The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
Nous avons analyse 554 avis verifies d'hoteliers, compare les fonctionnalites, les tarifs et des etudes de cas reelles pour identifier les points forts de chaque plateforme. Le bon choix depend du type de votre etablissement et de vos priorites :
HOTELTIME se distingue en ROI — en particulier pour les etablissements brand (4.9/5) , avec des fonctionnalites exclusives comme Guest CRM and Ancillary revenue tracking.
Lodgical Solution se distingue , avec des fonctionnalites exclusives comme Guest Communication (SMS Messaging) and Guest Messaging.
Notes comparees basees sur 554 avis verifies d'hoteliers sur HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Probabilite de recommandation |
|
|
| Facilite d'utilisation |
|
|
| Support client |
|
|
| Rapport qualite-prix |
|
|
| Prix de depart | From $600/mo | Contact sales |
| Avis verifies | 549 | 5 |
Apres analyse de 554 avis verifies, les utilisateurs de HOTELTIME apprecient surtout user interface and learning curve, assistance technique, reporting and analytics, tandis que ceux de Lodgical Solution mettent en avant . Cliquez sur un theme pour voir ce que disent les evaluateurs.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Avantages | |
|
+
User Interface and Learning Curve
▾
|
|
|
+
Assistance technique
▾
|
|
|
+
Reporting and Analytics
▾
|
|
|
+
System Stability and Updates
▾
|
|
| Inconvenients | |
|
−
Customization Options
▾
|
|
|
−
Automation Features
▾
|
|
|
−
Optimisation mobile
▾
|
|
Comment chaque produit se classe parmi les fournisseurs Systèmes de gestion immobilière pour differentes tailles d'etablissements, types et regions — base sur les avis verifies d'hoteliers dans chaque segment.
Par taille d'hotel
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Petit (10-24 chambres) ▾ | #5 219 avis | #51 2 avis |
| Moyen (25-74 chambres) ▾ | #3 238 avis | #55 2 avis |
| Grand (75-199 chambres) ▾ | #2 46 avis | — |
| Tres grand (200+ chambres) ▾ | #8 7 avis | — |
Par type d'etablissement
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #5 239 avis | #58 2 avis |
| Luxe ▾ | #3 241 avis | #52 2 avis |
| Enseigne / Chaine ▾ | #4 143 avis | — |
| Sejour prolonge ▾ | #4 49 avis | — |
Par region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Amerique du Nord ▾ | #52 4 avis | #30 5 avis |
| Europe ▾ | #2 384 avis | — |
| Asie-Pacifique ▾ | #5 111 avis | — |
| Moyen-Orient ▾ | #1 21 avis | — |
Choosing between HotelTime PMS by HOTELTIME and Lodgical Solution hinges on your hotel’s size, complexity, and operational needs. Both systems aim to streamline property management, but they differ significantly in scope, market presence, and user feedback. HotelTime, with its extensive feature set and global reach, is used by hundreds of properties worldwide, whereas Lodgical’s more focused, user-friendly platform caters primarily to smaller hotels and resorts. How do you determine which aligns best with your hotel’s priorities?
HotelTime PMS and Lodgical Solution both address core property management challenges, like reservations, guest data, and operational reporting. HotelTime's broad feature set includes modules for revenue management, guest CRM, EPoS, and multi-lingual support, making it adaptable for large, complex properties. Lodgical, on the other hand, offers a straightforward, easy-to-navigate interface with essential features that suit smaller hotels, villas, and vacation rentals. The key difference is in their customer bases: HotelTime's features and global reach serve larger, multi-property hotels, while Lodgical concentrates on simplicity and affordability for smaller establishments. Which approach better suits your hotel’s scale and operational complexity?
If your hotel needs a comprehensive, multi-module system capable of handling complex operations across multiple properties, HotelTime is the clear choice. It is ideal for larger hotels, resorts, and groups that require extensive integrations, advanced revenue management, and detailed reporting. Conversely, if your property is small to mid-sized, prioritizes ease of use, and seeks affordable deployment, Lodgical Solution is the better fit. Its intuitive platform is praised for its simplicity, making onboarding and staff adoption straightforward. For a property with 10–100 rooms wanting robust features without the complexity, Lodgical excels.
Both systems boast high usability ratings, with HotelTime scoring 4.66/5 and Lodgical slightly higher at 4.8/5. HotelTime's interface is feature-rich but can present a steeper learning curve, especially for staff unfamiliar with advanced modules. Its onboarding is rated 4.63/5, with some users noting initial setup complexity. Lodgical Solution, with an onboarding score of 4.67/5, is praised for its straightforward, intuitive design that minimizes training time and accelerates staff adoption. Edge: Lodgical Solution.
