The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
Nous avons analyse 887 avis verifies d'hoteliers, compare les fonctionnalites, les tarifs et des etudes de cas reelles pour identifier les points forts de chaque plateforme. Le bon choix depend du type de votre etablissement et de vos priorites :
Medialog se distingue , avec des fonctionnalites exclusives comme On premise.
Mews se distingue en ease of use and customer support — en particulier pour les etablissements independent (4.9/5) , avec des fonctionnalites exclusives comme Guest CRM and Guest profiles.
Notes comparees basees sur 887 avis verifies d'hoteliers sur HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Probabilite de recommandation |
|
|
| Facilite d'utilisation |
|
|
| Support client |
|
|
| Rapport qualite-prix |
|
|
| Prix de depart | From $400/mo | From $900/mo |
| Avis verifies | 0 | 887 |
Apres analyse de 887 avis verifies, les utilisateurs de Medialog apprecient surtout , tandis que ceux de Mews mettent en avant ease of use, automation and integrations, customizability and flexibility. Cliquez sur un theme pour voir ce que disent les evaluateurs.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Avantages | |
|
+
Ease of Use
▾
|
|
|
+
Automation and Integrations
▾
|
|
|
+
Customizability and Flexibility
▾
|
|
|
+
Intégration et soutien
▾
|
|
| Inconvenients | |
|
−
Billing and Invoicing
▾
|
|
|
−
Rapports et analyses
▾
|
|
|
−
Multi-Property Management
▾
|
|
Comment chaque produit se classe parmi les fournisseurs Systèmes de gestion immobilière pour differentes tailles d'etablissements, types et regions — base sur les avis verifies d'hoteliers dans chaque segment.
Par taille d'hotel
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Petit (10-24 chambres) ▾ | #76 0 avis | #3 329 avis |
| Moyen (25-74 chambres) ▾ | #72 0 avis | #1 397 avis |
| Grand (75-199 chambres) ▾ | — | #3 45 avis |
| Tres grand (200+ chambres) ▾ | — | #3 49 avis |
Par type d'etablissement
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #75 0 avis | #1 483 avis |
| Luxe ▾ | — | #5 220 avis |
| Enseigne / Chaine ▾ | #68 0 avis | #2 170 avis |
| Sejour prolonge ▾ | — | #1 130 avis |
Par region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Amerique du Nord ▾ | — | #8 106 avis |
| Europe ▾ | #52 0 avis | #1 660 avis |
| Asie-Pacifique ▾ | — | #10 17 avis |
| Moyen-Orient ▾ | — | #28 8 avis |
Choosing the right property management system (PMS) can dramatically influence your hotel’s operational efficiency, guest satisfaction, and revenue. Medialog and Mews PMS both aim to streamline hotel operations, but with radically different market presence and capabilities. Medialog is a longstanding player rooted in Europe with a focus on on-premise solutions, while Mews is a cloud-native platform with a broader global footprint and a highly modern feature set. Your decision hinges on which aligns best with your hotel’s size, location, and digital strategy.
Are you seeking a tried-and-true system with in-depth local support or a flexible, scalable cloud platform that integrates with a vast ecosystem? Let's explore how these two systems compare across core hotel management needs.
Medialog has been around since 1988, offering a centralized, on-premise PMS primarily serving European hotels, restaurants, and multi-venue establishments. Its 0/5 overall rating reflects a lack of recent reviews and limited customer feedback, which raises questions about its ongoing support and innovation. Conversely, Mews maintains a near-perfect 4.62/5 rating based on 758 reviews, with 98 in the last six months, indicating an active, satisfied user base. Mews’s recent reviews highlight its ease of use, automation, and extensive integrations.
Both products aim to simplify hotel operations, but Medialog’s legacy system might struggle to keep pace with modern demands. Mews, on the other hand, is praised for its intuitive interface, cloud accessibility, and rapid deployment. Given the recent surge in reviews for Mews, it’s clear that it currently commands a more engaged, user-driven ecosystem. So, which system truly fits your hotel’s future plans?
If your hotel needs a modern, scalable platform with a vast ecosystem of integrations, go with Mews. It’s ideal for independent hotels, boutique properties, and those looking to incorporate automation and guest-centric features. Conversely, if your team prefers a traditional, on-premise solution with a long-standing presence in specific European markets and no immediate need for extensive cloud features, Medialog may suit your needs—though it’s worth noting the lack of recent reviews or active customer feedback.
For hotels prioritizing a broad partner network, frequent updates, and a strong track record of customer satisfaction, Mews’s 93% likelihood to recommend makes it the clear choice. Medialog’s near-zero recent reviews suggest it’s less aligned with current hospitality technology trends.
Mews scores a 4.7/5 for ease of use, supported by numerous reviews praising its modern, user-friendly interface and quick onboarding process. Users report that staff adapt easily, and the system allows remote management, which enhances operational flexibility. In contrast, Medialog’s 0/5 rating indicates no recent user feedback, likely reflecting outdated UI and limited usability, especially for staff accustomed to contemporary tech.
Given Mews's recent reviews emphasizing its intuitive design and streamlined workflows, the edge clearly goes to Mews for ease of implementation and daily use.
