The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
Nous avons analyse 566 avis verifies d'hoteliers, compare les fonctionnalites, les tarifs et des etudes de cas reelles pour identifier les points forts de chaque plateforme. Le bon choix depend du type de votre etablissement et de vos priorites :
HotelRunner se distingue en ROI and onboarding , avec des fonctionnalites exclusives comme On premise and Mobile Device Notes & Tasks (Voice-to-Text).
HOTELTIME se distingue en matiere de user interface and learning curve — en particulier pour les etablissements brand (4.9/5) , avec des fonctionnalites exclusives comme Guest CRM and Guest profiles.
Notes comparees basees sur 566 avis verifies d'hoteliers sur HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Probabilite de recommandation |
|
|
| Facilite d'utilisation |
|
|
| Support client |
|
|
| Rapport qualite-prix |
|
|
| Prix de depart | From $100/mo | From $600/mo |
| Avis verifies | 17 | 549 |
Apres analyse de 566 avis verifies, les utilisateurs de HotelRunner apprecient surtout , tandis que ceux de HOTELTIME mettent en avant user interface and learning curve, assistance technique, reporting and analytics. Cliquez sur un theme pour voir ce que disent les evaluateurs.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Avantages | |
|
+
User Interface and Learning Curve
▾
|
|
|
+
Assistance technique
▾
|
|
|
+
Reporting and Analytics
▾
|
|
|
+
System Stability and Updates
▾
|
|
| Inconvenients | |
|
−
Customization Options
▾
|
|
|
−
Automation Features
▾
|
|
|
−
Optimisation mobile
▾
|
|
Comment chaque produit se classe parmi les fournisseurs Systèmes de gestion immobilière pour differentes tailles d'etablissements, types et regions — base sur les avis verifies d'hoteliers dans chaque segment.
Par taille d'hotel
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Petit (10-24 chambres) ▾ | #38 5 avis | #5 219 avis |
| Moyen (25-74 chambres) ▾ | #44 3 avis | #3 238 avis |
| Grand (75-199 chambres) ▾ | #34 1 avis | #2 46 avis |
| Tres grand (200+ chambres) ▾ | #41 0 avis | #8 7 avis |
Par type d'etablissement
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #36 8 avis | #5 239 avis |
| Luxe ▾ | #38 3 avis | #3 241 avis |
| Enseigne / Chaine ▾ | #47 1 avis | #4 143 avis |
| Sejour prolonge ▾ | #49 0 avis | #4 49 avis |
Par region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Amerique du Nord | #36 2 avis | #52 4 avis |
| Europe ▾ | #35 3 avis | #2 384 avis |
| Asie-Pacifique ▾ | #25 0 avis | #5 111 avis |
| Moyen-Orient ▾ | #4 6 avis | #1 21 avis |
Choosing the right property management system (PMS) is crucial for your hotel’s operational efficiency, guest satisfaction, and revenue growth. HotelRunner PMS and HotelTime PMS both aim to streamline hotel management, but they differ significantly in features, user experience, and market presence. Your decision hinges on understanding which system aligns best with your hotel’s size, complexity, and growth plans.
HotelRunner offers a smaller but highly rated platform with an emphasis on ease of use and exceptional support, while HotelTime provides a more feature-rich, scalable solution trusted by larger properties. Which system will serve your hotel’s current needs and future ambitions more effectively?
HotelRunner PMS and HotelTime PMS address core hotel management challenges—reservations, guest data, and operations automation—but they approach these from different angles. HotelRunner’s core strength lies in its simplicity and recent customer support ratings, boasting a 5/5 support score backed by 16 reviews, with no recent negative feedback. Its user-friendly interface consistently receives praise for making daily operations less burdensome.
HotelTime, on the other hand, is a broader, feature-heavy platform used by over 650 properties across 20+ countries. With a 4.83/5 overall rating from 433 reviews, it’s recognized for its extensive modules and global reach, especially among resorts and large hotels. But this complexity may require more time to master and implement effectively.
