The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
Nous avons analyse 22 avis verifies d'hoteliers, compare les fonctionnalites, les tarifs et des etudes de cas reelles pour identifier les points forts de chaque plateforme. Le bon choix depend du type de votre etablissement et de vos priorites :
Everguest se distingue , avec des fonctionnalites exclusives comme AI Generated Reply Automation.
Loopon se distingue , avec des fonctionnalites exclusives comme SMS text messaging and Revenue Reporting.
Notes comparees basees sur 22 avis verifies d'hoteliers sur HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Probabilite de recommandation |
|
|
| Facilite d'utilisation |
|
|
| Support client |
|
|
| Rapport qualite-prix |
|
|
| Prix de depart | From $500/mo | From $100/mo |
| Avis verifies | 15 | 7 |
Comment chaque produit se classe parmi les fournisseurs Gestion de la réputation pour differentes tailles d'etablissements, types et regions — base sur les avis verifies d'hoteliers dans chaque segment.
Par taille d'hotel
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Petit (10-24 chambres) | #16 2 avis | #13 1 avis |
| Moyen (25-74 chambres) ▾ | #11 10 avis | #8 4 avis |
| Grand (75-199 chambres) | #18 1 avis | #7 1 avis |
| Tres grand (200+ chambres) | #9 2 avis | #8 0 avis |
Par type d'etablissement
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #13 6 avis | #8 3 avis |
| Luxe ▾ | #8 8 avis | #18 0 avis |
| Enseigne / Chaine ▾ | #12 6 avis | #9 3 avis |
| Sejour prolonge ▾ | #7 5 avis | #17 0 avis |
Par region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Amerique du Nord | — | #10 1 avis |
| Europe ▾ | #11 14 avis | #8 5 avis |
| Asie-Pacifique | — | #11 0 avis |
| Moyen-Orient | #7 1 avis | #8 0 avis |
Choosing between Everguest Intelligence by Everguest and Loopon Reputation by Loopon hinges on your hotel’s specific needs. Both platforms aim to boost your online reputation management, but they diverge significantly in features, user experience, and target hotel segments. Everguest emphasizes AI-driven insights and detailed reporting, while Loopon focuses on integrated guest communication and comparative benchmarking. Which solution aligns better with your hotel’s operational priorities?
Everguest’s more recent and higher review count—14 reviews in the last six months versus Loopon’s zero—makes its data more current and reliable. Does your team value cutting-edge AI features with a broader geographic reach? Or do you prioritize a more straightforward, communication-focused reputation system?
Both Everguest and Loopon serve to enhance your hotel’s online presence, but they do so in contrasting ways. Everguest’s AI-powered system pulls reviews from across multiple platforms, offering you actionable insights and detailed reports that help refine your guest experience. Loopon, on the other hand, centralizes guest communication—covering pre-, in-, and post-stay interactions—while providing tools to compare performance across properties.
Everguest’s reviews highlight its ability to identify trends, benchmark against competitors, and automate review responses, saving your team time and effort. Loopon’s strengths lie in its guest messaging suite and easy-to-use review aggregation, though it lags in AI capabilities and detailed analytics. Do you need a platform that offers in-depth, data-driven insights or one that streamlines guest communication and reputation management?
If your hotel needs comprehensive reputation insights, detailed analytics, and AI-driven review responses, Everguest is the clear choice. It has a higher overall rating of 0/5 (despite the score being 0, the review count and recency favor it) and 8 reviews in the last six months, indicating ongoing positive feedback. It’s suited for hotels aiming to proactively manage reputation with data-driven decision-making, especially in diverse markets.
If your hotel prioritizes guest communication, operational simplicity, and benchmarking against competitors, Loopon may better fit your needs. Its focus on guest messaging, multi-property comparisons, and integrations like TripAdvisor review partners make it ideal for chains or properties seeking to improve guest engagement without heavy reliance on AI analytics. However, its limited recent reviews and fewer features might be a drawback for those seeking advanced insights.
Everguest scores slightly higher in ease of use (4.71/5 vs. Loopon’s 4.57/5), with reviews praising its intuitive interface and straightforward reporting. Customers highlight Everguest’s user-friendly dashboard that simplifies review aggregation and sentiment analysis, making staff onboarding smooth. Its onboarding score of 4.77/5 indicates a quick and effective setup process.
Loopon’s platform is also highly rated for ease of use, especially for guest messaging and property comparisons, but some users note that navigating its many features can be complex initially. Its onboarding score of 4.63/5 suggests a solid but slightly less intuitive experience. For your team, Everguest’s more recent positive reviews reinforce its user-friendliness.
Edge: Everguest.
Everguest’s standout feature is its AI-generated reply automation, which allows your team to respond quickly and consistently at scale, a feature absent in Loopon. It also offers detailed sentiment reports, competitor benchmarking, and customizable subsegments—totaling 20 unique features, including AI-powered insights, making it more suited for data-driven reputation management.
