The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
Nous avons analyse 549 avis verifies d'hoteliers, compare les fonctionnalites, les tarifs et des etudes de cas reelles pour identifier les points forts de chaque plateforme. Le bon choix depend du type de votre etablissement et de vos priorites :
HOTELTIME se distingue en ease of use and customer support — en particulier pour les etablissements brand (4.9/5) , avec des fonctionnalites exclusives comme Payment processing and Guest CRM.
Jaras se distingue , avec des fonctionnalites exclusives comme On premise and Guest Messaging.
Notes comparees basees sur 549 avis verifies d'hoteliers sur HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Probabilite de recommandation |
|
|
| Facilite d'utilisation |
|
|
| Support client |
|
|
| Rapport qualite-prix |
|
|
| Prix de depart | From $600/mo | From $1,000/mo |
| Avis verifies | 549 | 0 |
Apres analyse de 549 avis verifies, les utilisateurs de HOTELTIME apprecient surtout user interface and learning curve, assistance technique, reporting and analytics, tandis que ceux de Jaras mettent en avant . Cliquez sur un theme pour voir ce que disent les evaluateurs.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Avantages | |
|
+
User Interface and Learning Curve
▾
|
|
|
+
Assistance technique
▾
|
|
|
+
Reporting and Analytics
▾
|
|
|
+
System Stability and Updates
▾
|
|
| Inconvenients | |
|
−
Customization Options
▾
|
|
|
−
Automation Features
▾
|
|
|
−
Optimisation mobile
▾
|
|
Comment chaque produit se classe parmi les fournisseurs Systèmes de gestion immobilière pour differentes tailles d'etablissements, types et regions — base sur les avis verifies d'hoteliers dans chaque segment.
Par taille d'hotel
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Petit (10-24 chambres) ▾ | #5 219 avis | — |
| Moyen (25-74 chambres) ▾ | #3 238 avis | — |
| Grand (75-199 chambres) ▾ | #2 46 avis | — |
| Tres grand (200+ chambres) ▾ | #8 7 avis | — |
Par type d'etablissement
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #5 239 avis | — |
| Luxe ▾ | #3 241 avis | — |
| Enseigne / Chaine ▾ | #4 143 avis | — |
| Sejour prolonge ▾ | #4 49 avis | — |
Par region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Amerique du Nord | #52 4 avis | — |
| Europe ▾ | #2 384 avis | — |
| Asie-Pacifique ▾ | #5 111 avis | — |
| Moyen-Orient ▾ | #1 21 avis | — |
Choosing between HotelTime PMS by HOTELTIME and Jaras hinges on your hotel’s size, operational complexity, and regional presence. While both aim to streamline property management, HotelTime’s extensive feature set and proven global presence make it the more mature solution, especially for larger or multi-property hotels. Jaras, being newer and less established, offers a modern, all-in-one cloud-native platform that appeals to properties seeking centralization and automation but lacks the same depth of customer feedback and integrations.
HotelTime PMS excels in serving a broad spectrum of hotels—from independent boutique properties to large resorts—thanks to its mature platform, rich feature set, and extensive integration options. It offers over 37 unique features exclusive to its platform, such as integrated CRS, payment processing, guest CRM, and automation tools, which support complex operations and scale effectively. Conversely, Jaras, with its single unique feature—guest messaging—and no verified integrations, seems tailored toward smaller or more tech-savvy properties prioritizing centralization and automation. The real question is, do you need HotelTime’s robust set of tools and global reach or Jaras’s simplified, modern approach?
If your hotel requires a comprehensive, proven PMS that handles multiple departments, integrations, and has a strong international footprint, HotelTime is the clear choice. Its ability to support properties of all sizes, backed by over 433 reviews and a high satisfaction score (4.83/5), underpins its reliability for larger or multi-property management teams. For smaller properties or those prioritizing automation, centralized operations, and ease of use, Jaras may appeal due to its integrated reservation, financial workflows, and over 150 OTA integrations—though it lacks the extensive user feedback and third-party support HotelTime offers.
HotelTime’s user interface has an average ease of use rating of 4.66/5, supported by a solid onboarding score of 4.63/5 and positive reviews emphasizing its intuitive design. Users frequently mention that, despite its complexity, once familiar, it streamlines operations and reduces workload. Jaras, with no available user ratings, leaves its ease of use uncertain, but its modern, cloud-native design suggests a straightforward experience. Still, without verified reviews, it’s difficult to confidently compare. Edge: HotelTime.
HotelTime boasts a total of 37 features exclusive to its platform—such as EPoS, integrated CRS, guest CRM, automated night audit, and mobile check-in—supporting complex, multifaceted hotel operations. In contrast, Jaras offers core reservation management, channel distribution with over 150 OTA integrations, and guest messaging. While Jaras simplifies central management, HotelTime’s broader feature set makes it more suitable for hotels with diverse operational needs. End of the day, HotelTime’s feature depth surpasses Jaras’s, making it the more comprehensive choice. Edge: HotelTime.
