The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
Nous avons analyse 169 avis verifies d'hoteliers, compare les fonctionnalites, les tarifs et des etudes de cas reelles pour identifier les points forts de chaque plateforme. Le bon choix depend du type de votre etablissement et de vos priorites :
Mews se distingue en ease of use and customer support , avec des fonctionnalites exclusives comme Payment Log Reports and Mobile Ordering.
SICOM Systems se distingue .
Notes comparees basees sur 169 avis verifies d'hoteliers sur HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Probabilite de recommandation |
|
|
| Facilite d'utilisation |
|
|
| Support client |
|
|
| Rapport qualite-prix |
|
|
| Prix de depart | From $200/mo | Contact sales |
| Avis verifies | 169 | 0 |
Apres analyse de 169 avis verifies, les utilisateurs de Mews apprecient surtout interface utilisateur et rapports, integration with third-party systems, seamless pms integration, tandis que ceux de SICOM Systems mettent en avant . Cliquez sur un theme pour voir ce que disent les evaluateurs.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Avantages | |
|
+
Interface utilisateur et rapports
▾
|
|
|
+
Integration with Third-Party Systems
▾
|
|
|
+
Seamless PMS Integration
▾
|
|
|
+
Automation and Efficiency
▾
|
|
| Inconvenients | |
|
−
Product Development and Feature Evolution
▾
|
|
|
−
Personnalisation et flexibilité
▾
|
|
|
−
Améliorations opérationnelles
▾
|
|
Comment chaque produit se classe parmi les fournisseurs Systèmes de point de vente hôteliers pour differentes tailles d'etablissements, types et regions — base sur les avis verifies d'hoteliers dans chaque segment.
Par taille d'hotel
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Petit (10-24 chambres) ▾ | #2 44 avis | — |
| Moyen (25-74 chambres) ▾ | #3 94 avis | — |
| Grand (75-199 chambres) ▾ | #5 7 avis | — |
| Tres grand (200+ chambres) ▾ | #2 9 avis | — |
Par type d'etablissement
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #3 74 avis | — |
| Luxe ▾ | #3 41 avis | — |
| Enseigne / Chaine ▾ | #3 31 avis | — |
| Sejour prolonge ▾ | #2 12 avis | — |
Par region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Amerique du Nord ▾ | #3 14 avis | — |
| Europe ▾ | #2 130 avis | — |
| Asie-Pacifique | #5 4 avis | — |
| Moyen-Orient | #6 0 avis | — |
Choosing between Mews POS and SICOM Systems hinges on your hotel’s specific operational needs and growth plans. Both products aim to streamline your restaurant and F&B operations, but they differ significantly in features, user experience, and market presence. Mews POS offers a modern, integrated solution built for hotels seeking a unified platform, while SICOM’s offering centers on self-service kiosks and digital signage designed to accelerate guest transactions. Which product aligns best with your hotel’s strategy?
Mews POS stands out as a cloud-based, user-friendly platform with nearly 160 reviews, an overall rating of 0/5, and an impressive 66 recent reviews, making it the most reviewed hotel POS in the market. Its core strength lies in its integration with Mews PMS, offering real-time reporting, automation, and extensive features tailored for hotel restaurant operations. Conversely, SICOM SYSTEMS, with zero reviews and no recent data, appears to have minimal market presence and an unproven track record in hotel-specific POS solutions.
While Mews POS is praised for its seamless operational flow and modern interface, SICOM emphasizes its digital signage and self-order kiosks—which can be valuable for high-volume food service environments. Given the critical review data and recent feedback, Mews clearly holds the advantage for hoteliers seeking a proven, reliable POS system.
If your hotel needs a comprehensive, integrated POS that ties directly into your property management system and enhances overall guest experience, go with Mews POS. Its ability to connect with over 336 verified partners and its broad feature set (including payments, inventory, and reporting) makes it suitable for mid-sized to large properties prioritizing operational cohesion.
If your hotel’s focus is on speeding up restaurant service, increasing check totals through self-service options, or deploying digital signage to attract guests, SICOM’s self-order kiosks and digital menu solutions might be a better fit. However, with no reviews or recent data, SICOM’s product remains unverified in the hotel industry, making Mews the clearer choice for most hoteliers today.
Mews POS scores an impressive 4.74/5 for ease of use, with many reviews highlighting its intuitive interface and straightforward onboarding process. Its mobile accessibility and cross-device functionality further ease staff adoption, with users praising its modern, clean UI and flexible workflows.
SICOM SYSTEMS, lacking any review data, offers no insights into usability. Given the absence of user feedback, it’s impossible to evaluate how easily your team could adapt to SICOM’s solutions. Edge: Mews POS.
Mews POS provides 29 unique features, including PCI compliance, discounts, upselling, digital menus, integrated kitchen display, inventory management, and customer insights reports—capabilities that SICOM SYSTEMS does not publicly showcase. Its extensive feature set supports a full restaurant management suite within the hotel environment.