HotelTime offers 25 features exclusive to its platform, including guest CRM, multi-currency support, automated night audit, and integrated spa & wellness modules—features that Lodgical lacks. Lodgical, however, provides unique features like SMS guest communication and voice-to-text notes, enhancing guest engagement for smaller properties. Overall, HotelTime's 26 shared features plus its additional modules make it more comprehensive for complex operations. Edge: HotelTime PMS.
HotelTime is highly rated for support, with a 4.73/5 rating and over 400 reviews, many praising its responsive team and detailed onboarding. Customers mention quick responses and willingness to help, especially during system setup and troubleshooting. Lodgical's support, with a 4.6/5 rating from just five reviews, is described as friendly and helpful but less extensive, partly due to its smaller user base. Given the volume and recency of HotelTime’s reviews, it has a slight edge. Edge: HotelTime PMS.
HotelTime boasts 58 verified integration partners, including popular tools like Profitroom, STR, and Bookboost, offering extensive connectivity for large operations. Lodgical has 20 verified partners, with notable integrations like RateBoard and GuestCentric, suitable for smaller hotels needing core functionality. Shared integrations include systems like Lybra Tech and Duetto, but HotelTime’s broader ecosystem makes it more adaptable for complex tech stacks. Edge: HotelTime PMS.
HotelTime’s overall rating of 4.83/5 from 433 reviews makes it the more highly-rated system, especially among larger properties and brands. Recent reviews praise its feature richness, support, and ease of access, reinforcing its reputation. Lodgical, with no current ratings available beyond a few reviews, does not match HotelTime’s scale or recent feedback volume. Larger hotels and chains generally favor HotelTime’s proven track record. Edge: HotelTime PMS.
HotelTime charges a flat base fee of $600, with no trial or monthly per-room charges. Pricing details for Lodgical are unavailable, but it is positioned as an affordable, subscription-based solution for small to mid-sized hotels. If budget and transparent pricing are priorities, HotelTime’s straightforward model offers clarity. For smaller properties seeking a cost-effective option, Lodgical’s lack of explicit pricing may be advantageous, but you should request a quote.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if:
HotelTime offers a broad, feature-rich platform with extensive integrations and a proven track record across global markets, making it ideal for larger and more complex hotels. Its high ratings, support, and advanced modules justify its higher price point for properties with sophisticated operational needs.
Lodgical Solution stands out as a straightforward, cost-effective PMS primarily suited for small to mid-sized hotels and resorts. Its intuitive interface, high usability, and targeted features make it an excellent choice for properties seeking simplicity and efficiency without the burden of unnecessary complexity.
In conclusion, if your hotel requires a comprehensive, scalable management system and you operate across multiple locations or segments, HotelTime is the better choice. If your property is smaller, or if ease of use and affordability are your top priorities, Lodgical Solution will serve you well.
La tarification des Systèmes de gestion immobilière est rarement simple. Voici ce que nous savons a partir des donnees tarifaires publiques de chaque fournisseur. Demandez toujours un devis personnalise pour la taille de votre etablissement.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $600/mo | — |
Selon la base de donnees produits de HTR, HotelTime PMS et Lodgical Solution partagent 26 fonctionnalites. Voici les differences cles — les fonctionnalites que l'un possede et que l'autre n'a pas.
| Fonctionnalite |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Audit de nuit automatisé | ||
| CRM invité | ||
| Communication invité (messagerie SMS) | ||
| Guest Messaging | ||
| Notes et tâches relatives aux appareils mobiles (Voix-à-Texte) | ||
| Profils d'invités | ||
| Suivi des revenus annexes | ||
| Vue Calendrier | ||
| Épopée |
Affichage des principales differences. 16 fonctionnalites supplementaires different entre ces produits.
Nous avons analyse 8 etudes de cas verifiees pour comparer ce que les hotels obtiennent reellement avec chaque plateforme sur quatre objectifs commerciaux cles.
"We needed to change an on-site system we were using as we wanted to move our operation forward. We achieved that with HotelTime systems. They are reliable, and stable and offer fea..."
Aucune etude de cas publiee pour cet objectif pour le moment.
"In 2018 we were choosing a system for our first completely self-service ART and design hotel. We decided on HotelTime and after 4 years I have to say that the choice was the right..."
Aucune etude de cas publiee pour cet objectif pour le moment.
Ce que les hoteliers apprecient
While the system’s intuitive interface and ease of learning are generally appreciated, a few users mention initial challenges due to the complexity of... While the system’s intuitive interface and ease of learning are generally appreciated, a few users mention initial challenges due to the complexity of features offered. Overall, once users become familiar with the system, it significantly enhances efficiency and simplifies hotel operations.
Bien que la réactivité et l'efficacité de l'équipe d'assistance soient appréciées, certains avis suggèrent que l'extension des horaires d'assistance t... Bien que la réactivité et l'efficacité de l'équipe d'assistance soient appréciées, certains avis suggèrent que l'extension des horaires d'assistance technique améliorerait encore l'expérience utilisateur, en garantissant une assistance permanente, notamment pour les utilisateurs internationaux.
