The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
Nous avons analyse 549 avis verifies d'hoteliers, compare les fonctionnalites, les tarifs et des etudes de cas reelles pour identifier les points forts de chaque plateforme. Le bon choix depend du type de votre etablissement et de vos priorites :
HOTELTIME se distingue en ease of use and customer support — en particulier pour les etablissements brand (4.9/5) , avec des fonctionnalites exclusives comme Payment processing and Guest CRM.
Persefone se distingue , avec des fonctionnalites exclusives comme Automated Assignments.
Notes comparees basees sur 549 avis verifies d'hoteliers sur HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Probabilite de recommandation |
|
|
| Facilite d'utilisation |
|
|
| Support client |
|
|
| Rapport qualite-prix |
|
|
| Prix de depart | From $600/mo | From $200/mo |
| Avis verifies | 549 | 0 |
Apres analyse de 549 avis verifies, les utilisateurs de HOTELTIME apprecient surtout user interface and learning curve, assistance technique, reporting and analytics, tandis que ceux de Persefone mettent en avant . Cliquez sur un theme pour voir ce que disent les evaluateurs.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Avantages | |
|
+
User Interface and Learning Curve
▾
|
|
|
+
Assistance technique
▾
|
|
|
+
Reporting and Analytics
▾
|
|
|
+
System Stability and Updates
▾
|
|
| Inconvenients | |
|
−
Customization Options
▾
|
|
|
−
Automation Features
▾
|
|
|
−
Optimisation mobile
▾
|
|
Comment chaque produit se classe parmi les fournisseurs Systèmes de gestion immobilière pour differentes tailles d'etablissements, types et regions — base sur les avis verifies d'hoteliers dans chaque segment.
Par taille d'hotel
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Petit (10-24 chambres) ▾ | #5 219 avis | — |
| Moyen (25-74 chambres) ▾ | #3 238 avis | — |
| Grand (75-199 chambres) ▾ | #2 46 avis | — |
| Tres grand (200+ chambres) ▾ | #8 7 avis | — |
Par type d'etablissement
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #5 239 avis | — |
| Luxe ▾ | #3 241 avis | — |
| Enseigne / Chaine ▾ | #4 143 avis | — |
| Sejour prolonge ▾ | #4 49 avis | — |
Par region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Amerique du Nord | #52 4 avis | — |
| Europe ▾ | #2 384 avis | — |
| Asie-Pacifique ▾ | #5 111 avis | — |
| Moyen-Orient ▾ | #1 21 avis | — |
Choosing between HotelTime PMS by HOTELTIME and Persefone hinges on your hotel’s specific needs and scale. Both systems aim to streamline operations, but HotelTime’s extensive features, proven track record, and larger user base make it the more compelling choice for most hoteliers today. Persefone offers a simplified, web-based suite suited to smaller or less complex properties but lacks the same breadth of functionality or recent user feedback.
HotelTime excels in delivering a feature-rich platform with widespread adoption, while Persefone’s niche focus and limited recent reviews leave its real-world performance less certain. For a reliable, well-supported PMS with a proven reputation, HotelTime is the stronger contender. Are you ready to explore the details?
Both HotelTime and Persefone aim to manage hotel operations efficiently, but HotelTime’s reviews highlight its comprehensive capabilities and high satisfaction levels. Persefone, despite its long presence in Italy, has no recent reviews or extensive features listed, making it difficult to gauge its current effectiveness.
HotelTime’s recent 27 reviews across 433 users in the last six months reinforce its standing, whereas Persefone’s zero reviews in that period suggest limited recent user feedback. This difference underscores HotelTime’s stronger presence and confidence among hoteliers. Are you confident that a system with extensive, recent feedback better suits your hotel?
If your hotel requires a feature-rich, globally proven PMS capable of supporting large-scale or complex operations, go with HotelTime. Its extensive modules—including integrated CRS, guest CRM, payment processing, and automation—are ideal for properties that need deep management tools and reliable support.
If your hotel is smaller, with straightforward needs and limited budget, Persefone’s lower price point and simplified interface might seem appealing. However, without recent reviews or demonstrated advanced features, it’s less likely to support long-term growth or complex workflows. For most hotels seeking robustness and support, HotelTime is the clear choice.
HotelTime’s user interface is rated 4.66 out of 5, with many users praising its intuitive design and straightforward navigation. Its onboarding process scores 4.63, with many users reporting quick setup and effective training, though some note the complexity of certain modules.
Persefone offers a web-based platform, but with no available user ratings or recent feedback, it’s impossible to compare ease of use confidently. Given HotelTime’s high ratings and proven track record, edge: HotelTime.