Do you need a quick-to-implement, straightforward solution, or a comprehensive platform capable of supporting a diverse property portfolio?
If your hotel prioritizes ease of use, rapid onboarding, and dedicated support, HotelRunner is the better choice. It’s ideal for boutique properties, inns, and smaller hotels that want to streamline daily operations without extensive training or configuration. Its simple interface and ongoing support make it suitable for teams seeking dependable performance with minimal fuss.
HotelTime suits larger, more complex operations—resorts, chains, or properties with multiple outlets—that need a broad set of features like POS, spa & wellness modules, and advanced automation. Its scalability and integration capabilities support expansion and multi-department management. If your hotel needs a comprehensive, all-in-one platform, HotelTime delivers.
In summary, choose HotelRunner if your focus is on quick, intuitive management at a lower price point. Opt for HotelTime if your property demands extensive features and scalability.
HotelRunner scores slightly higher on ease of use, with a 4.81/5 rating based on 16 reviews, versus HotelTime’s 4.66/5 from 433 reviews. HotelRunner’s interface is described as very user-friendly, enabling staff to operate without extensive training, and its onboarding process earns a perfect 5/5. Customers mention ongoing training and support as key strengths, making adoption smoother.
HotelTime’s platform is also intuitive but can be more complex due to its wider feature set. Some users report initial challenges navigating modules, though once familiar, they find it enhances operational efficiency. Its onboarding rating (4.63/5) is strong but slightly behind HotelRunner’s.
Edge: HotelRunner.
HotelRunner features 26 shared functionalities with HotelTime but offers only 3 features unique to its platform, such as mobile device notes, SMS guest communication, and on-premise options. HotelTime offers 25 exclusive features, including EPoS, guest profiles, spa & wellness modules, automated reminders, online check-in, and real-time reporting.
HotelTime’s extensive modules support complex operations like automated space optimization and PCI/GDPR compliance, making it ideal for larger properties. HotelRunner, with fewer features but a focus on core PMS functions, is suited for properties seeking straightforward management tools.
Edge: HotelTime.
HotelRunner’s customer support is rated a perfect 5/5, with reviews highlighting ongoing training and responsiveness. Reviewers describe support as always helpful and friendly, with some noting that it’s a key factor for their satisfaction. The low review count (16) limits some insights, but recent feedback remains positive.
HotelTime’s support scores 4.73/5, with reviewers praising quick responses and knowledgeable assistance. Many mention the support team’s role in helping with complex module setups, although a few suggest extended availability could improve the experience.
Edge: HotelRunner.
HotelTime boasts 58 verified integrations across POS, channel managers, and third-party systems, significantly more than HotelRunner’s 17 verified partners. Shared integrations include major players like IDeaS, RoomPriceGenie, and Expedia, but HotelTime offers exclusive integrations with Profitroom, RevControl, and Umi Digital, supporting larger, multi-channel operations.
HotelTime’s broader integration ecosystem makes it more adaptable for hotels with complex tech stacks or plans to expand. HotelRunner’s integrations are sufficient for smaller or mid-sized properties focusing on core management functions.
Edge: HotelTime.
HotelRunner receives a perfect 5/5 rating from its 16 reviews, with particular praise for ease of use and support. Its recent reviews (none in last 6 months, but historically positive) suggest consistent satisfaction among boutique and small hotel owners.
HotelTime has a slightly lower overall rating of 4.83/5 from 433 reviews, but those reviews span a broad spectrum of property types, especially resorts and larger hotels, with many highlighting its robust features and support.
Given the volume and recency of HotelTime reviews, it holds the higher confidence rating—making it the more trusted choice overall.
Edge: HotelTime.
HotelRunner’s base price is $100 per month, with no freemium, implementation fees, or hidden charges. Its transparent, low-cost model makes it accessible for small properties and boutique hotels.
HotelTime charges $600 per month, reflecting its extensive features and enterprise-level capabilities. Its pricing is better suited for larger hotels or chains with complex needs and a bigger budget.
In conclusion, HotelRunner offers a budget-friendly, straightforward solution, while HotelTime provides a high-value, comprehensive platform at a higher price point.
