad functionality. Mews's extensive feature set and third-party marketplace give it a significant advantage.
Edge: Mews.
Mews, with a 4.27/5 support rating and recent reviews emphasizing its responsiveness, is praised for its onboarding and ongoing assistance. Hoteliers mention their support team’s quick problem resolution and helpful onboarding processes.
Eptera, with no recent reviews, offers no verified support feedback. Its recent market entry and lack of customer testimonials suggest support may be untested at scale.
Edge: Mews.
Mews integrates with over 336 verified partners, including major channel managers, revenue management, and POS solutions. Its open API and marketplace facilitate customization, making it adaptable for diverse operational needs.
Eptera’s integration count is limited to just one verified partner—SiteMinder—indicating a less mature ecosystem. For hotels relying on diverse integrations, Mews provides a decisive advantage.
Edge: Mews.
With 98 recent reviews, Mews has a 4.62/5 rating, with hoteliers across segments like boutique hotels, hostels, and city center hotels praising its ease of use, automation, and support. Hotels of different sizes and types rate it highly for operational efficiency and guest satisfaction.
Eptera has no recent reviews or ratings, rendering it impossible to gauge user satisfaction. Based on available data, Mews clearly leads in hotel trust and satisfaction.
Edge: Mews.
Eptera’s pricing details are unavailable, but its base price is listed at $1,100 without a trial or freemium options. Mews charges a $900 monthly base fee, with no implementation or setup costs disclosed.
Considering the extensive features and support, Mews’s pricing offers strong value, especially given its proven track record.
Not ideal if you seek extensive integrations, proven support, or a cloud-based solution.
Not ideal if your hotel prefers on-premise solutions or has minimal staffing for setup.
Mews offers a cloud-based, feature-rich platform with proven market success, extensive integrations, and high user satisfaction. Eptera, while promising, lacks recent reviews and a broad ecosystem, making it a riskier choice in today’s competitive landscape.
If your hotel values stability, proven performance, and future scalability, go with Mews. It’s the more dependable platform for hotels aiming to improve operations, guest experiences, and revenue.
Choose Eptera only if you require an on-premise solution with specific niche modules and are prepared to navigate untested support and integration waters.
In short, Mews’s recent review volume, high ratings, and extensive feature set solidify its position as the leading option for modern hotels ready to grow.
La tarification des Systèmes de gestion immobilière est rarement simple. Voici ce que nous savons a partir des donnees tarifaires publiques de chaque fournisseur. Demandez toujours un devis personnalise pour la taille de votre etablissement.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $1,100/mo | From $900/mo |
Selon la base de donnees produits de HTR, Eptera PMS et Mews PMS partagent 50 fonctionnalites. Voici les differences cles — les fonctionnalites que l'un possede et que l'autre n'a pas.
| Fonctionnalite |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| CRM invité | ||
| Module Spa & Bien-être | ||
| Multi-devise | ||
| Multilingue | ||
| Profils d'invités | ||
| Sur place | ||
| Tablet/Kiosk Check-in | ||
| Terminal de paiement et lecteur de carte intégrés |
Nous avons analyse 8 etudes de cas verifiees pour comparer ce que les hotels obtiennent reellement avec chaque plateforme sur quatre objectifs commerciaux cles.
Aucune etude de cas publiee pour cet objectif pour le moment.
"It was vital for us to find a hospitality cloud that would give us the freedom to innovate and move quickly with new technology – that’s one of the main reasons we chose Mews."
Aucune etude de cas publiee pour cet objectif pour le moment.
"Since moving to Mews, we can be so much more agile in how we operate, both in terms of how we engage with guests and testing out new integrations and tools through Mews Marketplace..."
Aucune etude de cas publiee pour cet objectif pour le moment.
"We want to provide the best hospitality for guests anywhere in the country, and Mews is definitely the right solution to help us achieve that goal."
Fonctionnalites uniques
Ce que les hoteliers apprecient
Many reviews highlight the user-friendliness of Mews, citing its intuitive interface that simplifies tasks across various hotel operations. Users find... Many reviews highlight the user-friendliness of Mews, citing its intuitive interface that simplifies tasks across various hotel operations. Users find the platform easy to navigate, which aids in quicker team onboarding and daily use.
Reviews frequently praise Mews for its automation of routine tasks like check-in, billing, and invoicing, reducing manual workload and minimizing erro... Reviews frequently praise Mews for its automation of routine tasks like check-in, billing, and invoicing, reducing manual workload and minimizing errors. Users appreciate the extensive integration options with other tools, which streamline overall operations and enhance efficiency.
