The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
Nous avons analyse 887 avis verifies d'hoteliers, compare les fonctionnalites, les tarifs et des etudes de cas reelles pour identifier les points forts de chaque plateforme. Le bon choix depend du type de votre etablissement et de vos priorites :
Mews se distingue en ease of use and customer support — en particulier pour les etablissements independent (4.9/5) , avec des fonctionnalites exclusives comme Revenue management module and Guest CRM.
Yohobeds se distingue .
Notes comparees basees sur 887 avis verifies d'hoteliers sur HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Probabilite de recommandation |
|
|
| Facilite d'utilisation |
|
|
| Support client |
|
|
| Rapport qualite-prix |
|
|
| Prix de depart | From $900/mo | Contact sales |
| Avis verifies | 887 | 0 |
Apres analyse de 887 avis verifies, les utilisateurs de Mews apprecient surtout ease of use, automation and integrations, customizability and flexibility, tandis que ceux de Yohobeds mettent en avant . Cliquez sur un theme pour voir ce que disent les evaluateurs.
|
|
Yohobeds |
|---|---|
| Avantages | |
|
+
Ease of Use
▾
|
|
|
+
Automation and Integrations
▾
|
|
|
+
Customizability and Flexibility
▾
|
|
|
+
Intégration et soutien
▾
|
|
| Inconvenients | |
|
−
Billing and Invoicing
▾
|
|
|
−
Rapports et analyses
▾
|
|
|
−
Multi-Property Management
▾
|
|
Comment chaque produit se classe parmi les fournisseurs Systèmes de gestion immobilière pour differentes tailles d'etablissements, types et regions — base sur les avis verifies d'hoteliers dans chaque segment.
Par taille d'hotel
| Segment |
|
Yohobeds |
|---|---|---|
| Petit (10-24 chambres) ▾ | #3 329 avis | — |
| Moyen (25-74 chambres) ▾ | #1 397 avis | — |
| Grand (75-199 chambres) ▾ | #3 45 avis | — |
| Tres grand (200+ chambres) ▾ | #3 49 avis | — |
Par type d'etablissement
| Segment |
|
Yohobeds |
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #1 483 avis | — |
| Luxe ▾ | #5 220 avis | — |
| Enseigne / Chaine ▾ | #2 170 avis | — |
| Sejour prolonge ▾ | #1 130 avis | — |
Par region
| Segment |
|
Yohobeds |
|---|---|---|
| Amerique du Nord ▾ | #8 106 avis | — |
| Europe ▾ | #1 660 avis | — |
| Asie-Pacifique ▾ | #10 17 avis | — |
| Moyen-Orient ▾ | #28 8 avis | — |
Choosing between Mews PMS and Yohobeds hinges on your hotel’s specific needs and operational scale. While both aim to streamline property management, Mews offers a mature, feature-rich platform with extensive integrations and a large user base, making it the more reliable choice for most hoteliers. Yohobeds is a smaller, less documented PMS with limited reviews and features, which raises questions about its suitability for larger or more complex operations.
Given Mews’ broad regional presence, proven track record, and active user community, it addresses a wider range of hotel types and sizes. Yohobeds, with no recent reviews or detailed features, appears less established and less capable of supporting the demands of modern hotels comprehensively.
Mews scores an impressive 99.5 on the HotelTechReport (HTR) scale, backed by 758 reviews and recent feedback from over 98 hotels in the last six months—testament to its ongoing development and user satisfaction. Yohobeds, with zero reviews and no verified customer feedback, lacks the credibility and confidence that comes from proven performance.
If you prioritize stability, proven features, and a large ecosystem, Mews clearly leads. Yohobeds’s absence of recent reviews makes it a risky choice for hoteliers seeking reliable, supported technology.
Mews is a cloud-native system designed to serve hotels of all sizes, from boutique properties to large chains, emphasizing automation, integrations, and guest experience. Yohobeds presents itself as a PMS with potentially similar functionalities but offers no publicly available reviews, user feedback, or detailed feature set for comparison.
