The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
Nous avons analyse 887 avis verifies d'hoteliers, compare les fonctionnalites, les tarifs et des etudes de cas reelles pour identifier les points forts de chaque plateforme. Le bon choix depend du type de votre etablissement et de vos priorites :
Mews se distingue en ease of use and customer support — en particulier pour les etablissements independent (4.9/5) , avec des fonctionnalites exclusives comme Guest CRM and Guest profiles.
Rentlio se distingue , avec des fonctionnalites exclusives comme On premise.
Notes comparees basees sur 887 avis verifies d'hoteliers sur HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Probabilite de recommandation |
|
|
| Facilite d'utilisation |
|
|
| Support client |
|
|
| Rapport qualite-prix |
|
|
| Prix de depart | From $900/mo | From $1,500/mo |
| Avis verifies | 887 | 0 |
Apres analyse de 887 avis verifies, les utilisateurs de Mews apprecient surtout ease of use, automation and integrations, customizability and flexibility, tandis que ceux de Rentlio mettent en avant . Cliquez sur un theme pour voir ce que disent les evaluateurs.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Avantages | |
|
+
Ease of Use
▾
|
|
|
+
Automation and Integrations
▾
|
|
|
+
Customizability and Flexibility
▾
|
|
|
+
Intégration et soutien
▾
|
|
| Inconvenients | |
|
−
Billing and Invoicing
▾
|
|
|
−
Rapports et analyses
▾
|
|
|
−
Multi-Property Management
▾
|
|
Comment chaque produit se classe parmi les fournisseurs Systèmes de gestion immobilière pour differentes tailles d'etablissements, types et regions — base sur les avis verifies d'hoteliers dans chaque segment.
Par taille d'hotel
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Petit (10-24 chambres) ▾ | #3 329 avis | — |
| Moyen (25-74 chambres) ▾ | #1 397 avis | — |
| Grand (75-199 chambres) ▾ | #3 45 avis | — |
| Tres grand (200+ chambres) ▾ | #3 49 avis | — |
Par type d'etablissement
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #1 483 avis | — |
| Luxe ▾ | #5 220 avis | — |
| Enseigne / Chaine ▾ | #2 170 avis | — |
| Sejour prolonge ▾ | #1 130 avis | — |
Par region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Amerique du Nord ▾ | #8 106 avis | — |
| Europe ▾ | #1 660 avis | — |
| Asie-Pacifique ▾ | #10 17 avis | — |
| Moyen-Orient ▾ | #28 8 avis | — |
Choosing between Mews PMS and Rentlio involves weighing a product with extensive reviews and proven performance against a less-reviewed but potentially simpler alternative. Mews, with over 750 reviews and a 4.62/5 overall rating, offers a comprehensive cloud-based system designed to boost operational efficiency and guest satisfaction. Rentlio, while promising, currently lacks review data and user feedback, making it difficult to assess its real-world performance. Which system aligns best with your hotel’s needs?
Mews and Rentlio aim to streamline hotel operations, but they diverge significantly in maturity and feature breadth. Mews offers a broad suite of functionalities, over 336 integrations, and a robust ecosystem, while Rentlio’s capabilities are more limited, with only 11 verified partners. Mews’s recent reviews highlight its ease of use, extensive automation, and high user satisfaction, whereas Rentlio’s lack of recent reviews leaves its effectiveness unverified.
Given Mews’s proven track record, large user base, and ongoing support, it better addresses the needs of hotels seeking a dependable, scalable PMS. Rentlio’s limited review presence suggests it may still be evolving, and its actual performance in complex hotel environments remains untested. Are you comfortable taking a risk on a less-reviewed product?
If your hotel needs a mature, feature-rich system that supports multi-property management, automation, and extensive integrations, go with Mews. Its proven track record, high review count, and recent positive feedback demonstrate it can meet diverse operational needs. If, however, your hotel or management team is looking for a budget-friendly, straightforward solution and is willing to accept limited proven capabilities, Rentlio might seem appealing—but its lack of recent data makes this uncertain.