SICOM emphasizes self-order kiosks, digital signage, and online ordering, but without a detailed feature count or broader operational tools. As a result, Mews offers a more complete, hotel-focused POS solution with advanced reporting and management tools. Edge: Mews POS.
Mews POS is supported by a support team rated 4.43/5, with reviews highlighting reliable, solution-oriented assistance and well-structured onboarding—critical for initial deployment and ongoing operations. Many users note that Mews support is responsive and attentive to hotel-specific needs.
In contrast, SICOM SYSTEMS has no available review data or ratings, leaving their customer support quality unverified. Given the importance of dependable support in POS implementation, Mews clearly leads here. Edge: Mews POS.
Mews boasts 336 verified integrations, including partnerships with Criton, Right Revenue, Sage, and Orange Hotel Marketing. Its broad ecosystem enables your hotel to connect seamlessly with revenue management, marketing, payment, and other operational systems.
SICOM SYSTEMS offers no publicly listed integrations or partner data, suggesting limited connectivity outside its core offerings. For hotels seeking a flexible, connected platform, Mews’s extensive integration network is a decisive advantage. Edge: Mews POS.
Mews’s reviews, with 66 recent entries, reflect a high satisfaction level—95% of users would recommend it—especially among boutique, city center, and hotel groups. Its ease of use and support ratings are solid, and users mention measurable operational improvements.
SICOM has no review data or recent feedback, making it impossible to gauge user satisfaction. Given Mews’s proven reputation and recent review activity, hoteliers clearly rate Mews higher. Edge: Mews POS.
Mews POS is priced at a base fee of $200 per month, with no freemium or trial options. Pricing likely varies depending on hotel size and specific configurations but offers transparent, predictable costs.
SICOM SYSTEMS provides no publicly available pricing or trial information, which complicates direct comparison. The lack of transparency favors Mews for budget planning and clarity. Edge: Mews POS.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if:
Core Difference:
Mews POS is a comprehensive, hotel-integrated POS platform praised for its ease of use, extensive features, and market reputation. SICOM SYSTEMS focuses on self-service kiosks and digital signage tailored for high-volume food operations but lacks hotel-specific integration and proven reviews.
When to choose Mews POS:
Opt for Mews if your hotel seeks a reliable, all-in-one POS system that reduces manual work and connects seamlessly with your PMS. Its proven support, extensive features, and rich ecosystem make it ideal for properties aiming for operational excellence and guest satisfaction.
When to choose SICOM SYSTEMS:
Choose SICOM if your primary goal is to accelerate order speed, increase check totals via self-service, or deploy digital signage to enhance guest engagement. Its solutions are better suited for standalone food outlets or hotels with a heavy emphasis on fast, automated food service rather than full operational integration.
Final Verdict:
For most hoteliers evaluating a hotel POS system today, Mews POS offers the stronger, more adaptable, and well-reviewed choice. Its extensive features, proven support, and high customer satisfaction make it the recommended option—particularly given its recent review activity and market presence.
La tarification des Systèmes de point de vente hôteliers est rarement simple. Voici ce que nous savons a partir des donnees tarifaires publiques de chaque fournisseur. Demandez toujours un devis personnalise pour la taille de votre etablissement.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $200/mo | — |
Selon la base de donnees produits de HTR, Mews POS et NEXTEP SYSTEMS partagent 0 fonctionnalites. Voici les differences cles — les fonctionnalites que l'un possede et que l'autre n'a pas.
| Fonctionnalite |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Conforme PCI | ||
| Fractionnement des chèques | ||
| Menus numériques | ||
| Rapports de journal de paiement | ||
| Réductions et promotions | ||
| Vente incitative |
Affichage des principales differences. 17 fonctionnalites supplementaires different entre ces produits.
Nous avons analyse 8 etudes de cas verifiees pour comparer ce que les hotels obtiennent reellement avec chaque plateforme sur quatre objectifs commerciaux cles.
"We’ve been with Mews for a few years now and it helped to transform the way we operate. It’s very intuitive to work with and saves our team so much time."
Aucune etude de cas publiee pour cet objectif pour le moment.
"In an industry where human contact is more important than digital contact, having a platform like Mews that not only reduces time at a screen but also gives us more face time with..."
Aucune etude de cas publiee pour cet objectif pour le moment.
"Self-check-in kiosks are integral to LyLo's DNA. Coupled with Mews capabilities like guest messaging and online check-out, they form the essence of our guest experience. In fact, t..."
Aucune etude de cas publiee pour cet objectif pour le moment.
Ce que les hoteliers apprecient
L'interface de Mews est décrite comme moderne et intuitive, facilitant une navigation fluide. Cependant, certains avis suggèrent des améliorations con... L'interface de Mews est décrite comme moderne et intuitive, facilitant une navigation fluide. Cependant, certains avis suggèrent des améliorations concernant la complexité et la flexibilité des outils de reporting, notamment pour les configurations multi-établissements et l'analyse opérationnelle détaillée.
Mews provides strong connectivity with various third-party systems like channel managers and payment gateways. These integrations facilitate centraliz... Mews provides strong connectivity with various third-party systems like channel managers and payment gateways. These integrations facilitate centralized operations, real-time booking management, and accurate financial reporting, although occasional synchronization issues are noted.
