The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
Nous avons analyse 887 avis verifies d'hoteliers, compare les fonctionnalites, les tarifs et des etudes de cas reelles pour identifier les points forts de chaque plateforme. Le bon choix depend du type de votre etablissement et de vos priorites :
hotelcube se distingue , avec des fonctionnalites exclusives comme On premise.
Mews se distingue en ease of use and customer support — en particulier pour les etablissements independent (4.9/5) , avec des fonctionnalites exclusives comme Guest CRM and Guest profiles.
Notes comparees basees sur 887 avis verifies d'hoteliers sur HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Probabilite de recommandation |
|
|
| Facilite d'utilisation |
|
|
| Support client |
|
|
| Rapport qualite-prix |
|
|
| Prix de depart | From $700/mo | From $900/mo |
| Avis verifies | 0 | 887 |
Apres analyse de 887 avis verifies, les utilisateurs de hotelcube apprecient surtout , tandis que ceux de Mews mettent en avant ease of use, automation and integrations, customizability and flexibility. Cliquez sur un theme pour voir ce que disent les evaluateurs.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Avantages | |
|
+
Ease of Use
▾
|
|
|
+
Automation and Integrations
▾
|
|
|
+
Customizability and Flexibility
▾
|
|
|
+
Intégration et soutien
▾
|
|
| Inconvenients | |
|
−
Billing and Invoicing
▾
|
|
|
−
Rapports et analyses
▾
|
|
|
−
Multi-Property Management
▾
|
|
Comment chaque produit se classe parmi les fournisseurs Systèmes de gestion immobilière pour differentes tailles d'etablissements, types et regions — base sur les avis verifies d'hoteliers dans chaque segment.
Par taille d'hotel
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Petit (10-24 chambres) ▾ | — | #3 329 avis |
| Moyen (25-74 chambres) ▾ | — | #1 397 avis |
| Grand (75-199 chambres) ▾ | — | #3 45 avis |
| Tres grand (200+ chambres) ▾ | — | #3 49 avis |
Par type d'etablissement
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | — | #1 483 avis |
| Luxe ▾ | — | #5 220 avis |
| Enseigne / Chaine ▾ | — | #2 170 avis |
| Sejour prolonge ▾ | — | #1 130 avis |
Par region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Amerique du Nord ▾ | — | #8 106 avis |
| Europe ▾ | — | #1 660 avis |
| Asie-Pacifique ▾ | — | #10 17 avis |
| Moyen-Orient ▾ | — | #28 8 avis |
Choosing the right property management system (PMS) is crucial for your hotel's success in today’s competitive landscape. HOTELCUBE PMS and Mews PMS both aim to streamline operations, but their approaches and capacities diverge significantly. HOTELCUBE offers a tailored, modular suite for specific needs, while Mews provides a broad, highly integrated platform favored by modern hoteliers. Which solution better aligns with your hotel’s scale and ambitions?
Both products aim to optimize your operational workflows, but they differ in scope, user base, and technological maturity. HOTELCUBE is a less prominent player with a minimal online footprint, whereas Mews is an industry leader with a robust ecosystem and a strong recent review count. Do you want a highly customizable platform or a proven, all-in-one operating system?
HOTELCUBE PMS is designed to serve hotels that need a flexible, modular system with specific modules like Spa & Wellness and On Premise management. Mews, on the other hand, supports a wide variety of hotel types with over 38 unique features, including a booking engine, guest CRM, and integrations for contactless check-in, inventory, and revenue management.
HOTELCUBE’s ratings are unavailable since it has no recent reviews, while Mews boasts a 4.62/5 overall score with nearly 760 reviews, most from the last six months. Mews’s recent reviews highlight its ease of use, extensive features, and strong customer support, making it the more proven choice for today’s hospitality needs.
Edge: Mews.
If your hotel requires a comprehensive, cloud-based platform capable of handling multiple functions across various departments, go with Mews. It’s suited for properties seeking automation, guest engagement, and extensive integrations, especially if you manage multiple properties or want to scale efficiently.
If your hotel’s needs are very specific, such as managing wellness modules or onsite services, and you prefer a system that can be tailored narrowly, HOTELCUBE might fit. However, given the lack of recent reviews and limited features listed, Mews’s proven track record makes it the stronger choice for most hotels aiming for modern, scalable operations.
Edge: Mews.
Mews scores a 4.7/5 for ease of use, with reviewers praising its intuitive, modern interface, and quick onboarding process, supported by a 4.39/5 onboarding score. Customers consistently mention that staff adopt Mews easily, and the platform’s self-paced Mews University training helps new users get up to speed fast.
HOTELCUBE’s usability ratings are unavailable, but its lack of recent reviews suggests limited user feedback on its user experience. Based on available data, Mews’s user interface and onboarding process are significantly more refined and easier for your team to adopt.
Edge: Mews.