HotelTime's robust reporting features are praised for providing comprehensive data insights into occupancy, revenue, and customer satisfaction. Users... HotelTime's robust reporting features are praised for providing comprehensive data insights into occupancy, revenue, and customer satisfaction. Users appreciate the variety of reports available for management, yet some desire more customization and advanced visualizations within the tool itself to better suit individual hotel needs.
Les points de friction pour les hoteliers
Some users voice a need for more customizable features, particularly in terms of reporting and interface personalization, which would allow hotels to... Some users voice a need for more customizable features, particularly in terms of reporting and interface personalization, which would allow hotels to better tailor the PMS to their specific operational strategies and guest services.
The automation capabilities in HotelTime, such as invoice processing and reservation management, are frequently mentioned for saving significant time... The automation capabilities in HotelTime, such as invoice processing and reservation management, are frequently mentioned for saving significant time for staff. Users highlight these features as reducing manual workload and minimizing the risk of human error, although they also express a desire for enhanced automation in guest communication and reporting.
Mieux classe pour
Fonctionnalites uniques
Mieux classe pour
Fonctionnalites uniques
Ou les notes divergent le plus
Cela depend de vos besoins. HotelTime PMS et Lodgical Solution partagent de nombreuses fonctionnalites Property Management Systems de base, mais chacun a des capacites uniques. HotelTime PMS propose 58 partenaires d'integration verifies, tandis que Lodgical Solution en propose 20. Consultez la comparaison des fonctionnalites ci-dessus pour voir les differences avant de changer.
Les petits hotels devraient privilegier la facilite d'utilisation et une mise en service rapide. Lodgical Solution est en tete pour la facilite d'utilisation avec 4.8/5 contre 4.7/5. Recherchez une tarification transparente et une option d'essai ou de demonstration. Filtrez les avis sur chaque page produit par taille d'etablissement pour lire les retours d'hotels similaires au votre.
HotelTime PMS : Non. Lodgical Solution : Non. Aucun des deux produits ne propose actuellement d'offre gratuite. La plupart des fournisseurs Property Management Systems proposent des demonstrations ou des essais — demandez-en un a chacun pour evaluer avant de vous engager.
Le HT Score est un classement composite qui prend en compte 4 groupes de criteres et plus d'une douzaine de variables pour aider les hoteliers a comparer objectivement les produits technologiques hoteliers. HOTELTIME a un HT Score de 92 et Lodgical Solution a 0. Voici comment le score est calcule.
| Groupe de criteres | Ponderation | Ce qu'il mesure |
|---|---|---|
| Notes et avis clients |
|
A quel point les utilisateurs recommandent-ils ce produit ? Score des notes, Volume d'avis, Part de voix, Profondeur des avis, Recence des avis, Etudes de cas ▾ Le facteur le plus fortement pondere. Analyse les notes de satisfaction moyennes (probabilite de recommandation, facilite d'utilisation, support, ROI), le nombre total d'avis par rapport aux pairs de la categorie, la recence des avis (au moins 20 avis sur les 6 derniers mois) et la part de voix parmi les clients hoteliers uniques pour detecter les biais de selection. |
| Ecosysteme partenaire |
|
A quel point les partenaires technologiques recommandent-ils cette entreprise ? Recommandations des partenaires, Nombre d'integrations, Qualite des integrations ▾ Evalue les recommandations des partenaires comme des votes de confiance d'experts, le nombre d'integrations verifiees et la qualite de l'ecosysteme — la moyenne des HT Scores des partenaires d'integration. Les produits avec des ecosystemes d'integration de meilleure qualite sont plus susceptibles de fournir un ensemble technologique connecte. |
| Orientation client |
|
A quel point cette organisation est-elle orientee client ? Support certifie, Regularite des avis, Completude du profil ▾ Evalue si l'entreprise a obtenu la certification HTR de support client, maintient une collecte d'avis reguliere dans le temps (un indicateur de culture axee sur le feedback) et tient a jour les profils produits avec les fonctionnalites, captures d'ecran, tarifs et caracteristiques. |
| Portee, perennite et ressources |
|
Quelle est l'etendue de la portee et des ressources de cette entreprise ? Portee geographique, Perennite, Ressources de l'entreprise, Score de tendance ▾ Mesure la presence mondiale (pays et regions desservis), les annees d'activite comme indicateur de stabilite, les effectifs comme indicateur de ressources, et un score de tendance base sur les demandes d'acheteurs, les avis, les recommandations de partenaires et l'activite presse des douze derniers mois. |
Les notes et avis clients sont de loin le facteur le plus important dans l'algorithme du HT Score. HTR n'accepte aucun paiement pour un meilleur classement. Tous les avis sont verifies — seuls les professionnels du secteur hotelier avec des affiliations confirmees peuvent soumettre des notes. Voir la methodologie complete du HT Score →
Conseiller en recommandations de produits