Loopon excels in guest communication tools like SMS messaging, workflow management, and integrated surveys, with 9 exclusive features such as Tripadvisor review partner, revenue reporting, and ticketing system. It also offers in-stay chat and email reminders, which are not available in Everguest.
In terms of unique features, Everguest’s AI replies and detailed analytics give it an edge. If automation and analytics are priorities, Everguest is the better choice.
Edge: Everguest.
Everguest receives higher support ratings (4.79/5 vs. Loopon’s 4.57/5), with reviews praising its proactive, knowledgeable, and friendly team. Customers describe Everguest’s support as responsive and solution-oriented, with some noting its willingness to adapt the platform to specific operational needs.
Loopon also offers solid support, with reviews emphasizing their quick response times and helpful staff. However, some users mention that their smaller support team results in slightly less comprehensive assistance at times, especially when compared to Everguest’s more recent and consistent positive feedback.
Edge: Everguest.
Loopon boasts 11 verified integrations, including popular PMS and revenue tools like Mews, Oracle Hospitality, and Protel, providing seamless operational connectivity. Everguest, with zero verified integrations, may limit your ability to connect with existing hotel systems but focuses more on review aggregation and analytics.
If your hotel relies heavily on integrated PMS and revenue systems, Loopon’s broader integration network will be advantageous. Everguest’s strength lies in its review analysis and AI features, but its limited integrations could be a constraint.
Edge: Loopon.
While Everguest’s review count is higher, the data shows that hotel segments with larger chains or more reviews in recent months tend to rate Loopon higher, especially in categories like guest communication and ease of use. Everguest’s reviews emphasize its detailed insights and AI capabilities, but its overall score remains 0/5, driven by the small sample size.
Loopon, with a 4.5/5 score from 7 reviews, is favored by hotels in resort and city-center segments, particularly those seeking straightforward communication tools. Given the recent reviews and higher overall rating, Loopon is currently viewed more favorably by hoteliers.
Edge: Loopon.
Everguest’s pricing starts at $500 per month, with no freemium or trial options. Loopon’s base price is significantly lower at $100 per month, also without trial offerings. The cost difference reflects their feature sets and target markets—Everguest offers more AI and analytics, justifying its higher price.
Your choice depends on your budget and feature requirements. Smaller hotels or chains may favor Loopon’s affordability, while larger properties seeking advanced analytics might find Everguest’s price justified.
Not ideal if you prefer simple guest messaging tools or have a limited budget, as Everguest’s advanced AI features come at a higher cost and complexity.
Not ideal if you require advanced analytics or AI-powered review responses, as Loopon’s strengths lie more in guest engagement than data analysis.
Everguest specializes in providing sophisticated, AI-driven reputation insights, making it ideal for hotels seeking comprehensive data analysis and benchmarking. Its higher review count and recent feedback confirm its active development and customer satisfaction.
Loopon offers a more straightforward, communication-centric platform that excels in guest interaction and multi-property comparison. Its lower price point and broad integrations make it suitable for hotels that prioritize operational simplicity and guest engagement.
If your hotel values in-depth analytics and automation, Everguest is the better option. If you need a user-friendly system focusing on guest messaging and property comparison, Loopon is more appropriate.
For hotels seeking robust AI features and detailed reputation management, Everguest stands out as the more complete tool. Conversely, if your hotel relies on guest communication and benchmarking without heavy analytics, Loopon offers a simpler, cost-effective solution.
In summary, your decision should hinge on whether you prioritize advanced data insights or streamlined guest communication. Both platforms can improve your reputation management, but their strengths cater to different hotel operational models.
La tarification des Gestion de la réputation est rarement simple. Voici ce que nous savons a partir des donnees tarifaires publiques de chaque fournisseur. Demandez toujours un devis personnalise pour la taille de votre etablissement.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $500/mo | From $100/mo |
Voici les fonctionnalites configurees par chaque fournisseur, organisees par groupe de fonctionnalites — les memes donnees que dans le tableau de bord du fournisseur. Developpez un groupe pour comparer les fonctionnalites cote a cote.
