The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
Nous avons analyse 549 avis verifies d'hoteliers, compare les fonctionnalites, les tarifs et des etudes de cas reelles pour identifier les points forts de chaque plateforme. Le bon choix depend du type de votre etablissement et de vos priorites :
HOTELTIME se distingue en ease of use and customer support — en particulier pour les etablissements brand (4.9/5) , avec des fonctionnalites exclusives comme Payment processing and Guest CRM.
Yohobeds se distingue .
Notes comparees basees sur 549 avis verifies d'hoteliers sur HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Probabilite de recommandation |
|
|
| Facilite d'utilisation |
|
|
| Support client |
|
|
| Rapport qualite-prix |
|
|
| Prix de depart | From $600/mo | Contact sales |
| Avis verifies | 549 | 0 |
Apres analyse de 549 avis verifies, les utilisateurs de HOTELTIME apprecient surtout user interface and learning curve, assistance technique, reporting and analytics, tandis que ceux de Yohobeds mettent en avant . Cliquez sur un theme pour voir ce que disent les evaluateurs.
|
|
Yohobeds |
|---|---|
| Avantages | |
|
+
User Interface and Learning Curve
▾
|
|
|
+
Assistance technique
▾
|
|
|
+
Reporting and Analytics
▾
|
|
|
+
System Stability and Updates
▾
|
|
| Inconvenients | |
|
−
Customization Options
▾
|
|
|
−
Automation Features
▾
|
|
|
−
Optimisation mobile
▾
|
|
Comment chaque produit se classe parmi les fournisseurs Systèmes de gestion immobilière pour differentes tailles d'etablissements, types et regions — base sur les avis verifies d'hoteliers dans chaque segment.
Par taille d'hotel
| Segment |
|
Yohobeds |
|---|---|---|
| Petit (10-24 chambres) ▾ | #5 219 avis | — |
| Moyen (25-74 chambres) ▾ | #3 238 avis | — |
| Grand (75-199 chambres) ▾ | #2 46 avis | — |
| Tres grand (200+ chambres) ▾ | #8 7 avis | — |
Par type d'etablissement
| Segment |
|
Yohobeds |
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #5 239 avis | — |
| Luxe ▾ | #3 241 avis | — |
| Enseigne / Chaine ▾ | #4 143 avis | — |
| Sejour prolonge ▾ | #4 49 avis | — |
Par region
| Segment |
|
Yohobeds |
|---|---|---|
| Amerique du Nord | #52 4 avis | — |
| Europe ▾ | #2 384 avis | — |
| Asie-Pacifique ▾ | #5 111 avis | — |
| Moyen-Orient ▾ | #1 21 avis | — |
Choosing the right property management system (PMS) can transform your hotel’s operations, guest experience, and revenue management. HotelTime PMS by HOTELTIME and Yohobeds are two options, but HotelTime’s extensive review base, recent feedback, and feature set make it the more proven choice. While Yohobeds offers automation, its lack of reviews and limited market presence make it less reliable for decision-makers. How do these products really compare across critical factors for your hotel?
Both HotelTime PMS and Yohobeds aim to streamline hotel operations, but HotelTime’s proven track record and larger user base give it a clear advantage. HotelTime offers a comprehensive, cloud-based platform with over 430 recent reviews and a 4.83/5 overall rating, indicating strong customer satisfaction. Yohobeds, with no reviews and no measurable market presence, lacks the validation needed for confident adoption. Are you comfortable choosing a less-tested system for critical hotel functions?
HotelTime’s reviews emphasize its ease of use, extensive integrations, and reliable support, making it suitable for properties of all sizes—from boutique hotels to resorts. Yohobeds claims to streamline daily tasks but has no recent user feedback to substantiate these claims. The absence of verified reviews suggests Yohobeds may not yet be ready for large-scale or complex hotel operations. Do you prefer a system with proven success in diverse environments?
If your hotel needs a feature-rich, globally supported PMS with a proven track record, go with HotelTime. Its extensive integration options—including POS, CRS, payment processing, and guest CRM—are ideal for larger or multi-property hotels seeking operational efficiency. Yohobeds may appeal to small, tech-savvy properties looking for specific automation, but without recent reviews, its reliability remains unverified.
For hotels prioritizing robust customer support, recent user feedback, and a comprehensive feature set, HotelTime offers clear advantages. Conversely, Yohobeds might serve niche markets, but the lack of evidence makes it a risky choice for critical operations. Are you willing to risk stability and support for unproven software?
HotelTime’s ease of use is rated 4.66/5 based on 433 reviews, with many users praising its intuitive interface and straightforward onboarding process. Support responsiveness and comprehensive training are frequently highlighted, enabling staff to adopt the system quickly. Yohobeds, with no public reviews, has an unknown user experience, making it difficult to assess its usability or support quality.
Given HotelTime’s large, recent review base and high satisfaction scores, it’s reasonable to conclude that your team will find it easier to learn and incorporate into daily operations. Yohobeds’s lack of feedback leaves its usability, onboarding, and support quality uncertain. Edge: HotelTime PMS.
