The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
Nous avons analyse 550 avis verifies d'hoteliers, compare les fonctionnalites, les tarifs et des etudes de cas reelles pour identifier les points forts de chaque plateforme. Le bon choix depend du type de votre etablissement et de vos priorites :
HOTELTIME se distingue en ease of use and customer support — en particulier pour les etablissements brand (4.9/5) , avec des fonctionnalites exclusives comme Payment processing and Guest CRM.
Marriott International se distingue .
Notes comparees basees sur 550 avis verifies d'hoteliers sur HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Probabilite de recommandation |
|
|
| Facilite d'utilisation |
|
|
| Support client |
|
|
| Rapport qualite-prix |
|
|
| Prix de depart | From $600/mo | Contact sales |
| Avis verifies | 549 | 1 |
Apres analyse de 550 avis verifies, les utilisateurs de HOTELTIME apprecient surtout user interface and learning curve, assistance technique, reporting and analytics, tandis que ceux de Marriott International mettent en avant . Cliquez sur un theme pour voir ce que disent les evaluateurs.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Avantages | |
|
+
User Interface and Learning Curve
▾
|
|
|
+
Assistance technique
▾
|
|
|
+
Reporting and Analytics
▾
|
|
|
+
System Stability and Updates
▾
|
|
| Inconvenients | |
|
−
Customization Options
▾
|
|
|
−
Automation Features
▾
|
|
|
−
Optimisation mobile
▾
|
|
Comment chaque produit se classe parmi les fournisseurs Systèmes de gestion immobilière pour differentes tailles d'etablissements, types et regions — base sur les avis verifies d'hoteliers dans chaque segment.
Par taille d'hotel
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Petit (10-24 chambres) ▾ | #5 219 avis | — |
| Moyen (25-74 chambres) ▾ | #3 238 avis | #59 1 avis |
| Grand (75-199 chambres) ▾ | #2 46 avis | — |
| Tres grand (200+ chambres) ▾ | #8 7 avis | — |
Par type d'etablissement
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #5 239 avis | #68 1 avis |
| Luxe ▾ | #3 241 avis | — |
| Enseigne / Chaine ▾ | #4 143 avis | #60 1 avis |
| Sejour prolonge ▾ | #4 49 avis | — |
Par region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Amerique du Nord | #52 4 avis | #43 1 avis |
| Europe ▾ | #2 384 avis | — |
| Asie-Pacifique ▾ | #5 111 avis | — |
| Moyen-Orient ▾ | #1 21 avis | — |
Choosing between HotelTime PMS by HOTELTIME and FOSSE by Marriott International hinges on your hotel’s size, operational complexity, and your team's needs. Both systems aim to streamline hotel operations, but they differ significantly in features, user experience, and support. HotelTime offers a comprehensive, cloud-based platform with a high user rating, whereas FOSSE is a proprietary system with limited recent reviews and a narrower feature set. Which aligns better with your hotel’s goals?
HotelTime PMS stands out with over 430 recent reviews, a 4.83/5 overall rating, and a 93% likelihood to recommend, making it the more trusted and validated option. FOSSE, by contrast, has only a single review in the past six months and a low 2/5 rating, indicating limited recent user satisfaction. For hotels seeking a proven, well-supported PMS, HotelTime is the more reliable choice.
HotelTime PMS and FOSSE are designed to automate and simplify hotel management, but they approach this goal differently. HotelTime provides a feature-rich, cloud-based system with extensive integrations, automation, and a broad user base. FOSSE, as Marriott’s proprietary solution, offers core reservation and guest management capabilities but lacks many advanced features found in HotelTime.
Where they diverge most sharply is in user feedback and system maturity. HotelTime’s recent reviews emphasize its stability, customer support, and ease of use, while FOSSE’s reviews are sparse, older, and critical of usability. Do you prioritize a system with a significant, recent user base and continuous improvements? Or are you comfortable with a more limited, internally managed solution?
If your hotel needs a flexible, scalable PMS with extensive third-party integrations, choose HotelTime. It’s suitable for properties of all sizes, including resorts, boutique hotels, and chains, thanks to its 51 unique features and widespread adoption across 20+ countries.
If your hotel is part of Marriott’s ecosystem and you prioritize a system designed for motels or similar properties, FOSSE might seem appropriate. However, given its limited reviews and low satisfaction ratings, HotelTime’s proven track record makes it the safer investment for most hotels.
HotelTime’s user interface is highly rated at 4.66/5, with many reviews praising its intuitive design and quick onboarding process. Its support team is known for responsiveness, helping staff adopt the system efficiently.
FOSSE, with a 2/5 ease-of-use rating and no recent reviews, faces criticism for its lack of a graphical user interface and complex, menu-heavy operation. Users report that FOSSE is less accessible and more time-consuming to learn and operate.
Edge: HotelTime PMS.