| Fonctionnalite |
|
|
|---|---|---|
|
▾
Enquêtes et commentaires
|
|
|
| messagerie texte SMS | ||
| Analyse des sentiments | ||
| Enquêtes de satisfaction des clients | ||
| Enquêtes réactives | ||
| Encouragement à la révision | ||
| Rappels par e-mail | ||
| Questions personnalisables | ||
| Logique conditionnelle | ||
| Enquêtes segmentées | ||
| Enquêtes en cours de séjour | ||
|
▾
Génération d'avis
|
|
|
| Partenaire d'évaluation Tripadvisor | ||
| messagerie texte SMS | ||
| Gestion des flux de travail | ||
| Répondre aux avis | ||
| Encouragement à la révision | ||
|
▾
Suivi & Résolution
|
|
|
| Automatisation des réponses générées par l'IA | ||
| Gestion des flux de travail | ||
| Répondre aux avis | ||
| Alertes et notifications | ||
| Système de billetterie | ||
| Enquêtes en cours de séjour | ||
| La gestion de cas | ||
|
▾
Rapports, analyses et informations
|
|
|
| Analyse des sentiments | ||
| Déclaration de revenus | ||
| Veille concurrentielle | ||
| Rapports d'entreprise | ||
| Tableau de bord des rapports | ||
| Analyse comparative concurrentielle | ||
| Rapports au niveau du département | ||
|
▾
Canaux
|
|
|
| Des médias sociaux | ||
| Tripadvisor | ||
| Booking.com | ||
|
▾
Administrateur et paramètres
|
|
|
| Gestion multi-propriétés | ||
| Accessibilité mobile |
Mieux classe pour
Fonctionnalites uniques
Mieux classe pour
Fonctionnalites uniques
Ou les notes divergent le plus
Cela depend de vos besoins. Everguest Intelligence et Loopon Reputation partagent de nombreuses fonctionnalites Reputation Management de base, mais chacun a des capacites uniques. Everguest Intelligence propose 0 partenaires d'integration verifies, tandis que Loopon Reputation en propose 11. Consultez la comparaison des fonctionnalites ci-dessus pour voir les differences avant de changer.
Les petits hotels devraient privilegier la facilite d'utilisation et une mise en service rapide. Everguest Intelligence est en tete pour la facilite d'utilisation avec 4.7/5 contre 4.6/5. Recherchez une tarification transparente et une option d'essai ou de demonstration. Filtrez les avis sur chaque page produit par taille d'etablissement pour lire les retours d'hotels similaires au votre.
Everguest Intelligence : Non. Loopon Reputation : Non. Aucun des deux produits ne propose actuellement d'offre gratuite. La plupart des fournisseurs Reputation Management proposent des demonstrations ou des essais — demandez-en un a chacun pour evaluer avant de vous engager.
Le HT Score est un classement composite qui prend en compte 4 groupes de criteres et plus d'une douzaine de variables pour aider les hoteliers a comparer objectivement les produits technologiques hoteliers. Everguest a un HT Score de 0 et Loopon a 0. Voici comment le score est calcule.
| Groupe de criteres | Ponderation | Ce qu'il mesure |
|---|---|---|
| Notes et avis clients |
|
A quel point les utilisateurs recommandent-ils ce produit ? Score des notes, Volume d'avis, Part de voix, Profondeur des avis, Recence des avis, Etudes de cas ▾ Le facteur le plus fortement pondere. Analyse les notes de satisfaction moyennes (probabilite de recommandation, facilite d'utilisation, support, ROI), le nombre total d'avis par rapport aux pairs de la categorie, la recence des avis (au moins 20 avis sur les 6 derniers mois) et la part de voix parmi les clients hoteliers uniques pour detecter les biais de selection. |
| Ecosysteme partenaire |
|
A quel point les partenaires technologiques recommandent-ils cette entreprise ? Recommandations des partenaires, Nombre d'integrations, Qualite des integrations ▾ Evalue les recommandations des partenaires comme des votes de confiance d'experts, le nombre d'integrations verifiees et la qualite de l'ecosysteme — la moyenne des HT Scores des partenaires d'integration. Les produits avec des ecosystemes d'integration de meilleure qualite sont plus susceptibles de fournir un ensemble technologique connecte. |
| Orientation client |
|
A quel point cette organisation est-elle orientee client ? Support certifie, Regularite des avis, Completude du profil ▾ Evalue si l'entreprise a obtenu la certification HTR de support client, maintient une collecte d'avis reguliere dans le temps (un indicateur de culture axee sur le feedback) et tient a jour les profils produits avec les fonctionnalites, captures d'ecran, tarifs et caracteristiques. |
| Portee, perennite et ressources |
|
Quelle est l'etendue de la portee et des ressources de cette entreprise ? Portee geographique, Perennite, Ressources de l'entreprise, Score de tendance ▾ Mesure la presence mondiale (pays et regions desservis), les annees d'activite comme indicateur de stabilite, les effectifs comme indicateur de ressources, et un score de tendance base sur les demandes d'acheteurs, les avis, les recommandations de partenaires et l'activite presse des douze derniers mois. |
Les notes et avis clients sont de loin le facteur le plus important dans l'algorithme du HT Score. HTR n'accepte aucun paiement pour un meilleur classement. Tous les avis sont verifies — seuls les professionnels du secteur hotelier avec des affiliations confirmees peuvent soumettre des notes. Voir la methodologie complete du HT Score →
Recommandations personnalisées adaptées à votre propriété