At its core, HotelRunner provides a simplified, highly rated system that excels in ease of use and support for small and boutique properties. Its lower price and straightforward interface make it a smart choice for hotels prioritizing operational efficiency without the complexity of extensive features.
HotelTime offers a broader suite of modules, integrations, and scalability for larger, more complex properties. Its extensive feature set supports growth, automation, and multi-department management, making it the preferred option for resorts and hotel groups.
If your hotel values simplicity, quick onboarding, and dedicated support, HotelRunner is the clear winner. For larger properties needing comprehensive management tools and extensive integrations, HotelTime delivers unmatched flexibility and scalability.
This comparison aims to guide your decision based on your hotel’s size, operational complexity, and growth plans. Both systems are strong contenders, but the right choice hinges on matching their strengths to your specific needs.
La tarification des Systèmes de gestion immobilière est rarement simple. Voici ce que nous savons a partir des donnees tarifaires publiques de chaque fournisseur. Demandez toujours un devis personnalise pour la taille de votre etablissement.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $100/mo | From $600/mo |
Selon la base de donnees produits de HTR, HotelRunner PMS et HotelTime PMS partagent 26 fonctionnalites. Voici les differences cles — les fonctionnalites que l'un possede et que l'autre n'a pas.
| Fonctionnalite |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| CRM invité | ||
| Communication invité (messagerie SMS) | ||
| Module Spa & Bien-être | ||
| Notes et tâches relatives aux appareils mobiles (Voix-à-Texte) | ||
| Profils d'invités | ||
| Sur place | ||
| Task Management | ||
| Transactional Emails (booking, folios, etc) | ||
| Épopée |
Affichage des principales differences. 16 fonctionnalites supplementaires different entre ces produits.
Nous avons analyse 8 etudes de cas verifiees pour comparer ce que les hotels obtiennent reellement avec chaque plateforme sur quatre objectifs commerciaux cles.
Aucune etude de cas publiee pour cet objectif pour le moment.
"We needed to change an on-site system we were using as we wanted to move our operation forward. We achieved that with HotelTime systems. They are reliable, and stable and offer fea..."
Aucune etude de cas publiee pour cet objectif pour le moment.
"In 2018 we were choosing a system for our first completely self-service ART and design hotel. We decided on HotelTime and after 4 years I have to say that the choice was the right..."
Mieux classe pour
Fonctionnalites uniques
Ce que les hoteliers apprecient
While the system’s intuitive interface and ease of learning are generally appreciated, a few users mention initial challenges due to the complexity of... While the system’s intuitive interface and ease of learning are generally appreciated, a few users mention initial challenges due to the complexity of features offered. Overall, once users become familiar with the system, it significantly enhances efficiency and simplifies hotel operations.
Bien que la réactivité et l'efficacité de l'équipe d'assistance soient appréciées, certains avis suggèrent que l'extension des horaires d'assistance t... Bien que la réactivité et l'efficacité de l'équipe d'assistance soient appréciées, certains avis suggèrent que l'extension des horaires d'assistance technique améliorerait encore l'expérience utilisateur, en garantissant une assistance permanente, notamment pour les utilisateurs internationaux.
HotelTime's robust reporting features are praised for providing comprehensive data insights into occupancy, revenue, and customer satisfaction. Users... HotelTime's robust reporting features are praised for providing comprehensive data insights into occupancy, revenue, and customer satisfaction. Users appreciate the variety of reports available for management, yet some desire more customization and advanced visualizations within the tool itself to better suit individual hotel needs.
Les points de friction pour les hoteliers
Some users voice a need for more customizable features, particularly in terms of reporting and interface personalization, which would allow hotels to... Some users voice a need for more customizable features, particularly in terms of reporting and interface personalization, which would allow hotels to better tailor the PMS to their specific operational strategies and guest services.