HotelTime’s support team scores 4.73/5, with reviews highlighting quick responses, helpfulness, and detailed onboarding. Users say, “Support staff are always on the other end of the phone and willing to help,” reinforcing confidence in their service. Jaras, founded in 2023 with no publicly available reviews, offers no verified support ratings, making it hard to assess. Given HotelTime’s established presence and recent customer feedback, it clearly provides better support at this stage. Edge: HotelTime.
HotelTime integrates with 58 verified partners, including major providers like Profitroom, Bookboost, and STR, enabling a seamless tech stack for larger operations. Jaras, launched in 2023, has no verified integrations, limiting its connectivity options. This substantial difference favors HotelTime for hotels seeking a flexible, integrated system capable of supporting complex workflows across multiple platforms. End of the day, HotelTime’s extensive integration network gives it a decisive edge. Edge: HotelTime.
HotelTime’s average rating of 4.83/5 from 433 reviews underscores high user satisfaction, particularly from resorts (5/5) and city hotels (4.82/5). Recent reviews highlight its ease of reservation management and support, making it a trusted choice. Jaras, with no reviews, offers no data on user satisfaction, leaving its rating unknown. HotelTime’s proven track record and recent positive feedback make it the clear leader here. Edge: HotelTime.
HotelTime charges a base price of $600/month, with no mention of freemium versions or additional fees. Jaras’s pricing starts at $1,000/month, also without free options. Considering HotelTime’s lower entry price and extensive feature set, it offers better value for most hotels, especially those seeking a proven, scalable system.
Not ideal if your hotel is a small, single-property operation with minimal operational complexity or if you prefer a simple, lightweight PMS.
Not ideal if you require extensive support, integrations with third-party providers, or proven experience in the global hospitality market.
HotelTime is a comprehensive, established PMS with a proven track record and a broad feature set that supports large and complex hotel operations. Its extensive integrations, high customer satisfaction, and regional presence make it suitable for larger resorts and multi-property groups.
Jaras, as a newer entrant, offers a sleek, cloud-native platform ideal for smaller, tech-savvy properties looking for automation and centralization, but with limited integration options and no verified reviews.
Choose HotelTime if your hotel needs reliability, depth, and proven performance; opt for Jaras if you want a modern, simplified system to get started quickly, especially if your operations are relatively straightforward.
La tarification des Systèmes de gestion immobilière est rarement simple. Voici ce que nous savons a partir des donnees tarifaires publiques de chaque fournisseur. Demandez toujours un devis personnalise pour la taille de votre etablissement.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $600/mo | From $1,000/mo |
Selon la base de donnees produits de HTR, HotelTime PMS et Jaras partagent 14 fonctionnalites. Voici les differences cles — les fonctionnalites que l'un possede et que l'autre n'a pas.
| Fonctionnalite |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| CRM invité | ||
| CRS intégré | ||
| Guest Messaging | ||
| Suivi des revenus annexes | ||
| Sur place | ||
| Tarifs personnalisés | ||
| Traitement des paiements | ||
| Épopée |
Affichage des principales differences. 27 fonctionnalites supplementaires different entre ces produits.
Nous avons analyse 8 etudes de cas verifiees pour comparer ce que les hotels obtiennent reellement avec chaque plateforme sur quatre objectifs commerciaux cles.
"We needed to change an on-site system we were using as we wanted to move our operation forward. We achieved that with HotelTime systems. They are reliable, and stable and offer fea..."
Aucune etude de cas publiee pour cet objectif pour le moment.
"In 2018 we were choosing a system for our first completely self-service ART and design hotel. We decided on HotelTime and after 4 years I have to say that the choice was the right..."
Aucune etude de cas publiee pour cet objectif pour le moment.
Ce que les hoteliers apprecient
While the system’s intuitive interface and ease of learning are generally appreciated, a few users mention initial challenges due to the complexity of... While the system’s intuitive interface and ease of learning are generally appreciated, a few users mention initial challenges due to the complexity of features offered. Overall, once users become familiar with the system, it significantly enhances efficiency and simplifies hotel operations.
Bien que la réactivité et l'efficacité de l'équipe d'assistance soient appréciées, certains avis suggèrent que l'extension des horaires d'assistance t... Bien que la réactivité et l'efficacité de l'équipe d'assistance soient appréciées, certains avis suggèrent que l'extension des horaires d'assistance technique améliorerait encore l'expérience utilisateur, en garantissant une assistance permanente, notamment pour les utilisateurs internationaux.