HotelTime boasts 51 exclusive features, including integrated CRS, payment processing, guest CRM, automated night audits, mobile check-in, and more—covering operational needs comprehensively. It also supports ancillary revenue tracking, custom rates, and real-time reporting.
FOSSE offers the core functions—reservations, check-ins, billing—but lacks many of the advanced capabilities available in HotelTime. Its feature set appears minimal and not well documented, which limits its usefulness for complex operations.
Edge: HotelTime PMS.
HotelTime’s support team scores 4.73/5, with reviews highlighting quick responses, helpful training, and ongoing assistance. Users commend its responsiveness, especially for international hotels needing timely help.
FOSSE’s support ratings and recent feedback are unavailable, and the limited reviews suggest a less proactive or responsive support system. Given the importance of reliable support for hotel operations, HotelTime’s customer service provides a decisive advantage.
Edge: HotelTime PMS.
HotelTime integrates with 58 verified partners, including third-party booking engines, revenue management tools, and POS systems. Its wide-ranging integrations allow hotels to customize their tech stack effectively.
FOSSE, with only 2 verified partners, offers limited connectivity, primarily within the Marriott ecosystem. Its narrow integration scope constrains flexibility and adaptability for hotels using multiple third-party solutions.
Edge: HotelTime PMS.
HotelTime’s recent reviews indicate a 4.83/5 rating, with 27 reviews in the last six months, and a 93% likelihood to recommend, showing strong, current user satisfaction. Hotels across various segments, especially boutique and resort properties, praise its ease of use and support.
FOSSE has only one recent review, rating it 2/5, and no current feedback, reflecting limited or declining satisfaction. Hotels seeking a highly-rated system should favor HotelTime.
Edge: HotelTime PMS.
HotelTime charges a flat monthly fee of $600, with no implementation or trial fees. Pricing includes a broad set of features appropriate for diverse property types.
FOSSE’s pricing details are unavailable publicly, but as a Marriott proprietary system, it’s likely included within broader corporate agreements or licensing fees. The explicit cost is less transparent and may involve contractual commitments.
Not ideal if your hotel is very small or operates with minimal technology needs, as HotelTime’s extensive features may be more than necessary.
Not ideal if your hotel requires modern UI, extensive integrations, or comprehensive automation—FOSSE’s limited features and older review data suggest it may not meet evolving hotel needs.
The core difference is that HotelTime offers a modern, cloud-based, feature-packed system with a strong user base and recent positive reviews. FOSSE, by comparison, is an older, internal Marriott system with limited recent feedback and fewer features.
For hotels seeking a proven, versatile, and well-supported PMS, HotelTime is the clear winner due to its extensive features, ease of use, and recent high ratings. It suits properties of all sizes, especially those wanting to automate and integrate their operations.
If your hotel is part of Marriott and your needs are basic, FOSSE might suffice, but its limited recent reviews and user dissatisfaction suggest it’s not the best choice for most independent or competitive properties.
In summary, HotelTime provides a more reliable, scalable, and user-rated solution, making it the better investment for most hotels aiming to improve operational efficiency and guest experience.
La tarification des Systèmes de gestion immobilière est rarement simple. Voici ce que nous savons a partir des donnees tarifaires publiques de chaque fournisseur. Demandez toujours un devis personnalise pour la taille de votre etablissement.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $600/mo | — |
Selon la base de donnees produits de HTR, HotelTime PMS et FOSSE partagent 0 fonctionnalites. Voici les differences cles — les fonctionnalites que l'un possede et que l'autre n'a pas.
| Fonctionnalite |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| CRM invité | ||
| CRS intégré | ||
| Suivi des revenus annexes | ||
| Traitement des paiements | ||
| Vue Calendrier | ||
| Épopée |
Affichage des principales differences. 39 fonctionnalites supplementaires different entre ces produits.
Nous avons analyse 8 etudes de cas verifiees pour comparer ce que les hotels obtiennent reellement avec chaque plateforme sur quatre objectifs commerciaux cles.
"We needed to change an on-site system we were using as we wanted to move our operation forward. We achieved that with HotelTime systems. They are reliable, and stable and offer fea..."
Aucune etude de cas publiee pour cet objectif pour le moment.
"In 2018 we were choosing a system for our first completely self-service ART and design hotel. We decided on HotelTime and after 4 years I have to say that the choice was the right..."
Aucune etude de cas publiee pour cet objectif pour le moment.
Ce que les hoteliers apprecient
While the system’s intuitive interface and ease of learning are generally appreciated, a few users mention initial challenges due to the complexity of... While the system’s intuitive interface and ease of learning are generally appreciated, a few users mention initial challenges due to the complexity of features offered. Overall, once users become familiar with the system, it significantly enhances efficiency and simplifies hotel operations.
Bien que la réactivité et l'efficacité de l'équipe d'assistance soient appréciées, certains avis suggèrent que l'extension des horaires d'assistance t... Bien que la réactivité et l'efficacité de l'équipe d'assistance soient appréciées, certains avis suggèrent que l'extension des horaires d'assistance technique améliorerait encore l'expérience utilisateur, en garantissant une assistance permanente, notamment pour les utilisateurs internationaux.