Mews offers 38 features exclusive to its platform, such as a booking engine, guest CRM, channel manager, mobile check-in, and automated revenue management, totaling 21 shared features with HOTELCUBE. HOTELCUBE’s unique features include Spa & Wellness modules and onsite management tools, but these are less comprehensive compared to Mews’s extensive ecosystem.
Mews’s rapid feature development and wide partner integrations make it adaptable, while HOTELCUBE’s niche modules may suit specialized needs but lack the breadth and depth of automation. For most hotels, Mews’s diverse feature set and ongoing updates give it the edge.
Edge: Mews.
Mews scores 4.27/5 for customer support, with reviews commending its responsiveness and support team’s ongoing improvements. Hoteliers highlight that Mews’s support is accessible and helpful, especially during onboarding and troubleshooting.
HOTELCUBE’s support ratings are nonexistent; without recent reviews, it’s difficult to assess support quality. Given the extensive reviews and recent positive feedback, Mews’s support is clearly more reliable and responsive for your team’s needs.
Edge: Mews.
With 758 reviews, mostly recent and highly positive, Mews’s 4.62/5 rating reflects broad user satisfaction across hotel segments, especially boutique hotels, city center properties, and hostels. HOTELCUBE’s lack of reviews means no measurable user rating is available, indicating lower transparency and market presence.
Mews’s high ratings across ease of use, support, and features confirm it’s the preferred choice among active users. For your hotel’s confidence and proven track record, Mews is the clear leader.
Edge: Mews.
HOTELCUBE’s pricing is not publicly available, suggesting a custom quote based on specific modules and hotel size. Mews costs $900/month for its base platform, with no additional implementation or per-room fees reported.
Given the transparency and competitive pricing of Mews, your team can more accurately evaluate ROI and budget expectations. The lack of listed pricing for HOTELCUBE makes it harder to compare value directly.
Edge: Mews.
Not ideal if you seek a scalable, all-in-one system with extensive integrations and proven scalability.
Not ideal if your hotel operates with very niche processes that require specialized modules outside Mews’s offerings.
Mews is a cloud-based platform with a broad feature set, extensive recent reviews, and high user ratings, making it the more reliable choice for modern hotels. HOTELCUBE offers modular solutions but lacks recent market validation, limiting its appeal for most hoteliers.
Choose Mews if you want a proven, scalable solution with a large ecosystem, excellent support, and a track record of delivering operational improvements. HOTELCUBE is better suited for very specialized, small-scale properties needing niche modules and high customization.
For most hotels, Mews’s maturity and user confidence make it the definitive choice. If your goal is efficiency, growth, and guest satisfaction, Mews will serve your team best today and into the future.
La tarification des Systèmes de gestion immobilière est rarement simple. Voici ce que nous savons a partir des donnees tarifaires publiques de chaque fournisseur. Demandez toujours un devis personnalise pour la taille de votre etablissement.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $700/mo | From $900/mo |
Selon la base de donnees produits de HTR, HOTELCUBE PMS et Mews PMS partagent 21 fonctionnalites. Voici les differences cles — les fonctionnalites que l'un possede et que l'autre n'a pas.
| Fonctionnalite |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| CRM invité | ||
| Gestionnaire de canaux | ||
| Module Spa & Bien-être | ||
| Moteur de réservation | ||
| Multi-devise | ||
| Multilingue | ||
| Profils d'invités | ||
| Sur place |
Affichage des principales differences. 28 fonctionnalites supplementaires different entre ces produits.
Nous avons analyse 8 etudes de cas verifiees pour comparer ce que les hotels obtiennent reellement avec chaque plateforme sur quatre objectifs commerciaux cles.
Aucune etude de cas publiee pour cet objectif pour le moment.
"It was vital for us to find a hospitality cloud that would give us the freedom to innovate and move quickly with new technology – that’s one of the main reasons we chose Mews."
Aucune etude de cas publiee pour cet objectif pour le moment.
"Since moving to Mews, we can be so much more agile in how we operate, both in terms of how we engage with guests and testing out new integrations and tools through Mews Marketplace..."
Aucune etude de cas publiee pour cet objectif pour le moment.
"We want to provide the best hospitality for guests anywhere in the country, and Mews is definitely the right solution to help us achieve that goal."
Fonctionnalites uniques
Ce que les hoteliers apprecient
Many reviews highlight the user-friendliness of Mews, citing its intuitive interface that simplifies tasks across various hotel operations. Users find... Many reviews highlight the user-friendliness of Mews, citing its intuitive interface that simplifies tasks across various hotel operations. Users find the platform easy to navigate, which aids in quicker team onboarding and daily use.
Reviews frequently praise Mews for its automation of routine tasks like check-in, billing, and invoicing, reducing manual workload and minimizing erro... Reviews frequently praise Mews for its automation of routine tasks like check-in, billing, and invoicing, reducing manual workload and minimizing errors. Users appreciate the extensive integration options with other tools, which streamline overall operations and enhance efficiency.
