The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
Nous avons analyse 892 avis verifies d'hoteliers, compare les fonctionnalites, les tarifs et des etudes de cas reelles pour identifier les points forts de chaque plateforme. Le bon choix depend du type de votre etablissement et de vos priorites :
Mews se distingue en matiere de ease of use — en particulier pour les etablissements independent (4.9/5) , avec des fonctionnalites exclusives comme Guest CRM and Guest profiles.
Prostay se distingue en customer support and ROI , avec des fonctionnalites exclusives comme On premise.
Notes comparees basees sur 892 avis verifies d'hoteliers sur HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Probabilite de recommandation |
|
|
| Facilite d'utilisation |
|
|
| Support client |
|
|
| Rapport qualite-prix |
|
|
| Prix de depart | From $900/mo | From $600/mo |
| Avis verifies | 887 | 5 |
Apres analyse de 892 avis verifies, les utilisateurs de Mews apprecient surtout ease of use, automation and integrations, customizability and flexibility, tandis que ceux de Prostay mettent en avant . Cliquez sur un theme pour voir ce que disent les evaluateurs.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Avantages | |
|
+
Ease of Use
▾
|
|
|
+
Automation and Integrations
▾
|
|
|
+
Customizability and Flexibility
▾
|
|
|
+
Intégration et soutien
▾
|
|
| Inconvenients | |
|
−
Billing and Invoicing
▾
|
|
|
−
Rapports et analyses
▾
|
|
|
−
Multi-Property Management
▾
|
|
Comment chaque produit se classe parmi les fournisseurs Systèmes de gestion immobilière pour differentes tailles d'etablissements, types et regions — base sur les avis verifies d'hoteliers dans chaque segment.
Par taille d'hotel
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Petit (10-24 chambres) ▾ | #3 329 avis | #48 5 avis |
| Moyen (25-74 chambres) ▾ | #1 397 avis | #67 0 avis |
| Grand (75-199 chambres) ▾ | #3 45 avis | — |
| Tres grand (200+ chambres) ▾ | #3 49 avis | — |
Par type d'etablissement
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #1 483 avis | #54 3 avis |
| Luxe ▾ | #5 220 avis | — |
| Enseigne / Chaine ▾ | #2 170 avis | #62 1 avis |
| Sejour prolonge ▾ | #1 130 avis | — |
Par region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Amerique du Nord ▾ | #8 106 avis | #49 0 avis |
| Europe ▾ | #1 660 avis | #48 1 avis |
| Asie-Pacifique ▾ | #10 17 avis | #15 4 avis |
| Moyen-Orient ▾ | #28 8 avis | — |
Choosing between Mews PMS and Prostay hinges on your hotel’s specific needs, operational scale, and preferred technology approach. Both systems promise to streamline hotel management, but Mews offers a proven track record with a larger user base, more recent reviews, and broader integrations. Prostay, while promising, has a significantly smaller footprint and less recent feedback, making Mews the safer choice for most hoteliers.
Are you looking for a trusted, well-established PMS with extensive features and integrations, or is a smaller, potentially more customizable system right for your property?
Mews and Prostay aim to simplify hotel operations, but Mews’s extensive review base and recent user feedback provide it with a sharper competitive edge. Mews excels in automating tasks from reservations to billing, supported by a cloud-native platform that is praised for its ease of use and wide-ranging integrations, including over 336 verified partners.
Prostay, on the other hand, touts an all-in-one approach with optional on-premise deployment and a proprietary POS. However, with only five reviews and no recent feedback, its practical reliability and user satisfaction remain less certain. Is your hotel looking for a system with proven stability and a broad ecosystem?
If your hotel needs a platform with proven scalability, extensive integrations, and a large community of active users, go with Mews. It is ideal for boutique hotels, hostels, and small chains seeking a flexible, cloud-based system supported by a global presence and a 4.62/5 overall rating backed by 758 reviews.
If your hotel requires a local or on-premise solution with integrated POS and proprietary messaging, and you’re comfortable with a smaller ecosystem, Prostay might seem attractive. But keep in mind, its limited verified partners and lack of recent reviews suggest less confidence in its current robustness. For most properties, Mews’s larger footprint and proven performance make it the safer bet.
Based on current ratings, Mews scores 4.7/5 for ease of use, supported by 98 recent reviews, while Prostay scores slightly higher at 4.8/5 with zero recent reviews. Mews’s interface is widely praised for being modern, intuitive, and flexible, with a straightforward onboarding process that many users describe as smooth, despite some reports of initial setup hurdles.
Prostay’s user friendliness is less documented, although the few available reviews highlight its well-thought flows and speed of staff training. However, with limited recent feedback, the real-world adoption experience remains less clear. Edge: Prostay.
