The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
Nous avons analyse 549 avis verifies d'hoteliers, compare les fonctionnalites, les tarifs et des etudes de cas reelles pour identifier les points forts de chaque plateforme. Le bon choix depend du type de votre etablissement et de vos priorites :
HOTELTIME se distingue en ease of use and customer support — en particulier pour les etablissements brand (4.9/5) , avec des fonctionnalites exclusives comme Payment processing and Guest CRM.
Box se distingue .
Notes comparees basees sur 549 avis verifies d'hoteliers sur HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Probabilite de recommandation |
|
|
| Facilite d'utilisation |
|
|
| Support client |
|
|
| Rapport qualite-prix |
|
|
| Prix de depart | From $600/mo | Contact sales |
| Avis verifies | 549 | 0 |
Apres analyse de 549 avis verifies, les utilisateurs de HOTELTIME apprecient surtout user interface and learning curve, assistance technique, reporting and analytics, tandis que ceux de Box mettent en avant . Cliquez sur un theme pour voir ce que disent les evaluateurs.
|
|
Box |
|---|---|
| Avantages | |
|
+
User Interface and Learning Curve
▾
|
|
|
+
Assistance technique
▾
|
|
|
+
Reporting and Analytics
▾
|
|
|
+
System Stability and Updates
▾
|
|
| Inconvenients | |
|
−
Customization Options
▾
|
|
|
−
Automation Features
▾
|
|
|
−
Optimisation mobile
▾
|
|
Comment chaque produit se classe parmi les fournisseurs Systèmes de gestion immobilière pour differentes tailles d'etablissements, types et regions — base sur les avis verifies d'hoteliers dans chaque segment.
Par taille d'hotel
| Segment |
|
Box |
|---|---|---|
| Petit (10-24 chambres) ▾ | #5 219 avis | — |
| Moyen (25-74 chambres) ▾ | #3 238 avis | — |
| Grand (75-199 chambres) ▾ | #2 46 avis | — |
| Tres grand (200+ chambres) ▾ | #8 7 avis | — |
Par type d'etablissement
| Segment |
|
Box |
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #5 239 avis | — |
| Luxe ▾ | #3 241 avis | — |
| Enseigne / Chaine ▾ | #4 143 avis | — |
| Sejour prolonge ▾ | #4 49 avis | — |
Par region
| Segment |
|
Box |
|---|---|---|
| Amerique du Nord | #52 4 avis | — |
| Europe ▾ | #2 384 avis | — |
| Asie-Pacifique ▾ | #5 111 avis | — |
| Moyen-Orient ▾ | #1 21 avis | — |
Choosing between HotelTime PMS by HOTELTIME and Sign Request by Box hinges on your hotel’s operational needs and strategic priorities. HotelTime PMS offers a comprehensive property management platform designed for hotels seeking robust automation, extensive integrations, and a full suite of features. Sign Request, in contrast, appears more focused on document signing or related functionalities, with no detailed features or user reviews provided.
Since HotelTime PMS has a clear market presence, a strong review base, and a dedicated suite of hotel-centric features, it is the more suitable option for your team’s property management needs. How do their core capabilities compare, and which aligns better with your hotel’s scale and goals?
HotelTime PMS solves multiple operational challenges for hotels, offering tools for reservations, guest management, revenue tracking, and integrations with third-party systems. Sign Request’s scope isn’t specified as a PMS, and without detailed reviews or features, it’s unclear how well it addresses the comprehensive needs of hotel operations.
HotelTime’s reviews highlight real-world benefits like improved operational efficiency and guest satisfaction, supported by 433 reviews and a high NPS score of 9.26/10, all from recent feedback. Sign Request’s lack of review data makes it difficult to assess its relevance or effectiveness for hotels.
Given the absence of detailed hotel-focused features and user feedback for Sign Request, HotelTime PMS emerges as the more reliable, proven solution. Are you looking for an all-in-one PMS, or just a document signing tool?
If your hotel needs a fully integrated, cloud-based PMS to manage reservations, revenue, housekeeping, and guest profiles, go with HotelTime PMS. It’s supported by over 650 properties worldwide, with a 4.83/5 overall rating and extensive features like channel management, payment processing, and automation.
If your primary requirement is digital document signing or contract management, and hotel-specific functionality isn’t essential, Sign Request might be worth considering—though lacking review data and features makes this uncertain. For well-rounded hotel operations, HotelTime’s proven track record makes it the clear choice.
HotelTime PMS boasts a high ease-of-use rating of 4.66/5, with many reviews praising its intuitive interface and quick onboarding process. Users highlight that once familiar, staff productivity increases due to straightforward navigation and automation features.
Sign Request’s usability details are unavailable, and without user reviews or interface ratings, evaluating its ease of use is impossible. Based on available data, HotelTime PMS’s user experience clearly outperforms the undefined usability of Sign Request.
Edge: HotelTime PMS.
