The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
Nous avons analyse 549 avis verifies d'hoteliers, compare les fonctionnalites, les tarifs et des etudes de cas reelles pour identifier les points forts de chaque plateforme. Le bon choix depend du type de votre etablissement et de vos priorites :
HOTELTIME se distingue en ease of use and customer support — en particulier pour les etablissements brand (4.9/5) , avec des fonctionnalites exclusives comme Payment processing and Guest CRM.
HS/3 se distingue .
Notes comparees basees sur 549 avis verifies d'hoteliers sur HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Probabilite de recommandation |
|
|
| Facilite d'utilisation |
|
|
| Support client |
|
|
| Rapport qualite-prix |
|
|
| Prix de depart | From $600/mo | Contact sales |
| Avis verifies | 549 | 0 |
Apres analyse de 549 avis verifies, les utilisateurs de HOTELTIME apprecient surtout user interface and learning curve, assistance technique, reporting and analytics, tandis que ceux de HS/3 mettent en avant . Cliquez sur un theme pour voir ce que disent les evaluateurs.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Avantages | |
|
+
User Interface and Learning Curve
▾
|
|
|
+
Assistance technique
▾
|
|
|
+
Reporting and Analytics
▾
|
|
|
+
System Stability and Updates
▾
|
|
| Inconvenients | |
|
−
Customization Options
▾
|
|
|
−
Automation Features
▾
|
|
|
−
Optimisation mobile
▾
|
|
Comment chaque produit se classe parmi les fournisseurs Systèmes de gestion immobilière pour differentes tailles d'etablissements, types et regions — base sur les avis verifies d'hoteliers dans chaque segment.
Par taille d'hotel
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Petit (10-24 chambres) ▾ | #5 219 avis | — |
| Moyen (25-74 chambres) ▾ | #3 238 avis | — |
| Grand (75-199 chambres) ▾ | #2 46 avis | — |
| Tres grand (200+ chambres) ▾ | #8 7 avis | — |
Par type d'etablissement
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #5 239 avis | — |
| Luxe ▾ | #3 241 avis | — |
| Enseigne / Chaine ▾ | #4 143 avis | — |
| Sejour prolonge ▾ | #4 49 avis | — |
Par region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Amerique du Nord | #52 4 avis | — |
| Europe ▾ | #2 384 avis | — |
| Asie-Pacifique ▾ | #5 111 avis | — |
| Moyen-Orient ▾ | #1 21 avis | — |
Choosing between HotelTime PMS and HS/3 (acq Mews) hinges on your hotel’s operational needs and growth plans. Both systems aim to streamline hotel management, but HotelTime offers a more established, feature-rich platform with a broader global presence, while HS/3 focuses on user-friendliness and straightforward reservation management. Your decision should consider the scale of your property, integration needs, and the importance of recent reviews.
HotelTime PMS by HOTELTIME is a comprehensive, cloud-based PMS with over 650 clients worldwide, primarily praised for its robust features, ease of use, and support. HS/3 (acq Mews) presents itself as a simpler, more streamlined system with an emphasis on core reservation functionalities, but it lacks the extensive review data and global presence that make HotelTime a more tangible choice today. Are you ready to evaluate which system aligns better with your hotel’s priorities?
HotelTime PMS and HS/3 are both designed to enhance hotel operations, but HotelTime’s broad feature set and extensive integrations set it apart. HotelTime’s platform supports a variety of functions including EPoS, integrated CRS, guest CRM, online check-in, and revenue tracking, making it suitable for properties that require a multi-department management tool.
In contrast, HS/3 offers a more limited feature scope focused on reservations and check-in/out processes, with no available third-party integration data or detailed reviews. HotelTime’s 433 reviews, most recent reviews from the last six months, and a high NPS score of 9.26/10 provide a clearer picture of its current performance and customer satisfaction, whereas HS/3’s lack of recent feedback makes it harder to gauge its recent stability.
Given this, HotelTime is the more proven choice for hotels looking for a wide-ranging PMS with reliable support and proven industry success. Are you prioritizing a comprehensive system with extensive customer feedback, or are you comfortable with a more minimal, less-reviewed solution?
If your hotel needs a flexible, all-in-one platform that covers reservations, POS, revenue management, and guest profiles, HotelTime is the clear winner. Its suitability spans independent hotels, resorts, and larger groups, thanks to its scalable architecture and wide regional presence.
If your hotel primarily requires a straightforward reservation system with minimal integration, and your team values simplicity over extensive features, HS/3 may seem attractive. However, given the absence of recent reviews and a lack of detailed feature data, HotelTime’s proven track record and active user base make it the safer choice for most properties seeking growth and operational efficiency.
For hotels aiming for a comprehensive, well-supported PMS with frequent updates and extensive integrations, HotelTime outperforms HS/3 definitively.
HotelTime PMS boasts a user-friendly interface rated 4.66/5, with onboarding rated 4.63/5, which indicates a relatively smooth initial setup and ongoing use. Its reviews highlight quick, efficient training and an intuitive design, though some users note the complexity of some modules can pose challenges during setup.