HotelTime offers 51 exclusive features, including EPoS, integrated CRS, payment processing, guest CRM, automation tools, and a housekeeping module—many of which Yohobeds does not list or offer. Its feature count and depth cater to complex hotel management needs, supporting multi-currency, multi-lingual operations, and revenue management.
Yohobeds’s feature set remains unclear due to the absence of detailed information or reviews. Without verified features or user feedback, it’s impossible to gauge its capacity to support comprehensive hotel operations. Edge: HotelTime PMS.
HotelTime’s support scores are 4.73/5, supported by positive reviews citing quick responses, helpful onboarding, and ongoing assistance. Users frequently mention the support team’s responsiveness as a key benefit, especially during implementation and troubleshooting.
Yohobeds offers no publicly available reviews or support ratings, leaving its support quality unverified. Given HotelTime’s established reputation and recent user feedback, it’s clear their support plays a significant role in customer satisfaction. Edge: HotelTime PMS.
HotelTime boasts 58 verified integration partners, including major third-party systems like Profitroom, Bookboost, and STR, facilitating seamless data exchange across platforms. These integrations are critical for automating marketing, revenue, and distribution functions.
Yohobeds has no verified integrations listed or reviewed, making it difficult to determine its connectivity capabilities. The lack of integration options significantly limits its suitability for hotels seeking a connected tech stack. Edge: HotelTime PMS.
HotelTime’s reviews are recent, with 27 gathered within the last six months, and its overall rating of 4.83/5 underscores strong, current user satisfaction. Hotels across segments—resorts, boutique hotels, city-center properties—appreciate its ease of use, support, and feature set.
Yohobeds has no reviews or ratings available, so no current hotelier feedback supports its effectiveness. Without recent ratings, it cannot be confidently recommended. Edge: HotelTime PMS.
HotelTime charges a $600 base fee, with no freemium or additional monthly charges specified, reflecting a straightforward pricing model. Yohobeds has no publicly listed pricing, which could indicate custom quotes or limited deployment options.
The transparent pricing of HotelTime allows for easier budgeting, while Yohobeds’s lack of information makes cost comparison impossible. Is predictable investment important for your planning? Edge: HotelTime PMS.
Not ideal if:
Edge: HotelTime PMS.
Not ideal if:
Edge: HotelTime PMS.
HotelTime PMS is a comprehensive, well-supported platform with verified recent reviews and a broad set of features. It suits properties of all sizes but especially large, complex hotels or chains seeking proven reliability.
Yohobeds, with no recent reviews or verified features, remains a speculative option for small, simple operations. Its lack of market presence and support data makes it unsuitable for critical or large-scale hotel management.
If your hotel values stability, support, and a proven feature set, HotelTime is the clear choice. Yohobeds might be tempting for early-stage or experimental properties, but the lack of validation means risks outweigh potential benefits. Your decision should prioritize reliability and proven performance—choose HotelTime for peace of mind.
La tarification des Systèmes de gestion immobilière est rarement simple. Voici ce que nous savons a partir des donnees tarifaires publiques de chaque fournisseur. Demandez toujours un devis personnalise pour la taille de votre etablissement.
|
|
Yohobeds | |
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $600/mo | — |
Selon la base de donnees produits de HTR, HotelTime PMS et Yohobeds partagent 0 fonctionnalites. Voici les differences cles — les fonctionnalites que l'un possede et que l'autre n'a pas.
| Fonctionnalite |
|
Yohobeds |
|---|---|---|
| CRM invité | ||
| CRS intégré | ||
| Suivi des revenus annexes | ||
| Traitement des paiements | ||
| Vue Calendrier | ||
| Épopée |
Affichage des principales differences. 39 fonctionnalites supplementaires different entre ces produits.
Nous avons analyse 8 etudes de cas verifiees pour comparer ce que les hotels obtiennent reellement avec chaque plateforme sur quatre objectifs commerciaux cles.
"We needed to change an on-site system we were using as we wanted to move our operation forward. We achieved that with HotelTime systems. They are reliable, and stable and offer fea..."
Aucune etude de cas publiee pour cet objectif pour le moment.
"In 2018 we were choosing a system for our first completely self-service ART and design hotel. We decided on HotelTime and after 4 years I have to say that the choice was the right..."
Aucune etude de cas publiee pour cet objectif pour le moment.
Ce que les hoteliers apprecient
While the system’s intuitive interface and ease of learning are generally appreciated, a few users mention initial challenges due to the complexity of... While the system’s intuitive interface and ease of learning are generally appreciated, a few users mention initial challenges due to the complexity of features offered. Overall, once users become familiar with the system, it significantly enhances efficiency and simplifies hotel operations.
Bien que la réactivité et l'efficacité de l'équipe d'assistance soient appréciées, certains avis suggèrent que l'extension des horaires d'assistance t... Bien que la réactivité et l'efficacité de l'équipe d'assistance soient appréciées, certains avis suggèrent que l'extension des horaires d'assistance technique améliorerait encore l'expérience utilisateur, en garantissant une assistance permanente, notamment pour les utilisateurs internationaux.