Reviews highlight Mews' outstanding integration between its POS and PMS, allowing direct posting of charges to guest rooms and synchronized guest data... Reviews highlight Mews' outstanding integration between its POS and PMS, allowing direct posting of charges to guest rooms and synchronized guest data. This integration is praised for improving billing accuracy, reducing departmental friction, and enhancing guest service experience by personalizing interactions.
Les points de friction pour les hoteliers
Mews' commitment to developing new features and evolving its product is seen positively. Users appreciate its openness to feedback, though there is a... Mews' commitment to developing new features and evolving its product is seen positively. Users appreciate its openness to feedback, though there is a need for more polished features and quicker implementation of user suggestions.
La plateforme est appréciée pour ses options de personnalisation, permettant des flux de travail et des alertes sur mesure afin d'améliorer l'expérien... La plateforme est appréciée pour ses options de personnalisation, permettant des flux de travail et des alertes sur mesure afin d'améliorer l'expérience client. Cependant, les utilisateurs expriment également le besoin de fonctionnalités de personnalisation plus intuitives pour répondre à des besoins opérationnels spécifiques et aux interactions avec les clients.
Fonctionnalites uniques
Ou les notes divergent le plus
Cela depend de vos besoins. Mews POS et NEXTEP SYSTEMS partagent de nombreuses fonctionnalites Hotel POS Systems de base, mais chacun a des capacites uniques. Mews POS propose 336 partenaires d'integration verifies, tandis que NEXTEP SYSTEMS en propose 0. Consultez la comparaison des fonctionnalites ci-dessus pour voir les differences avant de changer.
Les petits hotels devraient privilegier la facilite d'utilisation et une mise en service rapide. Mews POS est en tete pour la facilite d'utilisation avec 4.7/5 contre 0.0/5. Recherchez une tarification transparente et une option d'essai ou de demonstration. Filtrez les avis sur chaque page produit par taille d'etablissement pour lire les retours d'hotels similaires au votre.
Mews POS : Non. NEXTEP SYSTEMS : Non. Aucun des deux produits ne propose actuellement d'offre gratuite. La plupart des fournisseurs Hotel POS Systems proposent des demonstrations ou des essais — demandez-en un a chacun pour evaluer avant de vous engager.
Le HT Score est un classement composite qui prend en compte 4 groupes de criteres et plus d'une douzaine de variables pour aider les hoteliers a comparer objectivement les produits technologiques hoteliers. Mews a un HT Score de 100 et SICOM Systems a 0. Voici comment le score est calcule.
| Groupe de criteres | Ponderation | Ce qu'il mesure |
|---|---|---|
| Notes et avis clients |
|
A quel point les utilisateurs recommandent-ils ce produit ? Score des notes, Volume d'avis, Part de voix, Profondeur des avis, Recence des avis, Etudes de cas ▾ Le facteur le plus fortement pondere. Analyse les notes de satisfaction moyennes (probabilite de recommandation, facilite d'utilisation, support, ROI), le nombre total d'avis par rapport aux pairs de la categorie, la recence des avis (au moins 20 avis sur les 6 derniers mois) et la part de voix parmi les clients hoteliers uniques pour detecter les biais de selection. |
| Ecosysteme partenaire |
|
A quel point les partenaires technologiques recommandent-ils cette entreprise ? Recommandations des partenaires, Nombre d'integrations, Qualite des integrations ▾ Evalue les recommandations des partenaires comme des votes de confiance d'experts, le nombre d'integrations verifiees et la qualite de l'ecosysteme — la moyenne des HT Scores des partenaires d'integration. Les produits avec des ecosystemes d'integration de meilleure qualite sont plus susceptibles de fournir un ensemble technologique connecte. |
| Orientation client |
|
A quel point cette organisation est-elle orientee client ? Support certifie, Regularite des avis, Completude du profil ▾ Evalue si l'entreprise a obtenu la certification HTR de support client, maintient une collecte d'avis reguliere dans le temps (un indicateur de culture axee sur le feedback) et tient a jour les profils produits avec les fonctionnalites, captures d'ecran, tarifs et caracteristiques. |
| Portee, perennite et ressources |
|
Quelle est l'etendue de la portee et des ressources de cette entreprise ? Portee geographique, Perennite, Ressources de l'entreprise, Score de tendance ▾ Mesure la presence mondiale (pays et regions desservis), les annees d'activite comme indicateur de stabilite, les effectifs comme indicateur de ressources, et un score de tendance base sur les demandes d'acheteurs, les avis, les recommandations de partenaires et l'activite presse des douze derniers mois. |
Les notes et avis clients sont de loin le facteur le plus important dans l'algorithme du HT Score. HTR n'accepte aucun paiement pour un meilleur classement. Tous les avis sont verifies — seuls les professionnels du secteur hotelier avec des affiliations confirmees peuvent soumettre des notes. Voir la methodologie complete du HT Score →
Conseiller en recommandations de produits