HotelTime PMS offers over 51 unique features, including EPoS, integrated CRS, payment processing, guest CRM, housekeeping modules, digital registration, revenue management, and more. These features are tailored specifically for hotel operations, enabling full control over various departments.
Sign Request’s feature set isn’t specified, but as a document signing tool, it likely focuses on workflow automation for contracts and signatures rather than comprehensive hotel management. The depth and breadth of HotelTime’s features make it the more capable, hotel-centric system.
Edge: HotelTime PMS.
HotelTime’s support team scores 4.73/5, with reviews emphasizing quick, helpful responses and proactive onboarding assistance. Guests report that the support staff are knowledgeable, facilitating smoother implementation and ongoing use.
No support or onboarding data is available for Sign Request, making it impossible to compare. Given HotelTime’s established reputation and detailed reviews, it clearly offers superior support for hotel clients.
Edge: HotelTime PMS.
HotelTime PMS integrates with 58 verified partners, including Profitroom, Bookboost, STR, and various POS, revenue, and channel management tools. These integrations enable your hotel to build a connected ecosystem tailored to your operational needs.
Sign Request lacks publicly available integration data or verified partners, suggesting it’s not designed for hotel system interoperability. For comprehensive, hotel-specific integrations, HotelTime’s extensive partner network is clearly advantageous.
Edge: HotelTime PMS.
HotelTime PMS has a high overall rating of 4.83/5 based on 433 reviews, with recent feedback from 27 users emphasizing its reliability, features, and support. Property types like resorts, boutique hotels, and city center hotels rate it highly, often praising its ease of use and automation.
No ratings or reviews are available for Sign Request. The lack of feedback or recognition suggests it is not as widely adopted or tested in hotel settings.
Edge: HotelTime PMS.
HotelTime PMS is priced at a base of $600 per month, with no freemium or trial options indicated. It’s a fixed, predictable cost suitable for hotels seeking a full-featured PMS.
Pricing details for Sign Request are unavailable, and as a document signing tool, it may operate on a different pricing model, likely subscription-based or per-use. For hotel management, HotelTime’s transparent pricing offers better clarity.
Not ideal if you only need basic booking or contract signing tools without hotel-specific features.
Not ideal if you require a full PMS with automation, integrations, and operational tools.
HotelTime PMS provides a comprehensive, cloud-based operation management system with nearly 50 unique features tailored specifically for hotels. Its extensive integration options, strong support, and high user ratings make it the clear choice for properties seeking to streamline their operations and improve guest experiences.
Sign Request, lacking detailed hotel-specific features and reviews, does not currently serve as a viable alternative for managing hotel operations. It may be suitable only if your hotel’s needs are limited to digital contract signing, but otherwise, HotelTime remains the superior, more proven solution.
This comparison underscores HotelTime PMS’s strength as a full-featured hotel management system, making it the recommended choice for your team’s operational excellence.
La tarification des Systèmes de gestion immobilière est rarement simple. Voici ce que nous savons a partir des donnees tarifaires publiques de chaque fournisseur. Demandez toujours un devis personnalise pour la taille de votre etablissement.
|
|
Box | |
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $600/mo | — |
Selon la base de donnees produits de HTR, HotelTime PMS et Sign Request partagent 0 fonctionnalites. Voici les differences cles — les fonctionnalites que l'un possede et que l'autre n'a pas.
| Fonctionnalite |
|
Box |
|---|---|---|
| CRM invité | ||
| CRS intégré | ||
| Suivi des revenus annexes | ||
| Traitement des paiements | ||
| Vue Calendrier | ||
| Épopée |
Affichage des principales differences. 39 fonctionnalites supplementaires different entre ces produits.
Nous avons analyse 8 etudes de cas verifiees pour comparer ce que les hotels obtiennent reellement avec chaque plateforme sur quatre objectifs commerciaux cles.
"We needed to change an on-site system we were using as we wanted to move our operation forward. We achieved that with HotelTime systems. They are reliable, and stable and offer fea..."
Aucune etude de cas publiee pour cet objectif pour le moment.
"In 2018 we were choosing a system for our first completely self-service ART and design hotel. We decided on HotelTime and after 4 years I have to say that the choice was the right..."
Aucune etude de cas publiee pour cet objectif pour le moment.
Ce que les hoteliers apprecient
While the system’s intuitive interface and ease of learning are generally appreciated, a few users mention initial challenges due to the complexity of... While the system’s intuitive interface and ease of learning are generally appreciated, a few users mention initial challenges due to the complexity of features offered. Overall, once users become familiar with the system, it significantly enhances efficiency and simplifies hotel operations.
Bien que la réactivité et l'efficacité de l'équipe d'assistance soient appréciées, certains avis suggèrent que l'extension des horaires d'assistance t... Bien que la réactivité et l'efficacité de l'équipe d'assistance soient appréciées, certains avis suggèrent que l'extension des horaires d'assistance technique améliorerait encore l'expérience utilisateur, en garantissant une assistance permanente, notamment pour les utilisateurs internationaux.
