The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
Nous avons analyse 904 avis verifies d'hoteliers, compare les fonctionnalites, les tarifs et des etudes de cas reelles pour identifier les points forts de chaque plateforme. Le bon choix depend du type de votre etablissement et de vos priorites :
HotelRunner se distingue en customer support and ROI , avec des fonctionnalites exclusives comme On premise and Mobile Device Notes & Tasks (Voice-to-Text).
Mews se distingue en matiere de ease of use — en particulier pour les etablissements independent (4.9/5) , avec des fonctionnalites exclusives comme Guest CRM and Guest profiles.
Notes comparees basees sur 904 avis verifies d'hoteliers sur HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Probabilite de recommandation |
|
|
| Facilite d'utilisation |
|
|
| Support client |
|
|
| Rapport qualite-prix |
|
|
| Prix de depart | From $100/mo | From $900/mo |
| Avis verifies | 17 | 887 |
Apres analyse de 904 avis verifies, les utilisateurs de HotelRunner apprecient surtout , tandis que ceux de Mews mettent en avant ease of use, automation and integrations, customizability and flexibility. Cliquez sur un theme pour voir ce que disent les evaluateurs.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Avantages | |
|
+
Ease of Use
▾
|
|
|
+
Automation and Integrations
▾
|
|
|
+
Customizability and Flexibility
▾
|
|
|
+
Intégration et soutien
▾
|
|
| Inconvenients | |
|
−
Billing and Invoicing
▾
|
|
|
−
Rapports et analyses
▾
|
|
|
−
Multi-Property Management
▾
|
|
Comment chaque produit se classe parmi les fournisseurs Systèmes de gestion immobilière pour differentes tailles d'etablissements, types et regions — base sur les avis verifies d'hoteliers dans chaque segment.
Par taille d'hotel
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Petit (10-24 chambres) ▾ | #38 5 avis | #3 329 avis |
| Moyen (25-74 chambres) ▾ | #44 3 avis | #1 397 avis |
| Grand (75-199 chambres) ▾ | #34 1 avis | #3 45 avis |
| Tres grand (200+ chambres) ▾ | #41 0 avis | #3 49 avis |
Par type d'etablissement
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #36 8 avis | #1 483 avis |
| Luxe ▾ | #38 3 avis | #5 220 avis |
| Enseigne / Chaine ▾ | #47 1 avis | #2 170 avis |
| Sejour prolonge ▾ | #49 0 avis | #1 130 avis |
Par region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Amerique du Nord ▾ | #36 2 avis | #8 106 avis |
| Europe ▾ | #35 3 avis | #1 660 avis |
| Asie-Pacifique ▾ | #25 0 avis | #10 17 avis |
| Moyen-Orient ▾ | #4 6 avis | #28 8 avis |
Choosing between HotelRunner PMS and Mews PMS hinges on your hotel’s specific needs and growth ambitions. Both systems aim to streamline operations, but they diverge significantly in scope, features, and support at scale. HotelRunner offers a straightforward, highly-rated solution with a focus on ease and value, while Mews provides a broader, more integrated platform backed by extensive reviews and recent positive feedback. Which system aligns best with your hotel’s current and future goals?
Are you looking for a user-friendly, cost-effective platform with a dedicated support team, or a comprehensive operating system that can scale across multiple properties and integrate with hundreds of third-party tools? Let’s compare these two contenders in detail.
HotelRunner PMS and Mews PMS both address core hospitality management issues—reservation handling, guest management, and operational automation—but their approaches differ. HotelRunner emphasizes simplicity and ease of use, making it ideal for small hotels or boutique properties that want a straightforward solution. Mews, on the other hand, offers a cloud-native, scalable platform with a vast ecosystem of integrations and advanced features, suited for growing or multi-property management.
When it comes to recent reviews, Mews outperforms HotelRunner by a considerable margin, with 758 reviews in the last six months compared to HotelRunner's zero. This indicates a more active user base and a product that continues to evolve rapidly. Do you want a proven system with a large, recent user community, or a smaller, highly-rated platform that may be better for basic operations?
