The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
Nous avons analyse 554 avis verifies d'hoteliers, compare les fonctionnalites, les tarifs et des etudes de cas reelles pour identifier les points forts de chaque plateforme. Le bon choix depend du type de votre etablissement et de vos priorites :
HOTELTIME se distingue en matiere de user interface and learning curve — en particulier pour les etablissements brand (4.9/5) , avec des fonctionnalites exclusives comme Guest CRM and Guest profiles.
Prostay se distingue en ROI , avec des fonctionnalites exclusives comme On premise and Centralized Messaging.
Notes comparees basees sur 554 avis verifies d'hoteliers sur HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Probabilite de recommandation |
|
|
| Facilite d'utilisation |
|
|
| Support client |
|
|
| Rapport qualite-prix |
|
|
| Prix de depart | From $600/mo | From $600/mo |
| Avis verifies | 549 | 5 |
Apres analyse de 554 avis verifies, les utilisateurs de HOTELTIME apprecient surtout user interface and learning curve, assistance technique, reporting and analytics, tandis que ceux de Prostay mettent en avant . Cliquez sur un theme pour voir ce que disent les evaluateurs.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Avantages | |
|
+
User Interface and Learning Curve
▾
|
|
|
+
Assistance technique
▾
|
|
|
+
Reporting and Analytics
▾
|
|
|
+
System Stability and Updates
▾
|
|
| Inconvenients | |
|
−
Customization Options
▾
|
|
|
−
Automation Features
▾
|
|
|
−
Optimisation mobile
▾
|
|
Comment chaque produit se classe parmi les fournisseurs Systèmes de gestion immobilière pour differentes tailles d'etablissements, types et regions — base sur les avis verifies d'hoteliers dans chaque segment.
Par taille d'hotel
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Petit (10-24 chambres) ▾ | #5 219 avis | #48 5 avis |
| Moyen (25-74 chambres) ▾ | #3 238 avis | #67 0 avis |
| Grand (75-199 chambres) ▾ | #2 46 avis | — |
| Tres grand (200+ chambres) ▾ | #8 7 avis | — |
Par type d'etablissement
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #5 239 avis | #54 3 avis |
| Luxe ▾ | #3 241 avis | — |
| Enseigne / Chaine ▾ | #4 143 avis | #62 1 avis |
| Sejour prolonge ▾ | #4 49 avis | — |
Par region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Amerique du Nord | #52 4 avis | #49 0 avis |
| Europe ▾ | #2 384 avis | #48 1 avis |
| Asie-Pacifique ▾ | #5 111 avis | #15 4 avis |
| Moyen-Orient ▾ | #1 21 avis | — |
Choosing the right property management system (PMS) can transform your hotel’s operations, guest experience, and bottom line. HotelTime PMS by HOTELTIME and Prostay by Prostay both aim to streamline hotel management but differ significantly in scale, features, and market presence. Your decision hinges on your property’s size, complexity, and regional needs, but which platform truly offers the value and support your team requires?
HotelTime PMS stands out as a mature, globally recognized platform with over 650 properties across more than 20 countries, mainly serving large resorts and branded hotels. Its extensive feature set includes advanced integrations like guest CRM, online check-in, and housekeeper mobile apps, which are absent in Prostay, a newer entrant with just five reviews and a limited regional footprint.
Conversely, Prostay boasts high user ratings (5/5 from 5 reviews) and a recent, highly positive customer support score of 5/5—despite its smaller market presence. As a cloud and on-premise solution with native apps, it emphasizes full multi-property support, automation, and offline functionality.
Are you looking for a proven, broad-market system or a modern, flexible alternative tailored for multi-property management? The choice largely depends on your hotel’s size, location, and operational complexity.
If your hotel needs a mature, feature-rich PMS that integrates seamlessly with third-party systems and operates globally, HotelTime PMS is the clear choice. It’s particularly suited for resorts, large hotels, and properties requiring extensive automation and customization, supported by a strong, established customer base and regional presence.
On the other hand, if you run a boutique or resort-focused operation, especially in North America or emerging markets, Prostay may be better. Its intuitive interface, full offline support, and dedicated messaging platform benefit properties prioritizing ease of use and modern tech integration—especially if rapid staff onboarding and automation are priorities.
For properties with complex multi-property portfolios, HotelTime’s broader integrations and regional experience tip the scales. Conversely, for smaller or remote properties needing flexible deployment, Prostay’s native apps and offline capabilities may be more appealing.
HotelTime PMS has an average ease-of-use score of 4.66/5, with many users citing its intuitive interface once familiar, but some report a steep learning curve due to extensive features. Its onboarding process receives a 4.63/5 rating, and users highlight strong support, though initial setup can be complex.
Prostay slightly edges out with a 4.8/5 ease-of-use rating, and users praise its modern, straightforward design that simplifies staff training. Its recent 4.8/5 onboarding score reflects a smooth deployment experience, especially with native apps and offline support that enhance user adoption.
Edge: Prostay.