HotelTime's robust reporting features are praised for providing comprehensive data insights into occupancy, revenue, and customer satisfaction. Users... HotelTime's robust reporting features are praised for providing comprehensive data insights into occupancy, revenue, and customer satisfaction. Users appreciate the variety of reports available for management, yet some desire more customization and advanced visualizations within the tool itself to better suit individual hotel needs.
Les points de friction pour les hoteliers
Some users voice a need for more customizable features, particularly in terms of reporting and interface personalization, which would allow hotels to... Some users voice a need for more customizable features, particularly in terms of reporting and interface personalization, which would allow hotels to better tailor the PMS to their specific operational strategies and guest services.
The automation capabilities in HotelTime, such as invoice processing and reservation management, are frequently mentioned for saving significant time... The automation capabilities in HotelTime, such as invoice processing and reservation management, are frequently mentioned for saving significant time for staff. Users highlight these features as reducing manual workload and minimizing the risk of human error, although they also express a desire for enhanced automation in guest communication and reporting.
Fonctionnalites uniques
Fonctionnalites uniques
Ou les notes divergent le plus
Cela depend de vos besoins. HotelTime PMS et Jaras partagent de nombreuses fonctionnalites Property Management Systems de base, mais chacun a des capacites uniques. HotelTime PMS propose 58 partenaires d'integration verifies, tandis que Jaras en propose 0. Consultez la comparaison des fonctionnalites ci-dessus pour voir les differences avant de changer.
Les petits hotels devraient privilegier la facilite d'utilisation et une mise en service rapide. HotelTime PMS est en tete pour la facilite d'utilisation avec 4.7/5 contre 0.0/5. Recherchez une tarification transparente et une option d'essai ou de demonstration. Filtrez les avis sur chaque page produit par taille d'etablissement pour lire les retours d'hotels similaires au votre.
HotelTime PMS : Non. Jaras : Non. Aucun des deux produits ne propose actuellement d'offre gratuite. La plupart des fournisseurs Property Management Systems proposent des demonstrations ou des essais — demandez-en un a chacun pour evaluer avant de vous engager.
Le HT Score est un classement composite qui prend en compte 4 groupes de criteres et plus d'une douzaine de variables pour aider les hoteliers a comparer objectivement les produits technologiques hoteliers. HOTELTIME a un HT Score de 92 et Jaras a 0. Voici comment le score est calcule.
| Groupe de criteres | Ponderation | Ce qu'il mesure |
|---|---|---|
| Notes et avis clients |
|
A quel point les utilisateurs recommandent-ils ce produit ? Score des notes, Volume d'avis, Part de voix, Profondeur des avis, Recence des avis, Etudes de cas ▾ Le facteur le plus fortement pondere. Analyse les notes de satisfaction moyennes (probabilite de recommandation, facilite d'utilisation, support, ROI), le nombre total d'avis par rapport aux pairs de la categorie, la recence des avis (au moins 20 avis sur les 6 derniers mois) et la part de voix parmi les clients hoteliers uniques pour detecter les biais de selection. |
| Ecosysteme partenaire |
|
A quel point les partenaires technologiques recommandent-ils cette entreprise ? Recommandations des partenaires, Nombre d'integrations, Qualite des integrations ▾ Evalue les recommandations des partenaires comme des votes de confiance d'experts, le nombre d'integrations verifiees et la qualite de l'ecosysteme — la moyenne des HT Scores des partenaires d'integration. Les produits avec des ecosystemes d'integration de meilleure qualite sont plus susceptibles de fournir un ensemble technologique connecte. |
| Orientation client |
|
A quel point cette organisation est-elle orientee client ? Support certifie, Regularite des avis, Completude du profil ▾ Evalue si l'entreprise a obtenu la certification HTR de support client, maintient une collecte d'avis reguliere dans le temps (un indicateur de culture axee sur le feedback) et tient a jour les profils produits avec les fonctionnalites, captures d'ecran, tarifs et caracteristiques. |
| Portee, perennite et ressources |
|
Quelle est l'etendue de la portee et des ressources de cette entreprise ? Portee geographique, Perennite, Ressources de l'entreprise, Score de tendance ▾ Mesure la presence mondiale (pays et regions desservis), les annees d'activite comme indicateur de stabilite, les effectifs comme indicateur de ressources, et un score de tendance base sur les demandes d'acheteurs, les avis, les recommandations de partenaires et l'activite presse des douze derniers mois. |
Les notes et avis clients sont de loin le facteur le plus important dans l'algorithme du HT Score. HTR n'accepte aucun paiement pour un meilleur classement. Tous les avis sont verifies — seuls les professionnels du secteur hotelier avec des affiliations confirmees peuvent soumettre des notes. Voir la methodologie complete du HT Score →
Conseiller en recommandations de produits