The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
Nous avons analyse 169 avis verifies d'hoteliers, compare les fonctionnalites, les tarifs et des etudes de cas reelles pour identifier les points forts de chaque plateforme. Le bon choix depend du type de votre etablissement et de vos priorites :
Mews se distingue en ease of use and customer support , avec des fonctionnalites exclusives comme Payment Log Reports and Mobile Ordering.
Torqus se distingue .
Notes comparees basees sur 169 avis verifies d'hoteliers sur HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Probabilite de recommandation |
|
|
| Facilite d'utilisation |
|
|
| Support client |
|
|
| Rapport qualite-prix |
|
|
| Prix de depart | From $200/mo | Contact sales |
| Avis verifies | 169 | 0 |
Apres analyse de 169 avis verifies, les utilisateurs de Mews apprecient surtout interface utilisateur et rapports, integration with third-party systems, seamless pms integration, tandis que ceux de Torqus mettent en avant . Cliquez sur un theme pour voir ce que disent les evaluateurs.
|
|
Torqus |
|---|---|
| Avantages | |
|
+
Interface utilisateur et rapports
▾
|
|
|
+
Integration with Third-Party Systems
▾
|
|
|
+
Seamless PMS Integration
▾
|
|
|
+
Automation and Efficiency
▾
|
|
| Inconvenients | |
|
−
Product Development and Feature Evolution
▾
|
|
|
−
Personnalisation et flexibilité
▾
|
|
|
−
Améliorations opérationnelles
▾
|
|
Comment chaque produit se classe parmi les fournisseurs Systèmes de point de vente hôteliers pour differentes tailles d'etablissements, types et regions — base sur les avis verifies d'hoteliers dans chaque segment.
Par taille d'hotel
| Segment |
|
Torqus |
|---|---|---|
| Petit (10-24 chambres) ▾ | #2 44 avis | — |
| Moyen (25-74 chambres) ▾ | #3 94 avis | — |
| Grand (75-199 chambres) ▾ | #5 7 avis | — |
| Tres grand (200+ chambres) ▾ | #2 9 avis | — |
Par type d'etablissement
| Segment |
|
Torqus |
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #3 74 avis | — |
| Luxe ▾ | #3 41 avis | — |
| Enseigne / Chaine ▾ | #3 31 avis | — |
| Sejour prolonge ▾ | #2 12 avis | — |
Par region
| Segment |
|
Torqus |
|---|---|---|
| Amerique du Nord ▾ | #3 14 avis | — |
| Europe ▾ | #2 130 avis | — |
| Asie-Pacifique | #5 4 avis | — |
| Moyen-Orient | #6 0 avis | — |
Choosing between Mews POS by Mews and Torqus by Torqus depends on your hotel’s needs, especially regarding functionality, integrations, and support. Both aim to optimize restaurant operations within hospitality, but they diverge significantly in scope, user feedback, and market presence. Your team must evaluate whether you prioritize a hotel-specific POS with broad integrations or a more restaurant-focused management system.
Mews POS is a dedicated hotel restaurant POS designed to unify operational tasks, while Torqus offers a comprehensive restaurant management suite. Which product will better streamline your property’s F&B services and support your growth?
Mews POS caters specifically to hotels seeking a unified system that integrates seamlessly with PMS, simplifying billing and reservations. Its main strength lies in its ability to connect front-desk, F&B, and payment processes into a single platform, reducing manual errors.
Torqus, on the other hand, is more focused on restaurant management, offering modules like inventory, supply chain, and customer engagement, but it lacks clear hotel-specific integrations. For a hotel that needs an all-in-one solution, Mews POS’s dedicated design makes it the stronger choice; for standalone restaurant chains or properties with complex F&B needs, Torqus might be more suited.
Furthermore, Mews outperforms Torqus in recent reviews, with 156 reviews over the last six months and a high likelihood to recommend (95%), compared to no recent or detailed feedback for Torqus. Mews’s high ratings in ease of use, support, and overall value reinforce this lead.
If your hotel prioritizes a POS system embedded within an integrated property management ecosystem, go with Mews POS. Its ability to post charges directly to guest rooms, automate workflows, and connect with a broad partner network makes it ideal for hotels looking to streamline operations and enhance guest experiences.
If your hotel or restaurant group needs a dedicated restaurant management platform that handles inventory, supply chain, and customer relations independently of PMS, Torqus could be beneficial. However, given the lack of recent reviews and limited global presence, Mews’s well-supported, hotel-specific ecosystem gives it a decisive edge.
For hotels that want a proven, all-in-one hospitality POS, Mews remains the more dependable choice. Meanwhile, Torqus might appeal to operations where restaurant management is a standalone focus, not tightly integrated with hotel systems.
Mews POS has a user rating of 4.74/5 based on extensive recent feedback, with users praising its modern, intuitive interface and smooth onboarding process. Reviewers highlight that staff can be trained quickly due to its straightforward design and cross-device usability, making staff adoption seamless.