For hotels that prioritize scalability, automation, and extensive third-party integrations, Mews is the clear choice. Rentlio may appeal to smaller or less complex operations, but without current reviews, its reliability and feature set remain unverified.
Mews’s ease of use is well-documented, with a 4.7/5 ratings based on 758 reviews and recent feedback from hotels praising its intuitive, modern interface. Users highlight its quick onboarding, simple reservation dashboards, and user-friendly mobile and tablet apps. Rentlio’s current review data is nonexistent, so its usability remains an untested variable.
Given the extensive positive feedback and high ratings, Mews’s interface is designed for straightforward adoption by staff at all levels. Rentlio’s ease of use cannot be confidently assessed at this time; without reviews or user feedback, it’s challenging to determine whether it simplifies or complicates daily operations.
Edge: Mews.
Mews boasts 35 shared features with Rentlio but surpasses it with 24 unique capabilities. These include multi-lingual support, multi-currency management, guest CRM, integrated CRS, guest messaging, digital registration, kiosk check-in, automated space optimization, employee shift planning, and PCI compliance, among others. Rentlio’s only exclusive feature is on-premise deployment, which limits cloud-based flexibility.
Mews’s extensive feature set caters to diverse hotel types, from boutique to large-scale properties, with advanced automation and guest engagement tools. Rentlio’s narrower feature scope and lack of recent updates may restrict its utility for modern, tech-driven hotels.
Edge: Mews.
Mews’s support ratings stand at 4.27/5, based on numerous recent reviews praising its responsiveness, onboarding assistance, and proactive problem-solving. Users often mention that Mews’s support team sets a high standard, with some noting occasional bugs but rapid resolution. Rentlio’s support data isn’t available, making it impossible to compare support quality or responsiveness.
Given Mews’s proven support performance and recent positive reviews, your team can expect reliable assistance. Rentlio’s lack of recent support ratings suggests uncertainty about its post-sale service quality.
Edge: Mews.
Mews offers a verified network of 336 partners, including popular integrations like Stripe, PriceLabs, Criton, and many others, supporting extensive customization. Rentlio has only 11 verified partners, with just 10 shared with Mews, and a single unique partner, Qualpro. The large integration ecosystem in Mews supports complex automation and diverse operational needs.
For hotels seeking a flexible, interconnected system, Mews’s vast partner network is a major advantage. Rentlio’s limited integrations restrict its ability to connect with key third-party tools and expand functionalities.
Edge: Mews.
Mews’s recent reviews reflect a 4.62/5 overall rating, with hotels of various sizes and segments praising its ease of use, automation, and support. Hotels in boutique, city-center, and hostel segments rate it particularly highly, often citing it as transformative. Rentlio, lacking recent reviews, has no verifiable ratings or hotel feedback to compare.
With nearly 100 recent reviews, Mews’s high rating and positive comment volume demonstrate consistent user satisfaction. Rentlio’s untested reputation leaves hoteliers without data to gauge its performance or compare experiences.
Edge: Mews.
Mews’s pricing starts at $900 per month, with no mention of freemium plans or implementation fees. Rentlio’s pricing is listed at $1,500 per month, also without free tiers or trial information. The higher price point of Rentlio may reflect its more limited feature set or smaller company size.
Given the transparent pricing and detailed data, Mews’s cost appears competitive for its feature-rich platform. Rentlio’s higher listed price without clear added value makes it less attractive from a cost perspective.
Not ideal if:
Edge: Mews.
Not ideal if:
Given the current lack of reviews and detailed feature info, Rentlio’s suitability remains unverified for larger or more complex hotels.
Edge: Mews.