If your hotel needs a flexible, scalable system capable of managing multiple properties and complex operations, Mews is the clear choice. It’s particularly suited for hotels that require extensive integrations, automation, and a modern guest experience. Conversely, if your property prioritizes simplicity, immediate value, and lower costs, HotelRunner’s straightforward interface and highly-rated customer support make it a better fit.
For boutique hotels or properties with limited tech needs, HotelRunner’s $100/month fee and focus on core PMS functions are attractive. However, for hotels aiming for digital transformation, dynamic pricing, and extensive third-party integrations, Mews’ robust feature set and expansive ecosystem justify its $900/month price.
HotelRunner boasts an impressive ease-of-use rating of 4.81/5, with users emphasizing its user-friendly interface, quick onboarding, and ongoing support. Its mobile app, however, is noted as limited, with customers wanting more functionalities like reservations and edits on the go.
Mews also scores highly at 4.7/5, with users citing its intuitive modern interface, straightforward setup, and clear workflows. While both platforms are easy to adopt, HotelRunner’s smaller feature set and simpler design make it slightly easier for small teams to learn quickly.
Edge: HotelRunner.
HotelRunner offers 27 shared features plus 2 unique ones: on-premise management and voice-to-text notes & tasks on mobile devices. Its unique features cater to basic operational needs and mobile note-taking but lack advanced automation or guest engagement tools.
Mews stands out with 32 unique features—guest CRM, online check-in, automated reminders, real-time reporting, employee messaging, shift planning, and more—adding significant value for larger or tech-savvy hotels. Its comprehensive suite supports complex operations and enhances guest experiences, giving it a clear edge.
Edge: Mews.
HotelRunner receives perfect support ratings of 5/5, with reviews praising their ongoing training, responsiveness, and relationship-building. Customers appreciate their dedicated support team and proactive assistance, particularly during onboarding.
Mews’ support ratings are solid at 4.27/5, with users noting that issues are usually quickly addressed but some experience occasional bugs or delays. Although Mews is known for continuous innovation, HotelRunner’s support consistently receives higher praise.
Edge: HotelRunner.
HotelRunner integrates with 17 verified partners, including key OTAs and channel managers like Airbnb, Expedia, and Booking.com, focusing on core distribution needs. Its fewer integrations mean less flexibility but easier management for smaller properties.
Mews boasts 336 verified integrations, including industry giants like Oracle Hospitality, Stripe, and Sage, and thousands of third-party tools via the Mews Marketplace. This extensive ecosystem allows hotels to customize and expand their tech stack significantly.
Edge: Mews.
HotelRunner’s reviews are limited to 16, all very recent, with a perfect rating of 5/5, primarily from boutique and small hotels. The reviews highlight ease of use, support, and operational improvements, especially among smaller properties.
Mews has 758 reviews in the last six months, with an overall rating of 4.62/5. Its reviews span various hotel segments, including independent, boutique, and branded hotels, with many praising automation and scalability. The recent reviews reinforce its reputation as a reliable, innovative platform.
Edge: Mews.
HotelRunner charges $100 monthly per property with no implementation fees or free trial. Its straightforward pricing makes it accessible for small hotels with limited budgets.
Mews’ pricing starts at $900 per month, with no free trial or implementation fees. Its higher cost reflects its broader feature set and scalability options, making it suitable for larger or multi-property operations.
Hotels that:
Not ideal if:
Hotels that:
Not ideal if:
Mews is a comprehensive, scalable platform with a vast feature set and active user community, ideal for hotels seeking growth and advanced automation. HotelRunner excels at providing a simple, cost-effective solution with high support quality, perfect for small properties prioritizing ease and value.
If your hotel needs to streamline operations across multiple locations, automate guest interactions, and integrate with a broad ecosystem, Mews is the clear choice. Conversely, if your focus is on managing a single boutique or small hotel efficiently without the complexity or cost, HotelRunner offers a reliable, straightforward option.
