The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
Nous avons analyse 549 avis verifies d'hoteliers, compare les fonctionnalites, les tarifs et des etudes de cas reelles pour identifier les points forts de chaque plateforme. Le bon choix depend du type de votre etablissement et de vos priorites :
HOTELTIME se distingue en ease of use and customer support — en particulier pour les etablissements brand (4.9/5) , avec des fonctionnalites exclusives comme Guest CRM and Ancillary revenue tracking.
ICG FrontHotel se distingue , avec des fonctionnalites exclusives comme Automated Assignments and Shift Planning.
Notes comparees basees sur 549 avis verifies d'hoteliers sur HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Probabilite de recommandation |
|
|
| Facilite d'utilisation |
|
|
| Support client |
|
|
| Rapport qualite-prix |
|
|
| Prix de depart | From $600/mo | Contact sales |
| Avis verifies | 549 | 0 |
Apres analyse de 549 avis verifies, les utilisateurs de HOTELTIME apprecient surtout user interface and learning curve, assistance technique, reporting and analytics, tandis que ceux de ICG FrontHotel mettent en avant . Cliquez sur un theme pour voir ce que disent les evaluateurs.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Avantages | |
|
+
User Interface and Learning Curve
▾
|
|
|
+
Assistance technique
▾
|
|
|
+
Reporting and Analytics
▾
|
|
|
+
System Stability and Updates
▾
|
|
| Inconvenients | |
|
−
Customization Options
▾
|
|
|
−
Automation Features
▾
|
|
|
−
Optimisation mobile
▾
|
|
Comment chaque produit se classe parmi les fournisseurs Systèmes de gestion immobilière pour differentes tailles d'etablissements, types et regions — base sur les avis verifies d'hoteliers dans chaque segment.
Par taille d'hotel
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Petit (10-24 chambres) ▾ | #5 219 avis | — |
| Moyen (25-74 chambres) ▾ | #3 238 avis | — |
| Grand (75-199 chambres) ▾ | #2 46 avis | — |
| Tres grand (200+ chambres) ▾ | #8 7 avis | — |
Par type d'etablissement
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #5 239 avis | — |
| Luxe ▾ | #3 241 avis | — |
| Enseigne / Chaine ▾ | #4 143 avis | — |
| Sejour prolonge ▾ | #4 49 avis | — |
Par region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Amerique du Nord | #52 4 avis | — |
| Europe ▾ | #2 384 avis | — |
| Asie-Pacifique ▾ | #5 111 avis | — |
| Moyen-Orient ▾ | #1 21 avis | — |
Choosing between HotelTime PMS by HOTELTIME and ICG Fronthotel by ICG FrontHotel hinges on your hotel’s specific needs and operational scale. Both products aim to streamline hotel management, but they differ significantly in their features, market presence, and user feedback. HotelTime offers a comprehensive, cloud-based platform with a large user base and recent positive reviews, whereas ICG FrontHotel remains less reviewed and has a more limited regional footprint.
If your goal is to implement a proven, widely adopted PMS with extensive integrations and a strong support reputation, HotelTime is likely your better option. But if you seek a solution that emphasizes mobile productivity and simplified management without a focus on global support, ICG FrontHotel might be suitable.
HotelTime PMS specializes in providing a full suite of features designed for properties of all sizes, including resorts and groups, with over 650 properties across 20+ countries. Its cloud-based system offers modules for reservations, spa, POS, and revenue management, making it adaptable for large-scale operations. Conversely, ICG FrontHotel is positioned as a flexible, integrated platform with a focus on mobile tools, but it has no publicly available review score or user feedback, making its reliability less transparent.
HotelTime’s recent reviews highlight its high user satisfaction, with a 4.83/5 overall rating, 27 reviews in the last six months, and a 93% likelihood of recommendation. ICG FrontHotel, with zero reviews and no recent feedback, lacks proven user validation, which raises questions about its effectiveness and support.
Do you value a product with a proven track record and recent customer insights?
If your hotel needs a robust, scalable PMS capable of managing multiple departments and integrating with extensive third-party services, HotelTime should be your pick. Its feature set includes guest CRM, ancillary revenue tracking, online checkout, and a booking engine—features that cater to larger, complex properties or chains.
However, if your hotel requires a simple, mobile-centric tool to increase staff productivity and streamline daily tasks without the need for extensive integrations, ICG FrontHotel could be suitable. But given its lack of review data and limited market presence, HotelTime remains the safer, more validated choice for most hotel types.
For hotels seeking a comprehensive, well-supported solution with a proven track record, HotelTime is the clear winner.
HotelTime PMS scores a 4.66/5 for ease of use, with many reviews praising its intuitive interface and straightforward onboarding process. Users often highlight how quickly staff can learn the system and start managing reservations and operations effectively. The platform’s support team is also frequently commended for responsiveness, which helps reduce the learning curve.
ICG FrontHotel, with no publicly available user feedback or ratings, provides no concrete data to assess usability. Its simplified mobile tools suggest ease of use, but without reviews, this remains unverified.
Edge: HotelTime PMS.