Mews offers 32 unique features absent in Medialog, including guest CRM, online check-in, automated reminders, real-time reporting, and a guest app—features that modern hotel guests now expect. Medialog’s lone unique feature is its on-premise deployment, which limits remote access and real-time data sharing.
Mews’s extensive feature set—such as automated space optimization, integrated payments, and advanced revenue management—provides more tools to enhance guest experience and operational control. The platform’s 27 shared features also cover core needs like reservations and billing but with more depth and versatility.
Edge: Mews.
Mews’s support scores a 4.27/5, with recent reviews citing responsive support and helpful onboarding, especially given its global presence. Users note that the Mews team resolves bugs quickly and offers comprehensive training via Mews University. Medialog, with no recent reviews, offers limited data, suggesting it may not provide the same level of proactive, modern customer support.
Considering the volume and recency of reviews, Mews’s support stands out as more reliable and responsive in today’s hospitality environment.
Edge: Mews.
Mews boasts 336 verified partners, including popular integrations like Criton, Sage, and Orange Hotel Marketing, and a marketplace of over 1,000 apps. Medialog supports 41 verified integrations, focusing mainly on European and older legacy systems, with only a few exclusive partners like Mirai and Zenchef.
The extensive ecosystem of Mews allows your hotel to customize and expand functionalities with ease, making it highly adaptable to changing needs. Its open API and marketplace greatly surpass Medialog’s limited partner network.
Edge: Mews.
Mews’s reviews are overwhelmingly positive, with a 4.62/5 rating and recent feedback from boutique hotels, hostels, and independent properties praising its user-friendliness, automation, and support. Hotel segments like boutique hotels and hostels rate Mews particularly highly, with many recent reviews emphasizing its ease of use and flexibility.
Medialog lacks recent reviews, and given its 0/5 rating, it’s clear that current hoteliers do not rate it highly. For hotels seeking validation from active users, Mews is the transparent, trusted choice.
Edge: Mews.
Medialog’s pricing details are unavailable, but its base price is listed at $400, with no mention of a trial or monthly fees. Mews charges a $900 monthly base price, with no free tier or trial, reflecting its enterprise-grade solution.
While Mews’s higher price may be justified by its extensive features and support, the lack of transparent pricing for Medialog complicates direct comparison. Most modern hotels will find the investment in Mews worthwhile given its capabilities.
Not ideal if your hotel is looking for frequent updates, remote management, or modern guest features.
Not ideal if your hotel prefers on-premise solutions or operates exclusively within a very closed, legacy system environment.
Mews’s core advantage is its cloud-native architecture, active user base, and comprehensive integration ecosystem, making it the superior choice for modern, scalable hotel management. Medialog’s on-premise approach and European focus serve niche needs but lack recent reviews or evidence of active development.
If your hotel values ongoing support, frequent updates, and a broad partner network, go with Mews. For those with a strong preference for traditional, localized control and limited need for modern features, Medialog could suffice—but it’s an increasingly risky choice.
In today’s fast-evolving hospitality landscape, Mews offers a future-proof platform that supports your team’s growth, guest satisfaction, and operational agility.
La tarification des Systèmes de gestion immobilière est rarement simple. Voici ce que nous savons a partir des donnees tarifaires publiques de chaque fournisseur. Demandez toujours un devis personnalise pour la taille de votre etablissement.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $400/mo | From $900/mo |
Selon la base de donnees produits de HTR, Medialog et Mews PMS partagent 27 fonctionnalites. Voici les differences cles — les fonctionnalites que l'un possede et que l'autre n'a pas.
| Fonctionnalite |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| CRM invité | ||
| Communication invité (messagerie SMS) | ||
| Multi-devise | ||
| Multilingue | ||
| Profils d'invités | ||
| Suivi des revenus annexes | ||
| Sur place |
Affichage des principales differences. 21 fonctionnalites supplementaires different entre ces produits.
Nous avons analyse 8 etudes de cas verifiees pour comparer ce que les hotels obtiennent reellement avec chaque plateforme sur quatre objectifs commerciaux cles.
Aucune etude de cas publiee pour cet objectif pour le moment.
"It was vital for us to find a hospitality cloud that would give us the freedom to innovate and move quickly with new technology – that’s one of the main reasons we chose Mews."
Aucune etude de cas publiee pour cet objectif pour le moment.
"Since moving to Mews, we can be so much more agile in how we operate, both in terms of how we engage with guests and testing out new integrations and tools through Mews Marketplace..."
Aucune etude de cas publiee pour cet objectif pour le moment.
"We want to provide the best hospitality for guests anywhere in the country, and Mews is definitely the right solution to help us achieve that goal."
Fonctionnalites uniques
Ce que les hoteliers apprecient
Many reviews highlight the user-friendliness of Mews, citing its intuitive interface that simplifies tasks across various hotel operations. Users find... Many reviews highlight the user-friendliness of Mews, citing its intuitive interface that simplifies tasks across various hotel operations. Users find the platform easy to navigate, which aids in quicker team onboarding and daily use.