In contrast, Torqus offers no recent ratings or reviews, limiting insight into its user experience. Without user feedback, it's difficult to judge ease of use, but the absence suggests it may lack the refinement and clarity found in Mews.
Edge: Mews
Mews POS boasts 29 unique features tailored specifically for hotel restaurant operations, including PCI compliance, digital menus, self-service table ordering, integrated kitchen display, inventory management, recipe costing, loyalty programs, and detailed reporting tools.
Torqus, while comprehensive for restaurant management, offers no detailed feature list or unique capabilities in the source material. Its modules include POS, inventory, supply chain, and CRM, but without the breadth or hotel-specific functions seen in Mews.
Edge: Mews
Mews’s support and onboarding ratings are solid, at 4.43/5 and 4.39/5 respectively, with recent reviews praising their reliable and solution-oriented service. Users mention that onboarding is well-structured, and the support team responds promptly, easing the implementation process.
Torqus provides no recent reviews or support ratings, making it impossible to assess its customer service quality. Given the importance of support during deployment and ongoing use, Mews’s proven track record makes it the safer choice here.
Edge: Mews
Mews offers a highly extensive network with 336 verified partners, including Criton, Right Revenue, Sage, Orange Hotel Marketing, and more. These integrations cover PMS, property tech, revenue management, and marketing, enabling a connected hotel ecosystem.
Torqus, with no listed integrations, appears limited in connectivity. Its platform seems more focused on in-house restaurant management without external system integration support.
Edge: Mews
Mews has accumulated 156 reviews in the last six months, with a 95% likelihood to recommend, reflecting high satisfaction across various hotel segments, especially boutique, city center, and hostels. Reviewers emphasize its ease of use, support quality, and operational efficiency gains.
Torqus has no recent reviews or ratings available, making it impossible to determine hoteliers’ satisfaction level. The strong recent feedback for Mews makes it the clear leader for hoteliers seeking proven, positive experiences.
Edge: Mews
Mews’s pricing starts at $200 per month, with no free tier or trial indicated. This flat rate provides predictable budgeting for hotels.
Torqus’s pricing details are not available, which complicates direct comparison. Lack of transparent pricing makes it difficult to evaluate value, but Mews’s clear costs and proven ROI ratings suggest good value for hotel properties.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if:
Mews POS is a hotel-oriented POS solution with a proven track record, extensive integrations, and high user ratings. Its design supports unified hospitality operations, making it the safer choice for most hotels.
Torqus, while strong as a restaurant management system, lacks recent reviews, hotel-specific features, and global presence. It is better suited for standalone restaurant operations rather than integrated hotel environments.
For hotels seeking a reliable, all-in-one POS system that enhances guest experience and streamlines workflows, Mews POS remains the recommended option. Torqus may serve niche restaurant-focused needs but isn't the best fit for a comprehensive hotel operation.
La tarification des Systèmes de point de vente hôteliers est rarement simple. Voici ce que nous savons a partir des donnees tarifaires publiques de chaque fournisseur. Demandez toujours un devis personnalise pour la taille de votre etablissement.
|
|
Torqus | |
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $200/mo | — |
Selon la base de donnees produits de HTR, Mews POS et Torqus partagent 0 fonctionnalites. Voici les differences cles — les fonctionnalites que l'un possede et que l'autre n'a pas.
| Fonctionnalite |
|
Torqus |
|---|---|---|
| Conforme PCI | ||
| Fractionnement des chèques | ||
| Menus numériques | ||
| Rapports de journal de paiement | ||
| Réductions et promotions | ||
| Vente incitative |
Affichage des principales differences. 17 fonctionnalites supplementaires different entre ces produits.
Nous avons analyse 8 etudes de cas verifiees pour comparer ce que les hotels obtiennent reellement avec chaque plateforme sur quatre objectifs commerciaux cles.
"We’ve been with Mews for a few years now and it helped to transform the way we operate. It’s very intuitive to work with and saves our team so much time."
Aucune etude de cas publiee pour cet objectif pour le moment.
"In an industry where human contact is more important than digital contact, having a platform like Mews that not only reduces time at a screen but also gives us more face time with..."
Aucune etude de cas publiee pour cet objectif pour le moment.
"Self-check-in kiosks are integral to LyLo's DNA. Coupled with Mews capabilities like guest messaging and online check-out, they form the essence of our guest experience. In fact, t..."
Aucune etude de cas publiee pour cet objectif pour le moment.
Ce que les hoteliers apprecient
L'interface de Mews est décrite comme moderne et intuitive, facilitant une navigation fluide. Cependant, certains avis suggèrent des améliorations con... L'interface de Mews est décrite comme moderne et intuitive, facilitant une navigation fluide. Cependant, certains avis suggèrent des améliorations concernant la complexité et la flexibilité des outils de reporting, notamment pour les configurations multi-établissements et l'analyse opérationnelle détaillée.
Mews provides strong connectivity with various third-party systems like channel managers and payment gateways. These integrations facilitate centraliz... Mews provides strong connectivity with various third-party systems like channel managers and payment gateways. These integrations facilitate centralized operations, real-time booking management, and accurate financial reporting, although occasional synchronization issues are noted.