HS/3’s ease of use isn’t well documented in recent reviews, and the lack of detailed feedback suggests it may not match HotelTime’s level of refinement or support. Without recent review data, it’s difficult to assess how new users experience HS/3, but HotelTime’s high ratings and positive comments on onboarding give it the edge.
Edge: HotelTime PMS.
HotelTime PMS offers over 51 exclusive features—such as EPoS, integrated CRS, guest CRM, automated night audit, online check-in, and multi-currency support—making it a comprehensive management tool. Its extensive feature set is tailored to meet the needs of properties of all sizes, from boutique hotels to large resorts.
HS/3, on the other hand, provides core reservation and check-in functionalities but does not list additional features or integrations, making it less suitable for hotels requiring advanced operational tools. With no detailed feature count available for HS/3, HotelTime’s clear advantage is its extensive, proven feature set.
Edge: HotelTime PMS.
HotelTime PMS is highly rated for customer support, with a 4.73/5 rating and reviews emphasizing quick responses and helpful staff. Clients frequently mention support staff’s responsiveness, detailed onboarding, and ongoing assistance as key strengths.
HS/3’s support ratings and review insights are unavailable, which makes HotelTime’s support reputation the clear winner. Given the importance of reliable support in hotel management, HotelTime’s consistently high ratings and positive feedback give it a decisive advantage.
Edge: HotelTime PMS.
HotelTime PMS integrates with 58 verified partners, including Profitroom, Bookboost, and STR, providing broad connectivity across booking engines, analytics, and revenue platforms. This extensive partner network allows hoteliers to build a flexible tech stack tailored to their needs.
HS/3 has no verified integrations listed or available data on third-party partnerships, limiting its interoperability potential. For a hotel seeking a system that connects easily with other tools, HotelTime’s integration capacity is a significant advantage.
Edge: HotelTime PMS.
HotelTime’s 433 reviews, mostly recent and positive, give it a high overall rating of 4.83/5 and a 93% likelihood to recommend. The majority of reviews highlight its ease of use, feature richness, and strong support, especially in hotel segments like resorts and city center hotels.
HS/3’s reviews are nonexistent or outdated, making it impossible to gauge current user satisfaction. Based on available data, HotelTime’s user ratings and recent feedback make it the preferred choice for hoteliers.
Edge: HotelTime PMS.
HotelTime charges a flat monthly fee of $600, with no free tier, implementation fees, or per-room charges. Pricing details for HS/3 are unavailable, suggesting it may have a different or less transparent pricing structure.
Given HotelTime’s transparent pricing and proven value through extensive features, it offers predictable costs and a clear return on investment. The lack of cost data for HS/3 makes HotelTime the more financially transparent option.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if:
HotelTime offers a full-featured, well-supported PMS proven across diverse markets, with frequent updates and a solid global footprint. Its extensive integrations and high customer satisfaction make it ideal for hotels seeking a comprehensive management platform capable of supporting growth.
HS/3 may appeal to small, simple properties needing an easy reservation tool, but its lack of recent reviews and features limits its long-term viability and scalability. For most hotels aiming for efficiency, growth, and a proven track record, HotelTime is the clear choice.
If your hotel values a mature, feature-rich system with strong support and proven success, HotelTime is the safer and smarter investment. Conversely, if your needs are minimal and you prioritize simplicity, HS/3 could be adequate—though it carries more risk due to limited feedback.
La tarification des Systèmes de gestion immobilière est rarement simple. Voici ce que nous savons a partir des donnees tarifaires publiques de chaque fournisseur. Demandez toujours un devis personnalise pour la taille de votre etablissement.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $600/mo | — |
Selon la base de donnees produits de HTR, HotelTime PMS et HS/3 (acq Mews) partagent 0 fonctionnalites. Voici les differences cles — les fonctionnalites que l'un possede et que l'autre n'a pas.
| Fonctionnalite |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| CRM invité | ||
| CRS intégré | ||
| Suivi des revenus annexes | ||
| Traitement des paiements | ||
| Vue Calendrier | ||
| Épopée |
Affichage des principales differences. 39 fonctionnalites supplementaires different entre ces produits.
Nous avons analyse 8 etudes de cas verifiees pour comparer ce que les hotels obtiennent reellement avec chaque plateforme sur quatre objectifs commerciaux cles.
"We needed to change an on-site system we were using as we wanted to move our operation forward. We achieved that with HotelTime systems. They are reliable, and stable and offer fea..."
Aucune etude de cas publiee pour cet objectif pour le moment.
"In 2018 we were choosing a system for our first completely self-service ART and design hotel. We decided on HotelTime and after 4 years I have to say that the choice was the right..."
Aucune etude de cas publiee pour cet objectif pour le moment.
Ce que les hoteliers apprecient
While the system’s intuitive interface and ease of learning are generally appreciated, a few users mention initial challenges due to the complexity of... While the system’s intuitive interface and ease of learning are generally appreciated, a few users mention initial challenges due to the complexity of features offered. Overall, once users become familiar with the system, it significantly enhances efficiency and simplifies hotel operations.