Mews offers 35 shared features with other PMSs, plus an additional 24 features unique to its platform, such as multi-lingual support, guest CRM, group reservations, online check-in/out, and integrated ID scanning. Prostay, with only 2 verified unique features—on-premise deployment and spa & wellness module—lacks the breadth of options.
While Prostay’s integrated messaging and channel management are promising, Mews’s extensive feature set, including automation, guest communication, and a large marketplace of third-party apps, gives it a decisive advantage. Edge: Mews.
Mews’s support scores 4.27/5 based on 758 reviews, with users noting prompt responses and a helpful support team, although some mention occasional bugs. Recent reviews praise Mews for its continuous updates and the availability of 24/7 premium support, with comments like, “Their support team sets new standards.”
Prostay claims a perfect 5/5 rating based on five reviews, but none are recent, calling into question the current level of support. Without recent feedback, it’s hard to judge if Prostay’s support can match Mews’s proven track record. Edge: Mews.
Mews receives a 4.62/5 overall rating from 758 reviews, with a recent review count of 98 in the last six months, reflecting ongoing user satisfaction. It scores particularly high among boutique hotels (4.91/5) and city center hotels (4.64/5), with many users praising its flexibility, automation, and integration ecosystem.
Prostay’s rating remains unverified beyond a handful of reviews, all of which are outdated or limited in scope. Its small user base and lack of recent feedback make it difficult to gauge current satisfaction. Clearly, Mews’s larger, active community earns it the higher ratings.
Edge: Mews.
Mews’s pricing starts at $900 per month without a trial, with no implementation fee or freemium options. Prostay’s base price is $600 per month, also without a trial, but lacks transparency about additional costs or optional upgrades.
While Prostay appears more affordable at first glance, the absence of detailed pricing and limited information about add-on costs make it harder to assess value. Mews’s transparent, tiered pricing aligns with its extensive feature set and proven support.
Edge: Mews.
Mews stands out as the more validated, feature-rich, and widely supported PMS, with a large, active user base and recent positive reviews. It offers a comprehensive suite of automation, integrations, and guest management tools, making it well-suited for properties of all sizes that prioritize scalability and innovation.
Prostay, while offering some useful features like offline access and integrated messaging, lacks recent validation and a broad ecosystem. It may appeal to smaller properties or those with specific on-premise needs but carries less confidence overall.
Choose Mews if you want a proven, well-supported solution that keeps pace with hospitality innovations. Opt for Prostay only if your property’s requirements align closely with its limited but focused features and you’re comfortable with less market validation.
La tarification des Systèmes de gestion immobilière est rarement simple. Voici ce que nous savons a partir des donnees tarifaires publiques de chaque fournisseur. Demandez toujours un devis personnalise pour la taille de votre etablissement.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $900/mo | From $600/mo |
Selon la base de donnees produits de HTR, Mews PMS et Prostay partagent 35 fonctionnalites. Voici les differences cles — les fonctionnalites que l'un possede et que l'autre n'a pas.
| Fonctionnalite |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Audit de nuit automatisé | ||
| CRM invité | ||
| Fonctionnalité de groupe | ||
| Module Spa & Bien-être | ||
| Multi-devise | ||
| Multilingue | ||
| Profils d'invités | ||
| Sur place |
Affichage des principales differences. 14 fonctionnalites supplementaires different entre ces produits.
Nous avons analyse 8 etudes de cas verifiees pour comparer ce que les hotels obtiennent reellement avec chaque plateforme sur quatre objectifs commerciaux cles.
"It was vital for us to find a hospitality cloud that would give us the freedom to innovate and move quickly with new technology – that’s one of the main reasons we chose Mews."
Aucune etude de cas publiee pour cet objectif pour le moment.
"Since moving to Mews, we can be so much more agile in how we operate, both in terms of how we engage with guests and testing out new integrations and tools through Mews Marketplace..."
Aucune etude de cas publiee pour cet objectif pour le moment.
"We want to provide the best hospitality for guests anywhere in the country, and Mews is definitely the right solution to help us achieve that goal."
Aucune etude de cas publiee pour cet objectif pour le moment.
Ce que les hoteliers apprecient
Many reviews highlight the user-friendliness of Mews, citing its intuitive interface that simplifies tasks across various hotel operations. Users find... Many reviews highlight the user-friendliness of Mews, citing its intuitive interface that simplifies tasks across various hotel operations. Users find the platform easy to navigate, which aids in quicker team onboarding and daily use.
Reviews frequently praise Mews for its automation of routine tasks like check-in, billing, and invoicing, reducing manual workload and minimizing erro... Reviews frequently praise Mews for its automation of routine tasks like check-in, billing, and invoicing, reducing manual workload and minimizing errors. Users appreciate the extensive integration options with other tools, which streamline overall operations and enhance efficiency.