Reviews highlight Mews' outstanding integration between its POS and PMS, allowing direct posting of charges to guest rooms and synchronized guest data... Reviews highlight Mews' outstanding integration between its POS and PMS, allowing direct posting of charges to guest rooms and synchronized guest data. This integration is praised for improving billing accuracy, reducing departmental friction, and enhancing guest service experience by personalizing interactions.
Les points de friction pour les hoteliers
Mews' commitment to developing new features and evolving its product is seen positively. Users appreciate its openness to feedback, though there is a... Mews' commitment to developing new features and evolving its product is seen positively. Users appreciate its openness to feedback, though there is a need for more polished features and quicker implementation of user suggestions.
La plateforme est appréciée pour ses options de personnalisation, permettant des flux de travail et des alertes sur mesure afin d'améliorer l'expérien... La plateforme est appréciée pour ses options de personnalisation, permettant des flux de travail et des alertes sur mesure afin d'améliorer l'expérience client. Cependant, les utilisateurs expriment également le besoin de fonctionnalités de personnalisation plus intuitives pour répondre à des besoins opérationnels spécifiques et aux interactions avec les clients.
Fonctionnalites uniques
Ou les notes divergent le plus
Cela depend de vos besoins. Mews POS et Torqus partagent de nombreuses fonctionnalites Hotel POS Systems de base, mais chacun a des capacites uniques. Mews POS propose 335 partenaires d'integration verifies, tandis que Torqus en propose 0. Consultez la comparaison des fonctionnalites ci-dessus pour voir les differences avant de changer.
Les petits hotels devraient privilegier la facilite d'utilisation et une mise en service rapide. Mews POS est en tete pour la facilite d'utilisation avec 4.7/5 contre 0.0/5. Recherchez une tarification transparente et une option d'essai ou de demonstration. Filtrez les avis sur chaque page produit par taille d'etablissement pour lire les retours d'hotels similaires au votre.
Mews POS : Non. Torqus : Non. Aucun des deux produits ne propose actuellement d'offre gratuite. La plupart des fournisseurs Hotel POS Systems proposent des demonstrations ou des essais — demandez-en un a chacun pour evaluer avant de vous engager.
Le HT Score est un classement composite qui prend en compte 4 groupes de criteres et plus d'une douzaine de variables pour aider les hoteliers a comparer objectivement les produits technologiques hoteliers. Mews a un HT Score de 100 et Torqus a 0. Voici comment le score est calcule.
| Groupe de criteres | Ponderation | Ce qu'il mesure |
|---|---|---|
| Notes et avis clients |
|
A quel point les utilisateurs recommandent-ils ce produit ? Score des notes, Volume d'avis, Part de voix, Profondeur des avis, Recence des avis, Etudes de cas ▾ Le facteur le plus fortement pondere. Analyse les notes de satisfaction moyennes (probabilite de recommandation, facilite d'utilisation, support, ROI), le nombre total d'avis par rapport aux pairs de la categorie, la recence des avis (au moins 20 avis sur les 6 derniers mois) et la part de voix parmi les clients hoteliers uniques pour detecter les biais de selection. |
| Ecosysteme partenaire |
|
A quel point les partenaires technologiques recommandent-ils cette entreprise ? Recommandations des partenaires, Nombre d'integrations, Qualite des integrations ▾ Evalue les recommandations des partenaires comme des votes de confiance d'experts, le nombre d'integrations verifiees et la qualite de l'ecosysteme — la moyenne des HT Scores des partenaires d'integration. Les produits avec des ecosystemes d'integration de meilleure qualite sont plus susceptibles de fournir un ensemble technologique connecte. |
| Orientation client |
|
A quel point cette organisation est-elle orientee client ? Support certifie, Regularite des avis, Completude du profil ▾ Evalue si l'entreprise a obtenu la certification HTR de support client, maintient une collecte d'avis reguliere dans le temps (un indicateur de culture axee sur le feedback) et tient a jour les profils produits avec les fonctionnalites, captures d'ecran, tarifs et caracteristiques. |
| Portee, perennite et ressources |
|
Quelle est l'etendue de la portee et des ressources de cette entreprise ? Portee geographique, Perennite, Ressources de l'entreprise, Score de tendance ▾ Mesure la presence mondiale (pays et regions desservis), les annees d'activite comme indicateur de stabilite, les effectifs comme indicateur de ressources, et un score de tendance base sur les demandes d'acheteurs, les avis, les recommandations de partenaires et l'activite presse des douze derniers mois. |
Les notes et avis clients sont de loin le facteur le plus important dans l'algorithme du HT Score. HTR n'accepte aucun paiement pour un meilleur classement. Tous les avis sont verifies — seuls les professionnels du secteur hotelier avec des affiliations confirmees peuvent soumettre des notes. Voir la methodologie complete du HT Score →
Conseiller en recommandations de produits