Mews allows customization to fit diverse business needs, from rate structures to integration setups. Users appreciate this flexibility, although they... Mews allows customization to fit diverse business needs, from rate structures to integration setups. Users appreciate this flexibility, although they note room for improvement in adapting complex booking conditions and enhancing user-friendly navigation for settings.
Les points de friction pour les hoteliers
Users point out that while Mews offers efficient billing processes, there are complexities and areas needing improvement, such as handling group billi... Users point out that while Mews offers efficient billing processes, there are complexities and areas needing improvement, such as handling group billings, splits, and providing more customizable invoice formats. This can affect the ease of financial operations within the system.
Bien que Mews offre des fonctionnalités de reporting et d'analyse performantes, plusieurs avis soulignent le besoin de fonctionnalités de reporting pl... Bien que Mews offre des fonctionnalités de reporting et d'analyse performantes, plusieurs avis soulignent le besoin de fonctionnalités de reporting plus personnalisables et flexibles. Les utilisateurs souhaitent des analyses de données plus fines, notamment en matière de réservations et de revenus.
Fonctionnalites uniques
Ou les notes divergent le plus
Cela depend de vos besoins. HOTELCUBE PMS et Mews PMS partagent de nombreuses fonctionnalites Property Management Systems de base, mais chacun a des capacites uniques. HOTELCUBE PMS propose 24 partenaires d'integration verifies, tandis que Mews PMS en propose 336. Consultez la comparaison des fonctionnalites ci-dessus pour voir les differences avant de changer.
Les petits hotels devraient privilegier la facilite d'utilisation et une mise en service rapide. Mews PMS est en tete pour la facilite d'utilisation avec 4.7/5 contre 0.0/5. Recherchez une tarification transparente et une option d'essai ou de demonstration. Filtrez les avis sur chaque page produit par taille d'etablissement pour lire les retours d'hotels similaires au votre.
HOTELCUBE PMS : Non. Mews PMS : Non. Aucun des deux produits ne propose actuellement d'offre gratuite. La plupart des fournisseurs Property Management Systems proposent des demonstrations ou des essais — demandez-en un a chacun pour evaluer avant de vous engager.
Le HT Score est un classement composite qui prend en compte 4 groupes de criteres et plus d'une douzaine de variables pour aider les hoteliers a comparer objectivement les produits technologiques hoteliers. hotelcube a un HT Score de 0 et Mews a 99. Voici comment le score est calcule.
| Groupe de criteres | Ponderation | Ce qu'il mesure |
|---|---|---|
| Notes et avis clients |
|
A quel point les utilisateurs recommandent-ils ce produit ? Score des notes, Volume d'avis, Part de voix, Profondeur des avis, Recence des avis, Etudes de cas ▾ Le facteur le plus fortement pondere. Analyse les notes de satisfaction moyennes (probabilite de recommandation, facilite d'utilisation, support, ROI), le nombre total d'avis par rapport aux pairs de la categorie, la recence des avis (au moins 20 avis sur les 6 derniers mois) et la part de voix parmi les clients hoteliers uniques pour detecter les biais de selection. |
| Ecosysteme partenaire |
|
A quel point les partenaires technologiques recommandent-ils cette entreprise ? Recommandations des partenaires, Nombre d'integrations, Qualite des integrations ▾ Evalue les recommandations des partenaires comme des votes de confiance d'experts, le nombre d'integrations verifiees et la qualite de l'ecosysteme — la moyenne des HT Scores des partenaires d'integration. Les produits avec des ecosystemes d'integration de meilleure qualite sont plus susceptibles de fournir un ensemble technologique connecte. |
| Orientation client |
|
A quel point cette organisation est-elle orientee client ? Support certifie, Regularite des avis, Completude du profil ▾ Evalue si l'entreprise a obtenu la certification HTR de support client, maintient une collecte d'avis reguliere dans le temps (un indicateur de culture axee sur le feedback) et tient a jour les profils produits avec les fonctionnalites, captures d'ecran, tarifs et caracteristiques. |
| Portee, perennite et ressources |
|
Quelle est l'etendue de la portee et des ressources de cette entreprise ? Portee geographique, Perennite, Ressources de l'entreprise, Score de tendance ▾ Mesure la presence mondiale (pays et regions desservis), les annees d'activite comme indicateur de stabilite, les effectifs comme indicateur de ressources, et un score de tendance base sur les demandes d'acheteurs, les avis, les recommandations de partenaires et l'activite presse des douze derniers mois. |
Les notes et avis clients sont de loin le facteur le plus important dans l'algorithme du HT Score. HTR n'accepte aucun paiement pour un meilleur classement. Tous les avis sont verifies — seuls les professionnels du secteur hotelier avec des affiliations confirmees peuvent soumettre des notes. Voir la methodologie complete du HT Score →
Conseiller en recommandations de produits