HotelTime’s 42 unique features include EPoS, integrated CRS, guest CRM, ancillary revenue tracking, online check-in, automated night audit, and more—far surpassing Persefone’s single listed unique feature, automated assignments. HotelTime’s breadth supports multi-department management, revenue optimization, and guest engagement, making it suitable for larger or more complex properties.
Persefone’s one feature, automated assignments, is a valuable addition but insufficient to compete with HotelTime’s extensive suite. The clear edge: HotelTime.
HotelTime’s support ratings score 4.73 out of 5, with reviews consistently citing responsive, knowledgeable assistance and thorough onboarding. Customers appreciate their ability to handle issues promptly, which is critical for operational continuity.
Persefone provides no recent reviews or support ratings, leaving their support quality uncertain. In the absence of data, the edge goes to HotelTime, whose support reputation is well established.
HotelTime boasts 58 verified partner integrations, including Profitroom, Bookboost, STR, and others, facilitating seamless connectivity with distribution, analytics, and payment systems. Persefone lists no verified partners or integrations, which limits its ability to connect with other hotel tech.
For hotels seeking a flexible, interconnected system, HotelTime’s extensive integration options give it a definitive edge. End: HotelTime.
HotelTime’s overall rating is 4.83/5 based on 433 reviews, with recent reviews in the last six months emphasizing its stability, feature set, and support. Its user base covers a range of segments, from luxury hotels to resorts, with high satisfaction across property types.
Persefone has no recent reviews or ratings, making it impossible to assess user sentiment. Given the volume and recency of HotelTime’s reviews, the edge: HotelTime.
HotelTime charges a $600 monthly fee, with no free tier or trial info, which may be standard for comprehensive PMS solutions. Persefone’s pricing is listed at $200 monthly, but details on what’s included or whether there are setup fees are not provided.
While HotelTime’s higher price reflects its extensive features, the lack of transparency on Persefone’s costs makes comparison difficult. However, given HotelTime’s proven value and support, its higher cost is justified for most hotels needing a full-featured solution.
Not ideal if you own a very small property with minimal management needs or limited budget, as HotelTime’s extensive modules may be more than necessary.
Not ideal if you need advanced automation, extensive integrations, or support for complex operations at scale.
The core difference lies in scope. HotelTime offers a comprehensive, feature-rich platform with a proven reputation and strong support, making it suitable for properties of all sizes, especially those seeking growth and integration. Persefone provides a simplified, competitively priced solution, likely best for small, straightforward hotels or boutique properties with basic needs.
If your hotel values extensive functionality, recent positive reviews, and reliable support, HotelTime is the clear choice. Conversely, if budget and simplicity are your priorities, Persefone might fit, but its lack of recent validation makes it a risky bet for long-term success. For most hotels seeking dependability and scalability, HotelTime is the recommended option.
La tarification des Systèmes de gestion immobilière est rarement simple. Voici ce que nous savons a partir des donnees tarifaires publiques de chaque fournisseur. Demandez toujours un devis personnalise pour la taille de votre etablissement.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $600/mo | From $200/mo |
Selon la base de donnees produits de HTR, HotelTime PMS et Persefone partagent 9 fonctionnalites. Voici les differences cles — les fonctionnalites que l'un possede et que l'autre n'a pas.
| Fonctionnalite |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Automated Assignments | ||
| CRM invité | ||
| CRS intégré | ||
| Suivi des revenus annexes | ||
| Tarifs personnalisés | ||
| Traitement des paiements | ||
| Épopée |
Affichage des principales differences. 31 fonctionnalites supplementaires different entre ces produits.
Nous avons analyse 8 etudes de cas verifiees pour comparer ce que les hotels obtiennent reellement avec chaque plateforme sur quatre objectifs commerciaux cles.
"We needed to change an on-site system we were using as we wanted to move our operation forward. We achieved that with HotelTime systems. They are reliable, and stable and offer fea..."
Aucune etude de cas publiee pour cet objectif pour le moment.
"In 2018 we were choosing a system for our first completely self-service ART and design hotel. We decided on HotelTime and after 4 years I have to say that the choice was the right..."
Aucune etude de cas publiee pour cet objectif pour le moment.
Ce que les hoteliers apprecient
While the system’s intuitive interface and ease of learning are generally appreciated, a few users mention initial challenges due to the complexity of... While the system’s intuitive interface and ease of learning are generally appreciated, a few users mention initial challenges due to the complexity of features offered. Overall, once users become familiar with the system, it significantly enhances efficiency and simplifies hotel operations.
Bien que la réactivité et l'efficacité de l'équipe d'assistance soient appréciées, certains avis suggèrent que l'extension des horaires d'assistance t... Bien que la réactivité et l'efficacité de l'équipe d'assistance soient appréciées, certains avis suggèrent que l'extension des horaires d'assistance technique améliorerait encore l'expérience utilisateur, en garantissant une assistance permanente, notamment pour les utilisateurs internationaux.