For hotels with ambitious growth plans, Mews’ extensive features and recent reviews make it the stronger candidate. Small, boutique properties or those new to PMS technology should consider HotelRunner’s simplicity and support, which have earned it a near-perfect reputation.
In conclusion, prioritize Mews if your hotel aims to scale, automate, and innovate—its recent reviews and extensive ecosystem support this. If your needs are more basic, cost-conscious, and focused on ease, HotelRunner provides a proven, well-supported platform that can meet your immediate operational goals.
La tarification des Systèmes de gestion immobilière est rarement simple. Voici ce que nous savons a partir des donnees tarifaires publiques de chaque fournisseur. Demandez toujours un devis personnalise pour la taille de votre etablissement.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $100/mo | From $900/mo |
Selon la base de donnees produits de HTR, HotelRunner PMS et Mews PMS partagent 27 fonctionnalites. Voici les differences cles — les fonctionnalites que l'un possede et que l'autre n'a pas.
| Fonctionnalite |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| CRM invité | ||
| Multi-devise | ||
| Multilingue | ||
| Notes et tâches relatives aux appareils mobiles (Voix-à-Texte) | ||
| Profils d'invités | ||
| Sur place | ||
| Transactional Emails (booking, folios, etc) | ||
| Épopée |
Affichage des principales differences. 22 fonctionnalites supplementaires different entre ces produits.
Nous avons analyse 8 etudes de cas verifiees pour comparer ce que les hotels obtiennent reellement avec chaque plateforme sur quatre objectifs commerciaux cles.
Aucune etude de cas publiee pour cet objectif pour le moment.
"It was vital for us to find a hospitality cloud that would give us the freedom to innovate and move quickly with new technology – that’s one of the main reasons we chose Mews."
Aucune etude de cas publiee pour cet objectif pour le moment.
"Since moving to Mews, we can be so much more agile in how we operate, both in terms of how we engage with guests and testing out new integrations and tools through Mews Marketplace..."
Aucune etude de cas publiee pour cet objectif pour le moment.
"We want to provide the best hospitality for guests anywhere in the country, and Mews is definitely the right solution to help us achieve that goal."
Mieux classe pour
Fonctionnalites uniques
Ce que les hoteliers apprecient
Many reviews highlight the user-friendliness of Mews, citing its intuitive interface that simplifies tasks across various hotel operations. Users find... Many reviews highlight the user-friendliness of Mews, citing its intuitive interface that simplifies tasks across various hotel operations. Users find the platform easy to navigate, which aids in quicker team onboarding and daily use.
Reviews frequently praise Mews for its automation of routine tasks like check-in, billing, and invoicing, reducing manual workload and minimizing erro... Reviews frequently praise Mews for its automation of routine tasks like check-in, billing, and invoicing, reducing manual workload and minimizing errors. Users appreciate the extensive integration options with other tools, which streamline overall operations and enhance efficiency.
Mews allows customization to fit diverse business needs, from rate structures to integration setups. Users appreciate this flexibility, although they... Mews allows customization to fit diverse business needs, from rate structures to integration setups. Users appreciate this flexibility, although they note room for improvement in adapting complex booking conditions and enhancing user-friendly navigation for settings.
Les points de friction pour les hoteliers
Users point out that while Mews offers efficient billing processes, there are complexities and areas needing improvement, such as handling group billi... Users point out that while Mews offers efficient billing processes, there are complexities and areas needing improvement, such as handling group billings, splits, and providing more customizable invoice formats. This can affect the ease of financial operations within the system.
Bien que Mews offre des fonctionnalités de reporting et d'analyse performantes, plusieurs avis soulignent le besoin de fonctionnalités de reporting pl... Bien que Mews offre des fonctionnalités de reporting et d'analyse performantes, plusieurs avis soulignent le besoin de fonctionnalités de reporting plus personnalisables et flexibles. Les utilisateurs souhaitent des analyses de données plus fines, notamment en matière de réservations et de revenus.