HotelTime offers 17 unique features, including guest CRM, group management, integrated ID scanners, and online check-in—many tailored for large properties or chains. It also features extensive automation options like nightly audits and PCI compliance, which are absent in Prostay.
Prostay, meanwhile, has three exclusive features—on-premise support, centralized messaging, and automated assignments—that focus on operational efficiency and multi-property management. Its core strengths lie in simplifying workflows, automation, and offline capabilities, with a modern, consolidated platform.
Overall, HotelTime provides a broader array of advanced features, particularly suited for complex, high-volume operations. Edge: HotelTime.
HotelTime’s support team averages 4.73/5, with many reviews praising quick responses and dedicated onboarding. However, some users point out that extended support hours would bolster the experience, especially for international clients.
Prostay’s support is rated a perfect 5/5, with reviews highlighting its responsiveness and personalized assistance. Its small but dedicated team offers rapid onboarding and ongoing help, which is particularly advantageous for newer users or smaller properties.
Edge: Prostay.
HotelTime boasts 58 verified partners, including major channel managers and payment systems like Profitroom, Bookboost, and Lybra Tech. Its integration ecosystem allows hotels to connect with numerous third-party tools, streamlining operations and data management.
Prostay has just 2 verified partners, sharing one with HotelTime (STAAH), and only Stripe as a unique integration. While its native features compensate for fewer third-party options, the limited ecosystem may restrict advanced customization for some users.
Edge: HotelTime.
HotelTime’s reviews, with 433 total and 27 in the last six months, reflect a high overall rating of 4.83/5 and a likelihood to recommend of 93%. It is predominantly favored by resorts and city center hotels, with many praising its feature set and support.
Prostay, with only 5 reviews and no recent feedback, holds a perfect 5/5 rating but has limited data for broader validation. It is highly regarded by boutique and resort hoteliers who prioritize ease and automation.
Based on recent reviews and overall satisfaction, HotelTime’s ratings are more representative of consistent performance. Edge: HotelTime.
Both systems are priced at a base fee of $600 per month, with no freemium options, implementation fees, or monthly per-room charges. This parity simplifies direct cost comparison, but be aware that additional costs may accrue based on integrations and customizations.
Not ideal if your property is small, boutique, or in a remote location where simplicity or offline functionality is paramount.
Not ideal if your hotel requires extensive third-party integrations or operates in regions where Prostay’s regional presence is limited.
HotelTime PMS is a mature, feature-rich platform suited for large, complex properties with international operations. Its broad integration ecosystem, regional presence, and extensive automation support larger hotels and chains but can involve a steeper learning curve.
Prostay offers a modern, highly rated alternative with a focus on simplicity, offline support, and automation—ideal for boutique or resort properties that value quick setup and intuitive management. Its smaller ecosystem and regional focus make it less suitable for large, multi-national hotel groups.
If your hotel needs a proven, scalable system with extensive integrations, HotelTime is the clear choice. For properties that prioritize ease of use, offline capabilities, and rapid staff onboarding, Prostay provides a compelling, modern alternative.
La tarification des Systèmes de gestion immobilière est rarement simple. Voici ce que nous savons a partir des donnees tarifaires publiques de chaque fournisseur. Demandez toujours un devis personnalise pour la taille de votre etablissement.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $600/mo | From $600/mo |
Selon la base de donnees produits de HTR, HotelTime PMS et Prostay partagent 34 fonctionnalites. Voici les differences cles — les fonctionnalites que l'un possede et que l'autre n'a pas.
| Fonctionnalite |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Application mobile | ||
| Audit de nuit automatisé | ||
| Automated Assignments | ||
| CRM invité | ||
| Centralized Messaging | ||
| Fonctionnalité de groupe | ||
| Profils d'invités | ||
| Scanner d'identité et de passeport intégré | ||
| Sur place |
Affichage des principales differences. 8 fonctionnalites supplementaires different entre ces produits.
Nous avons analyse 8 etudes de cas verifiees pour comparer ce que les hotels obtiennent reellement avec chaque plateforme sur quatre objectifs commerciaux cles.
"We needed to change an on-site system we were using as we wanted to move our operation forward. We achieved that with HotelTime systems. They are reliable, and stable and offer fea..."
Aucune etude de cas publiee pour cet objectif pour le moment.
"In 2018 we were choosing a system for our first completely self-service ART and design hotel. We decided on HotelTime and after 4 years I have to say that the choice was the right..."
Aucune etude de cas publiee pour cet objectif pour le moment.
Ce que les hoteliers apprecient
While the system’s intuitive interface and ease of learning are generally appreciated, a few users mention initial challenges due to the complexity of... While the system’s intuitive interface and ease of learning are generally appreciated, a few users mention initial challenges due to the complexity of features offered. Overall, once users become familiar with the system, it significantly enhances efficiency and simplifies hotel operations.
Bien que la réactivité et l'efficacité de l'équipe d'assistance soient appréciées, certains avis suggèrent que l'extension des horaires d'assistance t... Bien que la réactivité et l'efficacité de l'équipe d'assistance soient appréciées, certains avis suggèrent que l'extension des horaires d'assistance technique améliorerait encore l'expérience utilisateur, en garantissant une assistance permanente, notamment pour les utilisateurs internationaux.