HotelTime's robust reporting features are praised for providing comprehensive data insights into occupancy, revenue, and customer satisfaction. Users... HotelTime's robust reporting features are praised for providing comprehensive data insights into occupancy, revenue, and customer satisfaction. Users appreciate the variety of reports available for management, yet some desire more customization and advanced visualizations within the tool itself to better suit individual hotel needs.
Les points de friction pour les hoteliers
Some users voice a need for more customizable features, particularly in terms of reporting and interface personalization, which would allow hotels to... Some users voice a need for more customizable features, particularly in terms of reporting and interface personalization, which would allow hotels to better tailor the PMS to their specific operational strategies and guest services.
The automation capabilities in HotelTime, such as invoice processing and reservation management, are frequently mentioned for saving significant time... The automation capabilities in HotelTime, such as invoice processing and reservation management, are frequently mentioned for saving significant time for staff. Users highlight these features as reducing manual workload and minimizing the risk of human error, although they also express a desire for enhanced automation in guest communication and reporting.
Fonctionnalites uniques
Fonctionnalites uniques
Ou les notes divergent le plus
Cela depend de vos besoins. HotelTime PMS et Persefone partagent de nombreuses fonctionnalites Property Management Systems de base, mais chacun a des capacites uniques. HotelTime PMS propose 58 partenaires d'integration verifies, tandis que Persefone en propose 0. Consultez la comparaison des fonctionnalites ci-dessus pour voir les differences avant de changer.
Les petits hotels devraient privilegier la facilite d'utilisation et une mise en service rapide. HotelTime PMS est en tete pour la facilite d'utilisation avec 4.7/5 contre 0.0/5. Recherchez une tarification transparente et une option d'essai ou de demonstration. Filtrez les avis sur chaque page produit par taille d'etablissement pour lire les retours d'hotels similaires au votre.
HotelTime PMS : Non. Persefone : Non. Aucun des deux produits ne propose actuellement d'offre gratuite. La plupart des fournisseurs Property Management Systems proposent des demonstrations ou des essais — demandez-en un a chacun pour evaluer avant de vous engager.
Le HT Score est un classement composite qui prend en compte 4 groupes de criteres et plus d'une douzaine de variables pour aider les hoteliers a comparer objectivement les produits technologiques hoteliers. HOTELTIME a un HT Score de 92 et Persefone a 0. Voici comment le score est calcule.
| Groupe de criteres | Ponderation | Ce qu'il mesure |
|---|---|---|
| Notes et avis clients |
|
A quel point les utilisateurs recommandent-ils ce produit ? Score des notes, Volume d'avis, Part de voix, Profondeur des avis, Recence des avis, Etudes de cas ▾ Le facteur le plus fortement pondere. Analyse les notes de satisfaction moyennes (probabilite de recommandation, facilite d'utilisation, support, ROI), le nombre total d'avis par rapport aux pairs de la categorie, la recence des avis (au moins 20 avis sur les 6 derniers mois) et la part de voix parmi les clients hoteliers uniques pour detecter les biais de selection. |
| Ecosysteme partenaire |
|
A quel point les partenaires technologiques recommandent-ils cette entreprise ? Recommandations des partenaires, Nombre d'integrations, Qualite des integrations ▾ Evalue les recommandations des partenaires comme des votes de confiance d'experts, le nombre d'integrations verifiees et la qualite de l'ecosysteme — la moyenne des HT Scores des partenaires d'integration. Les produits avec des ecosystemes d'integration de meilleure qualite sont plus susceptibles de fournir un ensemble technologique connecte. |
| Orientation client |
|
A quel point cette organisation est-elle orientee client ? Support certifie, Regularite des avis, Completude du profil ▾ Evalue si l'entreprise a obtenu la certification HTR de support client, maintient une collecte d'avis reguliere dans le temps (un indicateur de culture axee sur le feedback) et tient a jour les profils produits avec les fonctionnalites, captures d'ecran, tarifs et caracteristiques. |
| Portee, perennite et ressources |
|
Quelle est l'etendue de la portee et des ressources de cette entreprise ? Portee geographique, Perennite, Ressources de l'entreprise, Score de tendance ▾ Mesure la presence mondiale (pays et regions desservis), les annees d'activite comme indicateur de stabilite, les effectifs comme indicateur de ressources, et un score de tendance base sur les demandes d'acheteurs, les avis, les recommandations de partenaires et l'activite presse des douze derniers mois. |
Les notes et avis clients sont de loin le facteur le plus important dans l'algorithme du HT Score. HTR n'accepte aucun paiement pour un meilleur classement. Tous les avis sont verifies — seuls les professionnels du secteur hotelier avec des affiliations confirmees peuvent soumettre des notes. Voir la methodologie complete du HT Score →
Conseiller en recommandations de produits