HotelTime offers 35 shared features with 16 exclusive modules, including EPoS, guest CRM, ancillary revenue tracking, revenue management, booking engine, channel manager, rules-based room assignments, and online checkout. These comprehensive features support full-scale hotel operations and are backed by active development and user feedback.
In contrast, ICG FrontHotel has only 2 unique features: automated assignments and shift planning. The limited feature count suggests less depth in functionality, especially for larger or complex properties.
Edge: HotelTime PMS.
HotelTime’s customer support is rated 4.73/5, with reviews frequently mentioning quick, helpful responses and smooth onboarding. Clients value the support team’s proactive communication, which contributes to high user satisfaction. Many reviews underscore ongoing support, training, and platform updates as key strengths.
ICG FrontHotel has no available reviews or ratings, making it impossible to assess customer support quality. The lack of feedback raises concerns about the availability and responsiveness of support services.
Edge: HotelTime PMS.
HotelTime boasts 58 verified partners, including key integrations like SiteMinder, RateGain, and Onity, as well as a range of exclusive integrations with Profitroom, Bookboost, and STR. This extensive network allows properties to build a customized tech stack suited to their needs.
ICG FrontHotel offers only 12 verified integrations, including popular partners like SiteMinder and RateGain, but with fewer options overall. Its limited integration ecosystem reduces flexibility for hotels relying on multiple third-party tools.
Edge: HotelTime PMS.
HotelTime’s reviews are recent and plentiful, with a 4.83/5 overall rating from 433 reviews, and 27 reviews in the past six months. Its high scores across ease of use, support, and value for money indicate strong hotelier satisfaction across diverse segments, including resorts, boutique hotels, and city-center properties.
ICG FrontHotel has no reviews or ratings available, making it impossible to gauge user satisfaction or compare property segment ratings. This lack of feedback puts its efficacy into question.
Edge: HotelTime PMS.
HotelTime charges a base price of $600 per month without a trial or freemium option, offering a clear pricing structure. Pricing for ICG FrontHotel is not publicly available, which suggests it might be tailored or variable, but this opacity complicates decision-making.
Given the transparent, predictable pricing of HotelTime, it is easier for your hotel to budget and plan.
Not ideal if your hotel has very simple operations or only needs a basic guest management tool.
Not ideal if you need a fully featured, globally supported PMS with proven user feedback.
HotelTime PMS provides a comprehensive, well-reviewed platform with a track record of success across multiple regions. Its extensive features, integrations, and support make it suitable for mid-sized to large hotels aiming for operational efficiency and scalability.
ICG FrontHotel offers a simplified, mobile-centric alternative, but its lack of reviews and limited feature set make it less compelling for most hotels seeking proven solutions. It may appeal to small properties with basic needs and a preference for streamlined mobile workflows.
If your hotel values a trusted, feature-rich PMS with recent positive feedback, HotelTime is the clear choice. For smaller, mobile-focused operations with minimal integration needs, ICG FrontHotel could be considered, but proceed cautiously without user validation.
This comprehensive comparison aims to help your team make an informed decision aligned with your hotel’s operational goals and growth trajectory.
La tarification des Systèmes de gestion immobilière est rarement simple. Voici ce que nous savons a partir des donnees tarifaires publiques de chaque fournisseur. Demandez toujours un devis personnalise pour la taille de votre etablissement.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $600/mo | — |
Selon la base de donnees produits de HTR, HotelTime PMS et ICG Fronthotel partagent 35 fonctionnalites. Voici les differences cles — les fonctionnalites que l'un possede et que l'autre n'a pas.
| Fonctionnalite |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Automated Assignments | ||
| Basé sur le cloud | ||
| CRM invité | ||
| Module Spa & Bien-être | ||
| Profils d'invités | ||
| Shift Planning | ||
| Suivi des revenus annexes | ||
| Épopée |
Affichage des principales differences. 6 fonctionnalites supplementaires different entre ces produits.
Nous avons analyse 8 etudes de cas verifiees pour comparer ce que les hotels obtiennent reellement avec chaque plateforme sur quatre objectifs commerciaux cles.
"We needed to change an on-site system we were using as we wanted to move our operation forward. We achieved that with HotelTime systems. They are reliable, and stable and offer fea..."
Aucune etude de cas publiee pour cet objectif pour le moment.
"In 2018 we were choosing a system for our first completely self-service ART and design hotel. We decided on HotelTime and after 4 years I have to say that the choice was the right..."
Aucune etude de cas publiee pour cet objectif pour le moment.
Ce que les hoteliers apprecient
While the system’s intuitive interface and ease of learning are generally appreciated, a few users mention initial challenges due to the complexity of... While the system’s intuitive interface and ease of learning are generally appreciated, a few users mention initial challenges due to the complexity of features offered. Overall, once users become familiar with the system, it significantly enhances efficiency and simplifies hotel operations.