Mews offers a mature, feature-rich, and extensively supported PMS with a proven track record, a vast ecosystem of integrations, and high user satisfaction. Its recent reviews highlight its ease of use, automation, and scalability, making it ideal for diverse hotel types and sizes. Rentlio, while potentially suitable for small, straightforward properties, lacks recent performance data and user feedback, which diminishes confidence in its capabilities.
If your hotel values reliability, extensive features, and proven performance, Mews is the clear choice. Rentlio may appeal if your operations are simple, and you prefer a system with a smaller footprint—though its unverified status warrants caution.
In conclusion, for most hotels seeking a dependable, future-proof PMS, Mews remains the stronger option based on recent reviews, feature set, and support quality. Rentlio’s current limited data suggests it’s best to monitor its development before making a migration decision.
La tarification des Systèmes de gestion immobilière est rarement simple. Voici ce que nous savons a partir des donnees tarifaires publiques de chaque fournisseur. Demandez toujours un devis personnalise pour la taille de votre etablissement.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $900/mo | From $1,500/mo |
Selon la base de donnees produits de HTR, Mews PMS et Rentlio partagent 35 fonctionnalites. Voici les differences cles — les fonctionnalites que l'un possede et que l'autre n'a pas.
| Fonctionnalite |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Assistance en ligne 24h/24 et 7j/7 | ||
| CRM invité | ||
| Multi-devise | ||
| Multilingue | ||
| Profils d'invités | ||
| Sur place | ||
| Épopée |
Affichage des principales differences. 13 fonctionnalites supplementaires different entre ces produits.
Nous avons analyse 8 etudes de cas verifiees pour comparer ce que les hotels obtiennent reellement avec chaque plateforme sur quatre objectifs commerciaux cles.
"It was vital for us to find a hospitality cloud that would give us the freedom to innovate and move quickly with new technology – that’s one of the main reasons we chose Mews."
Aucune etude de cas publiee pour cet objectif pour le moment.
"Since moving to Mews, we can be so much more agile in how we operate, both in terms of how we engage with guests and testing out new integrations and tools through Mews Marketplace..."
Aucune etude de cas publiee pour cet objectif pour le moment.
"We want to provide the best hospitality for guests anywhere in the country, and Mews is definitely the right solution to help us achieve that goal."
Aucune etude de cas publiee pour cet objectif pour le moment.
Ce que les hoteliers apprecient
Many reviews highlight the user-friendliness of Mews, citing its intuitive interface that simplifies tasks across various hotel operations. Users find... Many reviews highlight the user-friendliness of Mews, citing its intuitive interface that simplifies tasks across various hotel operations. Users find the platform easy to navigate, which aids in quicker team onboarding and daily use.
Reviews frequently praise Mews for its automation of routine tasks like check-in, billing, and invoicing, reducing manual workload and minimizing erro... Reviews frequently praise Mews for its automation of routine tasks like check-in, billing, and invoicing, reducing manual workload and minimizing errors. Users appreciate the extensive integration options with other tools, which streamline overall operations and enhance efficiency.
Mews allows customization to fit diverse business needs, from rate structures to integration setups. Users appreciate this flexibility, although they... Mews allows customization to fit diverse business needs, from rate structures to integration setups. Users appreciate this flexibility, although they note room for improvement in adapting complex booking conditions and enhancing user-friendly navigation for settings.
Les points de friction pour les hoteliers
Users point out that while Mews offers efficient billing processes, there are complexities and areas needing improvement, such as handling group billi... Users point out that while Mews offers efficient billing processes, there are complexities and areas needing improvement, such as handling group billings, splits, and providing more customizable invoice formats. This can affect the ease of financial operations within the system.
Bien que Mews offre des fonctionnalités de reporting et d'analyse performantes, plusieurs avis soulignent le besoin de fonctionnalités de reporting pl... Bien que Mews offre des fonctionnalités de reporting et d'analyse performantes, plusieurs avis soulignent le besoin de fonctionnalités de reporting plus personnalisables et flexibles. Les utilisateurs souhaitent des analyses de données plus fines, notamment en matière de réservations et de revenus.