Bien que la réactivité et l'efficacité de l'équipe d'assistance soient appréciées, certains avis suggèrent que l'extension des horaires d'assistance t... Bien que la réactivité et l'efficacité de l'équipe d'assistance soient appréciées, certains avis suggèrent que l'extension des horaires d'assistance technique améliorerait encore l'expérience utilisateur, en garantissant une assistance permanente, notamment pour les utilisateurs internationaux.
HotelTime's robust reporting features are praised for providing comprehensive data insights into occupancy, revenue, and customer satisfaction. Users... HotelTime's robust reporting features are praised for providing comprehensive data insights into occupancy, revenue, and customer satisfaction. Users appreciate the variety of reports available for management, yet some desire more customization and advanced visualizations within the tool itself to better suit individual hotel needs.
Les points de friction pour les hoteliers
Some users voice a need for more customizable features, particularly in terms of reporting and interface personalization, which would allow hotels to... Some users voice a need for more customizable features, particularly in terms of reporting and interface personalization, which would allow hotels to better tailor the PMS to their specific operational strategies and guest services.
The automation capabilities in HotelTime, such as invoice processing and reservation management, are frequently mentioned for saving significant time... The automation capabilities in HotelTime, such as invoice processing and reservation management, are frequently mentioned for saving significant time for staff. Users highlight these features as reducing manual workload and minimizing the risk of human error, although they also express a desire for enhanced automation in guest communication and reporting.
Fonctionnalites uniques
Ou les notes divergent le plus
Cela depend de vos besoins. HotelTime PMS et HS/3 (acq Mews) partagent de nombreuses fonctionnalites Property Management Systems de base, mais chacun a des capacites uniques. HotelTime PMS propose 58 partenaires d'integration verifies, tandis que HS/3 (acq Mews) en propose 0. Consultez la comparaison des fonctionnalites ci-dessus pour voir les differences avant de changer.
Les petits hotels devraient privilegier la facilite d'utilisation et une mise en service rapide. HotelTime PMS est en tete pour la facilite d'utilisation avec 4.7/5 contre 0.0/5. Recherchez une tarification transparente et une option d'essai ou de demonstration. Filtrez les avis sur chaque page produit par taille d'etablissement pour lire les retours d'hotels similaires au votre.
HotelTime PMS : Non. HS/3 (acq Mews) : Non. Aucun des deux produits ne propose actuellement d'offre gratuite. La plupart des fournisseurs Property Management Systems proposent des demonstrations ou des essais — demandez-en un a chacun pour evaluer avant de vous engager.
Le HT Score est un classement composite qui prend en compte 4 groupes de criteres et plus d'une douzaine de variables pour aider les hoteliers a comparer objectivement les produits technologiques hoteliers. HOTELTIME a un HT Score de 92 et HS/3 a 0. Voici comment le score est calcule.
| Groupe de criteres | Ponderation | Ce qu'il mesure |
|---|---|---|
| Notes et avis clients |
|
A quel point les utilisateurs recommandent-ils ce produit ? Score des notes, Volume d'avis, Part de voix, Profondeur des avis, Recence des avis, Etudes de cas ▾ Le facteur le plus fortement pondere. Analyse les notes de satisfaction moyennes (probabilite de recommandation, facilite d'utilisation, support, ROI), le nombre total d'avis par rapport aux pairs de la categorie, la recence des avis (au moins 20 avis sur les 6 derniers mois) et la part de voix parmi les clients hoteliers uniques pour detecter les biais de selection. |
| Ecosysteme partenaire |
|
A quel point les partenaires technologiques recommandent-ils cette entreprise ? Recommandations des partenaires, Nombre d'integrations, Qualite des integrations ▾ Evalue les recommandations des partenaires comme des votes de confiance d'experts, le nombre d'integrations verifiees et la qualite de l'ecosysteme — la moyenne des HT Scores des partenaires d'integration. Les produits avec des ecosystemes d'integration de meilleure qualite sont plus susceptibles de fournir un ensemble technologique connecte. |
| Orientation client |
|
A quel point cette organisation est-elle orientee client ? Support certifie, Regularite des avis, Completude du profil ▾ Evalue si l'entreprise a obtenu la certification HTR de support client, maintient une collecte d'avis reguliere dans le temps (un indicateur de culture axee sur le feedback) et tient a jour les profils produits avec les fonctionnalites, captures d'ecran, tarifs et caracteristiques. |
| Portee, perennite et ressources |
|
Quelle est l'etendue de la portee et des ressources de cette entreprise ? Portee geographique, Perennite, Ressources de l'entreprise, Score de tendance ▾ Mesure la presence mondiale (pays et regions desservis), les annees d'activite comme indicateur de stabilite, les effectifs comme indicateur de ressources, et un score de tendance base sur les demandes d'acheteurs, les avis, les recommandations de partenaires et l'activite presse des douze derniers mois. |
Les notes et avis clients sont de loin le facteur le plus important dans l'algorithme du HT Score. HTR n'accepte aucun paiement pour un meilleur classement. Tous les avis sont verifies — seuls les professionnels du secteur hotelier avec des affiliations confirmees peuvent soumettre des notes. Voir la methodologie complete du HT Score →
Conseiller en recommandations de produits