Mews’s extensive ecosystem—over 336 verified integrations—enables it to adapt to complex, multi-property operations, whereas Yohobeds’s capabilities are undefined in the public domain. This lack of transparency makes it harder to assess whether Yohobeds can meet the operational demands of your hotel.
Do you need a tried-and-true platform with a proven ecosystem? Or are you willing to risk unverified, unreviewed software with limited market presence?
Edge: Mews
If your hotel requires a mature, feature-rich PMS capable of supporting multi-property management, revenue optimization, and robust integrations, Mews is the clear choice. Its large user base and recent, positive reviews demonstrate its reliability and ability to scale.
If your hotel has extremely simple needs, operates in a very niche market, or if you’re simply exploring options without demanding comprehensive support, Yohobeds’s undefined capabilities might suffice—though this remains speculative given the lack of reviews and data.
For hotels seeking a dependable, extensively supported platform with proven results, Mews’s extensive feature set and client testimonials make it the safest pick. Yohobeds’s limited information and absence of recent expressions of customer satisfaction render it unsuitable for hotels prioritizing operational stability.
Edge: Mews
Mews boasts a 4.7/5 ease of use rating based on 758 reviews, with many users emphasizing its intuitive interface, straightforward onboarding, and low training overhead. Customers frequently mention that staff adoption is smooth, thanks to the modern design and comprehensive support.
Yohobeds offers no publicly available ratings or reviews, making it impossible to assess its user experience or onboarding process. Its lack of demonstrated ease of use or customer feedback is a significant drawback for hoteliers wanting a hassle-free implementation.
Edge: Mews
Mews offers over 59 unique features exclusive to its platform, including multi-lingual capabilities, revenue management modules, online check-in, guest CRM, integrated CRS, automation tools, and a guest app—covering nearly every operational aspect of modern hotel management.
Yohobeds provides no publicly documented features or differentiators, making it impossible to compare functionalities. Without verified data, it’s unclear whether Yohobeds can support advanced revenue management, integrations, or guest experience features.
For feature depth and proven capabilities, Mews is the clear winner. Yohobeds’s lack of transparency limits its appeal.
Edge: Mews
Mews maintains a customer support rating of 4.27/5 from 758 reviews, with recent praise for its responsiveness, onboarding assistance, and proactive support teams. Many users express confidence that Mews support team swiftly resolves issues, even when bugs occur.
Yohobeds has no available customer support ratings, user reviews, or testimonials, raising concerns about its responsiveness and post-sale support. The absence of documented customer feedback diminishes trust in Yohobeds’s ability to assist hotels effectively.
Edge: Mews
Mews offers 336 verified integrations with third-party systems, including channel managers, payment providers, revenue tools, and CRM systems. Its open API and extensive marketplace enable hotels to customize and expand their tech stacks significantly.
Yohobeds, with no verified integrations listed, appears limited or untested in terms of third-party connectivity. The lack of available integration data suggests it might not support the advanced ecosystem that modern hotels require.
For a flexible, connected environment, Mews is the superior choice. Yohobeds’s integration capabilities remain unverified.
Edge: Mews
Mews’s current review score of 4.62/5, with over 98 recent reviews, shows consistent satisfaction across diverse hotel segments, including boutique, city center, and hostel properties. Hotels frequently praise its ease of use, automation, and support, with comments like “Mews makes everything much easier” and “their support team sets new standards.”
Yohobeds has no recent reviews or ratings, making it impossible to gauge customer satisfaction or property-specific performance. The lack of feedback indicates a potential gap in user experience or market penetration.
Given the data, Mews’s high rating and active reviews clearly position it as the preferred choice among hoteliers.
Edge: Mews
Mews’s pricing begins at a base fee of $900/month, with no freemium options or trial data publicly available. Additional costs may include implementation fees or premium modules, but transparency is limited.
Yohobeds does not disclose pricing details or any trial information, making it difficult to evaluate its value proposition or compare costs directly.