Bien que la réactivité et l'efficacité de l'équipe d'assistance soient appréciées, certains avis suggèrent que l'extension des horaires d'assistance t... Bien que la réactivité et l'efficacité de l'équipe d'assistance soient appréciées, certains avis suggèrent que l'extension des horaires d'assistance technique améliorerait encore l'expérience utilisateur, en garantissant une assistance permanente, notamment pour les utilisateurs internationaux.
HotelTime's robust reporting features are praised for providing comprehensive data insights into occupancy, revenue, and customer satisfaction. Users... HotelTime's robust reporting features are praised for providing comprehensive data insights into occupancy, revenue, and customer satisfaction. Users appreciate the variety of reports available for management, yet some desire more customization and advanced visualizations within the tool itself to better suit individual hotel needs.
Les points de friction pour les hoteliers
Some users voice a need for more customizable features, particularly in terms of reporting and interface personalization, which would allow hotels to... Some users voice a need for more customizable features, particularly in terms of reporting and interface personalization, which would allow hotels to better tailor the PMS to their specific operational strategies and guest services.
The automation capabilities in HotelTime, such as invoice processing and reservation management, are frequently mentioned for saving significant time... The automation capabilities in HotelTime, such as invoice processing and reservation management, are frequently mentioned for saving significant time for staff. Users highlight these features as reducing manual workload and minimizing the risk of human error, although they also express a desire for enhanced automation in guest communication and reporting.
Fonctionnalites uniques
Fonctionnalites uniques
Ou les notes divergent le plus
Cela depend de vos besoins. HotelTime PMS et ICG Fronthotel partagent de nombreuses fonctionnalites Property Management Systems de base, mais chacun a des capacites uniques. HotelTime PMS propose 58 partenaires d'integration verifies, tandis que ICG Fronthotel en propose 12. Consultez la comparaison des fonctionnalites ci-dessus pour voir les differences avant de changer.
Les petits hotels devraient privilegier la facilite d'utilisation et une mise en service rapide. HotelTime PMS est en tete pour la facilite d'utilisation avec 4.7/5 contre 0.0/5. Recherchez une tarification transparente et une option d'essai ou de demonstration. Filtrez les avis sur chaque page produit par taille d'etablissement pour lire les retours d'hotels similaires au votre.
HotelTime PMS : Non. ICG Fronthotel : Non. Aucun des deux produits ne propose actuellement d'offre gratuite. La plupart des fournisseurs Property Management Systems proposent des demonstrations ou des essais — demandez-en un a chacun pour evaluer avant de vous engager.
Le HT Score est un classement composite qui prend en compte 4 groupes de criteres et plus d'une douzaine de variables pour aider les hoteliers a comparer objectivement les produits technologiques hoteliers. HOTELTIME a un HT Score de 92 et ICG FrontHotel a 0. Voici comment le score est calcule.
| Groupe de criteres | Ponderation | Ce qu'il mesure |
|---|---|---|
| Notes et avis clients |
|
A quel point les utilisateurs recommandent-ils ce produit ? Score des notes, Volume d'avis, Part de voix, Profondeur des avis, Recence des avis, Etudes de cas ▾ Le facteur le plus fortement pondere. Analyse les notes de satisfaction moyennes (probabilite de recommandation, facilite d'utilisation, support, ROI), le nombre total d'avis par rapport aux pairs de la categorie, la recence des avis (au moins 20 avis sur les 6 derniers mois) et la part de voix parmi les clients hoteliers uniques pour detecter les biais de selection. |
| Ecosysteme partenaire |
|
A quel point les partenaires technologiques recommandent-ils cette entreprise ? Recommandations des partenaires, Nombre d'integrations, Qualite des integrations ▾ Evalue les recommandations des partenaires comme des votes de confiance d'experts, le nombre d'integrations verifiees et la qualite de l'ecosysteme — la moyenne des HT Scores des partenaires d'integration. Les produits avec des ecosystemes d'integration de meilleure qualite sont plus susceptibles de fournir un ensemble technologique connecte. |
| Orientation client |
|
A quel point cette organisation est-elle orientee client ? Support certifie, Regularite des avis, Completude du profil ▾ Evalue si l'entreprise a obtenu la certification HTR de support client, maintient une collecte d'avis reguliere dans le temps (un indicateur de culture axee sur le feedback) et tient a jour les profils produits avec les fonctionnalites, captures d'ecran, tarifs et caracteristiques. |
| Portee, perennite et ressources |
|
Quelle est l'etendue de la portee et des ressources de cette entreprise ? Portee geographique, Perennite, Ressources de l'entreprise, Score de tendance ▾ Mesure la presence mondiale (pays et regions desservis), les annees d'activite comme indicateur de stabilite, les effectifs comme indicateur de ressources, et un score de tendance base sur les demandes d'acheteurs, les avis, les recommandations de partenaires et l'activite presse des douze derniers mois. |
Les notes et avis clients sont de loin le facteur le plus important dans l'algorithme du HT Score. HTR n'accepte aucun paiement pour un meilleur classement. Tous les avis sont verifies — seuls les professionnels du secteur hotelier avec des affiliations confirmees peuvent soumettre des notes. Voir la methodologie complete du HT Score →
Conseiller en recommandations de produits