Mews allows customization to fit diverse business needs, from rate structures to integration setups. Users appreciate this flexibility, although they... Mews allows customization to fit diverse business needs, from rate structures to integration setups. Users appreciate this flexibility, although they note room for improvement in adapting complex booking conditions and enhancing user-friendly navigation for settings.
Les points de friction pour les hoteliers
Users point out that while Mews offers efficient billing processes, there are complexities and areas needing improvement, such as handling group billi... Users point out that while Mews offers efficient billing processes, there are complexities and areas needing improvement, such as handling group billings, splits, and providing more customizable invoice formats. This can affect the ease of financial operations within the system.
Bien que Mews offre des fonctionnalités de reporting et d'analyse performantes, plusieurs avis soulignent le besoin de fonctionnalités de reporting pl... Bien que Mews offre des fonctionnalités de reporting et d'analyse performantes, plusieurs avis soulignent le besoin de fonctionnalités de reporting plus personnalisables et flexibles. Les utilisateurs souhaitent des analyses de données plus fines, notamment en matière de réservations et de revenus.
Mieux classe pour
Fonctionnalites uniques
Fonctionnalites uniques
Ou les notes divergent le plus
Cela depend de vos besoins. Mews PMS et Prostay partagent de nombreuses fonctionnalites Property Management Systems de base, mais chacun a des capacites uniques. Mews PMS propose 335 partenaires d'integration verifies, tandis que Prostay en propose 2. Consultez la comparaison des fonctionnalites ci-dessus pour voir les differences avant de changer.
Les petits hotels devraient privilegier la facilite d'utilisation et une mise en service rapide. Prostay est en tete pour la facilite d'utilisation avec 4.8/5 contre 4.7/5. Recherchez une tarification transparente et une option d'essai ou de demonstration. Filtrez les avis sur chaque page produit par taille d'etablissement pour lire les retours d'hotels similaires au votre.
Mews PMS : Non. Prostay : Non. Aucun des deux produits ne propose actuellement d'offre gratuite. La plupart des fournisseurs Property Management Systems proposent des demonstrations ou des essais — demandez-en un a chacun pour evaluer avant de vous engager.
Le HT Score est un classement composite qui prend en compte 4 groupes de criteres et plus d'une douzaine de variables pour aider les hoteliers a comparer objectivement les produits technologiques hoteliers. Mews a un HT Score de 100 et Prostay a 0. Voici comment le score est calcule.
| Groupe de criteres | Ponderation | Ce qu'il mesure |
|---|---|---|
| Notes et avis clients |
|
A quel point les utilisateurs recommandent-ils ce produit ? Score des notes, Volume d'avis, Part de voix, Profondeur des avis, Recence des avis, Etudes de cas ▾ Le facteur le plus fortement pondere. Analyse les notes de satisfaction moyennes (probabilite de recommandation, facilite d'utilisation, support, ROI), le nombre total d'avis par rapport aux pairs de la categorie, la recence des avis (au moins 20 avis sur les 6 derniers mois) et la part de voix parmi les clients hoteliers uniques pour detecter les biais de selection. |
| Ecosysteme partenaire |
|
A quel point les partenaires technologiques recommandent-ils cette entreprise ? Recommandations des partenaires, Nombre d'integrations, Qualite des integrations ▾ Evalue les recommandations des partenaires comme des votes de confiance d'experts, le nombre d'integrations verifiees et la qualite de l'ecosysteme — la moyenne des HT Scores des partenaires d'integration. Les produits avec des ecosystemes d'integration de meilleure qualite sont plus susceptibles de fournir un ensemble technologique connecte. |
| Orientation client |
|
A quel point cette organisation est-elle orientee client ? Support certifie, Regularite des avis, Completude du profil ▾ Evalue si l'entreprise a obtenu la certification HTR de support client, maintient une collecte d'avis reguliere dans le temps (un indicateur de culture axee sur le feedback) et tient a jour les profils produits avec les fonctionnalites, captures d'ecran, tarifs et caracteristiques. |
| Portee, perennite et ressources |
|
Quelle est l'etendue de la portee et des ressources de cette entreprise ? Portee geographique, Perennite, Ressources de l'entreprise, Score de tendance ▾ Mesure la presence mondiale (pays et regions desservis), les annees d'activite comme indicateur de stabilite, les effectifs comme indicateur de ressources, et un score de tendance base sur les demandes d'acheteurs, les avis, les recommandations de partenaires et l'activite presse des douze derniers mois. |
Les notes et avis clients sont de loin le facteur le plus important dans l'algorithme du HT Score. HTR n'accepte aucun paiement pour un meilleur classement. Tous les avis sont verifies — seuls les professionnels du secteur hotelier avec des affiliations confirmees peuvent soumettre des notes. Voir la methodologie complete du HT Score →
Conseiller en recommandations de produits