The automation capabilities in HotelTime, such as invoice processing and reservation management, are frequently mentioned for saving significant time... The automation capabilities in HotelTime, such as invoice processing and reservation management, are frequently mentioned for saving significant time for staff. Users highlight these features as reducing manual workload and minimizing the risk of human error, although they also express a desire for enhanced automation in guest communication and reporting.
Mieux classe pour
Fonctionnalites uniques
Ou les notes divergent le plus
Cela depend de vos besoins. HotelRunner PMS et HotelTime PMS partagent de nombreuses fonctionnalites Property Management Systems de base, mais chacun a des capacites uniques. HotelRunner PMS propose 17 partenaires d'integration verifies, tandis que HotelTime PMS en propose 58. Consultez la comparaison des fonctionnalites ci-dessus pour voir les differences avant de changer.
Les petits hotels devraient privilegier la facilite d'utilisation et une mise en service rapide. HotelRunner PMS est en tete pour la facilite d'utilisation avec 4.8/5 contre 4.7/5. Recherchez une tarification transparente et une option d'essai ou de demonstration. Filtrez les avis sur chaque page produit par taille d'etablissement pour lire les retours d'hotels similaires au votre.
HotelRunner PMS : Non. HotelTime PMS : Non. Aucun des deux produits ne propose actuellement d'offre gratuite. La plupart des fournisseurs Property Management Systems proposent des demonstrations ou des essais — demandez-en un a chacun pour evaluer avant de vous engager.
Le HT Score est un classement composite qui prend en compte 4 groupes de criteres et plus d'une douzaine de variables pour aider les hoteliers a comparer objectivement les produits technologiques hoteliers. HotelRunner a un HT Score de 0 et HOTELTIME a 91. Voici comment le score est calcule.
| Groupe de criteres | Ponderation | Ce qu'il mesure |
|---|---|---|
| Notes et avis clients |
|
A quel point les utilisateurs recommandent-ils ce produit ? Score des notes, Volume d'avis, Part de voix, Profondeur des avis, Recence des avis, Etudes de cas ▾ Le facteur le plus fortement pondere. Analyse les notes de satisfaction moyennes (probabilite de recommandation, facilite d'utilisation, support, ROI), le nombre total d'avis par rapport aux pairs de la categorie, la recence des avis (au moins 20 avis sur les 6 derniers mois) et la part de voix parmi les clients hoteliers uniques pour detecter les biais de selection. |
| Ecosysteme partenaire |
|
A quel point les partenaires technologiques recommandent-ils cette entreprise ? Recommandations des partenaires, Nombre d'integrations, Qualite des integrations ▾ Evalue les recommandations des partenaires comme des votes de confiance d'experts, le nombre d'integrations verifiees et la qualite de l'ecosysteme — la moyenne des HT Scores des partenaires d'integration. Les produits avec des ecosystemes d'integration de meilleure qualite sont plus susceptibles de fournir un ensemble technologique connecte. |
| Orientation client |
|
A quel point cette organisation est-elle orientee client ? Support certifie, Regularite des avis, Completude du profil ▾ Evalue si l'entreprise a obtenu la certification HTR de support client, maintient une collecte d'avis reguliere dans le temps (un indicateur de culture axee sur le feedback) et tient a jour les profils produits avec les fonctionnalites, captures d'ecran, tarifs et caracteristiques. |
| Portee, perennite et ressources |
|
Quelle est l'etendue de la portee et des ressources de cette entreprise ? Portee geographique, Perennite, Ressources de l'entreprise, Score de tendance ▾ Mesure la presence mondiale (pays et regions desservis), les annees d'activite comme indicateur de stabilite, les effectifs comme indicateur de ressources, et un score de tendance base sur les demandes d'acheteurs, les avis, les recommandations de partenaires et l'activite presse des douze derniers mois. |
Les notes et avis clients sont de loin le facteur le plus important dans l'algorithme du HT Score. HTR n'accepte aucun paiement pour un meilleur classement. Tous les avis sont verifies — seuls les professionnels du secteur hotelier avec des affiliations confirmees peuvent soumettre des notes. Voir la methodologie complete du HT Score →
Conseiller en recommandations de produits