HotelTime's robust reporting features are praised for providing comprehensive data insights into occupancy, revenue, and customer satisfaction. Users... HotelTime's robust reporting features are praised for providing comprehensive data insights into occupancy, revenue, and customer satisfaction. Users appreciate the variety of reports available for management, yet some desire more customization and advanced visualizations within the tool itself to better suit individual hotel needs.
Les points de friction pour les hoteliers
Some users voice a need for more customizable features, particularly in terms of reporting and interface personalization, which would allow hotels to... Some users voice a need for more customizable features, particularly in terms of reporting and interface personalization, which would allow hotels to better tailor the PMS to their specific operational strategies and guest services.
The automation capabilities in HotelTime, such as invoice processing and reservation management, are frequently mentioned for saving significant time... The automation capabilities in HotelTime, such as invoice processing and reservation management, are frequently mentioned for saving significant time for staff. Users highlight these features as reducing manual workload and minimizing the risk of human error, although they also express a desire for enhanced automation in guest communication and reporting.
Mieux classe pour
Fonctionnalites uniques
Mieux classe pour
Fonctionnalites uniques
Ou les notes divergent le plus
Cela depend de vos besoins. HotelTime PMS et Prostay partagent de nombreuses fonctionnalites Property Management Systems de base, mais chacun a des capacites uniques. HotelTime PMS propose 58 partenaires d'integration verifies, tandis que Prostay en propose 2. Consultez la comparaison des fonctionnalites ci-dessus pour voir les differences avant de changer.
Les petits hotels devraient privilegier la facilite d'utilisation et une mise en service rapide. Prostay est en tete pour la facilite d'utilisation avec 4.8/5 contre 4.7/5. Recherchez une tarification transparente et une option d'essai ou de demonstration. Filtrez les avis sur chaque page produit par taille d'etablissement pour lire les retours d'hotels similaires au votre.
HotelTime PMS : Non. Prostay : Non. Aucun des deux produits ne propose actuellement d'offre gratuite. La plupart des fournisseurs Property Management Systems proposent des demonstrations ou des essais — demandez-en un a chacun pour evaluer avant de vous engager.
Le HT Score est un classement composite qui prend en compte 4 groupes de criteres et plus d'une douzaine de variables pour aider les hoteliers a comparer objectivement les produits technologiques hoteliers. HOTELTIME a un HT Score de 91 et Prostay a 0. Voici comment le score est calcule.
| Groupe de criteres | Ponderation | Ce qu'il mesure |
|---|---|---|
| Notes et avis clients |
|
A quel point les utilisateurs recommandent-ils ce produit ? Score des notes, Volume d'avis, Part de voix, Profondeur des avis, Recence des avis, Etudes de cas ▾ Le facteur le plus fortement pondere. Analyse les notes de satisfaction moyennes (probabilite de recommandation, facilite d'utilisation, support, ROI), le nombre total d'avis par rapport aux pairs de la categorie, la recence des avis (au moins 20 avis sur les 6 derniers mois) et la part de voix parmi les clients hoteliers uniques pour detecter les biais de selection. |
| Ecosysteme partenaire |
|
A quel point les partenaires technologiques recommandent-ils cette entreprise ? Recommandations des partenaires, Nombre d'integrations, Qualite des integrations ▾ Evalue les recommandations des partenaires comme des votes de confiance d'experts, le nombre d'integrations verifiees et la qualite de l'ecosysteme — la moyenne des HT Scores des partenaires d'integration. Les produits avec des ecosystemes d'integration de meilleure qualite sont plus susceptibles de fournir un ensemble technologique connecte. |
| Orientation client |
|
A quel point cette organisation est-elle orientee client ? Support certifie, Regularite des avis, Completude du profil ▾ Evalue si l'entreprise a obtenu la certification HTR de support client, maintient une collecte d'avis reguliere dans le temps (un indicateur de culture axee sur le feedback) et tient a jour les profils produits avec les fonctionnalites, captures d'ecran, tarifs et caracteristiques. |
| Portee, perennite et ressources |
|
Quelle est l'etendue de la portee et des ressources de cette entreprise ? Portee geographique, Perennite, Ressources de l'entreprise, Score de tendance ▾ Mesure la presence mondiale (pays et regions desservis), les annees d'activite comme indicateur de stabilite, les effectifs comme indicateur de ressources, et un score de tendance base sur les demandes d'acheteurs, les avis, les recommandations de partenaires et l'activite presse des douze derniers mois. |
Les notes et avis clients sont de loin le facteur le plus important dans l'algorithme du HT Score. HTR n'accepte aucun paiement pour un meilleur classement. Tous les avis sont verifies — seuls les professionnels du secteur hotelier avec des affiliations confirmees peuvent soumettre des notes. Voir la methodologie complete du HT Score →
Conseiller en recommandations de produits