Fonctionnalites uniques
Fonctionnalites uniques
Ou les notes divergent le plus
Cela depend de vos besoins. Mews PMS et Rentlio partagent de nombreuses fonctionnalites Property Management Systems de base, mais chacun a des capacites uniques. Mews PMS propose 335 partenaires d'integration verifies, tandis que Rentlio en propose 11. Consultez la comparaison des fonctionnalites ci-dessus pour voir les differences avant de changer.
Les petits hotels devraient privilegier la facilite d'utilisation et une mise en service rapide. Mews PMS est en tete pour la facilite d'utilisation avec 4.7/5 contre 0.0/5. Recherchez une tarification transparente et une option d'essai ou de demonstration. Filtrez les avis sur chaque page produit par taille d'etablissement pour lire les retours d'hotels similaires au votre.
Mews PMS : Non. Rentlio : Non. Aucun des deux produits ne propose actuellement d'offre gratuite. La plupart des fournisseurs Property Management Systems proposent des demonstrations ou des essais — demandez-en un a chacun pour evaluer avant de vous engager.
Le HT Score est un classement composite qui prend en compte 4 groupes de criteres et plus d'une douzaine de variables pour aider les hoteliers a comparer objectivement les produits technologiques hoteliers. Mews a un HT Score de 100 et Rentlio a 0. Voici comment le score est calcule.
| Groupe de criteres | Ponderation | Ce qu'il mesure |
|---|---|---|
| Notes et avis clients |
|
A quel point les utilisateurs recommandent-ils ce produit ? Score des notes, Volume d'avis, Part de voix, Profondeur des avis, Recence des avis, Etudes de cas ▾ Le facteur le plus fortement pondere. Analyse les notes de satisfaction moyennes (probabilite de recommandation, facilite d'utilisation, support, ROI), le nombre total d'avis par rapport aux pairs de la categorie, la recence des avis (au moins 20 avis sur les 6 derniers mois) et la part de voix parmi les clients hoteliers uniques pour detecter les biais de selection. |
| Ecosysteme partenaire |
|
A quel point les partenaires technologiques recommandent-ils cette entreprise ? Recommandations des partenaires, Nombre d'integrations, Qualite des integrations ▾ Evalue les recommandations des partenaires comme des votes de confiance d'experts, le nombre d'integrations verifiees et la qualite de l'ecosysteme — la moyenne des HT Scores des partenaires d'integration. Les produits avec des ecosystemes d'integration de meilleure qualite sont plus susceptibles de fournir un ensemble technologique connecte. |
| Orientation client |
|
A quel point cette organisation est-elle orientee client ? Support certifie, Regularite des avis, Completude du profil ▾ Evalue si l'entreprise a obtenu la certification HTR de support client, maintient une collecte d'avis reguliere dans le temps (un indicateur de culture axee sur le feedback) et tient a jour les profils produits avec les fonctionnalites, captures d'ecran, tarifs et caracteristiques. |
| Portee, perennite et ressources |
|
Quelle est l'etendue de la portee et des ressources de cette entreprise ? Portee geographique, Perennite, Ressources de l'entreprise, Score de tendance ▾ Mesure la presence mondiale (pays et regions desservis), les annees d'activite comme indicateur de stabilite, les effectifs comme indicateur de ressources, et un score de tendance base sur les demandes d'acheteurs, les avis, les recommandations de partenaires et l'activite presse des douze derniers mois. |
Les notes et avis clients sont de loin le facteur le plus important dans l'algorithme du HT Score. HTR n'accepte aucun paiement pour un meilleur classement. Tous les avis sont verifies — seuls les professionnels du secteur hotelier avec des affiliations confirmees peuvent soumettre des notes. Voir la methodologie complete du HT Score →
Conseiller en recommandations de produits