Mews allows customization to fit diverse business needs, from rate structures to integration setups. Users appreciate this flexibility, although they... Mews allows customization to fit diverse business needs, from rate structures to integration setups. Users appreciate this flexibility, although they note room for improvement in adapting complex booking conditions and enhancing user-friendly navigation for settings.
Les points de friction pour les hoteliers
Users point out that while Mews offers efficient billing processes, there are complexities and areas needing improvement, such as handling group billi... Users point out that while Mews offers efficient billing processes, there are complexities and areas needing improvement, such as handling group billings, splits, and providing more customizable invoice formats. This can affect the ease of financial operations within the system.
Bien que Mews offre des fonctionnalités de reporting et d'analyse performantes, plusieurs avis soulignent le besoin de fonctionnalités de reporting pl... Bien que Mews offre des fonctionnalités de reporting et d'analyse performantes, plusieurs avis soulignent le besoin de fonctionnalités de reporting plus personnalisables et flexibles. Les utilisateurs souhaitent des analyses de données plus fines, notamment en matière de réservations et de revenus.
Fonctionnalites uniques
Ou les notes divergent le plus
Cela depend de vos besoins. Eptera PMS et Mews PMS partagent de nombreuses fonctionnalites Property Management Systems de base, mais chacun a des capacites uniques. Eptera PMS propose 1 partenaires d'integration verifies, tandis que Mews PMS en propose 335. Consultez la comparaison des fonctionnalites ci-dessus pour voir les differences avant de changer.
Les petits hotels devraient privilegier la facilite d'utilisation et une mise en service rapide. Mews PMS est en tete pour la facilite d'utilisation avec 4.7/5 contre 0.0/5. Recherchez une tarification transparente et une option d'essai ou de demonstration. Filtrez les avis sur chaque page produit par taille d'etablissement pour lire les retours d'hotels similaires au votre.
Eptera PMS : Non. Mews PMS : Non. Aucun des deux produits ne propose actuellement d'offre gratuite. La plupart des fournisseurs Property Management Systems proposent des demonstrations ou des essais — demandez-en un a chacun pour evaluer avant de vous engager.
Le HT Score est un classement composite qui prend en compte 4 groupes de criteres et plus d'une douzaine de variables pour aider les hoteliers a comparer objectivement les produits technologiques hoteliers. Eptera a un HT Score de 0 et Mews a 100. Voici comment le score est calcule.
| Groupe de criteres | Ponderation | Ce qu'il mesure |
|---|---|---|
| Notes et avis clients |
|
A quel point les utilisateurs recommandent-ils ce produit ? Score des notes, Volume d'avis, Part de voix, Profondeur des avis, Recence des avis, Etudes de cas ▾ Le facteur le plus fortement pondere. Analyse les notes de satisfaction moyennes (probabilite de recommandation, facilite d'utilisation, support, ROI), le nombre total d'avis par rapport aux pairs de la categorie, la recence des avis (au moins 20 avis sur les 6 derniers mois) et la part de voix parmi les clients hoteliers uniques pour detecter les biais de selection. |
| Ecosysteme partenaire |
|
A quel point les partenaires technologiques recommandent-ils cette entreprise ? Recommandations des partenaires, Nombre d'integrations, Qualite des integrations ▾ Evalue les recommandations des partenaires comme des votes de confiance d'experts, le nombre d'integrations verifiees et la qualite de l'ecosysteme — la moyenne des HT Scores des partenaires d'integration. Les produits avec des ecosystemes d'integration de meilleure qualite sont plus susceptibles de fournir un ensemble technologique connecte. |
| Orientation client |
|
A quel point cette organisation est-elle orientee client ? Support certifie, Regularite des avis, Completude du profil ▾ Evalue si l'entreprise a obtenu la certification HTR de support client, maintient une collecte d'avis reguliere dans le temps (un indicateur de culture axee sur le feedback) et tient a jour les profils produits avec les fonctionnalites, captures d'ecran, tarifs et caracteristiques. |
| Portee, perennite et ressources |
|
Quelle est l'etendue de la portee et des ressources de cette entreprise ? Portee geographique, Perennite, Ressources de l'entreprise, Score de tendance ▾ Mesure la presence mondiale (pays et regions desservis), les annees d'activite comme indicateur de stabilite, les effectifs comme indicateur de ressources, et un score de tendance base sur les demandes d'acheteurs, les avis, les recommandations de partenaires et l'activite presse des douze derniers mois. |
Les notes et avis clients sont de loin le facteur le plus important dans l'algorithme du HT Score. HTR n'accepte aucun paiement pour un meilleur classement. Tous les avis sont verifies — seuls les professionnels du secteur hotelier avec des affiliations confirmees peuvent soumettre des notes. Voir la methodologie complete du HT Score →
Conseiller en recommandations de produits