Mieux classe pour
Fonctionnalites uniques
Ou les notes divergent le plus
Cela depend de vos besoins. HotelRunner PMS et Mews PMS partagent de nombreuses fonctionnalites Property Management Systems de base, mais chacun a des capacites uniques. HotelRunner PMS propose 17 partenaires d'integration verifies, tandis que Mews PMS en propose 336. Consultez la comparaison des fonctionnalites ci-dessus pour voir les differences avant de changer.
Les petits hotels devraient privilegier la facilite d'utilisation et une mise en service rapide. HotelRunner PMS est en tete pour la facilite d'utilisation avec 4.8/5 contre 4.7/5. Recherchez une tarification transparente et une option d'essai ou de demonstration. Filtrez les avis sur chaque page produit par taille d'etablissement pour lire les retours d'hotels similaires au votre.
HotelRunner PMS : Non. Mews PMS : Non. Aucun des deux produits ne propose actuellement d'offre gratuite. La plupart des fournisseurs Property Management Systems proposent des demonstrations ou des essais — demandez-en un a chacun pour evaluer avant de vous engager.
Le HT Score est un classement composite qui prend en compte 4 groupes de criteres et plus d'une douzaine de variables pour aider les hoteliers a comparer objectivement les produits technologiques hoteliers. HotelRunner a un HT Score de 0 et Mews a 99. Voici comment le score est calcule.
| Groupe de criteres | Ponderation | Ce qu'il mesure |
|---|---|---|
| Notes et avis clients |
|
A quel point les utilisateurs recommandent-ils ce produit ? Score des notes, Volume d'avis, Part de voix, Profondeur des avis, Recence des avis, Etudes de cas ▾ Le facteur le plus fortement pondere. Analyse les notes de satisfaction moyennes (probabilite de recommandation, facilite d'utilisation, support, ROI), le nombre total d'avis par rapport aux pairs de la categorie, la recence des avis (au moins 20 avis sur les 6 derniers mois) et la part de voix parmi les clients hoteliers uniques pour detecter les biais de selection. |
| Ecosysteme partenaire |
|
A quel point les partenaires technologiques recommandent-ils cette entreprise ? Recommandations des partenaires, Nombre d'integrations, Qualite des integrations ▾ Evalue les recommandations des partenaires comme des votes de confiance d'experts, le nombre d'integrations verifiees et la qualite de l'ecosysteme — la moyenne des HT Scores des partenaires d'integration. Les produits avec des ecosystemes d'integration de meilleure qualite sont plus susceptibles de fournir un ensemble technologique connecte. |
| Orientation client |
|
A quel point cette organisation est-elle orientee client ? Support certifie, Regularite des avis, Completude du profil ▾ Evalue si l'entreprise a obtenu la certification HTR de support client, maintient une collecte d'avis reguliere dans le temps (un indicateur de culture axee sur le feedback) et tient a jour les profils produits avec les fonctionnalites, captures d'ecran, tarifs et caracteristiques. |
| Portee, perennite et ressources |
|
Quelle est l'etendue de la portee et des ressources de cette entreprise ? Portee geographique, Perennite, Ressources de l'entreprise, Score de tendance ▾ Mesure la presence mondiale (pays et regions desservis), les annees d'activite comme indicateur de stabilite, les effectifs comme indicateur de ressources, et un score de tendance base sur les demandes d'acheteurs, les avis, les recommandations de partenaires et l'activite presse des douze derniers mois. |
Les notes et avis clients sont de loin le facteur le plus important dans l'algorithme du HT Score. HTR n'accepte aucun paiement pour un meilleur classement. Tous les avis sont verifies — seuls les professionnels du secteur hotelier avec des affiliations confirmees peuvent soumettre des notes. Voir la methodologie complete du HT Score →
Conseiller en recommandations de produits