For predictable budgeting and a clear understanding of cost, Mews’s transparent pricing structure offers peace of mind. Yohobeds’s pricing remains undisclosed.
Mews’s broad feature set and proven track record make it suitable for most hotel types, especially those looking for growth and operational efficiency.
Yohobeds might be suitable for very small, simple operations or experimental purposes, but lacks the robustness for most hotels.
Mews offers a comprehensive, well-established platform with extensive features, integrations, and recent positive reviews, making it the more trustworthy choice for most hoteliers. Its proven ecosystem and large user base provide confidence in its ability to support your hotel’s growth.
Choose Mews if you want a platform that’s supported by a thriving community, continuous innovation, and proven operational results. Yohobeds, with no recent reviews or detailed feature set, remains an unverified option unlikely to meet the demands of growing or complex properties.
When stability, scalability, and support matter most, Mews is the clear winner. Yohobeds is unlikely to provide the reliability that modern hotels require to succeed in competitive markets.
La tarification des Systèmes de gestion immobilière est rarement simple. Voici ce que nous savons a partir des donnees tarifaires publiques de chaque fournisseur. Demandez toujours un devis personnalise pour la taille de votre etablissement.
|
|
Yohobeds | |
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $900/mo | — |
Selon la base de donnees produits de HTR, Mews PMS et Yohobeds partagent 0 fonctionnalites. Voici les differences cles — les fonctionnalites que l'un possede et que l'autre n'a pas.
| Fonctionnalite |
|
Yohobeds |
|---|---|---|
| CRM invité | ||
| Module de gestion des revenus | ||
| Moteur de réservation | ||
| Multi-devise | ||
| Multilingue | ||
| Profils d'invités |
Affichage des principales differences. 47 fonctionnalites supplementaires different entre ces produits.
Nous avons analyse 8 etudes de cas verifiees pour comparer ce que les hotels obtiennent reellement avec chaque plateforme sur quatre objectifs commerciaux cles.
"It was vital for us to find a hospitality cloud that would give us the freedom to innovate and move quickly with new technology – that’s one of the main reasons we chose Mews."
Aucune etude de cas publiee pour cet objectif pour le moment.
"Since moving to Mews, we can be so much more agile in how we operate, both in terms of how we engage with guests and testing out new integrations and tools through Mews Marketplace..."
Aucune etude de cas publiee pour cet objectif pour le moment.
"We want to provide the best hospitality for guests anywhere in the country, and Mews is definitely the right solution to help us achieve that goal."
Aucune etude de cas publiee pour cet objectif pour le moment.
Ce que les hoteliers apprecient
Many reviews highlight the user-friendliness of Mews, citing its intuitive interface that simplifies tasks across various hotel operations. Users find... Many reviews highlight the user-friendliness of Mews, citing its intuitive interface that simplifies tasks across various hotel operations. Users find the platform easy to navigate, which aids in quicker team onboarding and daily use.
Reviews frequently praise Mews for its automation of routine tasks like check-in, billing, and invoicing, reducing manual workload and minimizing erro... Reviews frequently praise Mews for its automation of routine tasks like check-in, billing, and invoicing, reducing manual workload and minimizing errors. Users appreciate the extensive integration options with other tools, which streamline overall operations and enhance efficiency.
Mews allows customization to fit diverse business needs, from rate structures to integration setups. Users appreciate this flexibility, although they... Mews allows customization to fit diverse business needs, from rate structures to integration setups. Users appreciate this flexibility, although they note room for improvement in adapting complex booking conditions and enhancing user-friendly navigation for settings.
Les points de friction pour les hoteliers
Users point out that while Mews offers efficient billing processes, there are complexities and areas needing improvement, such as handling group billi... Users point out that while Mews offers efficient billing processes, there are complexities and areas needing improvement, such as handling group billings, splits, and providing more customizable invoice formats. This can affect the ease of financial operations within the system.