HotelTime's robust reporting features are praised for providing comprehensive data insights into occupancy, revenue, and customer satisfaction. Users... HotelTime's robust reporting features are praised for providing comprehensive data insights into occupancy, revenue, and customer satisfaction. Users appreciate the variety of reports available for management, yet some desire more customization and advanced visualizations within the tool itself to better suit individual hotel needs.
Les points de friction pour les hoteliers
Some users voice a need for more customizable features, particularly in terms of reporting and interface personalization, which would allow hotels to... Some users voice a need for more customizable features, particularly in terms of reporting and interface personalization, which would allow hotels to better tailor the PMS to their specific operational strategies and guest services.
The automation capabilities in HotelTime, such as invoice processing and reservation management, are frequently mentioned for saving significant time... The automation capabilities in HotelTime, such as invoice processing and reservation management, are frequently mentioned for saving significant time for staff. Users highlight these features as reducing manual workload and minimizing the risk of human error, although they also express a desire for enhanced automation in guest communication and reporting.
Mieux classe pour
Fonctionnalites uniques
Mieux classe pour
Ou les notes divergent le plus
Cela depend de vos besoins. HotelTime PMS et FOSSE partagent de nombreuses fonctionnalites Property Management Systems de base, mais chacun a des capacites uniques. HotelTime PMS propose 58 partenaires d'integration verifies, tandis que FOSSE en propose 2. Consultez la comparaison des fonctionnalites ci-dessus pour voir les differences avant de changer.
Les petits hotels devraient privilegier la facilite d'utilisation et une mise en service rapide. HotelTime PMS est en tete pour la facilite d'utilisation avec 4.7/5 contre 2.0/5. Recherchez une tarification transparente et une option d'essai ou de demonstration. Filtrez les avis sur chaque page produit par taille d'etablissement pour lire les retours d'hotels similaires au votre.
HotelTime PMS : Non. FOSSE : Non. Aucun des deux produits ne propose actuellement d'offre gratuite. La plupart des fournisseurs Property Management Systems proposent des demonstrations ou des essais — demandez-en un a chacun pour evaluer avant de vous engager.
Le HT Score est un classement composite qui prend en compte 4 groupes de criteres et plus d'une douzaine de variables pour aider les hoteliers a comparer objectivement les produits technologiques hoteliers. HOTELTIME a un HT Score de 92 et Marriott International a 0. Voici comment le score est calcule.
| Groupe de criteres | Ponderation | Ce qu'il mesure |
|---|---|---|
| Notes et avis clients |
|
A quel point les utilisateurs recommandent-ils ce produit ? Score des notes, Volume d'avis, Part de voix, Profondeur des avis, Recence des avis, Etudes de cas ▾ Le facteur le plus fortement pondere. Analyse les notes de satisfaction moyennes (probabilite de recommandation, facilite d'utilisation, support, ROI), le nombre total d'avis par rapport aux pairs de la categorie, la recence des avis (au moins 20 avis sur les 6 derniers mois) et la part de voix parmi les clients hoteliers uniques pour detecter les biais de selection. |
| Ecosysteme partenaire |
|
A quel point les partenaires technologiques recommandent-ils cette entreprise ? Recommandations des partenaires, Nombre d'integrations, Qualite des integrations ▾ Evalue les recommandations des partenaires comme des votes de confiance d'experts, le nombre d'integrations verifiees et la qualite de l'ecosysteme — la moyenne des HT Scores des partenaires d'integration. Les produits avec des ecosystemes d'integration de meilleure qualite sont plus susceptibles de fournir un ensemble technologique connecte. |
| Orientation client |
|
A quel point cette organisation est-elle orientee client ? Support certifie, Regularite des avis, Completude du profil ▾ Evalue si l'entreprise a obtenu la certification HTR de support client, maintient une collecte d'avis reguliere dans le temps (un indicateur de culture axee sur le feedback) et tient a jour les profils produits avec les fonctionnalites, captures d'ecran, tarifs et caracteristiques. |
| Portee, perennite et ressources |
|
Quelle est l'etendue de la portee et des ressources de cette entreprise ? Portee geographique, Perennite, Ressources de l'entreprise, Score de tendance ▾ Mesure la presence mondiale (pays et regions desservis), les annees d'activite comme indicateur de stabilite, les effectifs comme indicateur de ressources, et un score de tendance base sur les demandes d'acheteurs, les avis, les recommandations de partenaires et l'activite presse des douze derniers mois. |
Les notes et avis clients sont de loin le facteur le plus important dans l'algorithme du HT Score. HTR n'accepte aucun paiement pour un meilleur classement. Tous les avis sont verifies — seuls les professionnels du secteur hotelier avec des affiliations confirmees peuvent soumettre des notes. Voir la methodologie complete du HT Score →
Conseiller en recommandations de produits