Reviews frequently praise Mews for its automation of routine tasks like check-in, billing, and invoicing, reducing manual workload and minimizing erro... Reviews frequently praise Mews for its automation of routine tasks like check-in, billing, and invoicing, reducing manual workload and minimizing errors. Users appreciate the extensive integration options with other tools, which streamline overall operations and enhance efficiency.
Mews allows customization to fit diverse business needs, from rate structures to integration setups. Users appreciate this flexibility, although they... Mews allows customization to fit diverse business needs, from rate structures to integration setups. Users appreciate this flexibility, although they note room for improvement in adapting complex booking conditions and enhancing user-friendly navigation for settings.
Les points de friction pour les hoteliers
Users point out that while Mews offers efficient billing processes, there are complexities and areas needing improvement, such as handling group billi... Users point out that while Mews offers efficient billing processes, there are complexities and areas needing improvement, such as handling group billings, splits, and providing more customizable invoice formats. This can affect the ease of financial operations within the system.
Bien que Mews offre des fonctionnalités de reporting et d'analyse performantes, plusieurs avis soulignent le besoin de fonctionnalités de reporting pl... Bien que Mews offre des fonctionnalités de reporting et d'analyse performantes, plusieurs avis soulignent le besoin de fonctionnalités de reporting plus personnalisables et flexibles. Les utilisateurs souhaitent des analyses de données plus fines, notamment en matière de réservations et de revenus.
Mieux classe pour
Fonctionnalites uniques
Ou les notes divergent le plus
Cela depend de vos besoins. Medialog et Mews PMS partagent de nombreuses fonctionnalites Property Management Systems de base, mais chacun a des capacites uniques. Medialog propose 41 partenaires d'integration verifies, tandis que Mews PMS en propose 336. Consultez la comparaison des fonctionnalites ci-dessus pour voir les differences avant de changer.
Les petits hotels devraient privilegier la facilite d'utilisation et une mise en service rapide. Mews PMS est en tete pour la facilite d'utilisation avec 4.7/5 contre 0.0/5. Recherchez une tarification transparente et une option d'essai ou de demonstration. Filtrez les avis sur chaque page produit par taille d'etablissement pour lire les retours d'hotels similaires au votre.
Medialog : Non. Mews PMS : Non. Aucun des deux produits ne propose actuellement d'offre gratuite. La plupart des fournisseurs Property Management Systems proposent des demonstrations ou des essais — demandez-en un a chacun pour evaluer avant de vous engager.
Le HT Score est un classement composite qui prend en compte 4 groupes de criteres et plus d'une douzaine de variables pour aider les hoteliers a comparer objectivement les produits technologiques hoteliers. Medialog a un HT Score de 0 et Mews a 100. Voici comment le score est calcule.
| Groupe de criteres | Ponderation | Ce qu'il mesure |
|---|---|---|
| Notes et avis clients |
|
A quel point les utilisateurs recommandent-ils ce produit ? Score des notes, Volume d'avis, Part de voix, Profondeur des avis, Recence des avis, Etudes de cas ▾ Le facteur le plus fortement pondere. Analyse les notes de satisfaction moyennes (probabilite de recommandation, facilite d'utilisation, support, ROI), le nombre total d'avis par rapport aux pairs de la categorie, la recence des avis (au moins 20 avis sur les 6 derniers mois) et la part de voix parmi les clients hoteliers uniques pour detecter les biais de selection. |
| Ecosysteme partenaire |
|
A quel point les partenaires technologiques recommandent-ils cette entreprise ? Recommandations des partenaires, Nombre d'integrations, Qualite des integrations ▾ Evalue les recommandations des partenaires comme des votes de confiance d'experts, le nombre d'integrations verifiees et la qualite de l'ecosysteme — la moyenne des HT Scores des partenaires d'integration. Les produits avec des ecosystemes d'integration de meilleure qualite sont plus susceptibles de fournir un ensemble technologique connecte. |
| Orientation client |
|
A quel point cette organisation est-elle orientee client ? Support certifie, Regularite des avis, Completude du profil ▾ Evalue si l'entreprise a obtenu la certification HTR de support client, maintient une collecte d'avis reguliere dans le temps (un indicateur de culture axee sur le feedback) et tient a jour les profils produits avec les fonctionnalites, captures d'ecran, tarifs et caracteristiques. |
| Portee, perennite et ressources |
|
Quelle est l'etendue de la portee et des ressources de cette entreprise ? Portee geographique, Perennite, Ressources de l'entreprise, Score de tendance ▾ Mesure la presence mondiale (pays et regions desservis), les annees d'activite comme indicateur de stabilite, les effectifs comme indicateur de ressources, et un score de tendance base sur les demandes d'acheteurs, les avis, les recommandations de partenaires et l'activite presse des douze derniers mois. |
Les notes et avis clients sont de loin le facteur le plus important dans l'algorithme du HT Score. HTR n'accepte aucun paiement pour un meilleur classement. Tous les avis sont verifies — seuls les professionnels du secteur hotelier avec des affiliations confirmees peuvent soumettre des notes. Voir la methodologie complete du HT Score →
Conseiller en recommandations de produits