Bien que Mews offre des fonctionnalités de reporting et d'analyse performantes, plusieurs avis soulignent le besoin de fonctionnalités de reporting pl... Bien que Mews offre des fonctionnalités de reporting et d'analyse performantes, plusieurs avis soulignent le besoin de fonctionnalités de reporting plus personnalisables et flexibles. Les utilisateurs souhaitent des analyses de données plus fines, notamment en matière de réservations et de revenus.
Fonctionnalites uniques
Ou les notes divergent le plus
Cela depend de vos besoins. Mews PMS et Yohobeds partagent de nombreuses fonctionnalites Property Management Systems de base, mais chacun a des capacites uniques. Mews PMS propose 335 partenaires d'integration verifies, tandis que Yohobeds en propose 0. Consultez la comparaison des fonctionnalites ci-dessus pour voir les differences avant de changer.
Les petits hotels devraient privilegier la facilite d'utilisation et une mise en service rapide. Mews PMS est en tete pour la facilite d'utilisation avec 4.7/5 contre 0.0/5. Recherchez une tarification transparente et une option d'essai ou de demonstration. Filtrez les avis sur chaque page produit par taille d'etablissement pour lire les retours d'hotels similaires au votre.
Mews PMS : Non. Yohobeds : Non. Aucun des deux produits ne propose actuellement d'offre gratuite. La plupart des fournisseurs Property Management Systems proposent des demonstrations ou des essais — demandez-en un a chacun pour evaluer avant de vous engager.
Le HT Score est un classement composite qui prend en compte 4 groupes de criteres et plus d'une douzaine de variables pour aider les hoteliers a comparer objectivement les produits technologiques hoteliers. Mews a un HT Score de 100 et Yohobeds a 0. Voici comment le score est calcule.
| Groupe de criteres | Ponderation | Ce qu'il mesure |
|---|---|---|
| Notes et avis clients |
|
A quel point les utilisateurs recommandent-ils ce produit ? Score des notes, Volume d'avis, Part de voix, Profondeur des avis, Recence des avis, Etudes de cas ▾ Le facteur le plus fortement pondere. Analyse les notes de satisfaction moyennes (probabilite de recommandation, facilite d'utilisation, support, ROI), le nombre total d'avis par rapport aux pairs de la categorie, la recence des avis (au moins 20 avis sur les 6 derniers mois) et la part de voix parmi les clients hoteliers uniques pour detecter les biais de selection. |
| Ecosysteme partenaire |
|
A quel point les partenaires technologiques recommandent-ils cette entreprise ? Recommandations des partenaires, Nombre d'integrations, Qualite des integrations ▾ Evalue les recommandations des partenaires comme des votes de confiance d'experts, le nombre d'integrations verifiees et la qualite de l'ecosysteme — la moyenne des HT Scores des partenaires d'integration. Les produits avec des ecosystemes d'integration de meilleure qualite sont plus susceptibles de fournir un ensemble technologique connecte. |
| Orientation client |
|
A quel point cette organisation est-elle orientee client ? Support certifie, Regularite des avis, Completude du profil ▾ Evalue si l'entreprise a obtenu la certification HTR de support client, maintient une collecte d'avis reguliere dans le temps (un indicateur de culture axee sur le feedback) et tient a jour les profils produits avec les fonctionnalites, captures d'ecran, tarifs et caracteristiques. |
| Portee, perennite et ressources |
|
Quelle est l'etendue de la portee et des ressources de cette entreprise ? Portee geographique, Perennite, Ressources de l'entreprise, Score de tendance ▾ Mesure la presence mondiale (pays et regions desservis), les annees d'activite comme indicateur de stabilite, les effectifs comme indicateur de ressources, et un score de tendance base sur les demandes d'acheteurs, les avis, les recommandations de partenaires et l'activite presse des douze derniers mois. |
Les notes et avis clients sont de loin le facteur le plus important dans l'algorithme du HT Score. HTR n'accepte aucun paiement pour un meilleur classement. Tous les avis sont verifies — seuls les professionnels du secteur hotelier avec des affiliations confirmees peuvent soumettre des notes. Voir la methodologie complete du HT Score →
Conseiller en recommandations de produits