HotelTime's robust reporting features are praised for providing comprehensive data insights into occupancy, revenue, and customer satisfaction. Users... HotelTime's robust reporting features are praised for providing comprehensive data insights into occupancy, revenue, and customer satisfaction. Users appreciate the variety of reports available for management, yet some desire more customization and advanced visualizations within the tool itself to better suit individual hotel needs.
Les points de friction pour les hoteliers
Some users voice a need for more customizable features, particularly in terms of reporting and interface personalization, which would allow hotels to... Some users voice a need for more customizable features, particularly in terms of reporting and interface personalization, which would allow hotels to better tailor the PMS to their specific operational strategies and guest services.
The automation capabilities in HotelTime, such as invoice processing and reservation management, are frequently mentioned for saving significant time... The automation capabilities in HotelTime, such as invoice processing and reservation management, are frequently mentioned for saving significant time for staff. Users highlight these features as reducing manual workload and minimizing the risk of human error, although they also express a desire for enhanced automation in guest communication and reporting.
Fonctionnalites uniques
Ou les notes divergent le plus
Cela depend de vos besoins. HotelTime PMS et Yohobeds partagent de nombreuses fonctionnalites Property Management Systems de base, mais chacun a des capacites uniques. HotelTime PMS propose 58 partenaires d'integration verifies, tandis que Yohobeds en propose 0. Consultez la comparaison des fonctionnalites ci-dessus pour voir les differences avant de changer.
Les petits hotels devraient privilegier la facilite d'utilisation et une mise en service rapide. HotelTime PMS est en tete pour la facilite d'utilisation avec 4.7/5 contre 0.0/5. Recherchez une tarification transparente et une option d'essai ou de demonstration. Filtrez les avis sur chaque page produit par taille d'etablissement pour lire les retours d'hotels similaires au votre.
HotelTime PMS : Non. Yohobeds : Non. Aucun des deux produits ne propose actuellement d'offre gratuite. La plupart des fournisseurs Property Management Systems proposent des demonstrations ou des essais — demandez-en un a chacun pour evaluer avant de vous engager.
Le HT Score est un classement composite qui prend en compte 4 groupes de criteres et plus d'une douzaine de variables pour aider les hoteliers a comparer objectivement les produits technologiques hoteliers. HOTELTIME a un HT Score de 92 et Yohobeds a 0. Voici comment le score est calcule.
| Groupe de criteres | Ponderation | Ce qu'il mesure |
|---|---|---|
| Notes et avis clients |
|
A quel point les utilisateurs recommandent-ils ce produit ? Score des notes, Volume d'avis, Part de voix, Profondeur des avis, Recence des avis, Etudes de cas ▾ Le facteur le plus fortement pondere. Analyse les notes de satisfaction moyennes (probabilite de recommandation, facilite d'utilisation, support, ROI), le nombre total d'avis par rapport aux pairs de la categorie, la recence des avis (au moins 20 avis sur les 6 derniers mois) et la part de voix parmi les clients hoteliers uniques pour detecter les biais de selection. |
| Ecosysteme partenaire |
|
A quel point les partenaires technologiques recommandent-ils cette entreprise ? Recommandations des partenaires, Nombre d'integrations, Qualite des integrations ▾ Evalue les recommandations des partenaires comme des votes de confiance d'experts, le nombre d'integrations verifiees et la qualite de l'ecosysteme — la moyenne des HT Scores des partenaires d'integration. Les produits avec des ecosystemes d'integration de meilleure qualite sont plus susceptibles de fournir un ensemble technologique connecte. |
| Orientation client |
|
A quel point cette organisation est-elle orientee client ? Support certifie, Regularite des avis, Completude du profil ▾ Evalue si l'entreprise a obtenu la certification HTR de support client, maintient une collecte d'avis reguliere dans le temps (un indicateur de culture axee sur le feedback) et tient a jour les profils produits avec les fonctionnalites, captures d'ecran, tarifs et caracteristiques. |
| Portee, perennite et ressources |
|
Quelle est l'etendue de la portee et des ressources de cette entreprise ? Portee geographique, Perennite, Ressources de l'entreprise, Score de tendance ▾ Mesure la presence mondiale (pays et regions desservis), les annees d'activite comme indicateur de stabilite, les effectifs comme indicateur de ressources, et un score de tendance base sur les demandes d'acheteurs, les avis, les recommandations de partenaires et l'activite presse des douze derniers mois. |
Les notes et avis clients sont de loin le facteur le plus important dans l'algorithme du HT Score. HTR n'accepte aucun paiement pour un meilleur classement. Tous les avis sont verifies — seuls les professionnels du secteur hotelier avec des affiliations confirmees peuvent soumettre des notes. Voir la methodologie complete du HT Score →
Conseiller en recommandations de produits