HotelTime's robust reporting features are praised for providing comprehensive data insights into occupancy, revenue, and customer satisfaction. Users... HotelTime's robust reporting features are praised for providing comprehensive data insights into occupancy, revenue, and customer satisfaction. Users appreciate the variety of reports available for management, yet some desire more customization and advanced visualizations within the tool itself to better suit individual hotel needs.
Les points de friction pour les hoteliers
Some users voice a need for more customizable features, particularly in terms of reporting and interface personalization, which would allow hotels to... Some users voice a need for more customizable features, particularly in terms of reporting and interface personalization, which would allow hotels to better tailor the PMS to their specific operational strategies and guest services.
The automation capabilities in HotelTime, such as invoice processing and reservation management, are frequently mentioned for saving significant time... The automation capabilities in HotelTime, such as invoice processing and reservation management, are frequently mentioned for saving significant time for staff. Users highlight these features as reducing manual workload and minimizing the risk of human error, although they also express a desire for enhanced automation in guest communication and reporting.
Fonctionnalites uniques
Ou les notes divergent le plus
Cela depend de vos besoins. HotelTime PMS et Sign Request partagent de nombreuses fonctionnalites Property Management Systems de base, mais chacun a des capacites uniques. HotelTime PMS propose 58 partenaires d'integration verifies, tandis que Sign Request en propose 0. Consultez la comparaison des fonctionnalites ci-dessus pour voir les differences avant de changer.
Les petits hotels devraient privilegier la facilite d'utilisation et une mise en service rapide. HotelTime PMS est en tete pour la facilite d'utilisation avec 4.7/5 contre 0.0/5. Recherchez une tarification transparente et une option d'essai ou de demonstration. Filtrez les avis sur chaque page produit par taille d'etablissement pour lire les retours d'hotels similaires au votre.
HotelTime PMS : Non. Sign Request : Non. Aucun des deux produits ne propose actuellement d'offre gratuite. La plupart des fournisseurs Property Management Systems proposent des demonstrations ou des essais — demandez-en un a chacun pour evaluer avant de vous engager.
Le HT Score est un classement composite qui prend en compte 4 groupes de criteres et plus d'une douzaine de variables pour aider les hoteliers a comparer objectivement les produits technologiques hoteliers. HOTELTIME a un HT Score de 92 et Box a 0. Voici comment le score est calcule.
| Groupe de criteres | Ponderation | Ce qu'il mesure |
|---|---|---|
| Notes et avis clients |
|
A quel point les utilisateurs recommandent-ils ce produit ? Score des notes, Volume d'avis, Part de voix, Profondeur des avis, Recence des avis, Etudes de cas ▾ Le facteur le plus fortement pondere. Analyse les notes de satisfaction moyennes (probabilite de recommandation, facilite d'utilisation, support, ROI), le nombre total d'avis par rapport aux pairs de la categorie, la recence des avis (au moins 20 avis sur les 6 derniers mois) et la part de voix parmi les clients hoteliers uniques pour detecter les biais de selection. |
| Ecosysteme partenaire |
|
A quel point les partenaires technologiques recommandent-ils cette entreprise ? Recommandations des partenaires, Nombre d'integrations, Qualite des integrations ▾ Evalue les recommandations des partenaires comme des votes de confiance d'experts, le nombre d'integrations verifiees et la qualite de l'ecosysteme — la moyenne des HT Scores des partenaires d'integration. Les produits avec des ecosystemes d'integration de meilleure qualite sont plus susceptibles de fournir un ensemble technologique connecte. |
| Orientation client |
|
A quel point cette organisation est-elle orientee client ? Support certifie, Regularite des avis, Completude du profil ▾ Evalue si l'entreprise a obtenu la certification HTR de support client, maintient une collecte d'avis reguliere dans le temps (un indicateur de culture axee sur le feedback) et tient a jour les profils produits avec les fonctionnalites, captures d'ecran, tarifs et caracteristiques. |
| Portee, perennite et ressources |
|
Quelle est l'etendue de la portee et des ressources de cette entreprise ? Portee geographique, Perennite, Ressources de l'entreprise, Score de tendance ▾ Mesure la presence mondiale (pays et regions desservis), les annees d'activite comme indicateur de stabilite, les effectifs comme indicateur de ressources, et un score de tendance base sur les demandes d'acheteurs, les avis, les recommandations de partenaires et l'activite presse des douze derniers mois. |
Les notes et avis clients sont de loin le facteur le plus important dans l'algorithme du HT Score. HTR n'accepte aucun paiement pour un meilleur classement. Tous les avis sont verifies — seuls les professionnels du secteur hotelier avec des affiliations confirmees peuvent soumettre des notes. Voir la methodologie complete du HT Score →
Conseiller en recommandations de produits